See also:SIKH See also:WARS
, two See also:Indian See also:campaigns fought between the Sikhs and the See also:British, which resulted in the See also:conquest and See also:annexation of the See also:Punjab (see PUNJAB)
.
First See also:Sikh See also:War (1845-46).-The first Sikh War was brought about by the insubordination of the Sikh See also:army, which after the See also:death of Ranjit Singh became uncontrollable and on the 11th of See also:December 1845 crossed the See also:Sutlej, and virtually declared war upon the British
.
The British authorities had foreseen the outbreak, and had massed sufficient troops at Ferozepore, See also:Ludhiana and See also:Umballa to protect the frontier, but not to offer provocation
.
So See also:complete were the preparations for advance that on the 12th, the See also:day after the Sikhs crossed the Sutlej, See also:Sir See also:Hugh See also:Gough, the See also:commander-in-See also:chief, marched 16 m. with the Umballa force to Rajpura; on the 13th the See also:governor-See also:general, Sir See also:- HENRY
- HENRY (1129-1195)
- HENRY (c. 1108-1139)
- HENRY (c. 1174–1216)
- HENRY (Fr. Henri; Span. Enrique; Ger. Heinrich; Mid. H. Ger. Heinrich and Heimrich; O.H.G. Haimi- or Heimirih, i.e. " prince, or chief of the house," from O.H.G. heim, the Eng. home, and rih, Goth. reiks; compare Lat. rex " king "—" rich," therefore " mig
- HENRY, EDWARD LAMSON (1841– )
- HENRY, JAMES (1798-1876)
- HENRY, JOSEPH (1797-1878)
- HENRY, MATTHEW (1662-1714)
- HENRY, PATRICK (1736–1799)
- HENRY, PRINCE OF BATTENBERG (1858-1896)
- HENRY, ROBERT (1718-1790)
- HENRY, VICTOR (1850– )
- HENRY, WILLIAM (1795-1836)
Henry See also:Hardinge, declared war, and by the 18th the whole army had marched 15o m. to See also:Moodkee, in See also:- ORDER
- ORDER (through Fr. ordre, for earlier ordene, from Lat. ordo, ordinis, rank, service, arrangement; the ultimate source is generally taken to be the root seen in Lat. oriri, rise, arise, begin; cf. " origin ")
- ORDER, HOLY
order to protect Ferozepore from the Sikh attack
.
Wearied with their See also:long See also:march, the British troops were enjoying a See also:rest, when the See also:news came in that the Sikhs were advancing to See also:battle at four o'See also:clock in the afternoon
.
The British had some ro,000 men, and the Sikhs are estimated by some authorities as See also:low as ro,o0o See also:infantry with 2000 See also:cavalry and 22 guns
.
The battle opened with an See also:artillery See also:duel, in which the British guns, though inferior in See also:weight, soon silenced the enemy, the 3rd See also:Light Dragoons delivered a brilliant See also:charge, and the infantry drove the enemy from position after position with See also:great slaughter and the loss of seventeen guns
.
The victory was complete, but the fall of See also:night prevented it from being followed up, and caused some of the native regiments to See also:fire into each other in the confusion
.
After the battle of Moodkee Sir Henry Hardinge volunteered to serve as second in command under Sir Hugh Gough, a step which caused some confusion in the ensuing battle
.
At 4 A.M. on the 21st of December the British advanced shaose
.
-
shah
from Moodkee to attack the Sikh entrenched See also:camp
under the command of Lal Singh at See also:Ferozeshah, orders having been sent to Sir See also:John Littler, in command at Ferozepore, to join the See also:main British force
.
At 1r A.M. the British were in front of the Sikh position, but Sir John Littler, though on his way, had not yet arrived
.
Sir Hugh Gough wished to attack while there was plenty of daylight; but Sir Henry Hardinge re-asserted his See also:civil authority as governor-general, and forbade the attack until the junction with Littler was effected
.
The army then marched on to meet Littler and the battle did not begin until between 3.30 and 4 P.M
.
