Online Encyclopedia

STEPHEN BAR

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V25, Page 887 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

STEPHEN BAR  SUDHAIL$, a Syrian mystical writer, who flourished about the end of the 5th century A.D . The earlier
See also:
part of his career was passed at Edessa, of which he may have been a native.' He afterwards removed to Jerusalem, where he lived as a monk, and endeavoured to make converts to his
See also:
peculiar doctrines, both by teaching among the community there and by letters to his former friends at Edessa . He was the author of commentaries on the Bible and other theological
See also:
works . Two of his eminent contemporaries, the Monophysites Jacob of Serugh (451–521) and Philoxenus of Mabbogh (d . 523), wrote letters in condemnation of his teaching . His two main theses which they attacked were (1) the limited duration of the future punishment of sinners, (2) the pantheistic
See also:
doctrine that " all nature is consubstantial with the Divine essence "—that the whole universe has emanated from
See also:
God, and will in the end return to and be absorbed in him . The fame of Stephen as a writer rests on his identification with the author of a
See also:
treatise which survives in a single
See also:
Syriac MS . (Brit . M us . Add .
See also:
MSS . 7189, written mainly in the 13th century), "The
See also:
book of Hierotheus on the hidden mysteries of the house of God." The
See also:
work claims to have been composed in the 1st century A.D. by a certain Hierotheus who was the
See also:
disciple of St Paul and the teacher of Dionysius the Areopagite .

But, like the works which pass under the name of Dionysius, it is undoubtedly pseudonymous, and most Syriac writers who mention it attribute it to Stephen . An interesting discussion and

See also:
summary of the book have been given by A . L . Frothingham (Stephen bar Sudhaili,
See also:
Leiden, 1886), but the text is still (1910) unpublished . From Frothingham's analysis we learn that the work consists of five books; after briefly describing the origin of the
See also:
world by emanation from the Supreme Good it is mainly occupied with the description of the stages by which the mind returns to union with God, who finally becomes " all in all." " To describe the contents in a few words: at the beginning we find the statement regarding absolute existence, and the emanation from primordial essence of the spiritual and material universes: then comes, what occupies almost the entire work, the experience of ' He is described as " Stephen the Edessene " in the 8th-century MS. which contains the letter of Philoxenus to Abraham and
See also:
Orestes . the mind in search of perfection during this
See also:
life . Finally comes the description of the various phases of existence as the mind rises into
See also:
complete union with, and ultimate absorption into, the
See also:
primitive essence . The keynote to the experience of the mind is its absolute identification with Christ; but the son finally resigns the
See also:
kingdom unto the
See also:
Father, and all distinct existence comes to an end, being lost in the
See also:
chaos of the Good " (Frothingham, 92) . One of the most curious features of the work is the misguided skill with which the language of the Bible is pressed into the service of pantheistic
See also:
speculation . In this and other respects the book harmonizes well with the picture of Stephen's teaching afforded by the letter of Philoxenus to the Edessene priests Abraham and Orestes (Frothing-
See also:
ham, pp . 28-48) . The Book of Hierotheus is probably an
See also:
original Syriac work, and not translated from Greek .

Its relation to the Pseudo-Dionysian literature is a difficult question; probably Frothingham (p . 83) goes too far in suggesting that it was

prior to all the pseudo-Dionysian writings (cf . Ryssel in Zeitschrift fur Kirchengeschichte) . The unique MS. in which the book of Hierotheus survives furnishes along with its text the commentary made upon it by
See also:
Theodosius, patriarch of
See also:
Antioch (887-896), who appears to have sympathized with its teaching . A rearrangement and abridgment of the work was made by the
See also:
great Monophysite author Barhebraeus (1226-1286), who expunged or garbled much of its unorthodox teaching . It is interesting to note that the identical copy which he used is the MS. which now survives in the
See also:
British Museum . (N .

End of Article: STEPHEN BAR
[back]
STEPHEN (ISTVAN) BATHORY (1533-1586)
[next]
STEPHEN I

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.