See also:SURPLICE (See also:Late See also:Lat. superpelliceum; Fr. super, over, and pellis, See also:fur; Span. sobrepellice; Fr. surplis; in Ital. See also:cotta and Ger. Chorrock, See also:choir coat)
, a liturgical vestment of the See also:Christian See also:- CHURCH
- CHURCH (according to most authorities derived from the Gr. Kvpcaxov [&wµa], " the Lord's [house]," and common to many Teutonic, Slavonic and other languages under various forms—Scottish kirk, Ger. Kirche, Swed. kirka, Dan. kirke, Russ. tserkov, Buig. cerk
- CHURCH, FREDERICK EDWIN (1826-1900)
- CHURCH, GEORGE EARL (1835–1910)
- CHURCH, RICHARD WILLIAM (1815–189o)
- CHURCH, SIR RICHARD (1784–1873)
Church
.
It is a See also:tunic of See also:- WHITE
- WHITE, ANDREW DICKSON (1832– )
- WHITE, GILBERT (1720–1793)
- WHITE, HENRY KIRKE (1785-1806)
- WHITE, HUGH LAWSON (1773-1840)
- WHITE, JOSEPH BLANCO (1775-1841)
- WHITE, RICHARD GRANT (1822-1885)
- WHITE, ROBERT (1645-1704)
- WHITE, SIR GEORGE STUART (1835– )
- WHITE, SIR THOMAS (1492-1567)
- WHITE, SIR WILLIAM ARTHUR (1824--1891)
- WHITE, SIR WILLIAM HENRY (1845– )
- WHITE, THOMAS (1628-1698)
- WHITE, THOMAS (c. 1550-1624)
white See also:linen or See also:cotton material, with wide or moderately wide sleeves, reaching—according to the See also:Roman use—barely to the hips and elsewhere in the churches of the Roman communion to the See also:knee It is usually decorated witl*See also:lace, but in See also:modern times—in See also:Germany at least —also with embroidered bordures
.
The See also:surplice originally reached to the feet, but as See also:early as the 13th See also:century it began to be shortened, though as See also:late as the 15th century it still See also:fell to the See also:middle of the shin, and it was not till the 17th and 18th centuries that it was considerably shortened
.
More drastic were other modifications which it underwent in course of See also:- TIME (0. Eng. Lima, cf. Icel. timi, Swed. timme, hour, Dan. time; from the root also seen in " tide," properly the time of between the flow and ebb of the sea, cf. O. Eng. getidan, to happen, " even-tide," &c.; it is not directly related to Lat. tempus)
- TIME, MEASUREMENT OF
- TIME, STANDARD
time in several localities, which led to the See also:appearance of various subsidiary forms alongside of the See also:original type
.
Such were the sleeveless surplice, which was provided at the sides with holes to put the arms through; the surplice with slit-up arms or lappels (so-called " wings ") instead of sleeves; the surplice of which not only the sleeves but the See also:body of the garment itself were slit up the sides, precisely like the modern See also:dalmatic; and, finally, a sort of surplice in the See also:form of a See also:- BELL
- BELL, ALEXANDER MELVILLE (1819—1905)
- BELL, ANDREW (1753—1832)
- BELL, GEORGE JOSEPH (1770-1843)
- BELL, HENRY (1767-1830)
- BELL, HENRY GLASSFORD (1803-1874)
- BELL, JACOB (1810-1859)
- BELL, JOHN (1691-178o)
- BELL, JOHN (1763-1820)
- BELL, JOHN (1797-1869)
- BELL, ROBERT (1800-1867)
- BELL, SIR CHARLES (1774—1842)
bell-shaped See also:mantle, with a hole for the See also:head, which necessitated the arms being See also:stuck out under the hem
.
The first two of these forms were very early See also:developed; and, in spite of their See also:prohibition by synods here and there (e.g. that of See also:Liege in 1287), they survive in various places to the See also:present See also:day
.
The latter two only appeared after the See also:close of the middle ages: the first of them in See also:South Germany, the second more especially in See also:Venetia, where its use is attested by numerous pictorial records
.
As a See also:rule, however, these subsidiary forms of surplice were worn mostly by the See also:lower See also:clergy
.
They were the result partly of the 'See also:influence of the See also:secular fashions, but more particularly of considerations of convenience
.
The surplice belongs to the vestes sacrae, though it requires no See also:benediction
.
It is proper to all clerics, even to those who have only received the See also:tonsure, the See also:bishop himself vesting with it those who have been newly tonsured by him
.
Its use in divine service is very varied
.
It is worn in See also:choir at the See also:solemn offices; it is the See also:official sacral See also:dress of the lower clergy in their liturgical functions; it is worn by the See also:priest when administering the sacraments, undertaking benedictions, and the like; the use of the See also:alb being nowadays almost exclusively confined to the See also:mass and functions connected with this
.
In See also:general it may be said
that this was, in all See also:main particulars, the See also:custom so early as the 14th century
.
The older See also:history of the surplice is obscured by lack of exact See also:information
.
Its name is derived, as Durandus and Gerland also affirm, from the fact that it was formerly put on over the See also:fur garments which used to he worn in church and at divine service as a See also:protection against the See also:cold
.
It has been maintained that the surplice was known in the 5th century, the See also:evidence being the garments worn by the two clerics in attendance on Bishop Maximian represented in the mosaics of S
.
Vitale at See also:Ravenna; in this See also:case, however, the dalmatic has been confused with the surplice
.
In all See also:probability the surplice is no more than an expansion of the See also:ordinary liturgical alb, due to the See also:necessity for wearing it over thick furs
.
