Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:SIN (O. Eng. syn: a See also:common See also:Teutonic word, cf. Dutch zonde, Ger. Siinde)
, a See also:general See also:term for wickedness or a wicked See also:act
.
As See also:psychology recognizes a distinction of See also:pleasure and See also:pain, and See also:metaphysics of See also:good and evil, so morality assumes the difference between right and wrong in See also:action, good and See also:bad in See also:character; but the distinction in psychology and metaphysics applies to. what is, the difference in morality is based on a See also:judgment of what is by what ought to be
.
When the act or the character does not correspond with the See also:standard, this want of See also:correspondence may in different relations be variously described
.
In relation to human society, and the rules it imposes on its members, action that ought not to be done is See also:crime; a See also:habit which is injurious to a See also:man's own moral nature, especially if it involves evil See also:physical consequences, is described as See also:vice
.
If man is thought of as under the authority of See also:God, any transgression of or want of conformity to the See also:law of God is defined as See also:sin
.
Crime is a legal, vice a moral, and sin a religious term
.
Sin may be distinguished from See also:guilt as follows: guilt is the liability to See also:penalty, that is, to the suffering conceived not as the natural consequence, but as the expression of the divine displeasure, which sin as a See also:breach of divine law involves
.
Sin is a term applied not only to actions, but also to dispositions and motives
.
In the theological phrase See also:original sin it means the inherited tendency to do wrong
.
There have been two See also:great controversies in the See also:Christian See also: Pelagius him-self desired to avoid controversy, and with See also:mental reservations denied these statements of his friend; but he did not See also:escape suspicion, and his condemnation in 418 was the See also:signal for a See also:literary polemic, which lasted ten years, and in which See also:Julian of Eklanum was the most brilliant but reckless combatant on the See also:side of Pelagius . In the See also:East the freedom of the will was so insisted on, that one may regard See also:Greek See also:theology as essentially Pelagian . In the See also:West there was unanimity only on three points: the See also:necessity of See also:baptism for the remission of sins, the See also:inheritance of sin as a result of Adam's fall, and the indispensableness of tte divine See also:grace in the attainment of goodness . Pelagius insisted that sin was an act, not a See also:state, an abuse of the freedom of the will, and that each man was responsible and liable to See also:punishment only for his own acts . This extreme See also:individualism he qualified only in two respects, he admitted a principle of See also:imitation, the See also:influence of bad example, habit and customs, may be inherited and communicated . Divine grace is not necessary for human virtue . It is granted only according to act, and merits as the law in enlightening, warning or promising See also:reward . To this See also:Augustine opposed the view that Adam's sin is, as its penalty, transmitted to all his descendants, both as guilt and as weakness . The trans-See also:mission is not by imitation, but by See also:propagation . The essence and mode of operation of original sin is concupiscence, which, as of the See also:devil, subjects man in his natural state to the devil's dominion . Even infants are involved in Adam's condemnation . Sin is a necessity in each individual, and there is a See also:total corruption of man's nature, physically as well as morally . Into the details of the controversy it is not necessary to go any further . While the authority of Augustine received, See also:lip-See also:homage, the See also:doctrine of the See also:Roman See also:Catholic Church became more Pelagian, and in the Tridentine decrees and still more in the See also:ethics of the See also:Jesuits, in spite of the opposition of See also:Jansenism, Pelagianism at last triumphed . The See also:Reformation restored the teaching of Augustine; in Calvinism especially the See also:sovereignty of the divine and the See also:impotence of the human will were emphasized; and against this exaggeration Arminianism was a protest . Of the five articles of the Remonstrance of 1610 only two now concern us: the possibility of resisting the grace which is indispensable to salvation, and the possibility of falling away from grace even after See also:conversion . The Arminian See also:system was an See also:attempt to modify the Calvinistic theory in a moral See also:interest, so as to maintain human responsibility, good and See also:ill See also:desert; but to this moral interest the system sacrificed the religious interest in the sufficiency and the sovereignty of divine grace . Its adherents necessarily laid emphasis on human freedom . As regards original sin they taught that the inclinations to evil inherited from Adam are not themselves blameworthy, and only consent to them involves real guilt . It is not just, however, to Arminian-ism to identify it with Pelagianism, as it does strive to make clear man's need of divine grace to overcome sin and reach holiness . In the Evangelical Revival of the 18th century Arminianism was represented by See also:Wesley, and Calvinism by See also:Whitefield . |
|
|
[back] SIN |
[next] SINAI |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.