Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:SEADIAH (or SAADIA; in Arabic Said) See also:BEN See also:JOSEPH (892-942) was See also:born in A.D . 892 at Dilaz in the Fayyum, whence he is often called al-Fayyumi . Although he is justly regarded as the greatest figure in the See also:literary and See also:political See also:history of See also:medieval Judaism, nothing certain is known of his See also:father or of his See also:early See also:life . Even the names of his teachers, generally recorded in the See also:case of Jewish scholars, are unknown, with the exception of a certain See also:Abu Kathir, who is himself obscure, and See also:left no writings . Saadia's literary See also:work is in fact the more remarkable since it suddenly appears at a See also:time when learning seemed to be dead both in See also:East and See also:West . Since the completion of the See also:Talmud very little of any literary importance, if we except certain midrashim, had been produced among the orthodox (Rabbanite) See also:Jews, although the Babylonian See also:schools at Sura and Pumbeditha continued to enjoy a somewhat intermittent prosperity . On the other See also:hand, learning was cultivated among the See also:Qaraites (q.v.; see also See also:HEBREW LITERATURE), a See also:sect of Jews who rejected the oral tradition, restricting their practice to the ordinances of scripture (migra) . It even seemed for a time as if conservative See also:heresy would prevail against progressive orthodoxy . In Saadia, however, the Rabbanites found a powerful See also:champion . Almost his first work, written at the See also:age of twenty-three, was an attack on the teaching of 'See also:Allan, the founder of Qaraism, who lived in the 8th See also:century . This, like most of Saadia's polemical writings, is no longer extant, but we can gather something of its contents from references in the author's other See also:works, and from the statements of his opponents . The controversy turned largely on the See also:calendar, which of course involved the See also:dates of festivals, and, since the Rabbanite calendar had come down from See also:ancient times, opened up the whole question of oral tradition and the authority of the Talmud . The conflict raged for many years, the See also:chief representative of the other See also:side being See also:Solomon See also:ben Yeruliam, a virulent if not successful opponent . It was not, however, the only controversy in which Saadia was engaged . In 922 Ben See also:Meir, a See also:person of importance in See also:Palestine, attempted to make alterations in the calendar, against the authority of the Babylonian schools . Saadia, who was then at Baghdad, warned him of his errors, refuted him in a work called Sefer ha-Mo'adim (the See also:Book of the Festivals), and finally procured his See also:excommunication by See also:David ben Zakkai, the See also:exilarch or See also:head of the Jewish community in Babylonia . The vigorous See also:action of Saadia seems to have brought him more prominently to the See also:notice of the exilarch, and that at a time of more than usual difficulty . The See also:honourable rivalry of the two schools of Sura and Pumbeditha, as the recognized authorities in matters of See also:religion, had degenerated into See also:jealousy and contention . The See also:Gaon (q.v.) or See also:President of Pumbeditha, taking See also:advantage of his own position and of a vacancy in the Gaonate of Sura, wished to abolish the See also:rival school . The exilarch, however, no doubt in recognition of his See also:recent services, appointed Saadia as Gaon of Sura, although it was against the usual See also:custom to appoint a person who was not a member of the school . Unfortunately this step did not See also:lead to See also:peace . Pumbeditha was jealous: the exilarch was weak and not very scrupulous . See also:Money had to be raised not only for the support of the schools, but also to buy See also:immunity from the See also:government, and Saadia was not the See also:man to connive at the corruption and oppression practised by the exilarch to raise it . Within two years matters had come to a crisis, and the exilarch dismissed Saadia, while Saadia retorted by declaring the exilarch deposed (930) . After three years of contention David succeeded in sufficiently bribing the new and needy See also:Caliph (Qahir, 932–934; see See also:CALIPHATE, § 19), who definitely forbade Saadia to See also:act as Gaon . The next four years, spent in retirement at Baghdad, were devoted to literary labours, which had no doubt been impossible during the previous years of trouble, and in fact it was at this time that most of Saadia's work was produced . Eventually a reconciliation was effected with David, favoured probably by the new Caliph Radi (934–940; see CALIPHATE, § 20), and Saadia was reinstated as Gaon of Sura in 938 . Under his See also:rule the school attained the highest reputation among the Jewish communities of East and West—but it was not of See also:long duration . His See also:health had been impaired by the strenuous life he had Ied, and in his later years he suffered from See also:melancholia . In 942 he died, two years after the exilarch . That some of the many works of Saadia, in spite of their merits, have been neglected, and others partly or entirely lost, is not as surprising as it appears at first sight . They were for the most See also:part written in Arabic, the See also:vernacular of the Jews in the East, so that after the break-up of the Babylonian schools in the See also:middle of the iith century, they would only be studied in See also:Spain, the new centre of Jewish learning, and in See also:Egypt . After the See also:expulsion of the Jews from Spain, Arabic practically ceased to be used by them for literary purposes, and in the See also:rest of See also:Europe (except perhaps in S . See also:Italy) it was never understood . Even some Hebrew works, of See also:great See also:interest to us now, must have been regarded at the time as of purely temporary value, such as e.g. the Sefer ha-M0'adim, fragments of which have only recently been recovered in the Geniza at See also:Cairo . The See also:anti-Qaraite works'. against 'Allan, See also:Ibn Sakawaihi and Ben Zap., the Kitab at-tamyiz, Kitab al-Shara'i, Kitdb al-'Ibbur (calendar) and a book on anthropomorphisms, all in Arabic, are now lost and only known from quotations . So also are the refutafion of the sceptic IJivi of See also:Balkh, and the Sefer `Orayoth (on prohibited See also:marriage, against-Qaraites) . Of the Sefer ha-MO`adim and Sefer ha-Galiti 1 An excellent See also:account of these is given by Poznanski in the Jewish Quarterly See also:Review, x . 238 if.(against David ben Zakkai), both in Hebrew, some fragments have been recovered recently . Closely allied to his polemical writings are his exegetical works . He translated most of the See also:Bible into Arabic, and commented on at least some of the books . The memorial edition2 contains (I) the version of the See also:Pentateuch (1893), (3) of See also:Isaiah (1896), (5) of See also:Job (1899), (6) of See also:Proverbs (1894), the last three with commentary . The See also:translation of the 5 Meghilloth, and of See also:Daniel (with commentary), usually ascribed to Saadia, is not really by him, but a genuine translation of Daniel, with commentary, exists in See also:manuscript . There is also ascribed to him a midrashic work on the See also:Decalogue . These all, no doubt, exhibit the defects necessary to the time in which their author lived . But it must be remembered that Saadia was a See also:pioneer . IIayyuj, the father of Hebrew See also:grammar, was not yet born, nor had the scientific and See also:comparative study of the See also:language begun . In this respect Saadia contributed little to the subject . Moreover, he shows a tendency, See also:common at all times and perhaps due to a particular theory of See also:inspiration, to get more out of the See also:text than it contains, and to interpret it in accordance with preconceived philosophical opinions . At the same time both See also:translations and commentaries are remarkable for their great learning, See also:sound sense and an honest endeavour to arrive at the true meaning of the See also:original . They were thus admirably suited for their purpose, which was, like the earlier Targums and the later work of See also:Moses Mendelssohn, to render the sacred text more intelligible to the faithful generally and to check the growth of See also:error . The grammatical work called Agron, a sort of See also:dictionary, is now lost, as are also the Kutub al-Lughah and perhaps other See also:treatises on Hebrew grammar . The explanation of the 70 (really 90) hapaxlegomena in the Bible is still extant, and a poem on the number of letters in the Bible . On Talmudic subjects again little is preserved beyond the Kitab al-Mawarith, which was published as vol. ix. of the U uvres completes, together with the See also:short See also:treatise in Hebrew on the 13 Middoth or canons of exegesis of R . See also:Ishmael and some Responsa mostly in Hebrew . The translation of the Mishna, the introduction to the Talmud and other works of the See also:kind are known only by repute . Of the Siddur or arrangement of the See also:liturgy by Saadia, a large part exists in a single manuscript at See also:Oxford, and several fragments have been recovered from the Cairo Geniza . Numerous other liturgical poems, or parts of them, have been obtained from the same source, and several have been published in See also:periodicals . His Azharoth, a poetical enumeration of the 613 precepts, in Hebrew, is included in vol. ix. of the tEuvres completes . His philosophical works are (I) a commentary on the Sefer Vezira, a mystical treatise ascribed to the See also:patriarch See also:Abraham, which, as the See also:foundation of the Kabbala, had great See also:influence on Jewish thought, and was the subject of numerous commentaries; (2) the Kitab al-Amandt w`al-I`tigadat (Book of Beliefs and Convictions), written in 933, called, in the Hebrew translation by See also:Judah ibn Tibbon, Emfinoth we-De`oth . Its See also:system is based on See also:reason in See also:conjunction with See also:revelation, the two being not opposed, but mutually complementary . It is thus concerned, as the See also:title implies, with the rational foundation of the faith, and deals with creation, the nature of See also:God, revelation, See also:free will, the soul, the future life and the See also:doctrine of the See also:Messiah . It shows a thorough knowledge of See also:Aristotle, on whom much of the See also:argument is based, and incidentally refutes the views of Christians, Moslems, Brahmins and sceptics such as IIivi . From its nature, however, the work, although of great interest and value, never had the same wider influence as that of Ibn Gabirol (q.v.) . The Arabic text was published by S . Landauer (See also:Leiden, i88o), the Hebrew version at See also:Constantinople in 1562 and frequently since . 2 (Euvres completes de R . Saadia, ed. by J . See also:Derenbourg (See also:Paris, 1893 ff.) . religionsphilosophische Lehre Saadja Gaons," in Baeumker's Beitrage, iv . 4 (See also:Munster, 1903) (containing a See also:German translation of part iii. of the Kitab al-Atria-nett) ; A . Harkavy, Studien, v . (St See also:Petersburg, 1891) (in Hebrew); S . Schechter, Saadyana (See also:Cambridge, 1903) (texts from the Geniza, repr. from the Jewish Quarterly Review) . (A . |
|
|
[back] SAMUEL SEABURY (1729-1796) |
[next] EARLS OF SEAFIELD |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.