Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:RAIS (or See also:RETZ), GILLES DE (1404-1440)
, See also:marshal of See also:France and the central figure of a 15th-See also:century cause celbbre, whose name is associated with the See also:story of See also:Bluebeard, was the son of See also:Guy de See also:Montmorency-See also:Laval, the adopted son and See also:heir of Jeanne de See also:Rais and of See also:Marie de Craon
.
He was See also:born at Machecoul in See also:September or See also:October 1404, and, being See also:early See also:left an See also:orphan, was educated by his maternal grandfather, See also:Jean de Craon
.
See also:Chief among his See also:great possessions was the See also:barony of Rais (erected in the 16th century into the See also:peerage-duchy of See also:Retz), See also:south of the See also:Loire, on the See also:marches of See also:Brittany
.
He joined the party of the Montforts, supporting Jean V. of Brittany against the See also:rival See also:house of Penthievre
.
He helped to See also:release See also:Duke See also:
Meanwhile his See also:fortune was disappearing, although he had been one of the richest men in France
.
He had expended great sums in the See also: The abominable practices of which he was really guilty seem not to have been suspected by his equals or superiors, though he had many accomplices and his criminality was suspected by the peasantry . His wife finally left him in 1434-35, and may possibly have become acquainted with his doings, and when his brother Rene de la Suze seized Champtoce, all traces of his crimes had not been removed, but See also:family considerations no doubt imposed silence . His servants kidnapped See also:children, generally boys, on his behalf, and these he tortured and murdered . The number of his victims was stated in the ecclesiastical trial to have been 140, and larger figures are quoted . The amazing impunity which he enjoyed was brought to an end in 1440, when he was imprudent enough to come into conflict with the church by an See also:act of violence which involved See also:sacrilege and infringement of clerical See also:immunity . He had sold See also:Saint See also:Etienne de Malemort to the duke of Brittany's treasurer, Geffroi le Ferron . In the course of a See also:quarrel over the delivery of the See also:property to this See also:man's brother, Jean le Ferron, Gilles seized Jean, who was in clerical orders, in church, and imprisoned him . He then proceeded to defy the duke, but was reconciled to him by Richemont . In the autumn, however, he was arrested and cited before the bishop of Nantes on various charges, the chief of which were See also:heresy and See also:murder . With the latter count the ecclesiastical court was incompetent to See also:deal, and on the 8th of October Gilles refused to accept its See also:jurisdiction . Terrified by See also:excommunication, however, he acknowledged the See also:evidence of the witnesses, and by See also:confession he secured See also:absolution . He had been pronounced guilty of See also:apostasy and heresy by the inquisitor, and of See also:vice and sacrilege by the bishop . A detailed confession was extracted by the See also:threat of See also:torture on the 21st of October . A See also:separate and parallel inquiry was made by See also:Pierre de 1'Hbpifal, See also:president of the Breton parliament, by whose See also:sentence he was hanged (not burned alive as is sometimes stated), on the 26th of October 1440, with two of his accomplices . In view of his own repeated confessions it seems impossible to doubt his See also:guilt, but the numerous irregularities of the proceedings, the fact that his necromancer Prelati and other of his chief accomplices went unpunished, taken together with the financial See also:interest of Jean V. in his ruin, have left a certain mystery over a trial, which, with the exception of the See also:process of Joan of Arc, was the most famous in 15th-century France . His name is connected with the See also:tale of Bluebeard (q.v.) in See also:local tradition at Machecoul, Tiffauges, Pornic and Chemere, though the similarity between the two histories is at best vague . The records of the trial are preserved in the Bibliotheque Nationale in Paris, at Nantes and elsewhere . See See also:Eugene Bossard, Gilles de Rais, dit Bathe Bleue (2nd ed., x886), which includes the See also:majority of the documents of the trial published originally by De Maulde; E . A . See also:Vizetelly, Bluebeard (Igo2); H . C . See also:Lea, Irish of the See also:Inquisition (iii . 468, seq.); A . See also:Molinier, See also:Les See also:Sources de l'histoire de France (No . 4185) . See also:Huysmans in Ld-bas describes his See also:hero as engaged on a See also:life of Gilles de Rais, and takes the opportunity for a striking picture of the trial . |
|
|
[back] RAIPUR |
[next] RAISIN (Fr. raisin, grape; Lat. racemes) |
It is now very widely supposed that the trial of Gilles de Rais was a miscarriage of justice. He was a great war hero on the French side; his judges were pro-English and had an interest in blackening his name and, possibly, by association, that of Jehanne d'Arc. His confession was obtained under threat of torture and also excommunication, which he dreaded. A close examination of the testimony of his associates, in particular that of Poitou and Henriet, reveals that they are almost identical and were clearly extracted by means of torture. Even the statements of outsiders, alleging the disappearance of children, mostly boils down to hearsay; the very few cases where named children have vanished can be traced back to the testimony of just eight witnesses, which is not that many to suborn. (I am indebted to the scholar Kathleen Lehman for her painstaking examination of the trial records for this latter point).] In France, the subject of de Rais's possible innocence is far more freely discussed than it is in the English-speaking world. In 1992 a Vendéen author named Gilbert Prouteau was hired by the Breton tourist board to write a new biography. Prouteau was not quite the tame biographer that was wanted and his book, 'Gilles de Rais ou la gueule de loup', argued that Gilles de Rais was not guilty. Moreover, he summoned a Court of Cassation to re-try the case, which sensationally resulted in an acquittal. As of 1992, Gilles de Rais is officially an innocent man! There is even a rumour that he was put forward for canonization recently, but I have been unable to find the source of this story. He was certainly not the basis for Bluebeard, this is a very old story which appears all over the world in different forms. Morbid Morag
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.