It is first mentioned in the rith century, in a See also:canon of the See also:synod of Coyaca in See also:Spain (1050) and in an See also:ordinance of See also:- KING
- KING (O. Eng. cyning, abbreviated into cyng, cing; cf. O. H. G. chun- kuning, chun- kunig, M.H.G. kiinic, kiinec, kiinc, Mod. Ger. Konig, O. Norse konungr, kongr, Swed. konung, kung)
- KING [OF OCKHAM], PETER KING, 1ST BARON (1669-1734)
- KING, CHARLES WILLIAM (1818-1888)
- KING, CLARENCE (1842–1901)
- KING, EDWARD (1612–1637)
- KING, EDWARD (1829–1910)
- KING, HENRY (1591-1669)
- KING, RUFUS (1755–1827)
- KING, THOMAS (1730–1805)
- KING, WILLIAM (1650-1729)
- KING, WILLIAM (1663–1712)
King See also:Edward the See also:Confessor
.
In See also:Rome it was known at least as early as the 12th century
.
It probably originated outside Rome, and was imported thence into the Roman use
.
Originally only a choir vestment and See also:peculiar to lower clergy, it gradually—certainly no later than the 13th century —replaced the alb as the vestment proper to the administering of the sacraments and other sacerdotal functions
.
In the See also:Oriental See also:rites there is no surplice, nor any analogous vestment
.
Of the non-Roman Churches in the See also:West the surplice has continued in See also:regular use only in the Lutheran churches of See also:Denmark, See also:Norway and See also:Sweden, and in the Church of See also:England (see below)
.
(J
.
BRA.)
Church of England.—The surplice was prescribed by the second See also:Prayer-See also:Book of Edward VI., as, with the tippet or the academical See also:hood, the See also:sole vestment of the See also:minister of the church at " all times of their ministration," the See also:rochet being practically regarded as the episcopal surplice
.
Its use was furiously assailed by the extremer Reformers but, in spite of their efforts, was retained by See also:Elizabeth's See also:Act of Uniformity, and enforced by the advertisements and injunctions issued under her authority, which ordered the " massing See also:vestments " —chasubles, albs, stoles and the like—to be destroyed
.
It has since remained, with the exception of the See also:cope (q.v.), the sole vestment authorized by See also:law for the ministers, other than bishops, of the Church of England (for the question of the vestments prescribed by the " Ornaments See also:Rubric " see VESTMENTS)
.
Its use has never been confined to clerks in See also:holy orders, and it has been worn since the See also:Reformation by all the " ministers " (including vicars-choral and choristers) of See also:cathedral and collegiate churches, as well as by the See also:fellows and scholars of colleges in See also:chapel
.
The distinctive See also:mark of the clergy (at least of the more dignified) has been the tippet or See also:scarf above mentioned, a broad See also:band of See also:black See also:silk worn See also:stole-See also:wise, but not to be confused with the stole, since it has no liturgical significance and was originally no more than See also:part of the clerical outdoor dress (see STOLE)
.
The surplice was formerly only worn by the clergy when conducting the service, being exchanged during the See also:sermon for the " black See also:gown," i.e. either a See also:Geneva gown or the gown of an academical degree
.
This custom has, however, as a result of the High Church See also:movement, fallen almost completely obsolete
.
The "black gown," considered wrongly as the See also:ensign of See also:Low Church views, survives in comparatively few of even " evangelical " churches; it is still, however, the custom for preachers of university sermons to See also:wear the gown of their degree
.
The traditional form of the surplice in the Church of England is that which survived from pre-Reformation times, viz. a wide-sleeved, very full, See also:plain, white linen tunic, pleated from the yoke, and reaching almost, or quite, to the feet
.
Towards the end of the 17th century, when large wigs came into See also:fashion, it came for convenience to be constructed gown-wise, open down the front and buttoned at the See also:neck, a fashion which still partially survives, notably at the See also:universities
.
In general, however, the tendency has been, under See also:continental influence, to curtail its proportions
.
The ample vestment with beautiful falling folds has thus in many churches given See also:place to a scanty, unpleated garment scarce reaching to the knee
.
In. the more " extreme "churches the surplices are See also:frank imitations of the Roman See also:cotta
.
(W
.
A
.
P.) SURRENDER, in law, a mode of See also:alienation of real See also:estate
.
It is defined by See also:Lord See also:Coke to be " the yielding up of an estate for See also:life or years to him that hath an immediate estate in reversion or See also:remainder " (Coke upon See also:Littleton, 337 b)
.
It is the converse of See also:release, which is a See also:conveyance by the reversioner or remainder-See also:man to the See also:tenant of the particular estate
.
A surrender is the usual means of effecting the alienation of copyholds
.
The surrender is made to the lord, who grants admittance to the purchaser, an entry of the surrender and admittance being made upon the See also:court rolls
.
Formerly a devise of copyholds could only have been made by surrender to the use of the testator's will followed by admittance of the devisee
.
The See also:Wills Act of 1837 now allows the devisee of copyholds without surrender, though admittance of the devisee is still necessary
.
A surrender must, since the Real See also:Property Act 1845, be by See also:deed, except in the case of copyholds and of surrender by operation of law
.
Surrender of the latter See also:kind generally takes place by See also:merger, that is, the See also:combination of the greater and less estate by descent or other means without the act of the party (see REMAINDER)
.
In Scots law surrender in the case of a See also:lease is represented by renunciation
.
The nearest approach to surrender of a See also:copyhold is resignation in remanentiam (to the lord) or resignation in favorem (to a purchaser)
.
These modes of conveyance were practically superseded by the simpler forms introduced by the See also:Conveyancing Act 1874
.
End of Article: