Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:CORNELIUS See also:TACITUS (c. 55-120)
, See also:Roman historian
.
See also:Tacitus, who ranks beyond dispute in the highest See also:place among men of letters of all ages, lived through the reigns of the emperors See also:Nero, See also:Galba, See also:Otho, See also:Vitellius, See also:Vespasian, See also:Titus, See also:Domitian, See also:Nerva and See also:Trajan
.
All we know of his See also:personal See also:history is from allusions to himself in his own See also:works, and from eleven letters addressed to him by his very intimate friend, the younger See also:Pliny
.
The exact See also:year of his See also:birth is a See also:matter of inference, but it may be approximately fixed near the See also:close of the reign of See also:Claudius
.
Pliny indeed, though himself See also:born in 61 or 62, speaks of Tacitus and himself as being " much of an See also:age," 1 but he must have been some years junior to his friend, who began, he tells us, his See also:official See also:life under Vespasian,2 no doubt as See also:quaestor, and presumably See also:tribune or See also:aedile under Titus (8o or 81), at which See also:time he must have been twenty-five years of age at least
.
Of his See also:family and birthplace we know nothing certain; we can infer nothing from his name See also:Cornelius, which was then very widely extended; but the fact of his See also:early promotion seems to point to respectable antecedents, and it may be that his See also:father was one Cornelius Tacitus, who had been a See also:procurator in one of the divisions of See also:Gaul, to whom allusion is made by the See also:elder Pliny in his Natural History (vii
.
76)
.
But it is all matter of pure conjecture, as it also is whether his " praenomen " was Publius or Gait's
.
The most interesting facts about him to us are that he was an eminent pleader at the Roman See also:bar, that he was an See also:eye-See also:witness of the " reign of terror " during the last three years of Domitian, and that he was the son-in-See also:law of See also:Julius See also: In the concluding passage of his Life of Agricola he tells us plainly that he witnessed the judicial murders of many of Rome's best citizens from 93 to 96, and that being himself a senator he See also:felt almost a guilty complicity in them . With the See also:emperor Nerva's See also:accession his life became See also:bright and prosperous, and so it continued through the reign of Nerva's successor, Trajan, he himself, in the opening l Pliny, Epp. vii . 20 . 2 Hist. i. i . 3 Ibid.(J . S . F.) he outlived Trajan is matter of conjecture . It is See also:worth noticing that the emperor Tacitus in the 3rd See also:century claimed descent from him, and directed that ten copies of his works should be made every year and deposited in the public See also:libraries . He also had a See also:tomb built to his memory, which was destroyed by See also:order of See also:Pope See also:Pius V. in the latter See also:part of the 16th century . Pliny, as we see clearly from several passages in his letters, had the highest See also:opinion of his friend's ability and worth . He consults him about a school which he thinks of establishing at Comum (See also:Como), his birthplace, and asks him to look out for suitable teachers and professors . And he pays 5 him the high compliment, " I know that your Histories will be immortal, and this makes me the more anxious that may name should appear in them." The following is a See also:list of Tacitus's remaining works, arranged in their probable See also:chronological order, which may be approximately inferred from See also:internal See also:evidence:-(r) the See also:Dialogue on Orators, about 76 or 77; (2) the Life of Agricola, 97 or 98; (3) the Germany, 98, published probably in 99; (4) the Histories (Historiae), completed probably by 115 or 116, the last years of Trajan's reign (he must have been at See also:work on them for many years); (5) the See also:Annals, his latest work probably, written in part perhaps along with the Histories, and completed subsequently to Trajan's reign, which he may very well have outlived . The Dialogue on Orators discusses, in the See also:form of a conversation which Tacitus professes to have heard (as a See also:young See also:man) between some eminent men at the Roman bar, the causes of the decay of eloquence under the See also:empire . There are some interesting remarks in it on the See also:change for the worse that had taken place in the See also:education of Roman lads . The See also:style of the Dialogue is far more Ciceronian than that of Tacitus's later work, and critics have attributed it to See also:Quintilian; but its genuineness is now generally accepted . It is noticeable that the mannerisms of Tacitus appear to develop through his lifetime, and are most strongly marked in his latest books, the Annals . The Life of Agricola, See also:short as it is, has always been considered an admirable specimen of See also:biography . The See also:great man with all his See also:grace and dignity is brought vividly before us, and the See also:sketch we have of the history of our See also:island under the See also:Romans gives a See also:special See also:interest to this little work . The Germany, the full See also:title of which is " Concerning the See also:geography, the See also:manners and customs, and the tribes of Germany," describes with many suggestive hints the See also:general 4 See also:Ann. ii . 61; iv . 4 . 5 Epp. vii . 33 . character of the See also:German peoples, and dwells particularly on their fierce and See also:independent spirit, which the author evidently felt to be a See also:standing menace to the empire .
The geography is its weak point; much of this was no doubt gathered from vague hearsay
.
