Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

PART

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V21, Page 211 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

PART  HIA) . 5 . The Arians ('See also:

Ape?oL, Pers . Haraiva), in the vicinity of the See also:river See also:Arius (Heri-rud), which derived its name from them . This name, which survives in the See also:modern See also:Herat, has of course no connexion with that .of the See also:Aryans . 6 . The Drangians (Zaranka in See also:Darius, Sarangians in See also:Herod. iii . 93, 117, vii . 67), situated See also:south of the Arians, in the See also:north-See also:west of See also:Afghanistan (Arachosia) by the western affluents of See also:Lake Hamun, and extending to the See also:present See also:Seistan . 7 . Arachotians (Pers . Harauvati), in the See also:district of the Helmand and its tributaries, See also:round See also:Kandahar .

They are mentioned in the lists of Darius, also by the Greeks after See also:

Alexander . In See also:Herodotus their See also:place is taken by the Pactyans, whose name survives to thepresent See also:day in the word See also:Pushtu, with which the Afghans denote their See also:language (Herod. iii . 102, iv . 44, vii . 67, 85) . Probably it was the old tribal name; Arachosia being the See also:local designation . The Thamanaeans, who appear in Herodotus (iii . 93, 117), must be classed with them . 8 . The Bactrians (Pers . Bakhtri), on the See also:northern declivity of the See also:Hindu Kush, as far as the See also:Oxus . Their See also:capital was Bactra, the modern See also:Balkh (see See also:BACTRIA) .

9 . The Sogdians (Pets . Sugudu), in the mountainous district between the Oxus and Jaxartes . to . The Chorasmians (Khwarizmians, Pers . Uvarazmiya), in the See also:

great See also:oasis of See also:Khiva, which still bears the name Khwarizm . They stretched far into the midst of the nomadic tribes . 11 . The Margians (Pers . Margu), on the river Margus (See also:Murghab); chiefly inhabiting the oasis of See also:Merv, which has preserved their name . Darius mentions the district of Margu but, like Herodotus, omits them from his See also:list of peoples; so that ethnographically they are perhaps to be assigned to the Arians . 12 .

The Sagartians (Pers . Asagarta) ; according to Herodotus (vii . 85), a nomadic tribe of horsemen; speaking, as he expressly declares, the See also:

Persian language . Hence he describes them (i . 125) as a subordinate See also:nomad See also:clan of the Persians . They, with the Drangians, Utians and Myci, formed a single satrapy (Herod. iii . 93) . See also:Ptolemy (vi . 2, 6) speaks of Sagartians in the Eastern Zagros in See also:Media . 13 . We have already touched on the nomadic peoples (Ddha, Dahans) of Iranian See also:nationality, who occupied the See also:steppes of See also:Turkestan as far as the Sarmatians and Scythians of South See also:Russia . That these were conscious of their See also:Aryan origin is proved by the names Ariantas and Ariapeithes See also:borne by Scythian (Scolot) See also:kings (Herod, iv .

76, 87) . Still they were never counted as a portion of See also:

Iran or the Iranians . To the settled peasantry, these nomads of the See also:steppe were always " the enemy " (See also:dana, daha, that, Dahae) . See also:Side by side with this name we find " Turan " and " Turanian "; a designation applied both by the later Persians and by modern writers to this region . The origin of the word is obscure, derived perhaps from an obsolete tribal name . It has no connexion what-ever with the much later " See also:Turks," who penetrated thither in the 6th See also:century after See also:Christ . Though found neither in the See also:inscriptions of Darius nor in the See also:Greek authors, the name Turan must nevertheless be of great antiquity; for not merely is it repeatedly found in the Avesta, under the See also:form Tura, but it occurs already in a hymn, which, without doubt, originates from Zoroaster himself, and in which " the Turanian Fryana " and his descendants are commemorated as faithful adherents of the See also:prophet (Yasna, 46, 62) . The dividing See also:line between Iranian and See also:Indian is See also:drawn by the Hindu Kush and the Soliman mountains of the See also:Indus district . The valley of the See also:Kabul (Cophen) is already occupied by Indian tribes, especially the Gandarians; and the Satagydae (Pers . Thatagu) there See also:resident were presumably also of Indian stock . The non-Aryan See also:population of Iran itself has been discussed above . Of its other neighbours,-we must here mention the Sacae, a warlike equestrian See also:people in the mountains of the pamir See also:plateau and northward; who are probably of Mongol origin .

