Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
THEISM
.
corrupted, though from a very See also:early See also:period
.
He regards the See also:Stoics as having initiated a philosophical See also:theology, and gives numerous references for the " three theologies " which they distinguished
.
See also:Philo the See also:Jew is also quoted as using BeoXbyos of poets, of See also:Moses See also:par excellence, and of See also:Greek philosophers
.
It is possible that the epithet BeoXoyor for St See also: " Homeric Theology " (a See also:book by See also:Nagelsbach), Old Testament Theology, See also:Comparative Theology, Natural Theology, the word in See also:modern See also:languages means the theology of the Christian Church . What follows here will be confined to that subject . While the word points to God as the special theme of the theologian, other topics inevitably find entrance . Theistic Contents See also:philosophy thinks of God as the See also:absolute being; and of every monotheistic See also:religion insists, nit indeed that theology, the knowledge of God includes all knowledge, but that this supremely important knowledge throws fresh See also:light upon everything . So, with an added Christian intensity, St See also:Paul declares: " If any See also:man is in See also:Christ, he is a new creature; the old things are passed away; behold, they are become new . But all things are of God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ " (2 See also:Cor . V . 17, 18) . A minimum See also:division might be threefold—Gottesbegriff, Selbstbeurteilung, Weltanschauung.' But historically it is more important to note that Christian theology has See also:developed as a doctrine concerning Christ: his relation to God, our relation to God in or through him . For Christ is viewed as bringing redemption—a conception of importance in many religions, but in none so important as in See also:Christianity . Indeed, another possibility opens up here . In-See also:stead of being mainly a doctrine concerning God, or one concerning Christ, theology may be construed as being mainly the theory of Christian experience . Most See also:schools of theology will concur, however, in giving prominence to a complementary point of view and making their systems a study of Divine See also:revelation . Even if they accept Natural Theology, they generally hold that Christian theology, properly so called, begins at a further point . Those who deny this were formerly called Naturalists, i.e. deniers of supernatural revelation; those who extend the See also:province of See also:reason in theology, and push back the frontier of revelation, are often called Rationalists.4 Such being the Theology usual point of view, it is See also:plain that the claim of as a theology to be a See also:science, or a See also:group of sciences, is science. made in a sense of its own . In so far as theology is orderly, coherent, systematic, and seeks to See also:rest upon See also:good grounds of some sort, it may be called a science . But, in so far as it claims to See also:deal with special revelation, it lifts itself out of the circle of the sciences, and turns away from natural know- Other usages of OsoXoyia are the Divine nature of Christ (St John See also:Chrysostom, quoted in Konstantinides' Greek See also:Lexicon), Old and New Testaments (See also:Theodoret, ib.) ; Greek theology and See also:Mosaic or revealed theology (Theodoret) . z F . See also:Nitzsch in See also:Herzog-Plitt, Realencyk . (1877) . See also:Fuller details regarding Abelard's writings in the same author's See also:art. in Herzog-Hauck (1896) . 4 So See also:Ritschl, following See also:Schleiermacher, Der Christliche Glaube, § 30 . 4 A . W . Benn (See also:History of See also:English See also:Rationalism in the 19th Cent.) goes beyond See also:ordinary usage in defining rationalism as a militant' theory opposed to all belief in God.ledge towards what it regards as more intimate messages from God . Two special usages should be noted: (1) a See also:medieval use of " theology " for mystical or intuitive knowledge of God, as in the well-known book called Theologia Germanica; (2) " theology proper," in See also:Protestant systems, is the portion of theology which deals directly with the doctrine of God . Another characteristic of theology is its secondary and reflective See also:character . Religion, therefore, is earlier than theo- logy . Or the theology which religion contains is in Theology a See also:state of See also:solution—vaguely defined and suffused and with emotion; important practically, but intellectu- ally unsatisfying . " Scientific " theology contrasts with this as a laboratory See also:extract . History may soften the contrast by discovering transitional forms, and by showing the religious interest at See also:work in theology as well as the scientific interest affecting early utterances of religion . Still, this contrast enters into the meaning of divines when they say that they are at work upon a science . A religious man need no more be a theologian than a poet need have a theory of See also:aesthetics . Where, then, are we to look for Christian theology ? It is not the