Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
PERPETUAL See also:MOTION, or PERPETUUM See also:MOBILE , in its usual significance, not simply a See also:machine which will go on moving for ever, but a machine which, once set in See also:motion, will go on doing useful See also:work without See also:drawing on any See also:external source of See also:energy, or a machine which in every See also:complete See also:cycle of its operation will give forth more energy than it has absorbed . Briefly, a perpetual motion usually means a machine which will create energy . The earlier seekers after the " perpetuum See also:mobile " did not always appreciate the exact nature of their quest; for we find among their ideals a See also:clock that would periodically rewind itself, and thus go without human interference as See also:long as its machinery would last . The energy created by such a machine would simply be the work done in overcoming the See also:friction of its parts, so that its projectors might be held merely to have been ignorant of the See also:laws of friction and of the dynamic theory of See also:heat . Most of the perpetual motionists, however, had more See also:practical views, and explicitly declared the See also:object of their inventions to be the doing of useful work, such as raising See also:water, grinding See also:corn, and so on . Like the exact See also:quadrature of the circle, the transmutation of metals and other famous problems of antiquity, the perpetual motion has now become a See also:venerable See also:paradox . Still, like these others, it retains a See also:great See also:historical See also:interest . Just as some of the most interesting branches of See also:modern pure See also:mathematics sprang from the problem of squaring the circle, as the researches of the alchemists See also:developed into the See also:science of modern See also:chemistry, so, as the result of the vain See also:search after the perpetual motion, there See also:grew up the greatest of all the generalizations of See also:physical science, the principle of the conservation of energy . There was a See also:time when the problem of the perpetual motion was one worthy of the See also:attention of a philosopher . Before that See also:analysis of the See also:action of See also:ordinary See also:machines which led to the laws of See also:dynamics, and the discussion of the dynamical interdependence of natural phenomena which accompanied the See also:establishment of the dynamical theory of heat, there was nothing plainly unreason-able in the See also:idea that work might be done by the See also:mere concatenation of machinery . It had not then been proved that energy is uncreatable and indestructible in the ordinary course of nature; even now that See also:proof has only been given by See also:induction from long observation of facts . There was a time when See also:wise men believed that a spirit, whose See also:maintenance would cost nothing, could by magic See also:art be summoned from the deep to do his See also:master's work; and it was just as reasonable to suppose that a structure of See also:wood, See also:brass and See also:iron could be found to work under like conditions . The disproof is in both cases alike . No such spirit has ever existed, See also:save in the See also:imagination of his describer, and no such machine has ever been known to See also:act, save in the See also:fancy of its inventor . The principle of the conservation of energy, which in one sense is simply denial of the possibility of a perpetual motion, rests on facts See also:drawn from every See also:branch of physical science; and, although its full establishment only See also:dates from the See also:middle of the19th See also:century, yet so numerous are the cases in which it has been tested, so various the deductions from it that have been proved to See also:accord with experience, that it is now regarded as one of the best-established laws of nature . Consequently, on any one who calls it in question is thrown the See also:burden of proving his See also:case . If any machine were produced whose source of energy could not at once be traced, a See also:man of science (complete freedom of investigation being supposed) would in the first See also:place try to trace its See also:power to some hidden source of a See also:kind already known; or in the last resort he would seek for a source of energy of a new kind and give it a new name . Any assertion of creation of energy by means of a mere machine would have to be authenticated in many instances, and established by long investigation, before it could be received in modern science . The case is precisely as with the See also:law of See also:gravitation; if any apparent exception to this were observed in the case of some heavenly See also:body, astronomers, instead of denying the law, would immediately seek to explain the occurrence by a wider application of it, say by including in their calculations the effect of some disturbing body hitherto neglected . If a man likes to indulge the notion that, after all, an exception to the law of the conservation of energy may be found, and, provided he submits his idea to the test of experiment at his own charges without annoying his neighbours, all that can be said is that he is engaged in an unpromising enterprise . The case is otherwise with the projector who comes forward with some machine which claims by the mere ingenuity of its contrivance to multiply the energy supplied to it from some of the ordinary See also:sources of nature and sets to work to pester scientific men to examine his supposed See also:discovery, or attempts therewith to induce the credulous to See also:waste their See also:money . This is by far the largest class of perpetual-motion-mongers nowadays . The interest of such cases is that attaching to the morbid See also:anatomy of the human mind . Perhaps the most striking feature about them is the woful sameness of the symptoms of their madness . As a body perpetual-motion seekers are ambitious, lovers of the See also:short path to See also:wealth and fame, but wholly superficial . Their inventions are very rarely characterized even by See