Herodotus relates that the Persians distinguished " all the Scythians all the northern nomads—as Sacae; and this statement is confirmed by the inscriptions of Darius . The Babylonians employ the name Gimiri (i.e . Cimmerians) in the same sense . See also:

religion and in many views See also:common to both peoples . A great number of gods—Asura, See also:Mithras, the See also:Dragon-slayer Verethraghna (the See also:Indra of the See also:Indians), the See also:Water-shoot Apam napat (the See also:lightning), &c.—date from this era . So, too, See also:fire-See also:worship, especially of the sacrificial See also:flame; the preparation of the intoxicating See also:soma, which fills See also:man with divine strength and uplifts him to the gods; the See also:injunction to " See also:good thoughts and good See also:works," imposed on the pious by Veda and Avesta alike: the belief in an unwavering See also:order (rta)—a See also:law controlling gods and men and dominating them all; yet with this, a belief in the See also:power of magical formulae (mantra), exclamations and prayers, to whose compulsion not merely demons (the evil See also:spirits of deceptiondruh) but even the gods (daeva) must submit; and, lastly, the institution of a priesthood of fire-kindlers (athravan), who are. at once the repositories of all sacral traditions and the mediators in all intercourse between See also:earth and See also:heaven . The transition, moreover, to settled See also:life and See also:agriculture belongs to the Aryan Aryan Religion . See also:period; and to it may be traced the See also:peculiar sancitity of the evident that before the Achaemenids there were in Bactria only small local principalities of which Vishtaspa's was one: and it is possible that the primeval See also:empire of the See also:Saga is only a reflection of the Achaemenid and See also:Sassanid empires of reality, whose existence See also:legend See also:dates back to the beginning of the See also:world, simply because legend is pervaded by the See also:assumption that the conditions obtaining in the present are the natural conditions, and, as such, valid for all See also:time . Closely connected as are the See also:Mythology and Religion of Indian and Iranian, no less clearly marked is the fundamental difference of intellectual and moral standpoint, Difference which has led the two nations into opposite paths between the of See also:history and culture . The tendency to religious Iranian and thought and to a speculative See also:philosophy, compre- Indian hending the world as a whole, is shared by both and Rettion . is doubtless an See also:inheritance from the Aryan period . But with the Indians this See also:speculation leads to the See also:complete abolition of all barriers between See also:God and man, to a mystic See also:pantheism, and to absorption in the universal Ego, in contrast with which the world becomes an unsubstantial phantasm and sinks into nothingness .

For the Iranian, on the contrary, See also:

practical life, the real world, and with them the moral commandment, fill the foreground . The new gods created by Iran are ethical See also:powers; those of See also:India, abstractions of worship (See also:brahman) or of philosophy (atman) . These fundamental features of Iranian sentiment encounter us not only in the See also:doctrine of Zoroaster and the confessions of Darius, but also in that magnificent product of the See also:Persia of See also:Islam—the Sufi See also:mysticism . This is pantheistic, like the Brahman philosophy . But the pantheism of the Persian is always See also:positive, —affirming the world and life, taking joy in them, and seeking its ideal in See also:union with a creative god: the pantheism of the Indian is negative—denying world and life, and descrying its ideal in the cessation of existence . This contrast in intellectual and religious life must have See also:developed very See also:early . Probably, in the remote past violent religious disputes and feuds See also:broke out: for otherwise it is almost inexplicable that the old Indo-See also:European word, which in India, also, denotes the gods—See also:deva—should be applied by the Iranians to the See also:malignant demons or devils (daeva; mod. div); while they denote the gods by the name bhaga . Conversely the Asuras, whose name in Iran is the See also:title of the supreme god (a/See also:Jura, See also:aura), have in India degenerated to evil spirits . It is of great importance that among the See also:Slavonic peoples the same word bogu distinguishes the deity; since this points to See also:ancient cultural influences on which we have yet no more precise See also:information . Otherwise, the name is only found among the Phrygians, who, according to See also:Hesychius, called the Heaven-god (See also:Zeus) Bagaeus; there, however, it may have been borrowed from the Persians . We possess no other See also:evidence for these events; the only document we possess for the history of Iranian religion is the sacred. See also:writing, containing the doctrines of the prophet who gave that religion a new form . This is the Avesta, the See also:Bible of the modern Parsee, which comprises the See also:revelation of Zoroaster .