truism it may seem if we reply that we are to find it in the writings of theologians . As authorities See also:control- See also:sources. See also:ling their work, theologians may name the See also:Bible, or tradition, or the religious consciousness, or the Church, or some See also:combination of these . But the, teaching of the Bible is not systematic, and the authority of consciousness is vague; while the See also:creeds into which Church tradition crystallizes emerge out of See also:long theological discussions . Ordinarily, doctrine has been in See also:close connexion not only with edification but with controversy . See also:Anselm of See also:Canterbury stands almost alone among the See also:great theological masters in working purely from a scientific interest; this holds alike of his contribution to theism and of his doctrine of See also:Atonement . Among the earlier theological statements are catechetical books, e.g . See also:Cyril of See also:Jerusalem . These books See also:record doctrinal instruction given, for See also:practical ends, to laymen of adult years who were candidates for See also:baptism . Disinterested discussions by experts for experts is medieval rather than primitive . Modern catechisms in the See also:form of question and See also:answer for the instruction of baptized See also:children are sometimes convenient if dry summaries of doctrine (e.g. the See also:Westminster See also:Assembly's Shorter See also:Catechism); but sometimes they have the glow of religious tenderness, like See also:Luther's Lesser Catechism, or the See also:Heidelberg Catechism . They generally expound (r) The Apostles' Creed, (2) the Ten Commandments, (3) the See also:Lord's See also:Prayer . Medieval theology has an appearance of keeping in See also:touch with the Apostles' Creed when it divides the substance of doctrine into (usually) twelve " articles " —not always the same twelve—a See also:reminiscence of the legendary See also:composition of the Creed in twelve sections by the twelve apostles . This treatment, however, has little real See also:influence upon the structure of medieval theology . See also:German Protestant writers, again, following their catechisms, often distinguish three articles—of the See also:Father, of the Son, and of the See also:Holy Spirit .
This, too, is no more than convenient phraseology
.
Before the Christian See also:age, there had been a good deal of reflective thinking in the Jewish schools, though the interest there was legal rather than speculative
.
To some extent Christianity in- Jewish herited this Jewish theology
.
True, Jesus Christ sprang theology. from the See also:people
.
He was a" layman" (Paul Wernle),with-
out technical Jewish See also:lore
.
The great attainment of the Old Testament, ethical monotheism, had become the See also:common See also:property of the nation; it occurs in Christianity as a See also:simple presupposition
.
Early Christian writers find it unnecessary to prove what no one dreams of questioning
.
Along with this great doctrine there pass on into Christianity the slowly attained See also:hope of resurrection and the dreadful doctrine of future See also:punishment for the wicked
.
Leading thoughts in the teaching of Jesus, so far as they are new, are the Fatherhood of God—new at least in the central See also:place given it—the imminence of the " See also:kingdom " or See also:judgment of God, and Jesus' own place as " See also:Messiah," i.e. as See also: Modern Christians are . tempted to See also:charge the seeming extravagance of St Paul's thought upon his Jewish See also:inheritance, while modern See also:Jews are tempted to stigmatize them as See also:grotesque exaggerations of reasonable rabbinical doctrines . Probably both are right, and both wrong . The germs were Jewish; but, transported to a new See also:soil, and watered with a new See also:enthusiasm, they assumed new forms . These cannot claim the merit of correctness, but they are See also:works of religious See also:genius . At the same See also:time, they employ all the resources of See also:dialectic, and have, therefore, taken quite See also:half the See also:journey from See also:primary religion to theology . But the dislocation of religious thinking, when Christianity ceased to be a Jewish faith and found a See also:home with Gentiles, destroyed the continuity of Paulinism and of Jewish thought working through St Paul . In later times, when Paulinism revived, the epistles spoke for themselves, though they were not always correctly understood . It should be added that, according to A . See also:Harnack, Hellenistic Judaism had worked out the principles of a theology which simply passed on into the Greek-speaking Christian Church . Besides the teaching of Jesus (best preserved in the first three gospels) and the teaching of Paul (in six, ten, or thirteen Contents epistles), the See also:recent " science " of New Testament of New theology finds other types of doctrine . The See also:Epistle to Testa- the See also:Hebrews is a parallel to Paulinism, working out See also:meat. upon See also:independent lines the finality of Christianity and its superiority to the Old Testament .
The Johannine See also:Gospel and Epistles are later than Paulinism, and presuppose its leading or less startling positions
.
Whatever See also:historical elements may be preserved in Christ's discourses as given in the See also:Fourth Gospel, these discourses See also:fit into the author's type of thought better than into the synoptical framework
.
They have been transformed
.
I See also:Peter is good independent Paulinism
.
The Epistle of See also: When we go outside the New Testament, this involuntary lack of grasp becomes even more marked . Neither the theory of infallible See also:inspiration, with its assertion of absolute uniformity in the New Testament, nor Baur's See also:criticism, with its assertion of irreconcilable antagonisms, is See also:borne out by facts . The New Testament is many-sided, but it has a predominant spiritual unity . Only in See also:minor details do contradictions emerge . It is to be remembered that criticism has broken up the historical unity of the New Testament collection and placed many of its components See also:side by side with writings which have never been canonized, and which conservative writers had supposed to be distinctly later . But in regard to date there has been a remarkable See also:retreat from the earlier See also:critical assertions . And at any See also:rate, since the New Testament See also:canon was set up, New Testament writings have had a theological influence which no others can claim . On both sides of the great transition from being a Jewish to being a Gentile faith, Christianity, according to recent study, mani- Bathus- fested itself as " enthusiastic." We may distinguish See also:Mann „ several points in this conception . (I) Most important, perhaps—the end of the See also:world was held to be close at See also:hand . "Kingdom of God " as generally used was an eschatological concept ; and, whatever difficulties there may be as to certain gospel passages, Christ, to say the least, cannot have disclaimed this view . The watchword rings through all the New Testament—" the Lord is at hand.” A broader popular form was given to this expectation in " See also:Chiliasm "—the doctrine of the " Thousand " years' reign' of Christ on See also:earth (Rev. xx . 1-7) .
But even Chiliasm —which itself has its subtler and its grosser modifications—is found in early Gentile as well as in early Jewish Christianity
.
(2) I See also:Corinthians shows us a _ Christian community filled with disturbances, and apparently without recognized officials
.
The democratic, or rather theocratic, rights of the spiritual man were for a time relied on to extemporize so much Church See also:government as might be needed till the Master returned
.
Yet the beginnings of Church See also:order come earlier than those of doctrine proper; and much earlier than the cooling of eschatological hopes
.
(3) There are traces inside and
'Four See also:hundred years is another significant figure in the Jewish book, 4 See also:Ezra.outside the New Testament of aversion to receiving back into Church fellowship those who, after confessing Christ, had been guilty of See also:grave sins
.
The New Testament See also:evidence is by no means See also:uniform (contrast Heb. vi
.
4-6, x
.
26-31; 1 John v
.
16; with 2 Cor. ii
.
7) ; but this high conception of Church holiness is attested by a See also:series of rigorist " heresies" during the early centuries; and nothing could be more characteristic of eschatological enthusiasm
.
Those who had fallen were not banished from hope, even by the rigorists
.
Still, their See also:case was held over for a higher Judge; while the Church, especially in these more Puritian and separatist See also:groups, kept her garments See also: (4) The enthusiastic view of the possibilities of the Christian See also:life—associated, as modern and especially Western Christians must suspect, with shallow See also:external views of See also:sin—See also:lent itself to belief iin sinless perfection . Even St Paul has been supposed, not without a certain plausibility, to See also:teach the sinless perfection of real Christians . The See also:West, with its theology protesting in the background, but in vain, still sings the prayer of the Te Deum: " Vouchsafe, 0 Lord, to keep us this See also:day without sin." Such an enthusiastic See also:temper does not lend itself to cool theory . Why should theology labour at See also:definitions ? " The Lord is at hand;" a Christian's one See also:wisdom is to be ready to MateNai meet him . And yet materials for theology were richly for provided even during this period . That is true above all theology. of the man whom we know best in New Testament days St Paul . Himself through and through animated with the joyful hope, even when prepared to surrender (2 Cor . V . 8; Phil. i . 23, ii . 17) the prospect of See also:personal survival (i Thess. iv .
17; i Cor. xv
.
51, 52) until that See also:bright day, yet as a teacher he See also:lays such stress upon Christ's first coming that the emphasis on the second See also:Advent may be struck out—leaving still, we might almost claim, a See also:complete Paulinism
.
