Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:STOLE (See also:Lat. stela and orarium, Fr. etole, It. stola, Sp. estola, Ger. Stela)
, a liturgical vestment of the See also:Catholic See also: During the middle ages there were, however, deviations of See also:custom: e.g. priests, even according to the See also:Roman use, did not wear the stole crossed over the alb, though this had been prescribed for See also:Spain so early as 675 by the 4th See also:canon of the See also:council of See also:Braga . In See also:southern See also:Italy, probably under See also:Greek See also:influence, and in See also:Milan (where the custom still survives) the diaconal stole was put on over the See also:dalmatic . Similarly in Spain and See also:Gaul, anterior to the Carolingian age, the stole was worn by deacons over the See also:alba or See also:outer See also:tunic . According to the Roman use the stole is now only worn at See also:mass, in administering the sacraments and sacramentalia., when touching the See also:Host, &c., but not e.g. at See also:solemn offices or in processions . In the middle ages, however, it was the custom to wear it at nearly all liturgical functions . In the 9th and loth century it was even made obligatory, by the decrees of the synods of See also:Mainz (813) and Tribur (895), on priests throughout the See also:Frank See also:Empire to wear it at all times, especially when travelling . Else-where it was the custom to wear it always, at least for a See also:year after ordination . The custom of giving the stole to priests and deacons at their ordination is of See also:great antiquity . So far as Spain is concerned there is evidence for it in the decrees of the 4th council of See also:Toledo (633), and for See also:Rome that of the 8th century Ordo of See also:Mabillon . The present practice—according to which the See also:bishop See also:lays the stole over the left shoulder of the See also:deacon, and crosses it over the breast of the See also:priest—is already found in the pontificals of the loth century . There is no evidence to show when the stole was first used in the Western Church . In Gaul and Spain we already find it in the 6th century; our first evidence for its use in Rome is of the 8th century, which is however, of course, no See also:proof that it was not in use earlier . The See also:mosaic in the See also:apse of S . Vitale at See also:Ravenna, which has been taken to prove the existence of the stole in the first See also:half of the 6th century, has no value as evidence,, as the See also:lower See also:part of the figure of Bishop Ecclesius (see See also:VESTMENTS, fig . 2) was renewed in the 12th century . It is noteworthy that at Rome, until the loth century, the stole was worn by the lower orders of the See also:clergy also . In the Eastern Church the stole (Gr. wpaptov, the diaconal stole, isrtrpaail)aov, the priestly stole; Slay. orar and epitrachil; See also:Arm. urar; Syr. uroro; See also:Nest. urara; Copt. orarion and patrashil) makes its See also:appearance very early . The stole of the deacons is mentioned so early as the 4th and 5th centuries, the first instance being in the 22nd canon of the council of See also:Laodicea, where it is mentioned specifically as the insignia of a deacon . Of a priestly stole we hear for the first See also:time in the Theoria mystica (8th century) . In the Maronite, Syrian, and Nestorian Churches subdeacons also wear the stole, and among the See also:Maronites the lectors as well . There is very little evidence as to the character of the stole in the See also:ancient Church of the See also:East . The stole of priests and bishops, decorated with crosses, was worn originally in all See also:rites as in the See also:West, i.e. See also:hanging in two loose bands over the breast; at the present day, according to the Greek rite, the two bands arefirmly sewn together, while in the Armenian, Syrian and Coptic rites they have even been amalgamated into a single broad strip with an opening at the See also:top for the See also:head . Its ancient form has. been retained only by the See also:Nestorians, who wear it crossed over the breast . The diaconal stole was and continues to be worn usually hanging over the left shoulder, the ends falling straight down before and behind . Only the See also:Copts and Armenians wear it scarf-wise . Originally the diaconal stole would seem to have been a narrow strip of folded See also:linen, and it appears in the pictures of the 9th century as a narrow See also:band ornamented with crosses . Later, it was often the See also:habit to embroider on Greek diaconal stoles the words AFIOE AFIOL AFIOE . The question of the origin of the stole admits of no conclusive See also:answer . It is certainly not derived from the See also:antique stola, called tunica, as was formerly always held, nor yet from the See also:prayer blanket (tallith) of the See also:Jews . More careful investigation, moreover, throws very considerable doubt on the possibility of the derivation of the priest's stole from the ancient neck-See also:cloth (orarium) and of the diaconal stole from a napkin used in the See also:liturgy . A more See also:reason-able theory seems to be that which suggests that, in the East, the stole was originally introduced as that which it was when it first appears in the 22nd canon of Laodicea, viz. a See also:special liturgical See also:mark of distinction for deacons, which in course of time was extended to all the higher orders . In all See also:probability it was introduced straight from the East into Spain and Gaul . Rome also probably imported it from the same See also:quarter, but weakened its significance by making it a cloth sanctified by being laid on the Confessio ot St See also:Peter, the bestowal of which at ordination was intended to See also:express the fact that See also:elevation to clerical See also:office in the Roman Church was a See also:grace bestowed de benedictione S . Petri and that the ordinands were undertaking with their See also:consecration the See also:duty of serving St Peter, i.e. the Roman Church . Wherever the See also:Reformation was introduced the stole was done away with, even when See also:chasuble, alb and See also:cope were retained; the reason being that it was the See also:ensign of the See also:major orders, which in the Catholic sense were rejected by the Reformers.' (J . |
|
|
[back] GRAF ZU FRIEDRICH LEOPOLD STOLBERG (1750-1819) |
[next] STOLEN GOODS |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.