As to the See also:

home and time of Zoroaster, the Parsee tradition yields us no sort of information which could possibly be of See also:historical service . Its contents, even if they go back Zoroaster. to lost parts of the Avesta, are merely a See also:late patch- See also:work, based on the legendary tradition and devoid of historical See also:foundation . The attempts of West (See also:Pahlavi Texts Translated, vol. v.) to turn to historical See also:account the statements of the Bundahish and other Parsee books, which date Zoroaster at 258 years before Alexander, are, in the present writer's See also:opinion, a complete failure . See also:Jackson (Zoroaster, the Prophet of Ancient Iran, 1901) sides with West . The Greek theory, which relegates Zoroaster to the mists of antiquity, or even to the period of the fabulous See also:Ninus and See also:Semiramis, is equally valueless . Even the statement that he came from the north-west of Media (the later Atropatene), and his See also:mother from Rai (Rhagae) in eastern Media, must be considered as problematic in the extreme . Our only trustworthy information is to be gleaned from his own testimony and from the history of his religion . And here we may take it as certain that the See also:scene of his activity was laid in cow in India and Persia . For the cow is the See also:animal which voluntarily yields nourishment to man and See also:aids him in his daily labours, and on it depends the See also:industry of the See also:peasant as contrasted with the See also:wild See also:desert brigand to whom the cow is unknown . Very numerous are the legends common to both nations . These, in part, are rooted in the primeval Indo-European days, though their ultimate form dates only from the Aryan See also:epoch . Foremost among them is the myth See also:relating the See also:battle of a See also:sun-god (Ind .

Trita, generally replaced by Indra, Iran . Thraelona) against a fearful See also:

serpent (Ind . Ahi, Iran . Azhi; known moreover as Vrtra) : also, the legend of See also:Yama, the first man, son of Vivasvant, who, after a See also:long and blessed life in the happy years of the beginning, was seized by See also:death and now rules in the See also:kingdom of the departed . Then come a See also:host of other tales of old-world heroes; as the " Glorious One (Ind . Sushrava, Pers . Husrava, Chosrau or See also:Chosroes), or the Son who goes on a See also:journey to seek his See also:father, and, unknown, meets his end at his hands . These legends have lived and flourished in Iran at every period of its history; and neither the religion of Zoroaster, nor yet Islam, 'Iranian has availed to suppress them . Zoroastrianism—at saga. least in that form in which it became the dominant creed of the Iranians—legitimized not only the old gods, but the old heroes also; and transformed them into pious helpers and servants of Ahuramazda; while the creator of the great See also:national epic of Persia, Firdousi (A.D . 935-1020), displayed astonishing skill in combining the ancient tradition with Islam . Through his poem, this tradition is perfectly See also:familiar to every Persian at the present day; and the See also:primitive features of tales, whose origin must be dated 4000 years ago, are still preserved with fidelity . This tenacity of the Saga stands in the sharpest contrast with the fact that the historical memory of the Persian is extremely defective .

