|
See also: Provence, one of the leaders of the first Crusade
.
According to an Armenian authority, he had lost an See also: eye on a pilgrimage to Jerusalem before the first Crusade; but the statement probably rests on the fact that he was one-eyed, vir monoculus
.
He is also re-corded to have fought against the Moors in See also: Spain before 1o96; and it is certain that he was the first of the princes of the West to take the See also: cross after See also: Pope See also: Urban's See also: sermon at Clermont
.
The See also: oldest and the richest of the crusading princes, the count of Provence started, at the end of See also: October 1096, with a large See also: company, which included his wife, his son, and Adhemar, See also: bishop of See also: Puy, the Papal See also: Legate
.
His See also: march
See also: lay by Ragusa and See also: Scutari to Durazzo, whence he struck eastward, along the route also used by See also: Bohemund, to Constantinople
.
At the end of See also: April 1097 he was with difficulty induced to take a somewhat negative See also: oath of fealty to Alexius; for the obstinacy which was one of his characteristics, coupled perhaps with some hope of acquiring new territories, made him reluctant to submit like the other crusaders to Alexius
.
He was See also: present at See also: Nicaea and Dorylaeum; but he first showed his See also: hand in October 1097, when, as the army neared See also: Antioch, and a rumour was spread that Antioch had been deserted by the See also: Turks, he sent a detachment in advance to occupy the city—an See also: action which presaged his future difficulties with Bohemund, the would-be See also: prince of Antioch
.
In the siege of Antioch (which was far from having been deserted) See also: Raymund played his See also: part
.
When the city was taken by Bohemund (See also: June 1o98), the count garrisoned the palatium Cassiani (the palace of the emir, Yagi Sian) and the tower over the See also: Bridge See also: Gate
.
He lay See also: ill during the second siege of Antioch by Kerbogha; but in his See also: camp a See also: great spiritualistic activity culminated in the See also: discovery of the See also: Holy See also: Lance by the Provengals
.
The miracle stimulated the crusaders to defeat Kerbogha: the Lance itself, discovered by the Provengals and carried henceforward by their count, became a valuable asset in Raymund's favour; and he began to put difficulties in the way of Bohemund's retention of Antioch, obstinately alleging the oath to Alexius, and refusing to surrender the positions in the city which he had occupied
.
A struggle thus arose between the Provengals and the See also: Normans, partly with regard to the genuineness of the Lance, which the Normans naturally doubted, and partly with regard to the possession of Antioch—the real issue at stake
.
Raymund was the first of the princes to leave Antioch, moving southward in the autumn of ro98 to the siege of Marra, but leaving a detachment of his troops in Antioch, With Bohemund See also: left behind in Antioch; with the possession of the Holy Lance to give him See also: prestige; and with the See also: wealth which he had at his disposal, the count of Provence now definitely began to figure as the See also: leader of the Crusade
.
If he could have consented to leave Bohemund in possession of Antioch and push See also: south-See also: ward, he might have achieved much
.
But he could not stomach the greatness of Bohemund; and when the Normans turned his troops out of Antioch in
See also: January 1099, he marched from Marra (which had been captured in See also: December 1098) into the. emirate of See also: Tripoli, and began the siege of See also: Area (See also: February 1099), evidently with the idea of founding a power in Tripoli which would check the expansion of Bohemund's principality to the south
.
The siege of Area was protracted; and the selfish policy of the count, which thus deferred the march to Jerusalem, lost him all support from the mass of the crusaders
.
A See also: wave of indignation in the ranks, and the inducements which the emir of Tripoli offered to the other princes, forced Raymund to desist from the siege (May 1098), and to march southwards to Jerusalem
.
After the capture of Jerusalem, Raymund was offered, but refused, the advocacy of the Holy Sepulchre
.
He alleged his reluctance to See also: rule in the city in which Christ had suffered:
it is perhaps permissible to suspect that he hankered for the principality of Tripoli and the renewal of hostilities with Bohemund
.
As at Antioch, so at Jerusalem, he See also: fell into strife with the new ruler; and it was only with difficulty that Godfrey was able to secure from him the possession of the Tower of See also: David, which he had originally occupied
.
The grasping nature of Raymund again appeared after the See also: battle of See also: Ascalon, when his eagerness to occupy Ascalon for himself prevented it from being occupied at all; while Godfrey also blamed him for the failure of his army to capture See also: Arsuf
.
It almost seems as if the count could not appear without becoming a centre of storms; and when he went See also: north, in the winter of 1099-1100, his first See also: act was one of hostility against Bohemund, from whom he helped to wrest See also: Laodicea
.
From Laodicea he went to Constantinople, where he fraternized with Alexius, the great enemy of his own enemy Bohemund
.
Joining in the ill-fated Crusade which followed in the See also: wake of the First, he was successful in escaping from the debacle, and returning to Constantinople
.
In 1102 he came by See also: sea from Constantinople to Antioch, .where he was imprisoned by See also: Tancred, See also: regent of Antioch during the captivity of Bohemund, and only dismissed upon promising not to attempt any conquests in the country between Antioch and See also: Acre
.
He broke his promise, attacking and capturing See also: Tortosa, and beginning to build a See also: castle for the reduction of Tripoli (on the See also: Mons Peregrinus)
.
In this policy he was aided by Alexius, who was naturally willing to see the erection of a tributary county of Tripoli to the south of Bohelnund's principality
.
In 1105 Raymund died
.
He was succeeded by his See also: nephew See also: William, who in 1109, with the aid of Baldwin I., captured the
See also: town and definitely established the county of Tripoli
.
William was ousted in the same See also: year by Raymund's eldest son Bertrand; and the county continued in the possession of his See also: house during the 12th century.'
Raymund of Toulouse represents the Provencal See also: element in the first Crusade, as Bohemund represents the Norman, and Godfrey and Baldwin the Lotharingian
.
Religiosity, obstinacy and greed seem curiously blended in his composition
.
The first quality appears in the See also: episode of the Lance, and in his renunciation of the advocacy of Jerusalem: the second appears in the whole of his attitude to Bohemund: the third appears again and again, whenever the progress of the See also: Crusades brought any new See also: conquest
.
If in temperament he is the least attractive among the princes of the first Crusade, he was yet one of its foremost leaders, and he left his mark upon See also: history in the foundation of the county of Tripoli
.
Raymund of Agiles, a clerk in the Provencal army, gives the history of the first Crusade from his master's point of view
.
For a See also: modern account of Count Raymund's part in the crusading See also: movement, one may refer to Rohricht's See also: works (see/CRUSADES)
.
(E
.
|
|
|
[back] RAYMUND |
[next] RAYMUND OF TRIPOLI |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.