also:mechanical ingenuity . Sometimes indeed the inventor has simply bewildered himself by the complexity of his See also:device; but in most cases the machines of the perpetual motionist are of See also:child-like simplicity, remarkable only for the extraordinary assertions of the inventor concerning them . Wealth of ideas there is none; simply assertions that such and such a machine solves the problem, although an identical contrivance has been shown to do no such thing by the brutal test of See also:standing still in the hands of many previous inventors . Hosts of the seekers for the perpetual motion have attacked their insoluble problem with less than a schoolboy's See also:share of the'requisite knowledge; and their confidence as a See also:rule is in proportion to their See also:ignorance . Very often they get no further than a mere See also:prospectus, on the strength of which they claim some imaginary See also:reward, or offer their See also:precious discovery for See also:sale; sometimes they get the length of a See also:model which wants only the last perfection (already in the inventor's See also:brain) to solve the great problem; sometimes See also:fraud is made to See also:supply the See also:motive power which their real or pretended efforts have failed to discover . It was no doubt the barefaced See also:fallacy of most of the plans for perpetual motion that led the See also:majority of scientific men to conclude at a very See also:early date that the " perpetuum mobile " was an impossibility . We find the See also:Paris See also:Academy of Sciences refusing, as early as 1775, to receive schemes for the perpetual motion, which they class with solutions of the duplication of the See also:cube, the trisection of an See also:angle and the quadrature of the circle . See also:Stevinus and See also:Leibnitz seem to have regarded its impossibility as axiomatic; and See also:Newton at the beginning of his Principia states, so far as ordinary See also:mechanics are concerned, a principle which virtually amounts to the same thing . The famous proof of P . De la Hire simply refers to some of the more See also:common gravitational perpetual motions . The truth is, as we have said already, that, if proof is to be given, or considered necessary, it must proceed by induction from See also:ali physical phenomena .
W devices, such as curved spokes,
It would serve no useful purpose here to give an exhaustive historical See also:account 1 of the vagaries of mankind in pursuit of the " perpetuum mobile." The reader may refer to See also:
The two most famous perpetual motions of See also:history, viz. the wheels of the See also:marquis of See also:Worcester (d
.
1667) and of Councillor Orffyraeus, were probably of this type
.
The marquis of Worcester gives the following account of his machine in his Century of Inventions (art
.
56) :
" To provide and make that all the Weights of the descending side of a Wheel shall be perpetually further from the Centre than those of the mounting side, and yet equal in number and heft to one side as the other
.
A most incredible thing, if not seen but tried before the See also:late See also: The absurdity of the proposition is obvious to any one acquainted with the laws of See also:thermodynamics . Of more interest is the See also:radium clock devised by the Hon . R . J . See also:Strutt . This consists of a vacuum See also:vessel from the See also:top of which depends a short See also:tube containing a fragment of a radioactive substance . At the lower end of this tube there are two See also:gold leaves as in an See also:electroscope . Fused into the sides of the vacuum vessel at points where the extended gold leaves See also:touch the See also:glass are two See also:platinum wires, the See also:outer ends of which are earthed . The " clock " acts as follows . The radio-active substance emits a preponderating number of positively electrified particles, so that the leaves become charged and hence extended . On contact with the wires fused into the vessel, this See also:charge is conducted away and the leaves fall together . The See also:process is then repeated, and will continue until all the energy of the radium has been dissipated . This See also:period is extremely long, for woo years must elapse before Sven See also:half the radium has disappeared.—[ED.j Orffyraeus (whose real name was Johann See also:Ernst See also:Elias Bessler) (168o–1745) also obtained distinguished patronage for his invention . His last wheel, for he appears to have constructed more than one, was 12 ft. in diameter and i ft . 2 in. broad; it consisted of a See also:light framework of wood, covered in with oilcloth so that the interior was concealed, and was mounted on an See also:axle which had no visible connexion with any external mover . It was examined and approved of by the See also:landgrave of See also:Hesse-See also:Cassel, in whose See also:castle at Weissenstein it is said to have gone for eight See also:weeks in a sealed See also:room . The most remarkable thing about this machine is that it evidently imposed upon the mathematician W . J . 'sGravesande, who wrote a See also:letter to Newton giving an account of his examination of Orffyraeus's wheel undertaken at the See also:request of the landgrave, wherein he professes himself dissatisfied with the proofs theretofore given of she impossibility of perpetual motion, and indicates his See also:opinion that the invention of Orffyraeus is worthy of investigation . He himself, however, was not allowed to examine the interior of the wheel . The inventor seems to have destroyed it himself . One See also:story is that he did so on account of difficulties with the landgrave's See also:government as to a See also:licence for it; another that he was annoyed at the examination by 'sGravesande, and wrote on the See also:wall of the room containing the fragments of his model that he had destroyed it because of the impertinent curiosity of 'sGravesande . The overbalancing wheel perpetual motion seems to be as old as the 13th century . Dircks quotes an account of an invention by Wilars de Honecort, an architect whose sketchbook is still preserved in the Ecoles See also:des Chartes at Paris .
De Honecort says, " Many a time have skilful workmen tried to contrive a wheel that shall turn of itself ; here is a way to do it by means of an uneven number of mallets, or by quicksilver." He thereupon gives a See also:rude See also:sketch of a wheel with mallets jointed to its circumference
.
It would appear from some of the See also:manuscripts of Leonardo da See also:Vinci that he had worked with similar notions
.
Another See also:scheme of the perpetual metionist is a water-wheel which shall feed its own See also:
EFG (fig
.
3) is an inclined See also:plane over pulleys; at the top and bottom travels an endless band of sponge, abed, and over this again an endless band of heavy weights jointed together
.
The whole stands over the See also:surface of still water
.
The capillary action raises the water in ab, whereas the
same thing cannot hap-See also:pen in the part ad, since the weights squeeze the water out
.
Hence, See also:inch for inch, ab is heavier than ad; but we know that if ab were only just as heavy inch for inch as ad there would be See also:equilibrium, if the heavy See also:chain be also See also:uniform; therefore the extra See also:weight of ab will cause the chain to move See also:round in the direction of the arrow, and this will go on continually
.
The more recondite
vehicles of energy, such as See also:electricity and See also:magnetism, are more seldom drawn upon by perpetual-motion inventors than might perhaps be expected
.
William See also: One more See also:page from this See also:chapter of the See also:book of human folly; the author is the famous See also:Jean See also:Bernoulli the See also:elder . We N translate his Latin, as far as possible, into modern phraseology . In the first place we must premise the following (see fig . 5) . (1) If there be two fluids of different of G to L, the height of equiponderating cylinders on equal bases will be in the inverse ratio of L to G . (2) Accordingly, if the height AC of one fluid, contained in the See also:vase AD, be in this ratio to the height EF of the other liquid, which is in a tube open at both ends, the liquids so placed will remain at See also:rest . (3) Wherefore, if AC be to EF in a greater ratio than L to G, the liquid in the tube will ascend; or if the tube be not sufficiently long the liquid will overflow at the orifice E (this follows from hydrostatic principles) . (4) It is possible to have two liquids of different See also:density that will mix . (5) It is possible to have a See also:filter, colander, or other separator, by means of which the lighter liquid mixed with the heavier may be separated again therefrom . Construction.—These things being presupposed (says Bernoulli), I thus construct a perpetual motion . Let there be taken in any (if you please, in equal) quantities two liquids of different densities mixed together (which may be had by hyp . 4), and let the ratio of their densities be first determined, and be the heavier to the lighter as G to L, then with the mixture let the vase AD be filled up to A . This done let the tube EF, open at both ends, be taken of such a length that AC: EF> 2L:G+L; let the lower orifice F of this tube be stopped, or rather covered with the filter or other material separating the lighter liquid from the heavier (which may also be had by hyp . 5) ; now let the tube thus prepared be immersed to the bottom of the vessel CD ; I say that the liquid will continually ascend through the orifice F of the tube and overflow by the orifice E upon the liquid below . F of the tube is covered by the filter (by constr.) which separates the lighter liquid from the heavier, it follows that, if the tube be immersed to the bottom of the vessel, the lighter liquid alone which is mixed with the heavier ought to rise through the filter into the tube, and that, too, higher than the surface of the surrounding liquid (by hyp . 2), so that AC:EF=2L: G+L; but since by constr . AC: EF>2L: G+L it necessarily follows (by hyp . 3) that the lighter liquid will flow over by the orifice E into the vessel below, and there will meet the heavier and be again mixed with it; and it will then penetrate the filter, again ascend the tube, and be a second time driven through the upper orifice . Thus, therefore, will the flow be continued for ever.—Q.E D . Bernoulli then proceeds to apply this theory to explain the perpetual rise of water to the mountains, and its flow in See also:rivers to thesea, which others had falsely attributed to capillary action—his idea being that it was an effect of the different densities of See also:salt and fresh water . One really is at a loss with Bernoulli's wonderful theory, whether to admire most the conscientious statement of the See also:hypothesis, the See also:prim See also:logic of the demonstration, so carefully cut according to the See also:pattern of the ancients, or the weighty superstructure built on so frail a See also:foundation . Most of our perpetual motions were clearly the result of too little learning; surely this one was the product of too much . (G . |
|
|
[back] PERPENT, or PARPENT STONES |
[next] PERPETUITY (Lat. perpetuus, continuous) |
My idea is very difficult for understanding. It is not difficult for engineer - mechanic, who knows very good the Pascal's law and even-arm lever. Please open GOOgle and find metozor and next : index of metozor. Clean energy The entire world is looking for a source of clean energy. I have discovered a certain paradox basing on which a machine called METOZ can be built which by harnessing the gravitation of our EARTH can produce clean energy. The energy producing process is demonstrated in: http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/paradox.html and can be very easily confirmed by an experiment. I am also in possession of a set of calculations which prove that the METOZ machine: 1/ does not consume water / 39 A5-pictures /; 2/ does not consume compressed air / 39 A5-pictures /; 3/ produces energy to the outside = 4 839 kGm during a „swing cycle” /39 A5-pictures /; / this is a „weight cycle” = the centre of gravity of the water in the METOZ machine sinks ( downward movement ) / 4/ energy is produced / released to the outside = 44 600 kGm during the „straightening cycle” / 39 A5-pictures /. / this is a “pressure cycle” = the water mass centre of gravity inside the METOZ machine travels upwards (upward movement) / Features: 1/; 2/; 3/; 4/, of the machine owing to appropriate dimensions of individual elements of the lever mechanism. The METOZ has an even-arm lever of a 1.72 m length. The centre of gravity of the lever lies beneath the lever suspension point. The METOZ is equipped with two cylinders of a 1.6 m diameter each. Piston sidewalls do not contact directly with cylinder walls. The lever swing changes between and . Figures ( 3 x 13 x 4 = 156 ) present temporary, consecutive action situations at intervals of . The middle figure presents the machine and the side figures the position of the left and right cylinder and the mathematical description of these situations. In the past I have made two models, which confirmed the legitimacy of my theoretical assumptions concerning the METOZ machine. I have got photographs. I am looking for a person who would be interested in my invention. I can offer ample information. I look forward to hearing from you. http://www.nets.pl/~metozor/three_levers.html 13 - 03 -2005 Gdynia, Polska Zygmunt Orłowski P.S. The term “gravitational paradox” use in this description relates to the mathematical and physical description of the action of the METOZ-machine. THE EARTH GRAVITATION CAN BE THE SOURCE OF CLEAN ENERGY. Comment for METOZ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- By Orlowski Zygmunt Poland 2005 index html Comments concerning machine "METOZ" "METOZ" is able to realize the cycle "deflection" and the cycle "straighening." Both cycles are in accordance with current physic's laws. "METOZ" as machine can not work and hand over the energy because it would be inconsonant to the law of conservation of energy. I propose to execute the following intelectual process: we have found ourselves in the Europe of XVII century. We know the trigonometry in the scope of being occured for "METOZ." We know what is the even-arm lever and moment of force too. Just appeears Mr. Baise Pascal / 1623--1662/ and he publishes his hydraulics law with adequated experiment. All thinkers are sure that this law is correct and quite real. This time someone invents machine "METOZ". Now turn up the following questions: 1/ why the implementation of the cycle "deflection" is impossible? 2/ why the implementation of the cycle "straightening" is impossible?Both groups: opponents and followers of bulding "METOZ" live in XVII--th century and they not know that: a/ the idea of an "energy" will be introduced into science scarlerly in mid. of XIX century, b/ the law of conservation of the energy will be exist scarlerly after 1847 y. QVESTION!!! WHAT KIND OF RATIONALY ENTERELY / ARGUMENT/ CAN BE DREAMED UP THE OPPONENTS OF BUILDING THE MACHINE "METOZ' IN XVII CENTURY. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for your time and interest. Are you able to find any mistake in my elaboration? If so, do not hesistate to write an early reply.
Please open GOOgle and klick metozor and after : index of metozor At is site that explains technical details in easy to understand language. So you think we have an energy problem? No, we have a political problem. I am inventor and owner of Metoz machine invention. Everyone can take absolutely and legitimate the METOZ invention and build the Metoz machine. Orlowski Zygmunt 01-06-2006 Poland
P.S. The conception of an energy is discreate one to the same as a imbecility. No one has seen the energy and no one has seen the imbecility. We are able to observe results of the energy and imbecility. At present we have got to few energy because we have got to much imbecility. Thank you for your time and interest.
Dear Sirs I ask you to inform a science that the new physical law is opened « Transformation static loading springs in dynamics of rotary movement ». Therefore we receive inexhaustible ecologically pure energy source. The engineering specifications of "Perpetuum mobile" BURANLO, is in Russian applied for consideration in scientific circles. The given documentation is: http://mydiler.narod.ru/nm/ener.html http://www.skif.biz/index.php?name=Files&op=view_file&lid=347
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.