Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

LEWIS THEOBALD (1688-1744)

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V26, Page 760 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

See also:

LEWIS See also:THEOBALD (1688-1744)  , See also:English See also:man of letters, playwright and Shakespearian commentator, the son of an See also:attorney, was See also:born at See also:Sittingbourne, See also:Kent, and was baptized on the 2nd of See also:April 1688 . He was educated under a clergyman named See also:Ellis at Isleworth, and became a See also:good classical See also:scholar . He followed his See also:father's profession, but soon abandoned it for literature . In 1713 he translated the See also:Phaedo of See also:Plato, and entered into a See also:contract with See also:Bernard See also:Lintot the publisher to translate the tragedies of See also:Aeschylus . He seems to have made other promises not carried out, but in 1714 and 1715 appeared versions of the See also:Electra, the See also:Ajax, and the See also:Oedipus Rex of See also:Sophocles, and the See also:Plutus and the Clouds of See also:Aristophanes . He became a See also:regular hack-writer, contributing to Mist's See also:Journal, and producing plays and poews of very small merit . The publication of his See also:play The Perfidious See also:Brother (acted 171.5; printed 1716) involved See also:Theobald in considerable difficulty . He apparently received a rough draft of the play from See also:Henry Meystayer, a See also:London watchmaker, with a See also:commission to arrange it for the See also:stage . Theobald brought it out as his own See also:work . In the next See also:year Meystayer produced a version, and charged Theobald with See also:plagiarism, but there is no means of ascertaining the exact.; rights of the See also:case . His poverty compelled him to produce rapidly . He translated the first See also:book of the Odyssey (1716), wrote tragi-comedies, operas and masques, and helped See also:John See also:Rich in the See also:production of pantomimes, then an innovation at See also:Drury See also:Lane .

But in 1726 he produced See also:

Shakespeare Restored, or a Specimen of the many Errors as well Committed as Unamended by Mr See also:Pope in his See also:late edition of this Poet; designed not only to correct the said Edition, but to restore the true See also:Reading of Shakespeare in all the See also:Editions ever published (1726) . How-ever See also:ill Theobald may have succeeded as a poet and dramatist, he showed See also:great discrimination as a textual editor . Some of his happiest emendations are to be found in this work, which conclusively proved Pope's incompetence as a Shakespearian editor . Two years later a second edition of Pope's work appeared . In it he stated that he had incorporated some of Theobald's readings, in all amounting to about twenty-five words, and that he added the See also:rest which could " at worst but spoil See also:half a See also:sheet of See also:paper that chances to be See also:left vacant here." He also insinuated that Theobald had maliciously kept back his emendations during the progress of the edition . All this was a See also:gross misstatement of fact . He had in reality incor• porated the See also:majority of Theobald's best emendations . In the first edition of the Dunciad (1728) Theobald figured as the See also:hero, and he occupied the See also:place of See also:chief victim until replaced by See also:Colley See also:Cibber in 1741 . In spite of the critics, Theobald's work was appreciated by the public . In 1731 he undertook to edit Shakespeare for See also:Tonson the publisher . The work appeared in seven volumes in 1734, and completely superseded Pope's edition . From 1729 to the date of its publication Theobald had been engaged in See also:correspondence on the subject with See also:Warburton, who after his friend's See also:death published an edition of Shakespeare, in the See also:preface of which he asserted that Theobald owed his best corrections to him .

Study of the correspondence proves, however, that the indebtedness was on Warburton's See also:

side . Subsequent editors reaped, in most cases without See also:acknowledgment or with actual scorn, the See also:fruit of Theobald's pains-taking labour, his wide learning and his See also:critical See also:genius . But Pope's See also:satire, as See also:Johnson justly remarked, blasted the characters that it touched . Theobald remained the, type of the dry-as-dust commentator . His merits obtained a tardy recognition on the publication of a detailed study of his critical work by Mr Churton See also:Collins in an See also:essay entitled " The See also:Porson of Shakespearian See also:Criticism " (Essays and Studies, 1895) . Theo-bald gave See also:proof of the same happy See also:gift in classical scholarship in some emendations of Aeschylus, See also:Eustathius, See also:Athenaeus and others, contributed to a learned journal started by John See also:Jortin in 1731 . He was' a See also:candidate for the laureateship in 1730, but Cibber gained the coveted See also:post . His last years were harassed by poverty and disease . He began a critical edition of the plays of See also:Beaumont and See also:Fletcher, completed by See also:Seward and Sympson after his death, which took place on the 18th of See also:September 1744 . His correspondence with See also:Matthew Concanen, Styan See also:Thirlby and See also:William Warburton is to be found in See also:Nichols's Illustrations of Literature (ii . 204-654), which also gives the fullest See also:account of his See also:life .

End of Article: LEWIS THEOBALD (1688-1744)
[back]
THEOBALD (d. 1161)
[next]
THEOCRACY (Gr. Oeoeparia, the rule of God, from Oeb...

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.