Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

PERJURY (through the Anglo-Fr. perjur...

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V21, Page 173 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

PERJURY (through the Anglo-Fr. perjurie, See also:modern parjure, See also:Lat. perjurium, a false See also:oath, perjurare, to swear falsely)  , an assertion upon an See also:oath duly administered in a judicial proceeding before a competent See also:court of the truth of some See also:matter of fact, material to the question depending in that proceeding, which assertion the assertor does not believe to be true when he makes it, or on which he knows himself to be ignorant (See also:Stephen, See also:Digest of the Criminal See also:Law, See also:art . 135) . In the See also:early stages of legal See also:history See also:perjury seems to have been regarded rather as a See also:sin than as a See also:crime, and so subject only to supernatural penalties . The injury caused by a false oath was supposed to be done not so much to society as to the Divine Being in whose name the oath was taken (see OATH) . In See also:Roman law, even in the See also:time of the See also:empire, the perjurer See also:fell simply under divine reprobation, and was not dealt with as a criminal, except where he had been bribed to withhold true or give false See also:evidence, or where the oath was by the See also:genius of the See also:emperor . In the latter See also:case See also:punishment was no doubt inflicted more for the insult to the emperor than for the perjury . False testimony leading to the conviction of aperson for a crime punishable with See also:death constituted the offence of See also:homicide rather than of perjury . In See also:England, perjury, as being a sin, was originally a matter of ecclesiastical cognisance . At a later See also:period, when it had become a crime, the See also:jurisdiction of the spiritual courts became gradually confined to such perjury as was committed in ecclesiastical proceedings, and did not extend to perjury committed in a temporal court . The only perjury which was for a See also:long time noticed at See also:common law was the perjury of jurors . See also:Attaint of jurors (see ATTAINT, See also:WRIT OF) who were originally rather in the position of witnesses than of See also:judges of fact, incidentally subjected them to punishment for perjury . Criminal jurisdiction over perjury by persons other than jurors seems to have been first assumed by the See also:Star Chamber, acting under the See also:powers supposed to have been conferred by an See also:act of See also:Henry VII .

(1487) . After the abolition of the Star Chamber by the Long See also:

Parliament in 1641 and the See also:gradual diminution of the authority of the spiritual courts, perjury (whether in the strict sense of the word or the taking of a false oath in non-judicial proceedings) practically fell entirely within the jurisdiction of the See also:ordinary criminal tribunals . At common law only a false oath in judicial proceedings is perjury . But by See also:statute the penalties of perjury have been extended to extra-judicial matters e.g. false declarations made for the purpose of procuring See also:marriage (The Marriage and See also:Registration Act 1856), and false affidavits under the Bills of See also:Sale Act 1878 . False See also:affirmation by a See also:person permitted by law to affirm is perjury (The Evidence Further See also:Amendment Act 1869; The Evidence Amendment Act 187o) . In See also:order to support an See also:indictment for perjury the See also:prosecution must prove the authority to administer the oath, the occasion of administering it, the taking of the oath, the substance of the oath, the materiality of the matter sworn, the falsity of the matter sworn, and the corrupt intention of the See also:defendant, The indictment must allege that the perjury was wilful and corrupt, and must set out the false statement or statements on which perjury is assigned, subject to the provisions of the Prosecutions for Perjury Act 1749 (which also applies to subornation of perjury) . By that act it is sufficient to set out the substance of the offence, without setting forth the See also:bill, See also:answer, &c., or any See also:part of the See also:record and without setting forth the See also:commission or authority of the court before whom the perjury was committed . The matter sworn to must be one of fact and not of See also:mere belief or See also:opinion . It is not homicide, as in Roman law, to procure the death of another by false evidence, but the Criminal See also:Code, ss . 118, 164, proposed to make such an offence a substantive crime of greater gravity than ordinary perjury, and punishable by penal See also:servitude for See also:life . It is a See also:rule of evidence, founded upon obvious reasons, that the testimony of a single See also:witness is insufficient to convict on a See also:charge of perjury . There must be corroboration of his evidence in some material particular .

