Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

3RD MARQUESS OF ROBERT ARTHUR TALBOT ...

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V24, Page 76 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

3RD See also:

MARQUESS OF See also:ROBERT See also:ARTHUR See also:TALBOT GASCOYNECECIL See also:SALISBURY (1830-1903)  , See also:British statesman, second son of See also:James, and See also:marquess, by his first wife, Frances See also:Mary Gascoyne, was See also:born at See also:Hatfield on the 3rd of See also:February 183o, and was educated at See also:Eton and See also:Christ See also:Church, See also:Oxford, where he took his degree in 185o . At Oxford he was an active member of the See also:Union Debating Society . The first. few years after leaving the university were spent by See also:Lord See also:Robert See also:Cecil (as he then was) in travel, as far afield as New See also:Zealand; but in 1853 he was returned unopposed to the See also:House of See also:Commons as Conservative member for See also:Stamford, being elected in the same See also:year a See also:fellow of All Souls . He made his See also:maiden speech in See also:Parliament on the 7th of See also:April 18J4, in opposition to Lord See also:John See also:Russell's Oxford University See also:Bill . The speech was marked by See also:scepticism as to the utility of reforms, and Lord Robert prophesied that if the wishes of founders were disregarded, nobody would in future care to found anything . In 1857 he See also:Early appeared as the author of his first Bill—for establishing years in the voting-See also:paper See also:system at See also:parliamentary elections; Podia- and in the same year he married Georgina See also:Caroline, went daughter of See also:Sir See also:Edward See also:Holt Alderson, a See also:baron of the See also:Court of See also:Exchequer, a large See also:share of whose See also:great intellectual abilities she inherited . Lord Robert Cecil continued to be active not only in politics, but, for several years, in journalism, the income he earned by his See also:pen being then a See also:matter of pecuniary importance to him . One of his contemporaries at Oxford had been See also:Thomas Hamber of See also:Oriel, who became editor of the See also:Standard, and during these years Cecil was an occasional contributor of " leaders " to that paper . He also contributed to the Saturday See also:Review, founded in 1855 by his See also:brother-in-See also:law See also:Beresford See also:Hope, and edited by his friend See also:Douglas See also:Cook; not iafrequently he wrote for the Quarterly (where, in 1867, he was to publish his famous See also:article on " the Conservative Surrender "); and in 1858 he contributed to Oxford Essays a paper on " The Theories of Parliamentary Reform," giving expression to the more intellectual and aristocratic antagonism to doctrinaire Liberal views on the subject, while admitting the existence of many anomalies in the existing electoral system . In February of the next year, when Disraeli introduced his Reform Bill with its " See also:fancy franchises," the member for Stamford was prominent among its critics from the Tory point of view . During the seven years that followed Lord Robert was always ready to defend the Church, or the higher interests of Conservatism and See also:property; and his speeches then, not less than later, showed a See also:caustic quality and a tendency to what became known as " blazing indiscretions." For example, when the See also:repeal of the paper See also:duty was being discussed in 1861, he asked whether it " could be maintained that a See also:person of any See also:education could learn anything See also:worth knowing from a See also:penny paper "—a question the See also:answer to which has been given by the powerful, highly organized, and admirable Conservative penny See also:press of a subsequent See also:day . A little later he declared the proceedings of the See also:Government " more worthy of an See also:attorney than of a statesman "; and on being rebuked, apologized—to the attorneys .

He also charged Lord John Russell with adopting " a sort of See also:

tariff of insolence " in his dealings with See also:foreign See also:Powers, strong and weak . It was not, however, till the See also:death of See also:Palmerston and the removal of Lord John Russell to the House of Lords had brought See also:Gladstone to the front that Lord Robert Cecil—who became Lord Cranborne by the death of his See also:elder brother on the 14th of See also:June 1865—began to be accepted as a politician of the first See also:rank . His emergence coincided with the opening of the new See also:area in British politics; ushered in by the See also:practical steps taken to extend the parliamentary See also:franchise . On the 12th of See also:March 1866 Gladstone brought forward his measure to establish a £7 franchise in boroughs and a £14 franchise in counties, which were calculated to add 400,000 voters to the existing lists . Lord Cranborne met the Bill with a persistent opposition, his rigorous See also:logic and merciless hostility to clap-See also:trap tending strongly to reinforce the impassioned eloquence of Robert See also:Lowe . But though he attacked the Government Bill both in principle and detail, he did not absolutely commit himself to a position of hostility to Reform of every See also:kind; and on the .defeat of Glad-See also:stone's See also:Ministry no surprise was expressed at his joining the See also:Cabinet of Lord See also:Derby as secretary of See also:state for See also:India, even when it became known that a See also:settlement of the Reform question was See also:part of the Tory See also:programme . The early months of the new Government's See also:tenure were marked by the incident of the See also:Hyde See also:Park riots; and if there had been members of the Cabinet and party who believed up to that See also:time that the Reform question was not urgent the See also:action of the Reform See also:League and the See also:London populace forced them to a different conclusion . On the 11th of February Disraeli informed the House of Commons that the Government intended to ask its assent to a See also:series of thirteen resolutions; but when, on the 26th of February, the Liberal leaders demanded that the Government should produce a Bill, Disraeli at once consented to do so . The introduction of a Bill was, however, delayed by the resignation of Lord Cranborne, See also:General See also:Peel and Lord See also:Carnarvon . The Cabinet had been considering two alternative See also:measures, widely different in kind and extent, and the final decision between the two was taken in ten minutes (whence the See also:nickname of the " Ten Minutes Bill ") at an informal gathering of the Cabinet held just before Derby was engaged to address a general See also:meeting of the party . At a Cabinet See also:council held on the 23rd of February measure A had been agreed upon, the three doubtful ministers having been persuaded that the checks and safeguards provided were sufficient; in the See also:interval between Saturday and See also:Monday they had come to the conclusion that the checks were inadequate; on Monday See also:morning they had gone to Lord Derby and told him so; at two o'See also:clock the See also:rest of the Cabinet, hastily summoned, had been informed of the new situation, and had there and then, before the meeting at See also:half-past two, agreed, in See also:order to retain their three colleagues, to throw over measure A, and to See also:present measure B to the See also:country as the See also:fruit of their matured and unanimous See also:wisdom . Derby at the meeting, and Disraeli a few See also:hours later in the House of Commons, explained their new Cabinet See also:minister: the Franchise question : resignation 1867 .

measure—a measure based upon a £6 franchise; but their own See also:

side did not like it, the Opposition were furious, and the moral sense of the country was revolted by the undisguised See also:adoption of almost the very Bill which the Conservatives had refused to accept from their opponents only a year before . The result was that the Government reverted to measure A, and the three ministers again handed in their resignations . In the debate on the third See also:reading of the Bill, when its passage through the House of Commons without a See also:division was assured, Lord Cranborne showed with caustic See also:rhetoric how the " precautions, guarantees, and securities " with which the Bill had bristled on its second reading had been dropped one after another at the bidding of Gladstone . In countries where politics are conducted on any other than the give-and-take principles in See also:vogue in See also:England, such a See also:breach as that which occurred in 1867 between Lord Cranborne In the and his former colleagues, especially Disraeli, would House of Lords. have been beyond repair . But Cranborne, though an aristocrat both by See also:birth and by conviction, was not impracticable; moreover, Disraeli, who had himself risen to See also:eminence through invective, admired rather than resented that See also:gift in others; and their See also:common opposition to Gladstone was certain to reunite the two colleagues . In the session of 1868 Gladstone announced that he meant to take up the Irish question, and to See also:deal especially with the celebrated " See also:Upas See also:tree," of which the first See also:branch was the Established Church . By way of giving full See also:notice to the electorate, he brought in a series of resolutions on this question; and though the attitude adopted' by the See also:official Conservatives towards them was not one of serious antagonism, Lord Cranborne vigorously attacked them . This was his last speech in the House of Commons, for on the 12th of April his See also:father died, and he became 3rd marquess of See also:Salisbury . In the House of Lords the new Lord Salisbury's See also:style of eloquence —terse, incisive and wholly See also:free from false See also:ornament—found an even more appreciative See also:audience than it had met with in the House of Commons . The questions with which he was first called upon to deal were questions in which his See also:interest was keen—the recommendations of the See also:Ritual See also:Commission and, some time later, the Irish Church Suspensory Bill . Lord Salisbury's See also:argument was that the last session of an expiring parliament was not the time in which so See also:grave a matter as the Irish Church See also:Establishment should be judged or prejudged; that a Suspensory Bill involved the question of disestablishment; and that such a principle could not be accepted by the Lords until the country had pronounced decisively in its favour . Even then there were those who raised the cry that the only business of the House of Lords was to See also:register the decisions of the Commons, and that if they refused to do so it was at their peril .

Lord Salisbury met this cry boldly and firmly: " When the See also:

opinion of your countrymen has declared itself, and you see that their convictions—their See also:firm, deliberate, sustained convictions—are in favour of any course, I do not for a moment deny that it is your duty to yield." In the very next session Lord Salisbury was called upon to put his view into practice, and his See also:influence went far to persuade the peers to pass the Irish Church Disestablishment Bill . In his opinion the general See also:election of the autumn of 1868 had been fought on this question; his See also:friends had lost, and there was nothing for them to do but to See also:bow to the necessities of the situation . The See also:story of his conduct in the matter has been told in some fulness in the See also:Life of See also:Archbishop See also:Tait, with whom Salisbury acted, and who throughout those See also:critical See also:weeks played a most important part as mediator between the two extreme parties—those of Lord See also:Cairns (representing See also:Ulster) and Gladstone . See also:October 1869 saw the death of the old Lord Derby, who was still the titular See also:leader of his party; and he was succeeded as leader of the House of Lords by Cairns . For the dignified See also:post of See also:chancellor of the university of Oxford See also:Convocation unanimously See also:chose as Derby's successor the marquess of Salisbury . Derby had translated the Iliad very well, but his successor was far more able to sympathize with the See also:academic mind and See also:temper . He • was at See also:heart a student, and found his best See also:satisfaction in scientificresearch and in scientific See also:speculation; while still a See also:young See also:man he had made useful contributions to the investigation of the See also:flora of See also:Hertfordshire, and at Hatfield he had his own laboratory, where he was able to satisfy his interest in chemical and See also:electrical See also:research . As regards his connexion with Oxford may be mentioned in particular his See also:appointment, in 1877, of a second University Commission, and his See also:appearance, in See also:September 1894, in the Sheldonian See also:Theatre as See also:president of the British Association . It is not necessary to dwell at any length upon the part taken by Lord Salisbury between 1869 and 1873 in respect of the other great See also:political measures of Gladstone's Government—the Irish See also:Land See also:Act, the Act Abolishing See also:Purchase in DtsraeB the See also:Army, See also:Forster's Education Act, &c . Nor does of 1874. his attitude towards the Franco-See also:German See also:War of 187o–71 See also:call for any remark; a British leader of Opposition is See also:bound, even more than a minister, to preserve a discreet silence on such occasions . But early in 1874 came the See also:dissolution, suddenly announced in Gladstone's famous See also:Greenwich See also:letter, with the promise of the abolition of the income-tax . For the first time since 1841 the Conservatives found themselves in See also:office with a large See also:majority in the House of Commons .

In Disraeli's new Cabinet in 1874 Salisbury accepted his old position at the India Office, The first task with which the new secretary of state had to deal was one of those periodical famines which are the great See also:

scourge of India; he supported the action of Lord See also:Northbrook, the See also:viceroy, and refused to interfere with private See also:trade by prohibiting the export of See also:grain . This attitude was amply justified, and Lord Salisbury presently declared that the action of the Government had given so much confidence to private traders that, by their means, " grain was pouring into the distressed districts at a greater See also:rate than that which was being carried by the public agency,- the amount reaching nearly 2000 tons a day." The Public See also:Worship Regulation Bill of 1894 was the occasion of a famous passage of arms between Salisbury and his See also:chief . The Commons had inserted an See also:amendment which, on See also:consideration by the Lords, Salisbury opposed, with the remark that it was not for the peers to attend to the " bluster " of the See also:lower House merely because a small majority there had passed the amendment . The new clause was accordingly rejected, and the Commons eventually accepted the situation; but Disraeli, banteringly criticizing Salisbury's use of the word " bluster," alluded to him as " a man who does not measure his phrases . He is one who is a great See also:master of gibes and flouts and jeers." From the See also:middle of 1876 the Government was occupied with foreign affairs . In regard to the stages of Eastern See also:fever through which the nation passed between the occurrence of the Bulgarian " atrocities" and the See also:signature of See also:Item the Treaty of See also:Berlin, the part played by Salisbury question. was considerable . The excesses of the Bashi-Bazouks took See also:place in the early summer of 1876, and were recorded in See also:long and highly-coloured despatches to See also:English See also:newspapers; presently there followed Gladstone's pamphlet on Bulgarian Horrors, his speech on See also:Blackheath and his enunciation of a " bag-and-baggage " policy towards See also:Turkey . The autumn went by, See also:Servia and See also:Montenegro declared war upon Turkey and were in imminent danger of something like extinction . On the 31st of October See also:Russia demanded an See also:armistice, which Turkey granted; and Great See also:Britain immediately proposed a See also:conference at See also:Constantinople, at which the powers should endeavour to make arrangements with Turkey for a genera) pacification of her provinces and of the inflammable communities adjoining . At this conference Great Britain was represented by Lord Salisbury . It met early in See also:December, taking for its basis the British terms, namely, the status quo ante in Servia and Montenegro; a self-denying See also:ordinance on the part of all the powers; and the See also:independence and territorial integrity of the See also:Ottoman See also:empire, together with large administrative reforms assured by guarantees . General Ignatieff, the See also:Russian See also:ambassador, was effusively friendly with the British See also:envoy; but though the See also:philo-See also:Turkish party in England professed themselves scandalized, Salisbury made no improper concessions to Russia, and departed in no way from the agreed policy of the British Cabinet .

On the loth of See also:

January the conference See also:broke up, Turkey having declared its recommendations inadmissible; and See also:Europe withdrew to await the inevitable See also:declaration of war . Very early in the course of that war the intentions of Great Britain were clearly indicated in a despatch of Lord Derby to the British representative at St See also:Petersburg, which announced that so long as the struggle concerned Turkish interests alone Great Britain would be neutral, but that such matters as See also:Egypt, the See also:Suez See also:Canal, the regulations affecting the passage of the See also:Dardanelles, and the See also:possession of Constantinople itself would be regarded as matters to which she could not be indifferent . For some nine months none of these British interests appeared to be threatened, nor had Lord Salisbury's own See also:department to concern itself very directly with the progress of the belligerents . Once or twice, indeed, the See also:Indian secretary committed himself to statements which laid him open to a See also:good deal of attack, as when he rebuked an alarmist by bidding him study the Central Asian question " in large maps . " But with the advance of Russia through See also:Bulgaria and across the Balkans, British anxiety See also:grew . In See also:mid-December explanations were asked from the Russian Government as to their intentions with regard to Constantinople . On the 23rd of January the Cabinet ordered the See also:fleet to See also:sail to the Dardanelles . Lord Carnarvon resigned, and Lord Derby handed in his resignation, but withdrew it . The Treaty of See also:San Stefano was signed on the 3rd of March; and three weeks later, when its full See also:text became known, the succeeds Cabinet decided upon measures which finally induced Lord Derby Lord Derby, at the end of the See also:month, to retire from as Foreign the Foreign Office, his place being immediately filled Minister. by Lord Salisbury . The new foreign secretary at once issued the famous " Salisbury ;circular" to the British representatives abroad, which appeared in the newspapers on the 2nd of April . This elaborate and dignified State paper was at once a clear exposition of British policy, and practically an invitation to Russia to reopen the negotiations for a See also:European See also:congress . These negotiations, indeed, had been proceeding for several weeks past; but Russia having declared that she would only discuss such points as she pleased, the British Cabinet had withdrawn, and the matter for the time was at an end .