Even the glories of the Achaemenid Empire faded rapidly, and all but completely, from recollection; so also the See also:

conquest of Alexander, and the Hellenistic and See also:Parthian eras . In Firdousi, the legendary princes are followed, almost without a break, by See also:Ardashir, the founder of the Sassanid See also:dynasty: the intervening See also:episode of Darius and Alexander is not drawn from native tradition, but borrowed from Greek literature (the Alexander-See also:romance of the Pseudo-See also:Callisthenes) in precisely the same way as among the nations of the See also:Christian See also:East in the See also:middle ages.' Needless to say, however, this long period saw the Saga much recast and See also:expanded . Many new characters—Siyawush, Rustam, &c.—have swelled the See also:original list: among them is See also:King Gushtasp (Vishtaspa), the See also:patron of Zoroaster, who was known from the poems of the prophet and is placed at the See also:close of the legendary See also:age . The old gods and mythical figures reappear as heroes and kings, and their battles are fought no longer in heaven but upon earth, where they are localized for the most part in the east of Iran . In other words, the See also:war of the gods has degenerated to the war between Iranian See also:civilization and the Turanians . Only the evil serpent Azhi Dahaka (Azhdahak) is domiciled by the Avesta in See also:Babylon (Baum) and depicted on the See also:model of Babylonian gods and demons: he is a king in human form with a serpent growing from either See also:shoulder and feeding on the brains of men . In these traits are engrained the See also:general conditions of history and culture, under which the Iranians lived: on the one See also:hand, the contrast between Iranian and Turanian; on the other, the dominating position of Babylon, which influenced most strongly the civilization and religion of Iran . It is idle, however, to read definite historical events into such traits, or to See also:attempt, with some scholars, to convert them into history itself . We cannot deduce from them a conquest of Iran from Babylon: for the Babylonians never set See also:foot in Iran, and even the Assyrians merely conquered the western portion of Media . Nor yet can we make the favourite assumption of a great empire in Bactria . On the contrary, it is historically ' The fundamental work on the history of the Iranian Saga is Nbldeke., Das iranische Nationalepos 1896 (reprinted from the Grundriss der Iran . Philologie, ii.) .

the east of Iran, in Bactria and its neighbouring regions . The contrast there existing between peasant and nomad is of vital consequence for the whole position of his creed . Among the adherents whom he gained was numbered, as already mentioned, a Turanian, one Fryana and his See also:

household . The west of Iran is scarcely ever regarded in the Avesta, while the districts and See also:rivers of the east are often named . The language, even, is markedly different from the Persian; and the fire-priests are not styled Magians as in Persia—the word indeed never occurs in the Avesta, except in a single late passage—but athravan, identical with the atharvan of India (rupatboy " fire-kindlers," in See also:Strabo xv . 733) . Thus it cannot be doubted that the king Vishtaspa, who received Zoroaster's doctrine and protected him, must have ruled in eastern Iran: though strangely enough scholars can still be found to identify him with the homonymous Persian See also:Hystaspes, the father of Darius . The possibility that Zoroaster himself was not a native of East Iran, but had immigrated thither (from Rhagae?), is of course always to be considered; and this theory has been used to explain the phenomenon that the Gathas, of his own See also:composition, are written in a different See also:dialect from the See also:rest of the Avesta . On this See also:hypothesis, the former would be his mother-See also:tongue: the latter the speech of eastern Iran . This district is again indicated as the starting-point of Zoroastrianism, by the fact that dead bodies are not embalmed and then interred, as was usual, for instance, in Persia, but See also:cast out to the See also:dogs and birds (cf . Herod. i . 14o), a practice, as is well known, strictly enjoined in the Avesta, ruthlessly executed under the Sassanids, and followed to the present day by the See also:Parsees .

