|
ROBERT CARR See also: birth is unrecorded, was a younger son of See also: Sir See also: Thomas
See also: Ker of Ferniehurst by his second wife, See also: Janet, See also: sister of Sir Walter See also: Scott of See also: Buccleuch
.
He accompanied See also: James I. as page to
See also: England, but being then discharged from the royal service, sought for a See also: time to make his See also: fortune in See also: France
.
Returning to England he happened to break his arm at a tilting match, at which James was See also: present, and was recognized by the See also: king
.
Entirely devoid of all high intellectual qualities, Carr was endowed with
See also: good looks, excellent See also: spirits, and considerable See also: personal accomplishments
.
These advantages were sufficient for James, who knighted the See also: young See also: man and at once took him into favour
.
In 1607 an opportunity enabled the king to confer upon him a more substantial mark of his affection
.
Sir W
.
Raleigh had through his attainder forfeited his See also: life-See also: interest in the See also: manor of See also: Sherborne, but he had previously executed a See also: conveyance by which the See also: property was to pass on his deatn to his
eldest son
.
This document was, unfortunately, rendered worth-less by a flaw which gave the king eventual possession of the property
.
Acting on See also: Salisbury's See also: suggestion, James resolved to confer the manor on Carr
.
The See also: case was argued at See also: law, and See also: judgment was in 1609 given for the See also: Crown
.
Lady Raleigh received some compensation, apparently inadequate, and Carr at once entered on possession
.
His influence was already such that in 16ro he persuaded the king to dissolve the parliament, which had shown signs of attacking the Scottish favourites . On the 25th ofSee also: March r611 he was created Viscount Rochester, and subsequently a privy councillor, while on
See also: Lord Salisbury's See also: death in 1612 he began to See also: act as the king's secretary
.
On the 3rd of See also: November 1613 he was advanced to the earldom of See also: Somerset, on the 23rd of See also: December was appointed treasurer of Scotland, and in 1614 lord See also: chamberlain
.
He supported the
See also: earl of Northampton and the See also: Spanish party in opposition to the old tried advisers of the king, such as Lord-Chancellor See also: Ellesmere, who were endeavouring to maintain the union with the Protestants abroad, and who now in 1614 pushed forward another See also: candidate for the king's favour
.
Somerset, whose See also: head was turned by the sudden rise to power and influence, became jealous and peevish, and feeling his position insecure, obtained in 1615 from the king a full See also: pardon, to which, however, the chancellor refused to put the See also: Great See also: Seal
.
He still, however, retained the king's favour, and might possibly have remained in power for some time longer but for the See also: discovery of the See also: murder of Sir Thomas See also: Overbury
.
Before 16o9, while still only Sir Robert Carr, Somerset had begun an intrigue with Lady See also: Essex
.
Supported by the king, the latter obtained a decree of nullity of See also: marriage against Lord Essex in See also: September 1613, and in December she married the earl of Somerset
.
Ten days before the See also: court gave judgment, Sir Thomas Overbury, who apparently knew facts concerning Lady Essex which would have been fatal to her success, and had been imprisoned in the Tower, was poisoned
.
No idea seems to have been entertained at the time that Lady Essex and her future See also: husband were implicated
.
The See also: crime, however, was not disclosed till September 16 5
.
See also: Coke and See also: Bacon were set to unravel the
See also: plot
.
After four of the See also: principal agents had been convicted and punished, the earl and countess were brought to trial
.
The latter confessed, and of her See also: guilt there can be no doubt
.
Somerset's share is far more difficult to discover, and probably will never be fully known
.
The evidence against him rested on See also: mere presumption, and he consistently declared himself innocent
.
Probabilities are on the whole in favour of the hypothesis that he was not more than an See also: accessory after the fact
.
James, who had been threatened by Somerset with damaging disclosures, let matters take their course, and both earl and countess were found guilty
.
The See also: sentence was not carried into effect against either See also: culprit
.
The countess was pardoned immediately, but both remained in the Tower till See also: January 1622
.
The earl appears to have refused to buy forgiveness by concessions, and it was not till 1624 that he obtained his pardon
.
He only once more emerged into public view when in 163o he was prosecuted in the See also: Star Chamber for communicating a paper of Sir Robert See also: Dudley's to the earl of Clare, recommending the establishment of arbitrary See also: government
.
He died in See also: July 1645, leaving one daughter, See also: Anne, the See also: sole issue of his See also: ill-fated marriage, afterwards wife of the 1st duke of See also: Bedford
.
See the article by S
.
R . See also: Gardiner in See also: Diet
.
Nat
.
Biog., with authorities there cited, and the same author's See also: History of England; See also: State Trials I I
.
; Life and Letters of Bacon, ed. by See also: Spedding; Studies in Eng
.
Hirt., by See also: Gairdner and Spedding
.
|
|
|
[back] LORD ROBERT EDWARD HENRY SOMERSET (1776-1842) |
[next] SOMERSETSHIRE |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.