The bulk of the document consisted of an examination of the Treaty of San Stefano and its probable effects, Lord Salisbury justifying such an examination on the ground that as the position of Turkey and the other countries affected had been settled by Europe in the Treaty of See also:

Paris in 1856, the powers which signed that treaty had the right and the duty to see that no modifications of it should be made without their consent . The effect of the circular was great and immediate . At See also:home the Conservatives were encouraged, and many moderate Liberals rallied to the Eastern policy of the Govern- ment . Abroad it seemed as if the era of divided See also:councils was over, and the Russian Government promptly recognized that the circular meant either a congress or war with Great Britain . For the latter alternative it was by no means prepared, and very soon negotiations were reopened, which led to the meeting of the congress at Berlin on the 13th of June . The See also:history of that famous gathering and of its results is narrated under EUROPE . Lord See also:Beaconsfield on two or three subsequent occasions referred to the important part that his colleague had played in the negotiations, and he was not using merely the See also:language of politeness . Rumours had appeared in the London press as to a supposed Anglo-Russian agreement that had been signed between Salisbury and the Russian ambassador, See also:Count Shuvaloff, and these rumours or statements were described by the foreign secretary in the House of Lords, just before he See also:left for Berlin, as " wholly unauthentic." But on the 14th of June what purported to be the full text of the agreement was published by the Globe newspaper through a certain See also:Charles Marvin, at that time employed in occasional transcribing See also:work at the Foreign Office, and afterwards known by some strongly See also:anti-Russian books on the Central Asian question . Besides the general inconvenience of the disclosure, the agreement, which stipulated that See also:Batum and See also:Kars might be annexed by Russia, made it impossible for the congress to insist upon Russia entirely withdrawing her claim to Batum, though at the time of the meeting of the congress it was known to some of the negotiators that she was not unwilling to do so . In one respect Salisbury's action at the congress was unsuccessful . Much as he disliked Gladstone's sentimentalism, he was not without a certain sentimentalism of his own, and at the Berlin Congress this took the See also:form of an unexpected and, as it happened, useless pushing of the claims of See also:Greece . But in the See also:main Salisbury must be held to deserve, almost equally with his great colleague, the See also:credit for the Berlin settlement .

Phoenix-squares

Great, however, as was the work done at Berlin, and marked the See also:

relief to all Europe which was caused by the See also:signing of the treaty, much work, and of no pleasant kind, remained for the British Foreign Office and for the Indian Government before the Beaconsfield parliament ended and the Government had to render up its accounts to the nation . Russia, foreseeing a possible war with Great Britain, had during the See also:spring of 1878 redoubled her activity in Central See also:Asia, and, almost at the very time that the treaty was being signed, her See also:mission was received at See also:Kabul by the See also:Amir Sher See also:Ali . Out of the Amir's refusal to receive a counterbalancing British mission there grew the Afghan War; and though he had ceased to See also:control the India Office, Salisbury was naturally held responsible for some of the preliminary steps which, in the See also:judgment of the Opposition, had led to these hostilities . But the Liberals entirely failed to See also:fix upon Salisbury the blame for a series of events which was generally seen to be inevitable . A See also:defence of the foreign policy of the Government during the year which followed the Berlin Treaty was made by Salisbury in a speech at See also:Manchester (October 1879), which had a great effect throughout Europe . In it he justified the occupation of See also:Cyprus, and approved the beginnings of a league of central Europe for preserving See also:peace . In the spring of 188o the general election overthrew Beacons-See also:field's Government and replaced Gladstone in See also: