Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

THEISM

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V26, Page 785 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

THEISM  . corrupted, though from a very See also:

early See also:period . He regards the See also:Stoics as having initiated a philosophical See also:theology, and gives numerous references for the " three theologies " which they distinguished . See also:Philo the See also:Jew is also quoted as using BeoXbyos of poets, of See also:Moses See also:par excellence, and of See also:Greek philosophers . It is possible that the epithet BeoXoyor for St See also:John may go back as far as See also:Papias . This is the first See also:appearance of the See also:term upon See also:Christian ground . The See also:primitive application of BeoXbyot to the poets and myth-fanciers meets us again in See also:Church writers; but there is also a tendency to use the name for a philosophical theology based on the See also:doctrine of the See also:Logos . In this sense See also:Gregory Nazianzen also receives the See also:title BeoXiyos . His 71E01 OsoXoyias is a dissertation on the knowledge of See also:God.' Many centuries later See also:Abelard generalized the expression in books which came to See also:bear the titles Theologia Christiana and Introductio ad Theologiam . (Abelard speaks himself of " theologia nostra.") z It is of See also:interest to See also:note that even in these books the Trinity and Christology are the topics of outstanding importance . In the Summa Theologiae of See also:Thomas See also:Aquinas the technical sense is fully established . Except in See also:special circumstances which generally explain themselves, e.g .

" Homeric Theology " (a See also:

book by See also:Nagelsbach), Old Testament Theology, See also:Comparative Theology, Natural Theology, the word in See also:modern See also:languages means the theology of the Christian Church . What follows here will be confined to that subject . While the word points to God as the special theme of the theologian, other topics inevitably find entrance . Theistic Contents See also:philosophy thinks of God as the See also:absolute being; and of every monotheistic See also:religion insists, nit indeed that theology, the knowledge of God includes all knowledge, but that this supremely important knowledge throws fresh See also:light upon everything . So, with an added Christian intensity, St See also:Paul declares: " If any See also:man is in See also:Christ, he is a new creature; the old things are passed away; behold, they are become new . But all things are of God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ " (2 See also:Cor . V . 17, 18) . A minimum See also:division might be threefold—Gottesbegriff, Selbstbeurteilung, Weltanschauung.' But historically it is more important to note that Christian theology has See also:developed as a doctrine concerning Christ: his relation to God, our relation to God in or through him . For Christ is viewed as bringing redemption—a conception of importance in many religions, but in none so important as in See also:Christianity . Indeed, another possibility opens up here . In-See also:stead of being mainly a doctrine concerning God, or one concerning Christ, theology may be construed as being mainly the theory of Christian experience .

Most See also:

schools of theology will concur, however, in giving prominence to a complementary point of view and making their systems a study of Divine See also:revelation . Even if they accept Natural Theology, they generally hold that Christian theology, properly so called, begins at a further point . Those who deny this were formerly called Naturalists, i.e. deniers of supernatural revelation; those who extend the See also:province of See also:reason in theology, and push back the frontier of revelation, are often called Rationalists.4 Such being the Theology usual point of view, it is See also:plain that the claim of as a theology to be a See also:science, or a See also:group of sciences, is science. made in a sense of its own . In so far as theology is orderly, coherent, systematic, and seeks to See also:rest upon See also:good grounds of some sort, it may be called a science . But, in so far as it claims to See also:deal with special revelation, it lifts itself out of the circle of the sciences, and turns away from natural know- Other usages of OsoXoyia are the Divine nature of Christ (St John See also:Chrysostom, quoted in Konstantinides' Greek See also:Lexicon), Old and New Testaments (See also:Theodoret, ib.) ; Greek theology and See also:Mosaic or revealed theology (Theodoret) . z F . See also:Nitzsch in See also:Herzog-Plitt, Realencyk . (1877) . See also:Fuller details regarding Abelard's writings in the same author's See also:art. in Herzog-Hauck (1896) . 4 So See also:Ritschl, following See also:Schleiermacher, Der Christliche Glaube, § 30 . 4 A . W .

Benn (See also:

History of See also:English See also:Rationalism in the 19th Cent.) goes beyond See also:ordinary usage in defining rationalism as a militant' theory opposed to all belief in God.ledge towards what it regards as more intimate messages from God . Two special usages should be noted: (1) a See also:medieval use of " theology " for mystical or intuitive knowledge of God, as in the well-known book called Theologia Germanica; (2) " theology proper," in See also:Protestant systems, is the portion of theology which deals directly with the doctrine of God . Another characteristic of theology is its secondary and reflective See also:character . Religion, therefore, is earlier than theo- logy . Or the theology which religion contains is in Theology a See also:state of See also:solution—vaguely defined and suffused and with emotion; important practically, but intellectu- ally unsatisfying . " Scientific " theology contrasts with this as a laboratory See also:extract . History may soften the contrast by discovering transitional forms, and by showing the religious interest at See also:work in theology as well as the scientific interest affecting early utterances of religion . Still, this contrast enters into the meaning of divines when they say that they are at work upon a science . A religious man need no more be a theologian than a poet need have a theory of See also:aesthetics . Where, then, are we to look for Christian theology ? It is not the truism it may seem if we reply that we are to find it in the writings of theologians . As authorities See also:control- See also:sources. See also:ling their work, theologians may name the See also:Bible, or tradition, or the religious consciousness, or the Church, or some See also:combination of these .

But the, teaching of the Bible is not systematic, and the authority of consciousness is vague; while the See also:

creeds into which Church tradition crystallizes emerge out of See also:long theological discussions . Ordinarily, doctrine has been in See also:close connexion not only with edification but with controversy . See also:Anselm of See also:Canterbury stands almost alone among the See also:great theological masters in working purely from a scientific interest; this holds alike of his contribution to theism and of his doctrine of See also:Atonement . Among the earlier theological statements are catechetical books, e.g . See also:Cyril of See also:Jerusalem . These books See also:record doctrinal instruction given, for See also:practical ends, to laymen of adult years who were candidates for See also:baptism . Disinterested discussions by experts for experts is medieval rather than primitive . Modern catechisms in the See also:form of question and See also:answer for the instruction of baptized See also:children are sometimes convenient if dry summaries of doctrine (e.g. the See also:Westminster See also:Assembly's Shorter See also:Catechism); but sometimes they have the glow of religious tenderness, like See also:Luther's Lesser Catechism, or the See also:Heidelberg Catechism . They generally expound (r) The Apostles' Creed, (2) the Ten Commandments, (3) the See also:Lord's See also:Prayer . Medieval theology has an appearance of keeping in See also:touch with the Apostles' Creed when it divides the substance of doctrine into (usually) twelve " articles " —not always the same twelve—a See also:reminiscence of the legendary See also:composition of the Creed in twelve sections by the twelve apostles . This treatment, however, has little real See also:influence upon the structure of medieval theology . See also:German Protestant writers, again, following their catechisms, often distinguish three articles—of the See also:Father, of the Son, and of the See also:Holy Spirit .

This, too, is no more than convenient phraseology . Before the Christian See also:

age, there had been a good deal of reflective thinking in the Jewish schools, though the interest there was legal rather than speculative . To some extent Christianity in- Jewish herited this Jewish theology . True, Jesus Christ sprang theology. from the See also:people . He was a" layman" (Paul Wernle),with- out technical Jewish See also:lore . The great attainment of the Old Testament, ethical monotheism, had become the See also:common See also:property of the nation; it occurs in Christianity as a See also:simple presupposition . Early Christian writers find it unnecessary to prove what no one dreams of questioning . Along with this great doctrine there pass on into Christianity the slowly attained See also:hope of resurrection and the dreadful doctrine of future See also:punishment for the wicked . Leading thoughts in the teaching of Jesus, so far as they are new, are the Fatherhood of God—new at least in the central See also:place given it—the imminence of the " See also:kingdom " or See also:judgment of God, and Jesus' own place as " See also:Messiah," i.e. as See also:king (and as See also:judge) . The "second founder" of Christianity, Paul of See also:Tarsus, was indeed rabbinically trained . His recoil from Judaism is all the more intense because of St Paul. the special intellectual presuppositions which he See also:con- tinues to See also:share with Judaism . In many respects, Pauline Christianity is the obverse of the Pharisaic creed .

Modern Christians are . tempted to See also:

charge the seeming extravagance of St Paul's thought upon his Jewish See also:inheritance, while modern See also:Jews are tempted to stigmatize them as See also:grotesque exaggerations of reasonable rabbinical doctrines . Probably both are right, and both wrong . The germs were Jewish; but, transported to a new See also:soil, and watered with a new See also:enthusiasm, they assumed new forms . These cannot claim the merit of correctness, but they are See also:works of religious See also:genius . At the same See also:time, they employ all the resources of See also:dialectic, and have, therefore, taken quite See also:half the See also:journey from See also:primary religion to theology . But the dislocation of religious thinking, when Christianity ceased to be a Jewish faith and found a See also:home with Gentiles, destroyed the continuity of Paulinism and of Jewish thought working through St Paul . In later times, when Paulinism revived, the epistles spoke for themselves, though they were not always correctly understood . It should be added that, according to A . See also:Harnack, Hellenistic Judaism had worked out the principles of a theology which simply passed on into the Greek-speaking Christian Church . Besides the teaching of Jesus (best preserved in the first three gospels) and the teaching of Paul (in six, ten, or thirteen Contents epistles), the See also:recent " science " of New Testament of New theology finds other types of doctrine . The See also:Epistle to Testa- the See also:Hebrews is a parallel to Paulinism, working out See also:meat. upon See also:independent lines the finality of Christianity and its superiority to the Old Testament .

The Johannine See also:

Gospel and Epistles are later than Paulinism, and presuppose its leading or less startling positions . Whatever See also:historical elements may be preserved in Christ's discourses as given in the See also:Fourth Gospel, these discourses See also:fit into the author's type of thought better than into the synoptical framework . They have been transformed . I See also:Peter is good independent Paulinism . The Epistle of See also:James may breathe a Christianized Jewish legalism, or, as others hold, it may breathe the legalism (not untouched by Jewish influences) of popular See also:Gentile-Christian thought . The Johannine See also:Apocalypse is chiefly interesting as an apocalypse . F . C . See also:Baur and his school interpreted it as a manifesto of See also:anti-Pauline Jewish Christianity; on the contrary, it closely approaches Paul's doctrine of the Atonement and his Christology . Other writings are of less importance . Acts is indeed of interest in showing us Paulinism in a later See also:stage; the writer wishes to reproduce his great See also:master's thought, but his Paulinism is simplified and cut down . Possibly the See also:Pastoral Epistles show the same See also:process .

When we go outside the New Testament, this involuntary lack of grasp becomes even more marked . Neither the theory of infallible See also:

inspiration, with its assertion of absolute uniformity in the New Testament, nor Baur's See also:criticism, with its assertion of irreconcilable antagonisms, is See also:borne out by facts . The New Testament is many-sided, but it has a predominant spiritual unity . Only in See also:minor details do contradictions emerge . It is to be remembered that criticism has broken up the historical unity of the New Testament collection and placed many of its components See also:side by side with writings which have never been canonized, and which conservative writers had supposed to be distinctly later . But in regard to date there has been a remarkable See also:retreat from the earlier See also:critical assertions . And at any See also:rate, since the New Testament See also:canon was set up, New Testament writings have had a theological influence which no others can claim . On both sides of the great transition from being a Jewish to being a Gentile faith, Christianity, according to recent study, mani- Bathus- fested itself as " enthusiastic." We may distinguish See also:Mann „ several points in this conception . (I) Most important, perhaps—the end of the See also:world was held to be close at See also:hand . "Kingdom of God " as generally used was an eschatological concept ; and, whatever difficulties there may be as to certain gospel passages, Christ, to say the least, cannot have disclaimed this view . The watchword rings through all the New Testament—" the Lord is at hand.” A broader popular form was given to this expectation in " See also:Chiliasm "—the doctrine of the " Thousand " years' reign' of Christ on See also:earth (Rev. xx . 1-7) .

But even Chiliasm —which itself has its subtler and its grosser modifications—is found in early Gentile as well as in early Jewish Christianity . (2) I See also:

Corinthians shows us a _ Christian community filled with disturbances, and apparently without recognized officials . The democratic, or rather theocratic, rights of the spiritual man were for a time relied on to extemporize so much Church See also:government as might be needed till the Master returned . Yet the beginnings of Church See also:order come earlier than those of doctrine proper; and much earlier than the cooling of eschatological hopes . (3) There are traces inside and 'Four See also:hundred years is another significant figure in the Jewish book, 4 See also:Ezra.outside the New Testament of aversion to receiving back into Church fellowship those who, after confessing Christ, had been guilty of See also:grave sins . The New Testament See also:evidence is by no means See also:uniform (contrast Heb. vi . 4-6, x . 26-31; 1 John v . 16; with 2 Cor. ii . 7) ; but this high conception of Church holiness is attested by a See also:series of rigorist " heresies" during the early centuries; and nothing could be more characteristic of eschatological enthusiasm . Those who had fallen were not banished from hope, even by the rigorists . Still, their See also:case was held over for a higher Judge; while the Church, especially in these more Puritian and separatist See also:groups, kept her garments See also:white .

(4) The enthusiastic view of the possibilities of the Christian See also:

life—associated, as modern and especially Western Christians must suspect, with shallow See also:external views of See also:sinSee also:lent itself to belief iin sinless perfection . Even St Paul has been supposed, not without a certain plausibility, to See also:teach the sinless perfection of real Christians . The See also:West, with its theology protesting in the background, but in vain, still sings the prayer of the Te Deum: " Vouchsafe, 0 Lord, to keep us this See also:day without sin." Such an enthusiastic See also:temper does not lend itself to cool theory . Why should theology labour at See also:definitions ? " The Lord is at hand;" a Christian's one See also:wisdom is to be ready to MateNai meet him . And yet materials for theology were richly for provided even during this period . That is true above all theology. of the man whom we know best in New Testament days St Paul . Himself through and through animated with the joyful hope, even when prepared to surrender (2 Cor . V . 8; Phil. i . 23, ii . 17) the prospect of See also:personal survival (i Thess. iv .

17; i Cor. xv . 51, 52) until that See also:

bright day, yet as a teacher he See also:lays such stress upon Christ's first coming that the emphasis on the second See also:Advent may be struck out—leaving still, we might almost claim, a See also:complete Paulinism . He who planned his See also:campaigns to the great civilized centres of See also:Corinth, See also:Ephesus and See also:Rome, and thus prepared for a historic future of which he did not See also:dream, See also:drew his See also:parallels of thought with no less See also:firm hand, and showed himself indeed " a See also:wise master-builder." In one aspect See also:Montanism is the central reaction of the primitive Christian enthusiasm against the forces which were transforming its character . Of course it had other aspects and elements as well . See also:Hippolytus and Novatian repeat the protest less vehemently; Donatism shows it blended with later hierarchical ideas . But, when the enthusiasm cooled, it was Greek thought which interpreted the contents of Christianity . The process of See also:change is called by Harnack sometimes " secularization" and Greekinsometimes ' Hellenization." "Acute Hellenizing," we are Buenos . told, took the form of See also:Gnosticism . The Gnostics were the " first theologians." When the Church in turn began to produce a theology of her own she was imitating as well as guarding against those wayward See also:spirits . What was to be the central topic ? The Church's first creed had been " the Fatherhood of God and the Messiahship of Jesus " (A . Ritschl) ; but the " See also:Rule of Faith " (See also:Irenaeus; See also:Tertullian, who uses the exact expression; See also:Origen)—that See also:summary of religiously important facts which was meant to See also:ward off See also:error without reliance on speculations such as the Logos doctrine—built itself up along the lines of the baptismal See also:formula of Matt. See also:xxviii .

192 There are traces in the New Testament of a baptismal See also:

confession simply of the name of Christ (1 Cor. i . 13, 15; Rom. vi . 2; cf. even the See also:late See also:verse Acts viii . 37), not of the three-See also:fold name . Moreover, textual criticism points to an early type of See also:reading in Matt. xxviii . 19 without the threefold formula . Still, it is See also:strange how completely this seemingly isolated passage takes command of the development of early theology . Out of the Rule of Faith there came in time what tradition miscalls the Apostles' Creed—the See also:Roman baptismal creed, a formulary of great importance in all the West; then other creeds, which also are in a sense expansions of the Rule of Faith . The Greek mind threw itself upon the problem—who precisely is Jesus Christ the Lord ? His Messiahship is asserted; who then is Doctrine the Messiah? and this second figure in the baptismal of Trinity confession ? A provisional answer, linking Christian andof theology with the philosophical theology of antiquity, See also:person of asserted Jesus Christ to be the divine Logos . But this Christ. assertion was See also:expanded and refined upon till two great doctrines had been built up—that of the Trinity of divine Persons in the unity of the Godhead, and that of the See also:union of two distinct natures, divine and human, in the person of Jesus Christ .

It is curious that the Syrian church of the 4th See also:

century (e.g . See also:Aphraates) was almost unaffected by the great dogmatic debates . But there is no hint of a reasoned rejection of Greek developments in favour of primitive simplicity, still less of any independent theological development . Aphraates accepts the Logos Christology, and, soon after his time, his church is found on the beaten track of orthodoxy . 2 H .Harnack is right in regarding a New Testament canon as one of the " See also:Apostolical authorities " which the Church brought into the See also:field against Gnosticism, we see the truth on historical rounds of the position taught on dogmatic grounds by R . See also:Rainy Delivery and Development of Christian Doctrine)—scriptural faith f Delivery the starting-point but the See also:goal of theological development . The starting-point is rather he " Rule of Faith." Modern Christians generally See also:trust this development; and all of them must admit that it seeks to answer a question arising out of the elements of New Testament belief . There is one God; but also there is one Lord; how are the two related ? The strongest claim that can be put forward for the doctrine of the Trinity is that it is loyal to Christ without being disloyal to the Divine unity . Concurrently, there was a speculative or philosophical interest; and some prefer to defend Trinitarianism as a reconciliation of the See also:personality with the infinity of God . But the biblical materials worked up in the doctrine betray little sign of any except a religious, interest . We may take it as well established that St Paul (2 Cor. viii .

9: Phil. ii . 5–11) taught the personal pre-existence of Christ . A . M . See also:

Fairbairn (Phil. of Christian Religion, p . 476) has argued that Paul could not have given this teaching unless he had known of Christ's advancing the claim . Fairbairn barely refers to the Fourth Gospel in this connexion, and it is doubtful-whether Matt. xi . 27 will bear such See also:weight as he puts upon it . Of course, we might seek to infer an unwritten tradition of Christ's words; but without pedantic ultra-Protestant devotion to written scripture, one may distrust on scientific grounds the See also:attempt to reconstruct tradition by a process of inference . If such records as John vi . 36, viii . 58, xvii .

3, 4 can be taken as historical, we may feel certain that Jesus taught his pre-existence . If not, modern Christian minds will hardly regard the doctrine as more than a See also:

speculation . Yet we should mention another See also:argument of some weight . There is no trace that any Jewish Christian critics challenged St Paul's Christology . This may point to its being the Christology of the whole Church . If so, who could first teach it except the one Master ? \V Bousset has suggested that the title " Son of Man " (See also:Dan. via . 13), used by Jesus, may have come to imply for all early Christians personal pre-existence . W . See also:Wrede and others have more boldly conjectured that the Christ's pre-existence had become an accepted See also:element in Jewish Messianic—it certainly occurs in one portion of the Book of See also:Enoch and in 4 Ezra'—and that Paul merely transferred to Jesus a doctrine which he had held while still in the Jews' religion . " Son of God " might seem to carry us further still; but the Old Testament makes See also:free use of the title as a metaphorical See also:honour, and we have no See also:proof that any Jewish school interpreted the phrase differently . The See also:rival type of early theology is known as Adoptionism or See also:Adoptianism (q.v.) .

According to it, the man Jesus was exalted See also:

Adoption- to Messianic or divine See also:rank . It has been argued that ism. the narrative of Christ's baptism points to anAdoptionist Christclogy, and that the genealogies of Jesus (through See also:Joseph) presuppose this type of belief, if not a still See also:lower view of Christ's person . It has further been argued that the narratives of the Virgin See also:birth (See also:Matthew, See also:Luke) are an intermediate stage in Christology . When pre-existence is clearly taught (Paul, John), virgin birth, it is suggested, loses its importance; another theory of Divine Sonship has established itself . This trenchant See also:analysis is, however, not universally admitted . Further development of doctrine weeded out the last traces of Adoptionist belief,' though Christ's exaltation continued to be taught in correlation to His humiliation (Phil. ii . 8), and became in due time a dogmatic See also:locus in Protestantism . The lineaments of Greek Christian theology show themselves more clearly in See also:Justin See also:Martyr than in the other Apologists, but still more plainly in Irenaeus, who, with little speculative See also:power, keeps the safe See also:middle path . Tertullian's legal training as a lawyer was a curious coincidence, if nothing more, and those legal concepts which show themselves strongly in him have done much to See also:mould the Western type of Christian theology . He had great influence on the course of Latin theology, partly through his own writings, but still more through the spell he See also:cast upon See also:Cyprian . At See also:Alexandria, See also:Clement and his great See also:pupil Origen state Christianity in terms of philosophy . Origen's See also:treatise, De Przincipiis, origen. is the first and in some respects the greatest theo- logical See also:system in the whole of Church history .

The Catechetical school was primarily meant for instructing adult inquirers into Christianity . But it had attained the rank of a Christian university; and in this treatise Origen does not furnish See also:

milk for babes; he writes for himself and for like-minded See also:friends . Wildly conjectural as it may seem, his thinking—though partly Greek and only in See also:part biblical—is The passages referred to have sometimes, but with no great See also:probability, been regarded as Christian infiltrations . 2 Adoptionism is one See also:species of See also:Monarchianism . The other species,llodalism, has its most important type historically in Sabellianism . And the name Sabellianism is often loosely applied (e.g. to Swedenborgianism) to any modalistic Monarchianism (Christ one phase of God . Not three persons in the Godhead, but a threefold revelation of a God strictly one in person).completely fused together in his own mind . Nor does it ever suffer from lack of thoroughness . It may be summed up in one word as the theology of free will . Unfaltering use is made of that conception as a See also:key to all religious and moral problems . Usually, apologists and divines are hampered by the fact that, beyond a certain limited range, men cannot be regarded as separable moral See also:units . A new world, after See also:death, may be called in to redress the See also:balance of the old; but anomalies remain which faith in a future See also:immortality does not touch .

Origen called in a second new world—that of pre-existence . All souls were tried once, with equal See also:

privilege; all See also:fell, See also:save one, who steadily slave to the Logos, and thus merited to become in due time the human soul of Jesus Christ . No higher See also:function could be given to free will; unless, by an extravagance, some theologian should teach that the Almighty Himself had merited His See also:sovereignty by the virtuous use of freedom . On the other hand, a See also:shadow is cast upon the future by Origen's fear that incalculable free will may again depart from God . Human birth in a grossly material See also:body is partly due to the pre-temporal fall of souls; here we see in Origen the Greek, the dualist (mind and See also:matter), the ascetic, and to some extent the kinsman of the Gnostics . But he breaks away again when he asserts that God ever See also:wills to do good, and is seeking each lost soul until He find it . Even Satan must repent and live.' It was not possible that this brilliant tour de force should become the theology of Christendom . Origen contributed one or two points to the central development of thought; e.g. the Son of God is " eternally " begotten in a continuous process . But while to Origen creation also was a continuous process, an unspeculative orthodoxy struck out the latter point as inconsistent with biblical teaching; and we must See also:grant that the eternal See also:generation of the Divine Son adds a more distinctive See also:glory to the Logos when it is no longer balanced by an eternal creation . While the Church thus lived upon fragments of Origen's wisdom, lovers of the great See also:scholar and thinker, who had dominated his age, and reconciled many a heretic to his own version of orthodoxy, must submit to have him branded as a heretic in later days, when all freedom of thought was falling under suspicion . For a time, freedom in scholarship lingered in the younger rival of Alexandria, the school of See also:Antioch; though speculation was never so strong there . Alexandria, on the other hand, tended to be unduly speculative and allegorizing even in its scholarship .

The antagonism of the two schools governs much of the history of doctrine; and b