Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
PROROGATION , a postponement, specifically the termination without See also:dissolution of a session of See also:parliament by discontinuing the meetings until the next session . The See also:Lat. prorogatio (from prorogare, to ask publicly) meant a prolongation or continuance of See also:office or command, cf. prorogatio imperii (Liv. viii . 26), or a needful that to plainness should be added various attractions and ornaments . The sentences must be built up in a manner which displays variety and flexibility . It is highly desirable that there should be a See also:harmony, and even a See also:rhythm, in the progress of See also:style, care being always taken that this rhythm and this harmony are not those of See also:verse, or recognizably metrical . Again, the See also:colour and See also:form of adjectives, and their sufficient yet not excessive recurrence, is an important See also:factor in the construction of See also:prose . The omission of certain faults, too, is essential . In every See also:language grammatical correctness is obligatory . Here we see a distinction between See also:mere conversation, which is loose, fragmentary and often, even in the lips of highly educated persons, slightly ungrammatical; and prose, which is See also:bound to See also:weed away whatever is slovenly and incorrect, and to See also:watch very closely lest merely colloquial expressions, which cannot be defended, should slip into careful speech . What is required in See also:good prose is a moderate and reasonable See also:elevation without bombast or See also:bathos . Not everything that is loosely said or vaguely thought is prose, and the celebrated phrase of M . Jourdain in See also:Moliere's See also:Bourgeois gentilhomme: " See also:Par ma foi, it y a plus de quarante ans que je dis de la prose, sans que j'en susse rien," is not exactly true, although it is an amusing See also:illustration of the truth, for all the little loose phrases which M . Jourdain had used in his See also:life, though they were certainly not verse, were not prose either, whatever the schoolmaster might say . On the other See also:hand, it seems that See also:Earle goes too enthusiastically in the contrary direction when he says, " See also:Poetry, which is the See also:organ of See also:Imagination, is futile without the support of See also:Reason; Prose, which is the organ of Reason, has no vivacity or beauty or See also:artistic value but with the favour and sympathy of the Imagination." It is better to hold to the simpler view that prose is See also:literary expression not subjected to any See also:species cif metrical See also:law . See also:Greece.—The beginnings of See also:ancient See also:Greek prose are very obscure . It is highly probable that they took the form of See also:inscriptions in temples and upon monuments, and gradually See also:developed into See also:historical and topographical records, preserving See also:local memories, and giving form to local legends . It seems that it was in See also:Ionia that the See also:art of prose was first cultivated, and a See also:history of See also:Miletus, composed by the See also:half-mythical See also:Cadmus, is appealed to as the earliest See also:monument of Greek prose . This, however, is lost, and so are all the other horoi of earliest times . We come down to something definite when we reach Hecataeus, the first geographer, and Herodorus, the first natural philosopher, of the Greeks; and, although the writings of these men have disappeared, we know enough about them to see that by the 4th See also:century B.C. the use of prose in its set See also:modern sense had been established on a permanent basis . We even know what the See also:character of the style of Hecataeus was, and that it was admired for its clearness, its grammatical purity, its agreeable individuality—qualities which have been valued in prose ever since . These writers were promptly succeeded by See also:Hellanicus of See also:Lesbos, who wrote many historical books which are lost, and by See also:Herodotus of See also:Halicarnassus, whose See also:noble storehouse of See also:chronicle and See also:legend is the earliest monument of See also:European prose which has come down to us . When once non-metrical language could be used with the mastery and freedom of Herodotus, it was See also:plain that all departments of human knowledge were open to its exercise . But it is still in Ionia and the See also:Asiatic islands that we find it cultivated by philosophers, critics and men of See also:science . The earliest of these See also:great masters of prose survive, not in their See also:works, but in much later records of their opinions; in See also:philosophy the actual writings of Thales, Agaximander, See also:Pythagoras and See also:Empedocles are lost, and it is more than possible that their cosmological rhapsodies were partly metrical, a mingling of See also:ode with prose See also:apophthegm .
We come into clearer See also:air when we See also:cross the See also:Aegean and reach the Athenian historians: See also:Thucydides, whose priceless See also:story of the Peloponnesian See also:War has most fortunately come down to us; and See also:Xenophon, who continued that chronicle in the spirit and under the See also:influence of Thucydides, and who carried Greek prose to a great height of easy distinction
.
But it is with the practice of philosophy that prose in ancient Greece rises to its See also:acme of ingenuity, flexibility and variety,proving itself a vehicle for the finest human thought such as no later ingenuity of language has contrived to excel
.
The See also:death of See also:Socrates (399 B.C.) has been taken by scholars as the date when the philosophical writings of the Athenians reached their highest See also:pitch of perfection in the art of See also:Plato, who is the greatest prose writer of Greece, and, in the view of many who are well qualified to See also:judge, of the See also:world
.
In his celebrated dialogues–Crito, See also:Gorgias, See also:Phaedo, See also:Phaedrus, the See also:Symposium, most of all perhaps in the See also:Republic—we see what splendour, what See also:elasticity, what exactitude, this means of expression had in so See also:short a See also:time developed; how little there was for future prose-writers in any See also:age to learn about their business
.
The rhetoricians were even more highly admired by the critics of antiquity than the philosophers, and it is probable that ancient See also:opinion would have set See also:Demosthenes higher than Plato as a composer of prose
.
But modern readers are no longer so much interested in the technique of See also:rhetoric, and, although no less an authority than See also:Professor See also:
Alimentus, actually wrote in Greek
.
The earliest annalist who wrote in Latin was L
.
C
.
Hemina; the works of all these See also:early historians are lost
.
A great See also:deal of See also:primitive See also:Roman prose was occupied with See also:jurisprudence and See also:political See also:oratory
.