The engagement opened with an artillery duel, in which the British again failed to gain the mastery over the Sikhs
.
The infantry, therefore, advanced to the attack; but the Sikh muskets were as See also:good as the British, and fighting behind entrenchments they were a most formidable foe
.
Sir John Littler's attack was repulsed, the 62nd See also:regiment losing heavily in See also:officers and men, while the sepoys failed to support the See also:European regiments
.
But the Moodkee force, undaunted, stormed and captured the entrenchment, though the different brigades and regiments lost position and became mixed up together in the darkness
.
The army then passed the night on the Sikh position, while the Sikhs prowled See also:round keeping up an incessant fire
.
In the See also:morning the British found that they had captured seventy-three pieces of See also:cannon and were masters of the whole See also:- FIELD (a word common to many West German languages, cf. Ger. Feld, Dutch veld, possibly cognate with O.E. f olde, the earth, and ultimately with root of the Gr. irAaror, broad)
- FIELD, CYRUS WEST (1819-1892)
- FIELD, DAVID DUDLEY (18o5-1894)
- FIELD, EUGENE (1850-1895)
- FIELD, FREDERICK (18o1—1885)
- FIELD, HENRY MARTYN (1822-1907)
- FIELD, JOHN (1782—1837)
- FIELD, MARSHALL (183 1906)
- FIELD, NATHAN (1587—1633)
- FIELD, STEPHEN JOHNSON (1816-1899)
- FIELD, WILLIAM VENTRIS FIELD, BARON (1813-1907)
field; but at that moment a fresh Sikh army, under Tej Singh, came up to the assistance of the scattered forces of Lal Singh
.
The British were exhausted with their sleepless night, the native troops were shaken, and a determined attack by this fresh army might have won the day; but Tej Singh, after a See also:half-hearted attack, which was repulsed, marched away, whether from cowardice, incapacity or See also:treason, and See also:left the British masters of the position
.
After the battle of Ferozeshah the Sikhs retired behind the Sutlej, but See also:early in See also:January they again raided across the See also:river near Ludhiana, and Sir Harry See also:- SMITH
- SMITH, ADAM (1723–1790)
- SMITH, ALEXANDER (183o-1867)
- SMITH, ANDREW JACKSON (1815-1897)
- SMITH, CHARLES EMORY (1842–1908)
- SMITH, CHARLES FERGUSON (1807–1862)
- SMITH, CHARLOTTE (1749-1806)
- SMITH, COLVIN (1795—1875)
- SMITH, EDMUND KIRBY (1824-1893)
- SMITH, G
- SMITH, GEORGE (1789-1846)
- SMITH, GEORGE (184o-1876)
- SMITH, GEORGE ADAM (1856- )
- SMITH, GERRIT (1797–1874)
- SMITH, GOLDWIN (1823-191o)
- SMITH, HENRY BOYNTON (1815-1877)
- SMITH, HENRY JOHN STEPHEN (1826-1883)
- SMITH, HENRY PRESERVED (1847– )
- SMITH, JAMES (1775–1839)
- SMITH, JOHN (1579-1631)
- SMITH, JOHN RAPHAEL (1752–1812)
- SMITH, JOSEPH, JR
- SMITH, MORGAN LEWIS (1822–1874)
- SMITH, RICHARD BAIRD (1818-1861)
- SMITH, ROBERT (1689-1768)
- SMITH, SIR HENRY GEORGE WAKELYN
- SMITH, SIR THOMAS (1513-1577)
- SMITH, SIR WILLIAM (1813-1893)
- SMITH, SIR WILLIAM SIDNEY (1764-1840)
- SMITH, SYDNEY (1771-1845)
- SMITH, THOMAS SOUTHWOOD (1788-1861)
- SMITH, WILLIAM (1769-1839)
- SMITH, WILLIAM (c. 1730-1819)
- SMITH, WILLIAM (fl. 1596)
- SMITH, WILLIAM FARRAR (1824—1903)
- SMITH, WILLIAM HENRY (1808—1872)
- SMITH, WILLIAM HENRY (1825—1891)
- SMITH, WILLIAM ROBERTSON (1846-'894)
Smith was detached See also:Aliwal. to protect that See also:city
.