The See also:

motive of this, indeed, is to be found in the sanctity of Earth, which must not be polluted by a See also:corpse; but its origin is evidently to be traced in a barbaric See also:custom of nomadic or semi-nomadic tribes who leave the dead to See also:lie on the steppe; and we know from Greek See also:sources that this custom was widely diffused among the tribes of eastern Iran . The next See also:clue towards determining the period of Zoroaster is, that Darius I. and all his successors, as proved by their inscriptions and by Greek testimony, were zealous adherents of the pure word of Zoroastrianism; which consequently must already have been accepted in the west of Iran . That See also:Cyrus too owned See also:allegiance to the creed, cannot be doubted by an unprejudiced mind, although in the dearth of contemporary monuments we possess no See also:proof at first hand . The See also:Assyrian inscriptions demonstrate, however, that Zoroaster's teaching was dominant in Media two centuries before Cyrus . For in the list of Median princes, to which we have already referred, are two bearing the name of Mazdaka—evidently after the god Mazda . Now this name was the invention of Zoroaster himself; and he who names himself after Mazda thereby makes a See also:confession of faith in the religion of Zoroaster whose followers, as we know, termed themselves Mazdayasna, " worshippers of Mazda." Thus, if the doctrine of Zoroaster predominated in Media in 714 B.C., obviously his See also:appearance in the role of prophet must have been much earlier . A more definite date cannot be deduced from the evidence at our disposal, but his era may safely be placed as far back as l000 B.C . The religion which Zoroaster preached was the creation of. a single man, who, having pondered long and deeply the problems of existence and the world, propounded the See also:solution he found as a divine revelation . Naturally he starts from the old views, and is indebted to them for many of his tenets and ideas; but out of this material he builds a See also:uniform See also:system which bears throughout the impress of his own See also:intellect . In this world, two See also:groups of powers confront each other in a truceless war, the powers of Good, of See also:Light, of creative Strength, of Life and of Truth, and the powers of Evil, of Darkness, Destruction, Death and Deceit . In the See also:van of the first stands the See also:Holy Spirit (spenta mainyu) or the " Great See also:Wisdom " Mazdao . His helpers and vassals are the six powers of Good Thought (vohu See also:manor 'thiav6s), of Right Order (asha, Ind. eta, Pers. See also:aria, " lawfulness "), of the Excellent Kingdom (khshathra vairya), of Holy See also:Character (spenta armaiti), of See also:Health (haurvatat), and of See also:Immortality (ameretat) .

These are comprised under the general title of "undying holy ones " (amesha spenta, amshaspand) ; and a host of subordinate angels (yazata) are ranked with them . The powers of evil are in all points the opposite of the good; at their See also:

head being the Evil Spirit (See also:angra mainyu, See also:Ahriman) . These evil demons are identical with the old gods of the popular faith—the devas (div)—while Mazdao bears the name Ahura, above discussed; whence Ahuramazda (Ormuzd) . From this it will be See also:manifest that the figures of Zoroaster's religion are purely abstractions; the See also:concrete gods of vulgar belief being set aside . All those who do not belong to the devils (devas), might be recognized as inferior servants of Ahuramazda: See also:chief among them being the Sun-god Mithras (see MITHRAS) ; the goddess of vegetation and fertility, especially of the Oxus-stream, Anahita Ardvisura (Anaitis) ; and the Dragon-slayer Verethraghna (Gr . Artagnes), with the god of the intoxicating Haoma (the Indian Soma) . In the religion of the people, these divinities always survived; and the popularity of Mithras is evinced by the numerous Aryan proper names thence derived (See also:Mithradates; &c.) . The educated community who had embraced the pure doctrine in its completeness scarcely recognized them, and the inscriptions of Darius ignore them . Only once he speaks of " the gods of the clans," and once of " the other gods which there are." Not till the time of See also:Artaxerxes II. were Mithra and Anaitis received into the See also:official religion of the Persian kings . But they always played a leading part in the propaganda of the Persian cults in the West . Only one See also:element in the old Aryan belief was preserved by Zoroaster in all its sanctity: that of Fire—the purest manifestation of Ahuramazda and the powers of Good . Thus fire-altars were every. where erected ; and, to the prophet also, the Fire-kindlers (athravan) were the ministers and priests of the true religion and the intermediaries between God and man; at last in the popular mind, Zoroastrianism was identified with Fire-worship pure and See also:simple, —inadequate though the See also:term in reality is, as a description of its essentials .

Midway in this opposition of the powers of Good and Evil, man is placed . He has to choose on which side he will stand: he is called to serve the powers of Good: his See also:

duty lies in speaking the truth and combating the lie . And this is fulfilled when he obeys the commands of law and the true order; when he tends his See also:cattle and See also:fields, in contrast with the lawless and predatory nomad (Dahae) ; when he See also:wars on all harmful and evil creatures, and on the See also:devil-worshippers; when he keeps See also:free from pollution the pure creations of Ahuramazda—fire foremost, but also earth and water; and, above all, when he practises the Good and True in thought, word and work . And as his deeds are, so shall be his See also:fate and his future See also:lot on the Day of See also:Judgment; when he must See also:cross the See also:Bridge Gillett', which, according to his works, will either See also:guide him to the See also:Paradise of Ahuramazda or precipitate him to the See also:Hell of Ahriman . Obviously, it was through this See also:preaching of a judgment to come and a See also:direct moral responsibility of the individual man, that, like See also:Mahomet among the See also:Arabs, Zoroaster and his disciples gained their adherents and exercised their greatest See also:influence . In this creed of Zoroastrianism three important points are especially to be emphasized: for on them depend its peculiar characteristics and historical significance 1 . The abstractions which it preaches are not products of See also:meta-See also:physical speculation, as in India, but rather the ethical forces which dominate human life . They impose a duty upon man, and enjoin on him a positive line of See also:action—a definite activity in the world . And this world he is not to eschew, like the Brahman and the Buddhist, but to work in it, enjoying existence and life to the full . Thus a man's birthday is counted the highest festival (Herod . I . 133) ; and thus the joie de vivre, See also:rich banquets and carousals are not rejected by the Persian as godless and worldly, but are even prescribed by his religion .

To create offspring and people the world with servants of Ahuramazda is the duty of every true believer.' 2 . This religion See also:

grew up in the midst of a settled peasant population, whose mode of life and views it regards as the natural disposition of things . Consequently, it is at once a product of, and a See also:main See also:factor in civilization; and is thereby sharply differentiated from the Israelite religion, with whose moral precepts it otherwise coincides so frequently . 3 . The preaching of Zoroaster is directed to each individual man, and requires of him that he shall choose his position with regard to the fundamental problems of life and religion . Thus, even though it arose from national views, in its essence it is not national (as, for instance, the Israelite creed), but individualistic, and at the same time universal . From the first, it aims at propaganda; and the nationality of the convert is a See also:matter of indifference . So Zoroaster himself converted the Turanian Fryana with his kindred (see above) ; and the same tendency to proselytize See also:alien peoples survived in his religion . Zoroastrianism, in fact, is the first creed to work by See also:missions or to See also:lay claim to universality of See also:acceptance . It was, however, only natural that its adherents should be won, first and chiefly, among the countrymen of the prophet, and its further success in gaining over all the Iranian tribes gave it a national See also:stamp . So the Susan See also:translation of Darius' See also:Behistun inscription i These ideas are strongly exposed in a polemic against the Christians contained in an official See also:edict of the Persian creed to the Armenians by Mihr Narseh, the See also:vizier of Yazdeggerd II- (about A.D . 450), preserved by the Armenian historian, Elishe .

terms Ahuramazda " the god of the Aryans." Thus the creed and from a few allusions in the Old Testament . Of the Median became a powerful factor in the development of an See also:

united Iranian nationality, That a. religion, which See also:lays its chief stress upon moral precepts, may readily develop into See also:casuistry and See also:external formalism, with an infinity of See also:minute prescriptions, injunctions on purity and the like, is well known . In the Avesta all these recur ad nauseam, so much so that the primitive spirit of the religion is stifled beneath them, as the doctrine of the ancient prophets was stifled in Judaism and the See also:Talmud . The Sasse nid Empire, indeed, is completely dominated by this formalism and ritualism; but the earlier testimony of Darius in his inscriptions and the statements in Herodotus enable us still to recognize the original healthy life of a religion capable of awakening the enthusiastic devotion of the inner man . Its formal character naturally germinated in the priesthood (Herod. i . 140; cf . Strabo xv . 733, &c.) . The priests diligently practise all the precepts of their See also:ritual—e.g. the extermination of noxious animals, and the exposure of corpses to the dogs and birds, that earth may not be polluted by their presence . They have See also:advice for every contingency in life, and can say with precision when a man has been defiled, and how he may be cleansed again; they possess an endless stock of formulae for See also:prayer, and of sentences which serve for See also:protection against evil spirits and may be turned to purposes of magic . How the doctrine overspread the whole of Iran, we do not know . In the West, among the Medes and Persians, the guardianship The and See also:ministry of Zoroastrianism is vested in an exclusive Maglaas. priesthood—the Magians .

Whence this name—unknown as already mentioned, to the Avesta—took its rise, we have no knowledge . Herodotus (i. tot) includes the Magians in his list of Median tribes; and it is probable that they and their teaching reached the Persians from Media . At all events, they See also:

play here not merely the role of the " Fire-kindlers (athravan) in the Avesta, but are become an hereditary sacerdotal See also:caste, acting an important part in the See also:state-advisers and spiritual guides to the king, and so forth . With them the ritualism and magical character, above mentioned, are fully developed . In the narrations of Herodotus, they interpret dreams and predict the future; and in See also:Greece, from the time of Herodotus and See also:Sophocles (Oed . See also:Tyr . 387) onward, the word Magian connotes a magician-See also:priest . See further, ZOROASTER and works there quoted . IV . Beginnings of History.—A connected See also:chain of historical evidence begins with the time when under See also:Shalmaneser (Sal-Assyrian manassar II.), the Assyrians in 836 B.C. began for Conquest the first time to penetrate farther into the mounof media. tains of the east; and there, in addition to several non-Iranian peoples, subdued a few Median tribes . These wars were continued under successive kings, till the Assyrian power in these regions attained its See also:zenith under See also:Sargon (q.v.), who (715 B.c.) led into See also:exile the Median chief Dayuku (see See also:DEIOCES), a See also:vassal of the Minni (Mannaeans), with all his See also:family, and subjected the princes of Media as far as the See also:mountain of Bikni (See also:Elburz) and the border of the great desert . At that time twenty-eight Median "See also:town-lords" paid See also:tribute to See also:Nineveh; two years later, (713 B.C.) no fewer than See also:forty-six .

Sargon's successors, down to See also:

Assur-bani-See also:pal (668–626 B.c.), maintained and even augmented their See also:suzerainty over Media, in spite of repeated attempts to throw off the yoke in See also:conjunction with the Mannaeans, the Saparda, the Cimmerians—who had penetrated into the Armenian mountains—and others . Not till the last years of Assur-bani-pal, on which the extant Assyrian See also:annals are silent, can an See also:independent Median Empire have arisen . As to the history of this empire, we have an ancient account in Herodotus, which, with a large admixture of the legendary, The still contains numerous historical elements, and a Median completely fanciful account from See also:Ctesias, preserved Bemire. in Diodorus (ii . 32 sqq.) and much used by later writers . In the latter Nineveh is destroyed by the Mede See also:Arbaces and the Babylonian Belesys about 88o B.C., a period when the Assyrians were just beginning to lay the See also:foundations of their power . Arbaces is then followed by a long list of Median kings, all of them fabulous . On the other hand, according to Herodotus the Medes revolt from See also:Assyria about 710 B.C., that is to say, at the exact time when they were subdued by Sargon . Deioces founds the See also:monarchy; his son See also:Phraortes begins the work of conquest; and his son See also:Cyaxares is first overwhelmed by the Scythians, then captures Nineveh, and raises Media .to a great power . A little supplementary information may be gleaned from the inscriptions of King Nabonidus of Babylon (555–539) Empire