|
DUKE OF See also: protector of See also: England, See also: born about 15o6, was the eldest surviving son of See also: Sir See also: John Seymour of
See also: Wolf See also: Hall,
See also: Wiltshire, by his wife See also: Margaret, eldest daughter of Sir See also: Henry Wentworth of Nettlested,
See also: Suffolk
.
The Seymours claimed descent from a companion of See also: William the Conqueror, who took his name from St Maur-sur-
See also: Loire in See also: Touraine; and the protector's See also: mother was really descended from See also: Edward III
.
His See also: father was knighted by Henry VII. for his services against the Cornish rebels at See also: Blackheath in 1497, was See also: present at the two interviews between Henry VIII. and See also: Francis I. in 1520 and 1532, and died on the 21st of See also: December 1536
.
Edward was " enfant d'honneur " to Mary Tudor at her See also: marriage with See also: Louis XII. in 1514, served in Suffolk's
See also: campaign in See also: France in 1523, being knighted by the duke at Roze on the 1st of See also: November, and accompanied See also: Wolsey on his See also: embassy to France in 1527
.
Appointed esquire of the See also: body to Henry VIII. in 1529, he See also: grew in favour with the See also: king, who visited his
See also: manor at Elvetham in Hampshire in See also: October 1535• On the 5th of See also: June 1536, a week after his See also: sister Jane's marriage to Henry, he was created Viscount See also: Beauchamp of Hache in See also: Somerset, and a fortnight after Edward VI.'s See also: birth in October 1537, he was raised to the earldom of Hertford
.
See also: Queen Jane's See also: death was a See also: blow to his prospects, and in 1538 he was described as being " See also: young and wise " but of " small power." He continued, however, to rise in See also: political importance
.
In 1541, during Henry's See also: absence in the See also: north, Hertford, See also: Cranmer and Audley had the chief management of affairs in See also: London; in See also: September 1542 he was appointed See also: warden of the Scottish See also: marches, and a few months later See also: lord high See also: admiral, a See also: post which he almost immediately relinquished in favour of the future duke of See also: Northumberland (q.v.)
.
In See also: March 1544 he was made
See also: lieutenant-general of the north and instructed to punish the Scots for their repudiation of the treaty of marriage between See also: Prince Edward and the infant Mary Queen of Scots
.
He landed at See also: Leith in May, captured and pillaged See also: Edinburgh, and returned a See also: month later
.
In See also: July he was appointed lieutenant of the See also: realm under the queen See also: regent during Henry's absence at See also: Boulogne, but in See also: August he joined the king and was present at the surrender of the See also: town
.
In the autumn he was one of the commissioners sent to See also: Flanders to keep See also: Charles V. to the terms of his treaty with England, and in
See also: January 1545 he was placed in command at Boulogne, where on the 26th he brilliantly repelled an attempt of Marshal de Biez to recapture the town
.
In May he was once more appointed lieutenant-general in the north to avenge the Scottish victory at See also: Ancrum See also: Moor; this he did by a savage foray
into Scotland in September
.
In March 1 546 he was sent back to Boulogne to supersede Surrey, whose command had not been a success; and in June he was engaged in negotiations forSee also: peace with France and for the delimitation of the See also: English conquests
.
From October to the end of Henry's reign he was in attendance on the king, engaged in that unrecorded struggle for predominance which was to determine the complexion of the See also: government during the coming minority
.
See also: Personal, political and religious rivalry separated him and See also: Lisle from the Howards, and Surrey's hasty temper precipitated his own and his father's ruin
.
They could not acquiesce in the Imperial ambassador's verdict that Hertford and Lisle were the only noblemen of See also: fit age and capacity to carry on the government; and Surrey's attempt to secure the predominance of his See also: family led to his own execution and to his father's imprisonment in the Tower
.
Their overthrow had barely been accomplished when Henry VIII. died on the 28th of January 1547
.
Preparations had already been made for a further advance in the ecclesiastical See also: reformation and for a renewal of the design upon Scotland; and the new government to some extent proceeded on the lines which Chapuys anticipated that Henry VIII. would have followed had he lived
.
He had no statutory power to appoint a protector, but in the council of regency which he nominated Hertford and Lisle enjoyed a decisive preponderance; and the council at its first meeting after Henry's death determined to follow precedent and appoint a protector
.
Hertford was their only possible choice; he represented the predominant party, he was Edward VI.'s nearest relative, he was See also: senior to Lisle in the See also: peerage and See also: superior to him in experience
.
Seven See also: weeks later, however, after Lord-Chancellor Wriothesley, the leading Catholic, had been deprived of office Hertford, who had been made duke of Somerset, succeeded in emancipating himself from the trammels originally imposed on him as protector; and he became king in everything but name and See also: prestige
.
His ideas were in striking contrast with those of most Tudor statesmen, and he used his authority to divest the government of that apparatus of See also: absolutism which See also: Thomas
See also: Cromwell had perfected
.
He had generous popular sympathies and was by nature averse from coercion
.
" What is the See also: matter, then
?
" wrote See also: Paget in the midst of the commotions of 1549, " By my faith, sir,
.
. . liberty, liberty
.
And your See also: grace would have too much gentleness." In his first parliament, which met in November 1547, he procured the repeal of all the See also: heresy See also: laws and nearly all the treason laws passed since Edward III
.
Even with regard to Scotland he had protested against his instructions of 1544, and now ignored the claim to See also: suzerainty which Henry VIII. had revived, seeking to win over the Scots by those promises of autonomy, See also: free See also: trade, and equal privileges with England, which many years later eventually reconciled them to union
.
But the Scots were not thus to be won in 1547: " What would you say," asked one, " if your lad were a lass, and our lass were a lad
?
" and Scottish sentiment backed by See also: Roman Catholic influence and by French intrigues, See also: money and men, proved too strong for Somerset's amiable invitations
.
The Scots turned a See also: deaf ear to his persuasions; the protector led another army into Scotland in September 1547, and won the See also: battle of Pinkie (See also: Sept. ro)
.
He trusted to the garrisons he established throughout the Lowlands to See also: wear down Scottish opposition; but their pressure was soon weakened by troubles in England and abroad, and Mary was transported to France to wed Francis II. in 1557
.
Somerset apparently thought that the religious question could be settled by public discussion, and throughout 1547 and 1548 England went as it pleased so far as See also: church services were concerned; all sorts of experiments were tried, and the country was involved in a
See also: grand theological debate, in which See also: Protestant refugees from abroad hastened to join
.
The result convinced the protector that the government must prescribe one See also: uniform See also: order which all should be persuaded or constrained to obey; but the first See also: Book of See also: Common Prayer, which was imposed by the first See also: Act of Uniformity in 1549, was a studious compromise between the new and the old learning, very different from theaggressive Protestantism of the second See also: hook imposed after Somerset had been removed, in 1552
.
The Catholic risings in the west in 1549 added to Somerset's difficulties, but were not the cause of his fall
.
The factious and treasonable conduct of his See also: brother, the lord high admiral, in whose execution (March 20, 1549) the protector weakly acquiesced, also impaired his authority; but the See also: main cause of his ruin was the divergence between him and the majority of the council over the questions of constitutional liberty and enclosures of the See also: commons
.
The majority scouted Somerset's notions of liberty and deeply resented his championship of the poor against greedy landlords and capitalists . His efforts to check enclosures by means of See also: parliamentary legislation, royal proclamations, and commissions of inquiry were openly resisted or secretly foiled, and the popular revolts which their failure provoked cut the ground from Somerset's feet
.
He was divided in mind between his sympathy with the rebels and his duty to maintain See also: law and order
.
France, which was bent on ruining the protector's schemes in Scotland and on recovering Boulogne, seized the opportunity to declare war on August the 8th; and the outlying forts in the Boulonnais See also: fell into their hands, while the Scots captured See also: Haddington
.
These misfortunes gave a handle to Somerset's enemies
.
See also: Warwick combined on the same temporary platform Catholics who resented the Book of Common Prayer, Protestants who thought Somerset's mildness paltering with See also: God's truth, and the wealthy classes as a whole
.
In September he concerted See also: measures with the ex-lord-chancellor Wriothesley; and in October, after a vain effort to rouse the masses in his favour, Somerset was deprived of the See also: protectorate and sent to the Tower
.
But the hostile coalition broke up as soon as it had to See also: frame a constructive policy; Warwick jockeyed the Catholics out of the council and prepared to advance along Protestant lines
.
He could hardly combine proscription of the Catholics with that of Somerset, and the duke was released in See also: February 1550
.
For a See also: time the rivals seemed to agree, and Warwick's son married Somerset's daughter
.
But growing discontent with Warwick made Somerset too dangerous
.
In October 1551, after Warwick had been created duke of Northumberland, Somerset was sent to the Tower on an exaggerated See also: charge of treason, which broke down at his trial
.
He was, however, as a sort of compromise, condemned on a charge of felony for having sought to effect a change of government . Few expected that theSee also: sentence would be carried out, and apparently Northumberland found it necessary to forge an instruction from Edward VI. to that effect
.
Somerset was executed on the 22nd of January 1552, dying with exemplary See also: patience and fortitude
.
His eldest son by his second wife was re-created See also: earl of Hertford by See also: Elizabeth, and his
See also: great-See also: grandson William was restored as 2nd duke of Somerset in 166o
.
His See also: children by his first wife had been disinherited owing to the jealousy of his second; but their descendants came into the titles and See also: property when the younger See also: line died out in 1750
.
See A
.
F
.
See also: Pollard's England Under Protector Somerset (190o; full bibliography, pp
.
327-330), also his article in Dict
.
Nat
.
Biog. and vol. vi. of Political See also: History of England (191o)
.
(A
.
F . |
|
|
[back] DUKE OF EDMUND BEAUFORT SOMERSET (c. 1404–1455) |
[next] LORD ROBERT EDWARD HENRY SOMERSET (1776-1842) |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.