|
STONEHENGE ( See also: group of huge See also: standing stones (see See also: STONE MONUMENTS), situated on
See also: Salisbury Plain, See also: Wiltshire, See also: England, about 7 M
.
N. of Salisbury
.
Until comparatively See also: recent times the surrounding See also: district was in a See also: state of nature with merely a thin coating of See also: turf interspersed with tufts of heath and dwarf thistles, but See also: bare of trees and shrubs and altogether devoid of the See also: works of See also: man, with the exception of a series of prehistoric barrows of the See also: Bronze Age which, singly and in See also: groups, studded the landscape
.
It is safe to say that no prehistoric monument in See also: Great Britain has given rise to more See also: speculation as to its origin, date and purpose; and although the few hoary stones still extant are but a small portion of the See also: original structure they are still sufficiently imposing to excite the wonder of the passing traveller, and mysterious enough to See also: puzzle the See also: antiquary
.
Stonehenge was first mentioned by See also: Nennius in the 9th century, who asserts that it was erected in See also: commemoration of the 400 nobles who were treacherously slain near the spot by Hengist in 472
.
A similar account of its origin is given in the triads of the Welsh bards, where its erection is attributed to Aurelius Ambrosius, the successor of See also: Vortigern
.
This was regarded as a miraculous feat brought about by the incantations of the magician Merlin, who caused a great stone circle in See also: Ireland (said to have been previously carried thither out of See also: Africa by giants) to be trans-ported to Salisbury Plain, where, at Merlin's " word of power," all the stones moved into their proper places
.
On the other See also: hand, the Welsh See also: bard See also: Aneurin states that Stonehenge existed before the See also: time of Aurelius, whose title of Ambrosius may, as suggested by See also: Davies, have been derived from Stonehenge
.
Geoffrey of See also: Monmouth, in recording the See also: death of See also: Constantine, which took place about the See also: middle of the 6th century (Historia britonum), states that he was buried " close by Uther Pendragon, within the structure of stones which was set up with wonderful See also: art not far from Salisbury, and called in the See also: English See also: tongue, Stonehenge." Inigo See also: Jones, in his
See also: work on Stonehenge, published in 1655, endeavours to prove that it was a " See also: Roman See also: temple, inscribed to Coelus, the See also: senior of the See also: heathen gods, and built after the Tuscan See also: order." This theory was attacked by Dr Charleton (1725), one of the physicians of See also: Charles II., who maintained that it was erected by the Danes, and consequently after the departure of the
See also: Romans from Britain
.
The next controversialist who appeared on the scene was the famous Dr Stukely (1940) who propounded the theory that Stonehenge, the stone circle at Avebury (Abury), &c., were temples for serpent worship, `' Dracontia " as he called them, the serpent worshippers being the See also: Druids
.
Subsequent writers dropped the ophite portion of this theory, but still continued to regard Stonehenge as a temple or See also: observatory of the Druids
.
See also: Lord Avebury regards it as a temple of the Bronze Age (1500-1000 B.C.), though apparently it was not all erected at one time, the inner circle of small unwrought, blue stones being probably older than the rest (Prehistoric Times)
.
On the other hand See also: James Fergusson (1872) contended that it was a sepulchral monument of the Saxon
See also: period
.
The original number and position of the stones have suffered in the course of time from See also: wind and weather, in days when archaeological See also: interest was not alive to the importance of pre-serving so See also: ancient a monument
.
That, however, these natural causes of its dilapidation were assisted by the sacrilegious hand of man there is no lack of documentary evidence
.
Thus Inigo Jones laments the disappearance of stones that were standing when he measured it; and both Stukely and See also: Aubrey deplore the loss of fallen stones that were removed to make See also: bridges, See also: mill-dams and the like
.
On the evening of the 31st of
See also: December 1900, one of the See also: outer trilithons (22 on See also: plan), 'with its lintel, was blown down in the course of a severe See also: storm, this being the first collapse since the 3rd of See also: January 1797, when one of the See also: fine trilithons (57, 58) of the horseshoe See also: fell
.
This catastrophe attracted renewed See also: attention to the state of Stonehenge, and much discussion took place as to the taking of precautions against further decay
.
|
|
|
[back] STONEHAVEN (locally Stanehive) |
[next] GEORGE STONEMAN (1822-1894) |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.