By universal consent the first See also:master of Latin prose was See also:Cato, the loss of whose speeches and " Origines " is extremely to be deplored; we possess from his See also:pen one See also:practical See also:treatise on See also:agriculture
.
In the next See also:generation we are told that the literary perfection of oratory was carried to the highest point by See also:Marcus See also:Antonius and See also:Lucius See also:Licinius See also:Crassus—" by a happy See also:chance their styles were exactly complementary to one another, and to hear both in one day was the highest intellectual entertainment which Rome afforded." Unfortunately none but inconsiderable fragments survive to display to us the qualities of Roman prose in its See also:golden age
.
Happily, however, those qualities were concentrated in a See also:man of the highest See also:genius, whose best writings have come down to us; this is See also:Cicero, whose prose exhibits the Latin language to no less See also:advantage than Plato's does the Greek
.
From 70 to 6o B.C
.
Cicero's literary See also:work See also:lay mainly in the See also:
Of Cicero's greatest contemporary, See also:Julius See also:Caesar, much less has been preserved, and this is unfortunate because Roman See also:critical opinion placed Caesar at the See also:head of those who wrote Latin prose with purity and perfection: His letters, his grammars, his works of science, his speeches are lost, but we retain his famous Commentaries on the War in See also:Gaul
.
See also:Sallust followed Caesar as an historian, and Thucydides as a master of style
.
His use of prose, as we trace it in the Jugurtha and the Catilina, is hard, clear and polished
.
The chroniclers who succeeded Sallust neglected these qualities, and Latin prose, as the Augustan age began, became more diffuse and more rhetorical
.
But it was wielded in that age by one writer of the highest genius, the historian See also:Titus Livius
.
He greatly enriched the See also:tissue of Latin prose with See also:ornament which hitherto had been confined to poetry; this enables him, in the course of his vast See also:annals, " to advance without flagging through the long and intricate narrative where a simpler diction must necessarily have grown monotonous " (Mackail)
.
The periodic structure of Latin prose, which had been developed by Cicero, was carried by See also:Livy " to an even greater complexity." The style of See also:Pollio, who wrote a History of the See also:Civil See also:Laws, was much admired, and the loss of this work must be deplored
.
A different species of prose, the plebius sermo, or colloquial speech of the poor, is partly preserved in the invaluable fragments of a Neronian writer, See also:Petronius Arbiter
.
Of the Latin prose-writers of the See also:silver age, the See also:elder See also:Pliny, See also:Quintilian and See also:Tacitus, who adorned the last years before the decay of classical Latin, nothing need here be said
.
See also:English.—It was long supposed that the conscious use of prose in the English language was a comparatively See also:recent thing, dating back at farthest to the See also:middle of the 16th century, and due directly to See also:French influences
.
Earle was the first to show that this was not the See also:case, and to assert that we " possess a longer See also:pedigree of prose literature than any other See also:country in See also:Europe." Though this may be held to be a somewhat violent statement, the See also:independence of English prose is a fact which rests on a See also:firm basis
.
" The See also:Code of Laws of See also: After the Danish invasion, Latin ceased to be the universal language of the educated, and See also:translations into the See also:vernacular began to be required . In 887, See also:Alfred, who had collected the See also:principal scholars of See also:England around him, wrote with their help, in English, his Hand-See also:Book; this, probably the earliest specimen of finished English prose, is unhappily lost . Alfred's See also:preface to the English version of the Cura pastoralis was in Latin; this See also:translation was probably completed in 89o . Later still Alfred produced various translations from See also:Bede, See also:Orosius, Boethius and other See also:classics of the latest Latin, and, in coo, closing a translation from St See also:Augustine, we read " Here end the sayings of King Alfred." The prose of Alfred is See also:simple, straightforward and clear, without any pretension to elegance . He had no See also:direct followers until the time of the monastic revival, when the first name of See also:eminence which we encounter is that of See also:IElfric, who, about 997, began to translate, or rather to See also:paraphrase, certain portions of the See also:Bible . The prose of IFlfric, however, though extremely interesting historically, has the See also:fault that it presents too See also:close a resemblance, in structure and See also:movement, to the alliterative verse of the age . This is particularly true of his Homilies . A little later vigorous prose was put forth by See also:Wulfstan, See also:archbishop of See also:York, who died in 1023 . At the See also:Norman See also:Conquest, the progress of English prose was violently checked, and, as has been acutely said, it " was just kept alive, but only like a man in See also:catalepsy." The Annals of See also:Winchester, See also:Worcester and See also:Peterborough were carried on in English until 1154, when they were resumed in Latin; the chronicle which thus came to an end was the most important document in English prose 'written before the Norman Conquest . Except in a few remote monasteries, English now ceased to be used, even for religious purposes, and the literature became exclusively Latin or French . There was nothing in prose that was analogous to the revival of verse in the Ormulum or the metrical See also:chronicles . All the pre-Norman practice in prose belongs to what used to be distinguished as Anglo-Saxon literature .
The distinction has fallen into desuetude, as it has become more clearly perceived that there is no real break between the earlier and the later language
.
The Norman check, however, makes it See also:fair to say that modern English prose begins with the Testament of Love of See also:
The earliest modern historian was See also:Robert See also:Fabyan, whose See also:posthumous Chronicles were printed in 1515
.
See also:Edward See also:
The extravagances and eccentricities of Lyly outdid those of his See also:continental prototypes, and See also:euphuism became a disturbing influence which, it may be, English prose has not, even to the present See also:hour, entirely succeeded in throwing off
.
In spite of its overwhelming popularity, it was opposed in its own day, not merely by the stately sobriety of See also: |