On the 21st of January he was
approaching Ludhiana when he found the Sikhs under Runjoor Singh in an entrenched position flanking his See also:line of march at Budhowal
.
Sir Harry Smith passed on without fighting a general See also:action, but suffered considerable loss in men and baggage
.
After receiving reinforcements Sir Harry again advanced from Ludhiana and attacked the Sikhs at Aliwal on the 28th of January
.
An attack upon the Sikh left near the See also:village of Aliwal gave Sir Harry the See also:key of the position, and a brilliant charge by the 16th Lancers, which See also:broke a Sikh square, completed their demoralization
.
The Sikhs fled in confusion, losing sixty-seven guns, and by this battle were expelled from the See also:south See also:side of the Sutlej
.
Ever since Ferozeshah Sir Hugh Gough had been waiting to receive reinforcements, and on the 7th of See also:February his See also:siege See also:train arrived, while on the following day Sir Harry sohraon
.
Smith's force returned to camp
.
On the loth of
February Sir Hugh attacked the Sikhs, who occupied a strong entrenched position in a See also:bend of the Sutlej
.
After two See also:hours' cannonading, the infantry attack commenced at 9 A.M
.
The advance of the first See also:brigade was not immediately successful, but the second brigade following on carried the entrenchments
.
The cavalry then charged down the Sikh lines from right to left and completed the victory
.
The Sikhs, with the river behind them, suffered terrible carnage, and are computed to have lost mo,000 men and 67 guns
.
The British losses throughout the See also:campaign were considerably heavier than was usual in Indian warfare; but this was partly due to the fact that the Sikhs were the best natural fighters in See also:India, and partly to the lack of See also:energy of the See also:Hindostani sepoys
.
After the battle of See also:Sobraon
the British advanced to See also:Lahore, where the treaty of Lahore was signed on the 11th of March
.
Second Sikh War (1848-7849).—For two years after the battle of Sobraon the Punjab remained a British See also:protectorate, with Sir Henry See also:- LAWRENCE
- LAWRENCE (LAURENTIUS, LORENZO), ST
- LAWRENCE, AMOS (1786—1852)
- LAWRENCE, AMOS ADAMS (1814–1886)
- LAWRENCE, GEORGE ALFRED (1827–1876)
- LAWRENCE, JOHN LAIRD MAIR LAWRENCE, 1ST BARON (1811-1879)
- LAWRENCE, SIR HENRY MONTGOMERY (1806–1857)
- LAWRENCE, SIR THOMAS (1769–1830)
- LAWRENCE, STRINGER (1697–1775)
Lawrence as See also:resident; but the Sikhs were unconvinced of their military inferiority, the Rani Jindan and her ministers were constantly intriguing to recover their See also:power, and a further trial of strength was inevitable
.
The outbreak came at See also:Multan, where on the 20th of See also:April 1848 the troops of the See also:Dewan Mulraj broke out and attacked two British officers, Mr Vans See also:Agnew and See also:Lieutenant See also:- ANDERSON
- ANDERSON, ADAM (1692—1765)
- ANDERSON, ALEXANDER (c. 1582-1620?)
- ANDERSON, ELIZABETH GARRETT (1836— )
- ANDERSON, JAMES (1662—1728)
- ANDERSON, JAMES (1739-1808)
- ANDERSON, JOHN (1726-1796)
- ANDERSON, MARY (1859– )
- ANDERSON, RICHARD HENRY (1821–1879)
- ANDERSON, ROBERT (1750–1830)
- ANDERSON, SIR EDMUND (1530-1605)
Anderson, eventually murdering them
.
On See also:hearing of the incident, Lieut
.
See also:Herbert See also:Edwardes, who was Sir Henry Lawrence's assistant in the Derajat, advanced upon Multan with a force of levies See also:drawn from the See also:Pathan tribes of the frontier; but he was not strong enough to do more than keep the enemy in check until Multan was invested by a Bombay See also:column under General Whish
.
In the meantime Edwardes wished for an immediate British advance upon Multan; but See also:Lord Gough, as he had now become, decided on a See also:cold See also:season campaign, on the ground that, if the Sikh See also:government at Lahore joined in the rising, the British would require all their available strength to suppress it
.
Multan was invested on the 18th of See also:August by General Whish in See also:conjunction with the Sikh general Shere Singh; but during the course of the siege Shere Singh deserted and joined the rebels, thus turning the rising into a See also:national war
.
The siege of Multan was temporarily abandoned, but was resumed in See also:November, when Lord Gough's main advance had begun, and Mulraj surrendered on the 22nd of January
.
In the meantime Lord Gough had collected his army and stores, and on the 9th of November crossed the Sutlej
.
On the 22nd of November there was a cavalry skirmish at Ramnagar, in which General See also:Cureton and See also:Colonel See also:Havelock were
killed
.
For a See also:month after this Lord Gough remained C611llan- inactive, waiting to be reinforced by General Whish from Multan; but at last he decided to advance without General Whish, and fought the battle of See also:Chillianwalla on the 13th of January 1849
.
Lord Gough had intended to encamp for the night; but the Sikh guns opening fire revealed the fact that their army had advanced out of its intrenchments, and Lord Gough decided to seize the opportunity and attack at once
.
An See also:hour's artillery duel showed that the Sikhs had the See also:advantage both in position and guns, and the infantry advance commenced at three o'clock in the afternoon
.
The battle resulted in great loss to the European regiments, the 24th losing all its officers in a few minutes, while the See also:total loss in killed and wounded amounted to 2338; but when darkness See also:fell the British were in See also:possession of the whole of the Sikh line
.
Lord Gough subsequently retired to the village of Chillianwalla, and the Sikhs returned and carried off their guns
.
After the battle Lord Gough received an See also:ovation from his troops, but his losses were thought excessive by the public in See also:England and the See also:directors of the See also:East India See also:Company, and Sir See also:Charles See also:Napier was appointed to supersede him
.
Before, however, the latter had See also:- TIME (0. Eng. Lima, cf. Icel. timi, Swed. timme, hour, Dan. time; from the root also seen in " tide," properly the time of between the flow and ebb of the sea, cf. O. Eng. getidan, to happen, " even-tide," &c.; it is not directly related to Lat. tempus)
- TIME, MEASUREMENT OF
- TIME, STANDARD
time to reach India, the crowning victory of See also:Gujrat had been fought and won
.
After the fall of Multan General Whish marched to join Lord Gough, and the junction of the two armies was effected on the Gujrat
.
18th of February
.
In the meantime the Sikhs had
withdrawn from their strong intrenchments at Russool, owing to want of provisions, and marched to Gujrat, which Lord Gough considered a favourable position for attacking them
.
By a See also:series of See also:short See also:marches he prepared the way for his " last and best battle." In this engagement, for the first time in either of the Sikh See also:wars, the British had the superiority in artillery, in addition to a picked force of 24,000 men
.
The battle began on the morning of the 21st of February with two and a half hours' artillery fire, which was overwhelmingly in favour of the British
.
At 11.30 A.M
.
Lord Gough ordered a general advance covered by the artillery; and an hour and a half later the British were in possession of the See also:town of Gujrat, of the Sikh camp, and of the enemy's artillery and baggage, and the cavalry were in full pursuit on both flanks
.
In this battle the British only lost 96 killed and 700 wounded, while the Sikh loss was enormous, inaddition to 67 guns
.
This decisive victory ended the war
.
On the 12th of March the Sikh leaders surrendered at discretion, and the Punjab was annexed to British India
.
See Sir Charles Gough and A
.
D
.
Innes, The Sikhs and the Sikh Wars (1897) ; and R
.
S
.
Rait
.
See also:Life and Campaigns of See also:Viscount Gough
(1903)
.
End of Article: