Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

SIR WILLIAM SCROGGS (c. 1623—1683)

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V24, Page 484 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

SIR See also:WILLIAM See also:SCROGGS (c. 1623—1683)  , See also:lord See also:chief See also:justice of See also:England, was the son of a See also:butcher of sufficient means to give his son a university See also:education . See also:Scroggs went to See also:Oriel See also:College, and later to See also:Pembroke College, See also:Oxford, where he graduated in 164o, having acquired a See also:fair knowledge of the See also:classics . There is some See also:evidence that he fought on the royalist See also:side during the See also:Civil See also:War . In 1653 he was called to the See also:bar, and soon gained a See also:good practice in the courts . He was appointed a See also:judge of the See also:common pleas in 1676, and two years later was promoted to be lord .chief justice, his See also:advancement being due to his unfailing readiness to degrade the See also:administration of justice to serve the purposes of the See also:court . He was a See also:man of debauched See also:life and coarse and violent See also:manners; and these qualities were conspicuous in his demeanour on the See also:bench . As lord chief justice Scroggs presided at the trial of the persons denounced by See also:Titus See also:Oates for complicity in the " popish See also:plot," and he treated these prisoners with characteristic violence and brutality, overwhelming them with indecent See also:sarcasm and abuse while on their trial, and taunting them with See also:savage mockery when sentencing them to See also:death . He may at first have been a sincere believer in the existence of a plot; if so he showed himself not less gullible than the ignorant multitude out of doors; at all events he did nothing to test the credibility of such perjured witnesses as Oates, See also:Bedloe and See also:Dangerfield . At the trial in See also:February 1679 of the prisoners accused of the See also:murder of See also:Sir See also:Edmund See also:Godfrey he gave a characteristic See also:exhibition of his methods, indulging in a vituperative tirade against the See also:Roman See also:Catholic See also:religion, and loudly proclaiming his See also:satisfaction in the See also:guilt of the accused . It was only when, in See also:July of the same See also:year, Oates's See also:accusation against the See also:queen's physician, Sir See also:George Wakeman, appeared likely to involve the queen herself in the ramifications of the plot, that Scroggs began to think matters were going too far; he was probably also influenced by the See also:discovery that the court regarded the plot with discredit and disfavour, and that the See also:country party led by See also:Shaftesbury had less See also:influence than he had supposed with the See also:king . The chief justice on this occasion threw doubt on the trustworthiness of Bedloe and Oates, and warned the See also:jury to be careful in accepting their evidence . This See also:change of front inflamed public See also:opinion against Scroggs, for the popular belief in the plot was still undiminished .

Scroggs, however, was no less violent than before against Catholic priests who came before him for trial, as he showed when he sentenced See also:

Andrew Bromwich to death at See also:Stafford in the summer of 1679; but his proposing the See also:duke of See also:York's See also:health at the lord See also:mayor's See also:dinner a few months later in the presence of Shaftesbury indicated his determination not to support the Exclusionists against the known wishes of the king . Acting in the assurance of popular sympathy, Oates and Bedloe now arraigned the chief justice before the privy See also:council for having discredited their evidence and misdirected the jury in the Wakeman See also:case, accusing him at the same See also:time of several other misdemeanours on the bench, including a See also:habit of excessive drinking and See also:bad See also:language . In See also:January 168o the case was argued before the council and Scroggs was acquitted . At the trials of See also:Elizabeth See also:Cellier and of Lord See also:Castlemaine in See also:June of the same year, both of whom were acquitted, he discredited Dangerfield's evidence, and on the former occasion committed the See also:witness to See also:prison . In the same See also:month he discharged the See also:grand jury of See also:Middlesex before the end of See also:term in See also:order to See also:save the duke of York from See also:indictment as a popish See also:recusant, a proceeding which the See also:House of See also:Commons declared to be illegal, and which was made an See also:article in the See also:impeachment of Scroggs in January 1681 . The See also:dissolution of See also:parliament put an end to the impeachment, but in See also:April Scroggs was removed from the bench with a See also:pension; he died in See also:London on the 25th of See also:October 1683 . Scroggs was perhaps the worst of the See also:judges who disgraced the See also:English bench at a See also:period when it had sunk to the lowest degradation; and although his See also:infamy is less notorious than that of See also:Jeffreys, his See also:character exhibited fewer redeeming features . Scroggs was the author of a See also:work on the Practice of Courts-Leet and Courts-See also:Baron (London, 1701), and he edited reports of the See also:state trials over which he presided . He was the subject of many contemporary satires . See W . See also:Cobbett, See also:Complete Collection of State Trials (vols. i.-x. of State Trials, 33 vols., London, 1809); See also:Roger See also:North, Life of Lord See also:Guilford, &c., edited by A . Jessopp (3 vols., London, 1890), and Examen (London, 174o) ; See also:Narcissus See also:Luttrell, A Brief Relation of State Affairs, 1678–1714 (6 vols., Oxford, 1857) ; See also:Anthony a See also:Wood, Alhenae Oxonienses, edited by P .

See also:

Bliss (4 vols .. London, 1813—182o) ; See also:Correspondence of the See also:Family of See also:Hatton, edited by E . M . See also:Thompson (2 vols., See also:Camden See also:Soc . 22, 23, London, 1878) ; Lord See also:Campbell, Lives of the Chief Justices of England (3 vols., London, 1849–1857); See also:Edward See also:Foss, The Judges of England (9 vols., London, 1848–1864) ; Sir J . F . See also:Stephen, See also:History of the Criminal See also:Law of England (3 vols., London, 1883); See also:Henry B . See also:Irving, Life of Judge Jeffreys (London, 1898) . (R . J .

End of Article: SIR WILLIAM SCROGGS (c. 1623—1683)
[back]
SCROFULA (Lat. for " little sow "), or STJTMA
[next]
SCROLL

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.