Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

SYLLABUS (from Gr. auXXa 43aveuv, to ...

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V26, Page 282 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

SYLLABUS (from Gr. auXXa 43aveuv, to take together, cf. " syllable ")  , literally something taken together, a collection (See also:Late See also:Lat. See also:syllabus), hence a compendium, table or abstract giving the heads, outline or See also:scheme of a course of lectures, teaching, &c . The word in the sense of a See also:list or See also:catalogue is used of a collection of eighty condemned propositions, addressed by See also:order of See also:Pius IX. to all the See also:Catholic episcopate, under the date of the 8th of See also:December 1864 . The See also:official See also:title is: " A collection (syllabus) containing the See also:principal errors of ourtimes as noted in the Allocutions, Encyclicals and other Apostolic Letters of our See also:Holy See also:Father See also:Pope Pius IX." This collection has a rather curious See also:history . As See also:early as 1849, the See also:council of See also:Spoleto asked the pope for a collective condemnation of all errors concerning the See also:Church, her authority and See also:property . In 1851 the Civiltd cattolica proposed that this should be See also:drawn up in connexion with the See also:definition of the Immaculate Conception of See also:Mary . In 1852, See also:Cardinal Fornari wrote by order of the pope to a certain number of bishops and laymen asking for their assistance in the study of the errors most prevalent in See also:modern society . The answers are unknown; but after the definition of the Immaculate Conception (December 8, 1854), the See also:commission of theologians charged with the preparatory investigations was entrusted with the further See also:mission of studying modern errors . For six years it gave no outward signs of activity; but in 186o Mgr Gerbet, See also:bishop of See also:Perpignan, published his Instruction pastorale sur diverses erreurs du temps See also:present; in it he enumerated 85 erroneous propositions, grouped under eleven heads . Pius IX. was much impressed by this See also:work; he had it printed, and communicated it to the commission, to which he added a few new members, desiring them to take it as a fresh basis for their researches . In 1861 the commission had various meetings, at which the principal propositions were chosen and formulated in Latin, and the theological censure which they incurred applied to them . The result was a collection first of 70, and later of 61 propositions, of which only 27 have the See also:note haeretica; Mgr Gerbet's divisions, and frequently his See also:text, are adhered to . This Syllabus, which was excellently drawn up, was not promulgated, owing to an indiscretion .

On the occasion of the festivals of the See also:

canonization of the See also:Japanese martyrs, Pius IX. had gathered around him three See also:hundred bishops from all parts of the See also:world; he had the projected Syllabus communicated to each of them, under the See also:seal of secrecy for the purpose of asking their See also:opinion on it; each bishop was also, still under the seal of secrecy, empowered to consult a theologian selected by himself . But in See also:October 1862, the See also:Turin Mediatore published the catalogue in full, and Mgr See also:Bourget, bishop of See also:Montreal, thinking that it had been published in See also:Rome, officially promulgated it for his See also:diocese in December 1863 . Pius IX. then modified his plans: a new commission was appointed to See also:extract from the Allocutions, Encyclicals and papal Letters the See also:chief errors dealt with in them . This work lasted about a See also:year; the result of it was the Syllabus, in eighty propositions, arranged under the distinct heads; the propositions are not accompanied by any theological censure, but simply by a reference to the See also:Allocution, Encyclical or See also:Letter from which each had been more or less textually extracted . This was addressed to the episcopate together with a letter from Cardinal See also:Antonelli, and dated the 8th of December 1864, the same date as the Encyclical Quanta cura, from which, however, it remains quite distinct . Its publication aroused the most violent polemics; what was then called the Ultramontane party was loud in its praise; while the liberals treated it as a See also:declaration of See also:war made by the Church on modern society and See also:civilization . See also:Napoleon III.'s See also:government forbade its publication, and suspended the newspaper 1' Univers for having published it . Controversies were equally numerous as to the theological value of the Syllabus . Most Catholics saw in it as many infallible See also:definitions as condemned propositions; others observed that the pope had neither personally signed nor promulgated the collection, but had intentionally separated it from the Encyclical by sending it merely under See also:cover of a letter from his secretary of See also:state; they said that it was hastily, and sometimes unfortunately drawn up (cf. prop . 61); they saw in it an See also:act of the pontifical authority, but without any of the marks required in the See also:case of dogmatic definitions; they concluded, therefore, that each proposition was to be appreciated separately, and in consequence that each was open to theological comment . That such is the true view is proved by the fact that Rome never censured the theologians who, like See also:Newman, took up this position . The errors enumerated in the Syllabus are grouped under the ten following heads: (I) See also:Pantheism, See also:naturalism and See also:absolute See also:rationalism; (2) Moderate rationalism; (3) Indifferentism, latitudinarianism; (4) See also:Socialism, See also:communism, See also:secret See also:societies, See also:Bible societies, clerico-liberal societies; (5) Errors regarding the Church and her rights; (6) Errors regarding See also:civil society both in itself and in its relations with the Church; (7) Errors regarding See also:Christian and natural morality; (8) Errors regarding Christian See also:marriage; (9) Errors concerning the temporal See also:power of the pope; (ro) Errors relative to modern Liberalism .

It was paragraphs 5, 6 and so which especially gave rise to discussion . In reality, however, the Syllabus did not contain a new See also:

doctrine: the Church was defending. her traditional doctrine against the progressive invasion of what were called modern ideas of See also:liberty, i.e. the See also:independence of religious authority shown by See also:secular societies, liberty of See also:conscience, equality of all religious confessions before the state, &c . She upheld her theoretical position as in the See also:time of See also:Philip the See also:Fair or of the See also:Reformation, and the Syllabus goes no further in this respect than the En-cyclical Quanta cura of the same date, or that of See also:Gregory XVI., Mirari vos, of the 15th of See also:August 1832 . But the unusual See also:form of the document should be considered: instead of an exposition of doctrine it enumerates the errors in the form of See also:bare propositions, without any qualification, and with no variation in the degree of condemnation; the result being that many See also:people on both sides were misled . The name Syllabus has sometimes also been given to the collection of 65 " modernist " propositions condemned by the See also:decree Lamentabili of the Holy See also:Office, dated the 3rd of See also:July 1907; but this name is in no See also:wise official .

End of Article: SYLLABUS (from Gr. auXXa 43aveuv, to take together, cf. " syllable ")
[back]
SYLHET
[next]
SYLLOGISM (Gr. ovAAoytvµos, from en', and Xb-yor, ...

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.