Tacitus dwells on the contrast between See also:barbarian freedom and simplicity on the one See also:hand, and the servility and degeneracy of Roman life on the other
.
The Histories, as originally composed in twelve books, brought the history of the empire from Galba in 69 down to the close of Domitian's reign in 97
.
The first four books, and a small fragment of the fifth, giving us a very See also:minute See also:account of the eventful year of revolution, 69, and the brief reigns of Galba, Otho and Vitellius, are all that remain to us
.
In the fragment of the fifth See also:book we have a curious but entirely inaccurate account of the Jewish nation, of their character, customs and See also:religion, from a cultivated Roman's point of view, which we see at once was a strongly prejudiced one
.
The Annals—a title for which there is no See also:ancient authority, and which there is no See also:reason for supposing Tacitus gave distinctively to the work—See also:record the history of the emperors of the See also:Julian See also:line from Tiberius to Nero, comprising thus a See also:period from A.D
.
14 to 68
.
Of these, nine books have come down to us entire; of books v., xi. and xvi. we have but fragments, and the whole of the reign of See also:Gaius (Caligula), the first six years of Claudius, and the last three years of Nero are wanting
.
Out of a period of fifty-four years we thus have the history of See also:forty years
.
The See also:principal See also:MSS. of Tacitus are known as the "first "and " second " Medicean—both of the loth or 1th centuries
.
The first six books of the Annals exist nowhere but in the " first Medicean " MS., and an See also:attempt was made in 1878 to prove that the Annals are a See also:forgery by See also:Poggio See also:Bracciolini, an See also:Italian See also:scholar of the 15th century, but their genuineness is confirmed by their agreement' in various minute details with coins and See also:inscriptions discovered since that period
.
Moreover, Ruodolphus, a See also: Add to this the testimony of See also:Jerome that Tacitus wrote in See also:thirty books the lives of the Caesars and the evidence of style, and there can be no doubt that in the Annals we have a genuine work of Tacitus . Much of the history of the period described by him, especially of the earlier Caesars, must have been obscure and locked up with the emperor's private papers and memoranda . As we should expect, there was a vast amount of floating See also:gossip, which an historian would have to sift and utilize as best he might . Tacitus, as a man of good social position, no doubt had See also:access to the best See also:information, and must have talked matters over with the most eminent men of the See also:day . There were several writers and chroniclers, whom he occasionally cites but not very often; there were See also:memoirs of distinguished persons—those, for example, of the younger See also:Agrippina, of Thrasea, and Helvidius . There were several collections of letters, like those of the younger Pliny; a number, too, of funeral orations; and the " acta senatus " and the " acta populi " or " acta diurna," the first a record of proceedings in the See also:senate, the latter a See also:kind of See also:gazette or See also:journal . Thus there were the materials for history in considerable abundance, and Tacitus was certainly a man who knew how to turn them to good account . He has given us a striking, and on the whole doubtless a true, picture of the empire in the 1st century . The rhetorical tendency which characterizes the" See also:silver age" of Roman literature, gives perhaps exaggerated expression to his undoubtedly strong sense of the badness of individual emperors, but he assuredly wrote with a high aim, and we may accept his own account of it: " I regard2 it as history's highest See also:function to See also:rescue merit from oblivion, and to hold up as a terror to See also:base words and actions the reprobation of posterity." He is convinced of the degeneracy of the age, though it be relieved by the existence of truly See also:noble virtues: and he connects this degeneracy more or less directly with the ' See Introduction to vol. i. of See also:Furneaux's edition of the Annals of Tacitus, See also:Clarendon See also:Press See also:Series, 1884 . 2 Ann. iii . 65.imperial regime . But it is difficult to dogmatize as to Tacitus's See also:political ideals .
He is primarily concerned rather with See also:ethics than with politics; though he may feel that the See also:world is out of See also:joint—with whatever sentimental sympathy he may regard the age of "See also:liberty," and admire the heroic See also:epoch of the See also:republic—yet he appears to realize that the empire is a See also:practical See also:necessity, and to the provinces even a benefit
.
Like the See also:Stoics, with whom otherwise he has little in See also:common, he censures rather individual rulers than the imperial See also:system
.
But " the See also:
But they are alike only in the brevity of sentences; and the brevity of Carlyle is not that of an artist in See also:epigram
.
Tacitus was probably never a popular author; to be understood and appreciated he must be read again and again, or the point of some of his acutest remarks will be quite missed
.
Tacitus has been many times translated, in spite of the very great difficulty of the task; the number of versions of the whole or part is stated as 393
.
See also:Murphy's See also:translation (we should See also:call it a See also:paraphrase) was for See also:long one of the best known; it was published early in the 19th century
.
On this was based the so-called See also:Oxford translation, published by See also:Bohn in a revised edition
.
Messrs See also: J . B.; A . D . G.) . |
|
|
[back] TACHYLYTES, or TACHYLITES (from Gr. Taxbs, swift, X... |
[next] MARCUS CLAUDIUS TACITUS |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.