|
See also: India from Central See also: Asia
.
The word is used loosely, especially by See also: Hindu authors, to designate all the tribes which from See also: time to time invaded India from the See also: north, much as all the tribes who invaded See also: China are indiscriminately termed Tatars
.
Used more accurately, it denotes the tribe which invaded India 13o—140 B.C
.
They are the Sacae and See also: Sakai of classical authors and the Se of the See also: Chinese, which may represent an See also: original Sek or Sok
.
The Chinese annalists See also: state that they were a pastoral See also: people who lived in the neighbourhood of the See also: modern See also: Kashgar
.
About 16o B.C. they were driven southward by the advance of the Yue-Chi from the See also: east
.
One portion appears to have settled in western See also: Afghanistan, hence called Sakasthana, in modern Persian Sejistan
.
The other section occupied the See also: Punjab and possessed themselves of the territory which the Graeco-Bactrian See also: kings had acquired in India, that is See also: Sind, See also: Gujarat and See also: Malwa
.
The rulers of these provinces See also: bore the title of Satrap (Kshatrapa or Chhatrapa) and were apparently subordinate to a See also: king who ruled over the valley of
See also: Kabul and the Punjab
.
In 57 B.C. the Sakas were attacked simultaneously by Parthians from the west and by the Malaya clans from the east and their power was destroyed
.
It should be added that what we know of See also: Saka See also: history is mostly derived from coins and inscriptions which admit ,of various interpretations and that scholars are by no means agreed as to names and. See also: dates
.
In any See also: case their power, if it lasted so long, must have been swept away by the Kushan See also: conquest of See also: Northern India
.
Nothing is known of the language orSee also: race of the Sakas
.
Like most of the invaders of India at this See also: period they adopted See also: Buddhism, at least partially
.
They can be traced to the neighbourhood of Kashgar, but not like the Yue-Chi to the frontiers of China
.
They may have been Turanians akin to that tribe,or they may have been Iranians akin to the Iranian See also: element in Transoxiana and the districts See also: south of the See also: Pamirs
.
They cannot be the same as the Scythians of See also: Europe, though the name and original nomadic See also: life are points in See also: common
.
See Vincent See also: Smith, Early History of India (19o8); O
.
Franke, Beitrage aus chinesischen Quellen zur Kenntnis der Tiirkvolker and Skythen (19o4); P
.
See also: Gardner, Coins of See also: Greek and Scythian Kings in India (1886); and various articles by Vincent Smith, See also: Fleet, See also: Cunningham, A Stein, Sylvain Levi and others in the Journal of the Royal See also: Asiatic Society, Journal asiatique, See also: Indian See also: Antiquary, Zeitsch. der Deutschen Morgenlandischen Gesellschaft, &c
.
(C
.
|
|
|
[back] EMILE EDMOND SAISSET (1814-1863) |
[next] SAKAI |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.