He who planned his See also:campaigns to the great civilized centres of See also:Corinth, See also:Ephesus and See also:Rome, and thus prepared for a historic future of which he did not See also:dream, See also:drew his See also:parallels of thought with no less See also:firm hand, and showed himself indeed " a See also:wise master-builder."
In one aspect See also:Montanism is the central reaction of the primitive Christian enthusiasm against the forces which were transforming its character
.
Of course it had other aspects and elements as well
.
See also:Hippolytus and Novatian repeat the protest less vehemently; Donatism shows it blended with later hierarchical ideas
.
But, when the enthusiasm cooled, it was Greek thought which interpreted the contents of Christianity
.
The process of See also:change is called by Harnack sometimes " secularization" and Greekinsometimes ' Hellenization." "Acute Hellenizing," we are Buenos
.
told, took the form of See also:Gnosticism
.
The Gnostics were
the " first theologians." When the Church in turn began to produce a theology of her own she was imitating as well as guarding against those wayward See also:spirits
.
What was to be the central topic
?
The Church's first creed had been " the Fatherhood of God and the Messiahship of Jesus " (A
.
Ritschl) ; but the " See also:Rule of Faith " (See also:Irenaeus; See also:Tertullian, who uses the exact expression; See also:Origen)—that See also:summary of religiously important facts which was meant to See also: 192 There are traces in the New Testament of a baptismal See also:confession simply of the name of Christ (1 Cor. i . 13, 15; Rom. vi . 2; cf. even the See also:late See also:verse Acts viii . 37), not of the three-See also:fold name . Moreover, textual criticism points to an early type of See also:reading in Matt. xxviii . 19 without the threefold formula . Still, it is See also:strange how completely this seemingly isolated passage takes command of the development of early theology . Out of the Rule of Faith there came in time what tradition miscalls the Apostles' Creed—the See also:Roman baptismal creed, a formulary of great importance in all the West; then other creeds, which also are in a sense expansions of the Rule of Faith . The Greek mind threw itself upon the problem—who precisely is Jesus Christ the Lord ? His Messiahship is asserted; who then is Doctrine the Messiah? and this second figure in the baptismal of Trinity confession ? A provisional answer, linking Christian andof theology with the philosophical theology of antiquity, See also:person of asserted Jesus Christ to be the divine Logos . But this Christ. assertion was See also:expanded and refined upon till two great doctrines had been built up—that of the Trinity of divine Persons in the unity of the Godhead, and that of the See also:union of two distinct natures, divine and human, in the person of Jesus Christ .
It is curious that the Syrian church of the 4th See also:century (e.g
.
See also:Aphraates) was almost unaffected by the great dogmatic debates
.
But there is no hint of a reasoned rejection of Greek developments in favour of primitive simplicity, still less of any independent theological development
.
Aphraates accepts the Logos Christology, and, soon after his time, his church is found on the beaten track of orthodoxy
.
2 H .Harnack is right in regarding a New Testament canon as one of the " See also:Apostolical authorities " which the Church brought into the See also: 9: Phil. ii . 5–11) taught the personal pre-existence of Christ . A . M . See also:Fairbairn (Phil. of Christian Religion, p . 476) has argued that Paul could not have given this teaching unless he had known of Christ's advancing the claim . Fairbairn barely refers to the Fourth Gospel in this connexion, and it is doubtful-whether Matt. xi . 27 will bear such See also:weight as he puts upon it . Of course, we might seek to infer an unwritten tradition of Christ's words; but without pedantic ultra-Protestant devotion to written scripture, one may distrust on scientific grounds the See also:attempt to reconstruct tradition by a process of inference . If such records as John vi . 36, viii . 58, xvii . 3, 4 can be taken as historical, we may feel certain that Jesus taught his pre-existence . If not, modern Christian minds will hardly regard the doctrine as more than a See also:speculation . Yet we should mention another See also:argument of some weight . There is no trace that any Jewish Christian critics challenged St Paul's Christology . This may point to its being the Christology of the whole Church . If so, who could first teach it except the one Master ? \V Bousset has suggested that the title " Son of Man " (See also:Dan. via . 13), used by Jesus, may have come to imply for all early Christians personal pre-existence . W . See also:Wrede and others have more boldly conjectured that the Christ's pre-existence had become an accepted See also:element in Jewish Messianic—it certainly occurs in one portion of the Book of See also:Enoch and in 4 Ezra'—and that Paul merely transferred to Jesus a doctrine which he had held while still in the Jews' religion . " Son of God " might seem to carry us further still; but the Old Testament makes See also:free use of the title as a metaphorical See also:honour, and we have no See also:proof that any Jewish school interpreted the phrase differently . The See also:rival type of early theology is known as Adoptionism or See also:Adoptianism (q.v.) . According to it, the man Jesus was exalted See also:Adoption- to Messianic or divine See also:rank . It has been argued that ism. the narrative of Christ's baptism points to anAdoptionist Christclogy, and that the genealogies of Jesus (through See also:Joseph) presuppose this type of belief, if not a still See also:lower view of Christ's person . It has further been argued that the narratives of the Virgin See also:birth (See also:Matthew, See also:Luke) are an intermediate stage in Christology . When pre-existence is clearly taught (Paul, John), virgin birth, it is suggested, loses its importance; another theory of Divine Sonship has established itself . This trenchant See also:analysis is, however, not universally admitted . Further development of doctrine weeded out the last traces of Adoptionist belief,' though Christ's exaltation continued to be taught in correlation to His humiliation (Phil. ii . 8), and became in due time a dogmatic See also:locus in Protestantism . The lineaments of Greek Christian theology show themselves more clearly in See also:Justin See also:Martyr than in the other Apologists, but still more plainly in Irenaeus, who, with little speculative See also:power, keeps the safe See also:middle path . Tertullian's legal training as a lawyer was a curious coincidence, if nothing more, and those legal concepts which show themselves strongly in him have done much to See also:mould the Western type of Christian theology . He had great influence on the course of Latin theology, partly through his own writings, but still more through the spell he See also:cast upon See also:Cyprian . At See also:Alexandria, See also:Clement and his great See also:pupil Origen state Christianity in terms of philosophy . Origen's See also:treatise, De Przincipiis, origen. is the first and in some respects the greatest theo- logical See also:system in the whole of Church history .
The Catechetical school was primarily meant for instructing adult inquirers into Christianity
.
But it had attained the rank of a Christian university; and in this treatise Origen does not furnish See also:milk for babes; he writes for himself and for like-minded See also:friends
.
Wildly conjectural as it may seem, his thinking—though partly Greek and only in See also:part biblical—is
The passages referred to have sometimes, but with no great See also:probability, been regarded as Christian infiltrations
.
2 Adoptionism is one See also:species of See also:Monarchianism
.
The other species,llodalism, has its most important type historically in Sabellianism
.
And the name Sabellianism is often loosely applied (e.g. to Swedenborgianism) to any modalistic Monarchianism (Christ one phase of God
.
Not three persons in the Godhead, but a threefold revelation of a God strictly one in person).completely fused together in his own mind
.
Nor does it ever suffer from lack of thoroughness
.
It may be summed up in one word as the theology of free will
.
Unfaltering use is made of that conception as a See also:
Origen called in a second new world—that of pre-existence
.
All souls were tried once, with equal See also:privilege; all See also:fell, See also:save one, who steadily slave to the Logos, and thus merited to become in due time the human soul of Jesus Christ
.
No higher See also:function could be given to free will; unless, by an extravagance, some theologian should teach that the Almighty Himself had merited His See also:sovereignty by the virtuous use of freedom
.
On the other hand, a See also:shadow is cast upon the future by Origen's fear that incalculable free will may again depart from God
.
Human birth in a grossly material See also:body is partly due to the pre-temporal fall of souls; here we see in Origen the Greek, the dualist (mind and See also:matter), the ascetic, and to some extent the kinsman of the Gnostics
.
But he breaks away again when he asserts that God ever See also:wills to do good, and is seeking each lost soul until He find it
.
Even Satan must repent and live.'
It was not possible that this brilliant tour de force should become the theology of Christendom
.
Origen contributed one or two points to the central development of thought; e.g. the Son of God is " eternally " begotten in a continuous process
.
But while to Origen creation also was a continuous process, an unspeculative orthodoxy struck out the latter point as inconsistent with biblical teaching; and we must See also: The antagonism of the two schools governs much of the history of doctrine; and b |