Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:RATITAE (from See also:Lat. ratis, a raft) , the name given by B . Merrem (Abh . Ak . Wiss., See also:Berlin, 1812–1813; Phys . Kl., p . 259) to the " See also:flat-breasted birds," in opposition to the Carinatae, or those which normally possess a keeled sternum . In thus dividing the birds into two See also:great See also:equivalent See also:groups, he was followed only by C . L . See also:Nitzsch (1829), T . H . See also:Huxley (1867), P . L . Sclater (188o), A . See also:Newton (1884), R . B . See also:Sharpe (1891), whilst in most of the other numerous classifications the See also:Ratitae (vicariously named Struthiones, Cursores, Brevipennes, Proceres) were treated as of much See also:lower See also:rank . A diagnosis covering all the Ratitae (struthio, See also:rhea, casuarius, dromaeus, apteryx and the allied fossils dinornis and aepyornis) would be as follows—(i) terrestrial birds without See also:keel to the sternum, absolutely flightless; (ii) quadrate See also:bone with a single proximal articulating knob; (iii) coracoid and scapula fused together and forming an open See also:angle; (iv) normally without a pygostyle; (v) with an incisura ischiadica; (vi) rhamphotheca See also:compound; (vii) without apteria or See also:hare spaces in the plumage; (viii) with a See also:complete copulatory See also:organ, moved by skeletal muscles . The separation of the Ratitae from the other birds, and their seemingly fundamental See also:differences, notably the See also:absence of the keel and of the See also:power of See also:flight, induced certain authors to go so far as to derive the Ratitae from the Dinosaurian See also:reptiles, whilst See also:Archaeopteryx (q.v.) and the Carinatae were supposed to have sprung from some Pterosaurian or similar reptilian stock . Such vagaries require no refutation . But it is quite another question, whether the " Ratitae " See also:form a natural See also:group . See also:Sir R . See also:Owen was the first (Comp . Anat. and Physiol. of Vertebrates, ii . 1866) to indicate that the various Ratitae might be referable to various natural groups of the Carinatae . A . W . See also:Forbes likewise had doubts about them . B . See also:Lindsay (P . Z . S., 1885, pp . 684–716, pls . EL–1v.) found vestiges of a keel in a See also:young rhea, and apteria in the embryonic See also:ostrich, and she concluded that they were descendants of birds which originally possessed the power of flight . This has been settled by M . Furbringer (Untersuchungen . . . 1888), and there is now no doubt that the absence of the power of flight is a secondary, not See also:primitive, feature in the Ratitae as well as in the flightless See also:bona fide Carinatae, e.g . Didus, and penguins . It had already been understood that the various genera of the Ratitae were the representatives of so many different groups, each of which was at least equivalent to ordinal rank, and that therefore, if the Ratitae were still to. be considered a natural group, this See also:common ancestry must be referred to a remote See also:geological See also:epoch . Furbringer, however, separated Apteryx with Dinornis from the See also:rest, combining his " Apteryges " with Crypturi and Galli as See also:Alectorornithes, the latter being practically A . H . Garrod's Galliformes, of which his " Struthiones " form See also:part together with the Tinamidae or Crypturi . Relationship of this other-See also:wise typically carinate, neotropical See also:family with the Ratitae had already been insisted upon by T . H . Huxley; hence his See also:term Dromaeognathae for the Crypturi . L . Stejneger (See also:Standard Nat . Hist., iv., See also:Boston, r885) applied this term in a new wider sense to all the Ratitae, and recently W . P . Pycraft has revived this notion by his See also:division of the Neornithes into Dromaeo- and Neognathae . At any See also:rate we begin to see that some of the Ratitae, namely the Rheidae, may possibly be an See also:early and then much modified offshoot of such of the Carinatae as are now represented by the Crypturi, whilst in another part of the See also:world, and at a much later See also:time, kiwis and moas have sprung from a somewhat more Galliform stock, which points to a descent from a still undivided Galliform-Tinamiform See also:mass . Further, it is the See also:opinion of competent ornithologists that there is See also:affinity of the Australian emeus and cassowaries with the New See also:Zealand moas and with the Malagasy Aepyornis . Struthio alone still stands aloof, possibly because it is the See also:oldest and most specialized form . This genus was already typically See also:developed in See also:late See also:Miocene times, and with a very wide See also:geographical See also:distribution (see See also:BIRD, Fossil), but of the See also:affinities of the other See also:mid- and early See also:tertiary flightless birds we know nothing, and it must be emphasized that we should probably not be able to classify a truly ancestral Ratite, namely, a bird which is still to a certain extent carinate and not yet ratite . It is impossible to give a satisfactory diagnosis of such intermediate forms . All the See also:recent Ratitae still possess a considerable number of rather primitive characters, e.g. they are typically nidifugous; the See also:simple structure of their neossoptiles; quintocubital; compound rhamphotheca; holorhinal See also:nares imperviae; basipterygoid processes; simple articular facet of the quadrate; configuration of the palatal bones, including the large vomer; incisura ischiadica; simple hypotarsus; the thigh muscles; the copulatory organ . We restrict the origin of the Ratitae to that great See also:branch of still primitive Carinatae which, after separation of the Ratitae, has further developed into the See also:legion of the Alectoromorphae, notably Tinami- and Galliformes, together with still See also:low Gruiformes (see BIRD, See also:Classification) . From such a rudis indigestaque moles, after it had attained an almost world-wide distribution, have arisen the various Ratitae, independently at various epochs and in various countries . Most of them are now restricted to widely separated countries of the See also:southern hemisphere . Although loss of flight (correlated with more or less reduction of the wings and the sternal keel, and often compensated by stronger See also:hind limbs) has occurred, and is still taking See also:place in various groups of birds, it is quite impossible that a new Ratite can still come into existence, because the necessary primitive substratum, whence arose the true Ratitae, is no longer available . Consequently we are justified in retaining " Ratitae " in our classification, although they are a heterogeneous, not strictly monophyletic, See also:assembly . (H . F . |
|
|
[back] LOUIS GUSTAVE FORTUNE RATISBONNE (1827-1900) |
[next] RATKE (RATCHIUS), WOLFGANG (1571-1635) |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.