Perjury is a common law See also:

misdemeanour, not triable at See also:quarter-sessions . Most persons in a judicial position have the right of directing the prosecution of any witness, if it appears to them that he has been guilty of perjury (The Criminal See also:Procedure Act 1851) . The provisions of the Vexatious Indictments Act 1859 extend to perjury and subornation of perjury . By that Act no indictment for either of such offences can be preferred unless the prosecutor or accused is See also:bound by recognisance, or the accused is in custody, or the consent of a See also:judge is obtained, or (in the case of perjury) a prosecution is directed under the act of 1851 . Subornation of perjury is procuring a person to commit a per-See also:jury which he actually commits in consequence of such procurement . If the person attempted to be suborned do not take the oath, the person inciting him, though not guilty of subornation, is liable to See also:fine and See also:corporal punishment . Perjury and subornation of perjury are punishable at common law with fine and imprisonment . By the combined operation of the Perjury Act 1728 and later statutes, the punishment at See also:present appears to be penal servitude for any See also:term, or imprisonment with or without hard labour for a term not exceeding seven years (see Stephen, Digest, art . 148) . The punishment at common law was See also:whipping, imprisonment, fine and See also:pillory . Perjury or See also:prevarication committed before a See also:committee of either See also:House of Parliament may be dealt with as a contempt or See also:breach of See also:privilege as well as by prosecution . As to false oaths not perjury, it is a misdemeanor at common law, punishable by fine and imprisonment, to swear falsely before any person authorized to administer an oath upon a matter of common concern, under such circumstances that the false See also:swearing, if committed in judicial proceedings, would have amounted to perjury .

There are some cases of making false declarations which are punishable on See also:

summary conviction, e.g. certain declarations under the Registration of Births and Deaths Act 1874, and the Customs Consolidation Act 1876 . In See also:Scotland the law, as a See also:general rule, agrees with that of England . Perjury may be committed by a party on reference to oath as well as by a witness . A witness making a false affirmation is guilty of perjury (The Affirmation [Scotland] Act, 1865) . The acts of 1851 and 1859 do not extend to Scotland . The trial, though usually by the court of See also:justiciary, may be by the court of session if the perjury is committed in the course of an See also:action before that court . The punishment is penal servitude or imprisonment at the discretion of the court . Formerly a person convicted of perjury was disabled from giving evidence in future; this See also:disability was abolished by the Evidence (Scotland) Act 1852 . In the See also:United States the common law has been extended by most states to embrace false affirmations and false evidence in proceedings not judicial . Perjury in a United States court is dealt with by an act of See also:Congress of the 3rd of See also:March 1825, by which the maximum punishment for perjury or subornation of perjury is a fine of $20o0 or imprisonment for not more than five years . Jurisdiction to punish perjury committed in the See also:state courts belongs to the states, as the Federal Constitution did not give it to the Federal See also:government . Statutory provisions founded upon the See also:English act of 1749, have been adopted in some states .

In the states which have not adopted such provisions, the indictment must set out the offence with the particularity necessary at common law . On the See also:

continent of See also:Europe perjury is also regarded as an offence of gravity punishable by imprisonment for varying periods . In See also:Germany, as in England, it was at one time a matter for the spiritual courts . In See also:Austria it is treated as a See also:form of See also:fraud, and the punishment is proportioned to the estimated amount of damage done to the party aggrieved . In See also:France the term perjury (perjure) is specifically applied only to the making of false oaths by parties in a See also:civil suit .

End of Article: PERJURY (through the Anglo-Fr. perjurie, modern parjure, Lat. perjurium, a false oath, perjurare, to swear falsely)
[back]
PERIZONIUS (or ACCINCTUS)
[next]
SIR WILLIAM HENRY PERKIN (1838-1907)

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.