Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:THEOPOMPUS (b. c. 380)
, See also:Greek historian and rhetorician, was See also:born at See also:Chios about 38o B.C
.
In See also:early youth he seems to have spent some See also:time at See also:Athens, along with his See also:father, who had been exiled on See also:account of his Laconian sympathies
.
Here he became a See also:pupil of Isocrates, and rapidly made See also:great progress in See also:rhetoric; we are told that Isocrates used to say that See also:Ephorus required the See also:spur but See also:Theopompus the See also:bit (See also:Cicero, See also:Brutus, 204)
.
At first he appears to have composed epideictic speeches, in which he attained to such proficiency that in 352—351 he gained the See also:prize of See also:oratory given by See also:Artemisia (q.v.) in See also:honour of her See also:husband, although Isocrates was himself among the competitors
.
It is said to have been the See also:advice of his teacher that finally determined his career as an historian—a career for which he was peculiarly qualified owing to his abundant patrimony and his wide knowledge of men and places
.
Through the See also:influence of See also: Sic., xiii . 42, with xiv . 84) . Of this See also:work only a few fragments were known up till 1907 . The See also:papyrus fragment of a Greek historian of the 4th See also:century B.C., discovered by B . P . Grenfell and A . S . See also:Hunt, and published by them in Oxyrhynchus Papyri, vol. v . (1908), has been recognized by Ed . See also:Meyer, U. von Wilamowitz-Moellendorff and G . Busolt as a portion of the Hellenics .
This See also:identification has been disputed, however, by F
.
See also:Blass, J
.
B
.
See also:Bury, E
.
M
.
See also: The Attack upon See also:Plato, and the See also:treatise On Piety, which are sometimes referred to as See also:separate works, were perhaps only two of the many digressions in the history of Philip; some writers have doubted their authenticity . The libellous attack (Tpucapavos, the " three-headed ") on the three cities—Athens, See also:Sparta and See also:Thebes—was published under the name of Theopompus by his enemy Anaximenes of See also:Lampsacus . The nature of the extant fragments fully bears out the divergent criticisms of antiquity upon Theopompus . Their See also:style is clear and pure, full of choice and pointed expressions, but lacking in See also:weight and dignity . The See also:artistic unity of his work suffered severely from the frequent and lengthy digressions already referred to . The most important was 788 that On the Athenian Demagogues in the loth book of the Philippica, containing a See also:bitter attack on many of the chief Athenian statesmen, and generally recognized as having been freely used by Plutarch in several of the Lives . Another See also:fault of Theopompus was his excessive fondness for romantic and incredible stories; a collection of some of these (Oauulvna) was afterwards made and published under his name . He was also severely blamed in antiquity for his censoriousness, and throughout his fragments no feature is more striking than this . On the whole, however, he appears to have been fairly impartial . Philip himself he censures severely for See also:drunkenness and immorality, while See also:Demosthenes receives his warm praise . |
|
|
[back] THEOPHYLACT (d. c.. 1110) |
[next] THEORBO |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.