Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:RAMUS, PETRUS, or See also:PIERRE DE LA RAMEE (1515-1572)
, See also:French humanist, was See also:born at the See also:village os Cuth in See also:Picardy in 1515, a member of a See also:noble but impoverished See also:family; hisfather was a See also:charcoal-burner
.
Having gained See also:admission, in a See also:menial capacity, to the See also:college of See also:Navarre, he worked with his hands by See also:day and carried on his studies at See also:night
.
The reaction against See also:scholasticism was still in full See also:tide; it was the transition See also:time between the old and the new, when the eager and forward-looking See also:spirits had first of all to do See also:battle with scholastic Aristotelianism
.
See also:Ramus outdid his predecessors in the impetuosity of his revolt
.
On the occasion of taking his degree (1536) he actually took as his thesis " Everything that See also:Aristotle taught is false." This tour de force was followed up by the publication in 1543 of Aristotelicae Animadversiones and Dialecticae Partitiones, the former a See also:criticism on the old See also:logic and the latter a new textbook of the See also:science
.
What are substantially fresh See also:editions of the Partitions appeared in 1547 as Institutions Dialecticae, and in 1548 as Scholae Dialecticae; his Dialectique
(1555), a French version of his See also:system, is the earliest See also:work on the subject in the French See also:language
.
Meanwhile Ramus, as
See also:graduate of the university, had opened courses of lectures; but his audacities See also:drew upon him the hostility of the conservative party in See also:philosophy and See also:theology
.
He was accused of undermining the See also:foundations of philosophy and See also:religion, and the See also:matter was brought before the See also:parlement of See also:Paris, and finally before See also:Francis I
.
By him it was referred to a See also:commission of five, who found Ramus guilty of having " acted rashly, arrogantly and impudently," and interdicted his
lectures (1544)
.
He withdrew from Paris, but soon afterwards returned, the See also:decree against him being cancelled through the
See also:influence of the See also:cardinal of See also:Lorraine
.
In 1551 See also:
In 1561, however, the enmity against him was fanned into See also:flame by his See also:adoption of Protestantism
.
He had to flee from Paris; and, though he found an See also:asylum in the See also:palace of See also:Fontainebleau, his See also:house was pillaged and his library burned in his See also:absence
.
He resumed his See also:chair after this for a time, but in 1568 the position of affairs was again so threatening that he found it advisable to ask permission to travel
.
Returning to France he See also:fell a victim to his opponents in the See also:massacre of St See also:Bartholomew (1572)
.
The logic of Ramus enjoyed a See also:great celebrity for a time, and there existed a school of Ramists boasting numerous adherents in France, See also:Germany and See also:
Logic falls, according to Ramus, into two parts—invention (treating of the notion and definition) and See also:judgment (comprising the judgment proper, See also:syllogism and method)
.
This See also:division gave rise to the jocular designation of judgment or See also:mother-wit as the " secunda Petri." He is, perhaps, most suggestive in his emendations of the syllogism
.
He admits only the first three figures, as in the See also:original Aristotelian See also:scheme, and in his later works he also attacks the validity of the third figure, following in this the precedent of See also:Laurentius See also:Valla
.
Ramus also set the See also:modern See also:fashion of deducing the figures from the position of the See also:middle See also:term in the premises, instead 9f basing them, as Aristotle does, upon the different relation of the middle to the so-called See also:major and See also:minor term
.
On the whole, however, though Ramus may be allowed to have advanced logical study by the wholesome See also:fermentation of thought which he caused, there is little ground for his pretentious claim to supersede Aristotle by a new and See also:independent system
.
See See also:Waddington-Kastus, De Petri Rami vita, script-is, philosophia (Paris, 1848) ; See also: See also:Hoffding, Hist. of Mod . Phil . (Eng. trans., 190o), vol. i . 185; Voigt, Uber den Ramismus der Universitat See also:Leipzig (Leipzig, 1888) . |
|
|
[back] RAMU9 V |
[next] RAMUSIO |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.