Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

RICHARD OF CIRENCESTER (c. 1335-c. 1401)

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V23, Page 298 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

RICHARD OF See also:CIRENCESTER (c. 1335-c. 1401)  , See also:historical writer, was a member of the See also:Benedictine See also:abbey at See also:Westminster, and his name (" Circestre ") first appears on the See also:chamberlain's See also:list of the monks of that See also:foundation See also:drawn up in the See also:year 1355 . In the year 1391 he obtained a See also:licence from the See also:abbot to go to See also:Rome, and in this the abbot gives his testimony to See also:Richard's perfect and sincere observance of See also:religion for upwards of See also:thirty years . In 1400 Richard was in the infirmary of the abbey, where he died in the following year . His only known extant See also:work is See also:Speculum Historiale de Gestis Regum Angliae, 447-1066 . The MS. of this is in the university library at See also:Cambridge, and has been edited for the Rolls See also:Series (No . 3o) by See also:Professor J . E . B . See also:Mayor (2 vols., See also:London, 1863-69) . It is in four books, and at the conclusion of the See also:fourth See also:book Richard expresses his intention of continuing his narrative from the See also:accession of See also:William I., and incorporating a See also:sketch of the Conqueror's career from his See also:birth . This See also:design he does not, however, appear to have carried into effect . The value of the Speculum as a contribution to our historical knowledge is but slight, for it is mainly a compilation from other writers; while even in trans-scribing these the compiler is guilty of See also:great carelessness .

He gives, however, numerous charters See also:

relating to Westminster Abbey, and also a very See also:complete See also:account of the See also:saints whose tombs were in the abbey See also:church, and especially of See also:Edward the See also:Confessor . The work was, however, largely used by historians and antiquaries, until, with the rise of a more See also:critical spirit, its value became more accurately estimated . Besides the Speculum Richard also wrote, according to the statement of William of See also:Woodford in his See also:Answer to Wycliffe (Edward See also:Brown, Fasciculus Rerum expetendarum, p . 193), a See also:treatise De O lciis; and there was formerly in the See also:cathedral library at See also:Peterborough another tractate from his See also:pen, entitled Super Symbolum . Of neither of these See also:works, however, does any known copy now exist . The Speculum affords the most conclusive See also:proof of the spuriousness of another work attributed to Richard and See also:long accepted by the learned See also:world as his . This was the De Situ Britanniae, an elaborate See also:forgery relating to the antiquities of See also:Roman See also:Britain, which first appeared at See also:Copenhagen in the year 1747 . It was printed with the works of See also:Gildas and See also:Nennius, under the editorship of See also:Charles See also:Julius See also:Bertram, professor of See also:English in the See also:academy of Copenhagen in the See also:middle of the 18th See also:century, with the following See also:special See also:title: " Richardi Corinensis monachi Westmonasteriensis de situ Britanniae libri duo . E . Codici MS. descripsit, Notisque et Indite adornavit Carolus Bertram." This forgery was accepted as genuine by a well-known See also:antiquary of the 18th century, Dr William See also:Stukeley, and under the See also:sanction of his authority continued for a long See also:time to be regarded in the same See also:light by numerous scholars and antiquaries, including See also:Gibbon and See also:Lingard . On the other See also:hand, critics of a later date gave expression, on various grounds, to a contrary conclusion . All doubt on the subject may, however, be held to have been effectually set at See also:rest by the masterly exposure of the whole See also:fraud drawn up by Professor Mayor in the See also:preface to the edition above referred to of the Speculum .

He has there not only demonstrated, from the See also:

external and See also:internal See also:evidence alike, the spuriousness of the whole treatise, but in a See also:collation (extending to nearly a See also:hundred pages) of numerous passages with corresponding passages in classical See also:medieval authorities, has also traced out the various See also:sources whence Bertram derived the terminology and the facts which he reproduced in the De Situ . (J . B .

End of Article: RICHARD OF CIRENCESTER (c. 1335-c. 1401)
[back]
RICHARD II
[next]
RICHARD OF DEVIZES (fl. 1191)

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.