Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
MAURUS SERVIUS HONORATUS (or See also:MARCUS) , See also:Roman grammarian and commentator on See also:Virgil, flourished at the end of the 4th.See also:century A.D . He is one of the interlocutors in the Saturnalia of See also:Macrobius, and allusions in that See also:work and a See also:letter from See also:Symmachus to Servius show that he was a See also:pagan . He was one of the most favourable examples of the Roman "See also:gram matici" and the most learned See also:man of his See also:time . He is chiefly known for his commentary on Virgil, which has come down to us in two distinct forms . The first is a comparatively See also:short commentary, definitely attributed to Servius in the superscription in the See also:MSS. and by other See also:evidence . A second class of MSS . (all going back to the loth or 11th century) presents a much See also:expanded commentary, in which the first is embedded; but these MSS. differ very much in the amount and See also:character of the additions they make to the See also:original, and none of them bears the name of Servius . The added See also:matter is undoubtedly See also:ancient, dating from a time but little removed from that of Servius, and is founded to a large extent on See also:historical and antiquarian literature which is now lost . The writer is See also:anonymous and probably a See also:Christian . A third class of MSS., written for the most See also:part in See also:Italy and of See also:late date, repeats the See also:text of the first class, with numerous interpolated scholia of quite See also:recent origin and little or no value . The real Servian commentary practically gives the only See also:complete extant edition of a classic author written before the destruction of the See also:empire . It is constructed very much on the principle of a See also:modern edition, and is partly founded on the extensive Virgilian literature of preceding times, much of which is known only from the fragments and facts preserved in the commentary . The notices of Virgil's text, though seldom or never authoritative in See also:face of the existing MSS., which go back to, or even beyond, the times of Servius, yet See also:supply valuable See also:information concerning the ancient recensions and textual See also:criticism of Virgil . In the grammatical See also:interpretation of his author's See also:language, Servius does not rise above the stiff and overwrought subtleties of his time; while his etymologies, as is natural, violate every See also:law of See also:sound and sense . As a See also:literary critic the shortcomings of Servius, judged by a modern See also:standard, are See also:great, but he shines in comparison with his contemporaries . In particular, he deserves See also:credit for setting his face against the prevalent allegorical methods of exposition . But the abiding value of his work lies in his preservation of facts in Roman See also:history, See also:religion, antiquities and language, which but for him might have perished . Not a little of the laborious erudition of See also:Varro and other ancient scholars has survived in his pages . Besides the Virgilian commentary, other See also:works of Servius are extant: a collection of notes on the See also:grammar (Ars) of Aelius Donatu"s; a See also:treatise on metrical endings (De finalibus); and a See also:tract on the different metres (De centum metris) . See also:Editions of the Virgilian commentary by G . See also:Fabricius (1551); P . See also:Daniel, who first published the enlarged commentary (16ao); and G . Thilo and H . See also:Hagen (1878-1902) .
The Essai sur Servius by E
.
See also: |
|
|
[back] SERVITUDE (Lat. servitus, from service, to serve) |
[next] SERVIUS TULLIUS |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.