Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:TORTURE (from See also:Lat. torquere, to twist)
, the See also:general name for innumerable modes of inflicting See also:pain which have been from See also:time to time devised by the perverted ingenuity of See also:man, and especially for those employed in a legal aspect by the civilized nations of antiquity and of See also:modern See also:Europe
.
From this point of view See also:torture was always inflicted for one of two purposes: (1) As a means of eliciting See also:evidence from a See also:witness or from an accused See also:person either before or after condemnation; (2) as a See also:part of the See also:punishment
.
The second was the earlier use, its See also:function as a means of evidence arising when rules were gradually formulated by the experience of legal experts
.
Torture as a part of the punishment may be regarded as including every See also:kind of bodily or See also:mental pain beyond what is necessary for the safe custody of the offender (with or without enforced labour) or the destruction of his See also:life—in the See also:language of See also:Bentham, an " afflictive " as opposed to a " See also:simple " punishment
.
Thus the unnecessary sufferings endured in See also:English prisons before the reforms of See also: Confession, as probatio probatissima and vox See also:vera, was the best of all evidence, and all the machinery of law was moved to obtain it . The trials for See also:witchcraft remain on See also:record as a refutation of the theory . The opinions of the best See also:lay authorities have been almost unanimously against the use of torture, even in a See also:system where it was as completely established as it was in See also:Roman law . " Tormenta," says See also:Cicero,' in words which it is almost impossible to translate satisfactorily, " gubernat dolor, regit quaesitor, flectit libido, corrumpit See also:spes, infirmat metus, ut in tot rerum angustiis nihil veritati loci relinquatur." See also:Seneca says bitterly, " it forces even the See also:innocent to See also:lie." St See also:Augustine 4 recognizes the See also:fallacy of torture . " If," says he, " the accused be innocent, he will undergo for an uncertain See also:crime a certain punishment, and that not for having committed a crime, but because it is'unknown whether he committed it." At the same time he regards it as excused by its See also:necessity . The words of See also:Ulpian, in the See also:Digest of Justinian,' are no less impressive: " The torture (quaestio) is not to be regarded as wholly deserving or wholly undeserving of confidence; indeed, it is untrustworthy, perilous and deceptive . For most men, by See also:patience or the severity of the torture, come so to despise the torture that the truth cannot be elicited from them; others are so impatient that they will lie in any direction rather than suffer the torture; so it happens that they depose to contradictions and accuse not only themselves but others." See also:Montaigne's' view of torture as a part of the punishment is a most just one: " All that exceeds a simple See also:death appears to me See also:absolute See also:cruelty; neither can our See also:justice expect that he whom the fear of being executed by being beheaded or hanged will not restrain should be any more awed by the See also:imagination of a languishing See also:fire, burning pincers, - or the See also:wheel." He continues with the curious phrase: " He whom the See also:judge has tortured (gehenne) that he may not See also:die innocent, See also:dies innocent and tortured." See also:Montesquieu' speaks of torture in a most guarded manner, condemning it, but without giving reasons, and eulogizing England for doing without it . The system was condemned by See also:Bayle and See also:Voltaire with less reserve . Among 1 But even in these countries, whatever the law was, torture certainly existed in fact . 2 See also:Primitive systems varied . There is no trace of it in Babylonian or See also:Mosaic law, but See also:Egyptian and See also:Assyrian provided for it; and the See also:story of See also:Regulus seems to show that it was in use at See also:Carthage . ' See also:Pro See also:Sulla, c . 28 . 4 De civ . Dei, bk. xix. c . 6 . Dig. xlviii . 18, 23 . 'See also:Essay lxv . (See also:Cotton's trans.) 7 Esprit See also:des lois, bk. vi . C . 17 . the Germans, Sonnenfels (1766), and, among the Italians, See also:Beccaria,l Verri 2 and See also:Manzoni 3 will be found to contain most that can be said on the subject . The See also:influence of Beccaria in rendering the use of torture obsolete was undoubtedly greater than that of any other legal reformer . The great point that he makes is the unfair incidence of torture, as minds and bodies differ in strength . Moreover, it is, says he, to confound all relations to expect that a man should be both accuser and accused, and that pain should be the test of truth, as though truth resided in the muscles and See also:fibres of a wretch under torture . The result of the torture is simply a See also:matter of calculation . Given the force of the muscles and the sensibility of the nerves of an innocent person, it is required to find the degree of pain necessary to make him confess himself guilty of a given crime . Bentham's4 objection to torture is that the effect is exactly the See also:reverse of the intention . " Upon the See also:face of it, and probably enough in the intention of the framers, the See also:object of this institution was the See also:protection of innocence; the protection of See also:guilt and the See also:aggravation of the pressure upon innocence was the real See also:fruit of it." The apologists of torture are chiefly among jurists . But theoretical objections to it are often urged by the authors of books of practice, as by Damhouder, von Rosbach, von Boden, Voet, and others named below under the See also:head of The See also:Netherlands, It is worthy of See also:note as illustrative of the feeling of the time that even Bacon9 compares experiment in nature to torture in See also:civil matters as the best means of eliciting truth . Muyart de Vouglans 6 derives the origin of torture from the law of See also:God . Other apologists are See also:Simancas, See also:bishop of See also:Badajoz,7 See also:Engel,8 Pedro de See also:Castro,9 and in England See also:Sir R . See also:Wiseman.10 See also:Greece.—The See also:opinion of See also:Aristotle was in favour of torture as a mode of See also:proof . " It is," he says, " a kind of evidence, and appears to carry with it absolute credibility because a kind of constraint is applied." It is classed as one of the " artless persuasions " (itesgpoL 7rturssS).11 " It was the surest means of obtaining evidence, says See also:Demosthenes .? At See also:Athens slaves, and probably at times See also:resident aliens, were tortured,13 in the former See also:case generally with the See also:master's consent, but torture was seldom applied to See also:free citizens,34 such application being forbidden by a psephism passed in the archonship of Scamandrius . After the See also:mutilation of the See also:Hermae in 415 B.C. a proposition was made, but not carried, that it should be applied to two senators named by an informer . In this particular case See also:Andocides gave up all his slaves to be tortured.15 Torture was sometimes inflicted in open See also:court . The See also:rack was used as a punishment even for free citizens . See also:Antiphon was put to death by this means ? The torture of See also:Nicias by the Syracusans is alluded to by Thucydides17 as an event likely to happen, and it was only in See also:order to avoid the possibility of inconvenient disclosures that he was put to death without torture . Isocrates and See also:Lysias refer to torture under the generic name of orpl¢Xwocs, but it was generally called (i6.Qavo,, in the plural, like tormenta . As might be expected, torture was frequently inflicted by the See also:Greek despots, and both See also:Zeno and See also:Anaxarchus are said to have been put to it by such irresponsible authorities . At See also:Sparta the See also:despot Nabis was accustomed, as we learn from See also:Polybius,ls to put persons to death by an See also:instrument of torture in the See also:form of his wife Apega, a mode of torture no doubt resembling the Jungfernkuss once used in See also:Germany . At See also:Argos, as Diodorus informs us (xv . 57), certain conspirators were put to the torture in 371 B.C.19 Dei Delitti e delle bene, c. xvi . 2 Osservazioni sulla tortura . 3 Storia della See also:Colonna infame .
4 See also:Works, vii
.
525
.
Nov
.
Org., bk. i. aph
.
98
.
In the See also:Advancement of Learning, bk. iv. ch
.
4, See also: 122 (See also:London, 1686) . Rhet . I . 15, 26 . 12 In Onetum, i . 874 . 13 Usually by the diaetetae in the Hephaestaeum, Isocrates, Trapez . 361 . u The opinion of Cicero (De partitionibus oraloriis, § 34), that it was so applied at Athens and See also:Rhodes, seems, as far as regards Athens, not to be justified by existing evidence . 15 The demand for, or the giving up of, a slave for torture was called 7rpac?1rioLS its $avavov . 18 In the See also:Ramie of See also:Aristophanes, v . 617, there is a See also:list of kinds of torture, and the wheel is alluded to in Lysistrata, v . 846 . 17 vii . 86 . 18 xiii . 7 . 19 For the whole subject, see See also:Diet . See also:Ant., s.v . Tormenta . Rome.—The Roman system was the basis of all subsequent See also:European systems which recognized torture as a part of their See also:procedure, and the rules attained a refinement beyond anything approached at Athens . The law of torture was said by Cicero to See also:rest originally on See also:custom (mores majorum), but there is no allusion to it in the Twelve Tables . There are frequent allusions to it in the classical writers? both of the See also:republic and the See also:empire . The law, as it existed under the later empire, is contained mainly in the titles De quaestionibus 21 of the Digest and the See also:Code 22—the former consisting largely of opinions from the Sententiae receptae of See also:Paulus,23 the latter being for the most part merely a repetition of constitutions contained in the Theodosian Code.24 Both substantive law and procedure were dealt with by these texts of Roman law, the latter, however, not as fully as in See also:medieval codes, a large discretion being See also:left to the See also:judges . Torture was used both in civil and criminal trials, but in the former only upon slaves and freedmen or infamous persons (after Nov. xc . 1, 1, upon ignoti and obscuri if they showed signs of corruption)—such as See also:gladiators—and in the absence of alia See also:manifest¢ indici¢ 25 as in cases affecting the See also:inheritance (res hereditariae) . Its See also:place in the case of free citizens was taken by the reference to the See also:oath of the party . During the republic torture appears to have been confined to slaves in all cases, but with the empire a free man became liable to it if accused of a crime, though in most cases not as a witness . On an See also:accusation of treason every one, whatever his See also:rank, was liable to torture, for in treason the See also:condition of all was equal.20 The same was the case of those accused of sorcery (magi), who were regarded as humani generis inirnici 17 A wife might be tortured (but only after her slaves had been put to the torture) if accused of poisoning her See also:husband . In accusations of crimes other than treason or sorcery, certain persons were protected by the dignity of their position or their See also:tender See also:age . The See also:main exemptions were contained in a constitution of See also:Diocletian and Maximian, and included soldiers, nobles of a particular rank, i.e. eminentissimi and perfectissimi, and their descendants to the third See also:generation, and decuriones and their See also:children to a limited extent (tormenta moderata)—that is to say, they were subject to the torture of the plumbatae in certain cases, such as See also:fraud on the See also:revenue and See also:extortion . In addition to these, priests (but not See also:clergy of a See also:lower rank), children under fourteen and pregnant See also:women were exempt . A free man could be tortured only where he had been inconsistent in his depositions, or where there was a suspicion that he was lying 28 The rules as to the torture of slaves were numerous and precise . It was a See also:maxim of Roman law that torture of slaves was the most efficacious means of obtaining truth.29 They could be tortured either as accused or as witnesses for their masters in all cases, but against their masters only in accusations of treason, See also:adultery, frauds on the revenue, coining, and similar offences (which were regarded as a See also:species of treason), attempts by a husband or wife on the life of the other, and in cases where a master had bought a slave for the See also:special See also:reason that he should not give evidence against him . The See also:privilege from accusations by the slave extended to the master's See also:father, See also:mother, wife, or See also:tutor, and also to a former master . On the same principle a freedman could not be tortured against his See also:patron . The privilege did not apply where the slave was See also:joint See also:property, and one of his masters had been murdered by the other, or where he was the property of a See also:corporation, for in such a case he could be tortured in a See also:charge against a member of the corporation . Slaves belonging to the inheritance could be tortured in actions concerning the inheritance . The adult slaves of a deceased person could be tortured where the deceased had been murdered . In a charge of adultery against a wife, her husband's, her own and her father's slaves could be put to the torture . A slave manumitted for the See also:express purpose of escaping torture was regarded as still liable to it . Before putting a slave to torture without the consent of his master, See also:security must be given to the master for his value and the oath of calumny must be taken.30 The master of a slave tortured on a false accusation could recover See also:double his value from the accuser . The undergoing of torture had at one time a serious effect upon the after-life of the slave, for in the time of See also:Gaius a slave who had been tortured could on manumission obtain no higher civil rights than those of a dediticius.31 The rules of procedure were conceived in a spirit of as much fairness as such rules could be . Some of the most important were these: The amount of torture was at the discretion of the judge, but it was to be so 20 An instance is See also:Pliny's See also:letter to See also:Trajan (Epist. x . 97), where he mentions having put to the torture two See also:Christian deaconesses (ministrae) . The words are confitentes iterum ac tertio interrcgavi . This supports See also:Tertullian's objection to the torture of Christians, torquemur confitentes (A poi. c . 2) . z1 Quaestio included the whole See also:process of which torture was a part . In the words of Cujacius, Quaestio est interrogatio quae See also:fit per aormenta, vel de reis, vel de testibus qui facto intervenisse dicuntur . 22 Dig. xlviii . 18; See also:Cod. ix . 41 . 23 v . 14, 15, 16 . 24 ix . 35 . 25 Cod. ix . 8, 3 . 29 Ibid. ix . 8, 4 . 27 Ibid. ix . 18, 7 . 28 Ibid. iv . 20, 13 . 29 Ibid. i . 3, 8 . 30 Ibid. ii . 59, I, T . The demand of another man's slave for torture was postulare . 31 Gaius i . 13 . applied as not to injure life or See also:limb . If so applied the judge was infamis . The examination was not to begin by torture; other proofs must be exhausted first . The evidence' must have advanced so far that nothing but the confession of the slave was wanting to See also:complete it . Those of weakest See also:frame and tenderest age were to be tortured first . Except in treason, the unsupported testimony of a single witness was not a sufficient ground for torture . The See also:voice and manner of the accused were to be carefully observed . A spontaneous confession, or the evidence of a See also:personal enemy, was to be received with caution . Repetition of the torture could only be ordered in case of inconsistent depositions or denial in the face of strong evidence . There was no See also:rule limiting the number of repetitions . Leading questions were not to be asked . A judge was not liable to an See also:action for anything done during the course of the examination .
An See also:appeal from an order to torture was competent to the accused, except in the case of slaves, when an appeal could be made only by the master.' The appellant was not to be tortured pending the appeal, but was to remain in See also:prison.' The quaesitor asked the questions, the tortores applied the See also:instruments
.
The See also:principal forms of torture in use were the equuleus, or rack (mentioned as far back as Cicero),4 the plumbatae, or leaden balls, the ungulae, or barbed hooks, the lamina, or hot See also:plate, the male mansio,' and the
fidiculae, or See also:cord compressing the See also:arm
.
Other allusions in the Digest and Code, in addition to those already cited, may be shortly noticed
.
The testimony of a gladiator or infamous person (such as an See also:accomplice) was not valid without torture.' This was no doubt the origin of the medieval See also:maxims (which were, however, by no means universally recognized)—Vilitas personae est justa causa torquendi testem, and Tortura purgatur infamia
.
Torture could not be inflicted during the See also:forty days of See also:Lent.' Robbers and pirates might be tortured even on See also:Easter See also:day, the divine See also:pardon being hoped for where the safety of society was thus assured.' See also:Capital punishment was not to be suffered until after conviction or confession under torture.9 Withdrawal from See also:prosecution (abolitio) was not to be allowed as a rule after the accused had undergone the torture." In charges of treason the accuser was liable to torture if he did not prove his case." The infliction of torture, not judicial, but at the same time countenanced by law, was at one time allowed to creditors
.
They were allowed to keep their debtors in private prisons, and most cruelly See also:ill-use them, in order to extort See also:payment.12 Under the empire private prisons were forbidden.13 In the time of See also:Juvenal the Roman ladies actually hired the public torturers to torture their domestic slaves." As a part of the punishment torture was in frequent use
.
Crucifixion, mutilation, exposure to See also:wild beasts in the See also:arena and other cruel modes of destroying life were See also:common, especially in the time of the persecution of the Christians under See also:Nero." Crucifixion as a punishment was abolished by See also:Constantine in 315, in veneration of the memory of Him who was crucified for mankind
.
On the other See also:hand, where the interests of the See also:
Indicium was rather the See also:foundation or cause of probatio, whether plena or semiplena
.
An indicium or a concurrence of indicia might, according to circumstances, constitute a plena or semi plena probatio
.
The phrase legitima indicia was sometimes used
.
In Sir T
.
See also: 62, 12 . 4 See also:Milo, )vii . Of doubtful meaning, but perhaps like the " Little Ease " of the See also:Tower of London . 6 Dig. xxii . 5, 21, 2 . 7 Cod. iii . 12, 6 . ' Ibid. in . 12, 10 . 9 Ibid. ix . 47, 16 . " o Ibid. ix . 42, 3 . " Ibid. ix . 8, 3 . 12 See, for instance, See also:Livy vi . 36 . 1' Cod. i . 4, 23; ix . 5 . " 4 Ibid. vi . 480 . " As an example of such punishments, cf. the well-known lines of Juvenal (Sat. i . 155) : Taeda lucebis in ilia, Qua stantes ardent qui fixo,gutture fumant." For other poetical allusions, see vi . 48o, xiv . 21; Lucr. iii . 1030; Propert. iv . 7, 35 . is xvi . 53 . '7 Nov. cxxiii . 31 . On the subject of torture in Roman law reference may be made to Wasserscheben, Historia quaestionum per tormenta apud See also:Romanos (See also:Berlin, 1836) ; H . See also:Walton . Histoire de l'esclavage daps l'antiquite (Paris, 1879) ; See also:Mommsen, Romisches The Leges barbarorum are interesting as forming the See also:link of connexion between the Roman and the medieval systems . Through them the Roman doctrines were transmitted into the Roman law countries . The See also:barbarian codes were based chiefly on the Theodosian Code . As compared with Roman law there seems to be a leaning towards humanity, e.g. the provision for redemption of a slave after confession by s . 40 of the Lex salica . After the See also:edict of Gundobald in 501 the combat rather than the torture became the expression of the judicium Dei . The Church.—As far as it could the Church adopted the Roman law . The Church generally secured the almost entire See also:immunity of its clergy, at any See also:rate of the higher ranks, from torture by civil tribunals;" but in general, where laymen were concerned all persons were equal . In many instances See also:councils of the Church pronounced against torture, e.g. in a See also:synod at Rome in 384.19 Torture even of heretics seems to have been originally left to the See also:ordinary tribunals . Thus a See also:bull of Innocent IV., in 1282, directed the torture of heretics by the civil See also:power, as being robbers and murderers of souls, and thieves of the sacraments of God." The Church also enjoined torture for See also:usury.21 A characteristic See also:division of torture, accepted by the Church, but not generally acknowledged by lay authorities, was into spiritual and See also:corporal, the latter being simply the See also:imposition of the oath of purgation, the only form originally in use in the ecclesiastical courts . The See also:canon law contains little on the subject of torture, and that little of a comparatively humane nature . It laid down that it was no See also:sin in the faithful to inflict torture," but a priest might not do so with his own hands,23 and charity was to be used in all punishments.24 No confession was to be extracted by torture" and it was not to be ordered indiciis non praecedentibus2' The principal ecclesiastical tribunal by which torture was inflicted in more recent times was the See also:Inquisition . The code of instructions issued by See also:Torquemada in See also:Spain in 1484 provided that an accused person might be put to the torture if semiplena probatio existed against the accused—that is, so much evidence as to raise a See also:grave and not merely a See also:light presumption of guilt, often used for the evidence of one See also:eye or See also:ear witness of a fact . If the accused confessed during torture, and afterwards confirmed the confession, he was punished as convicted ; if he retracted, he was tortured again, or subjected to extraordinary punishment .
One or two inquisitors, or a See also:commissioner of the See also:Holy See also:Office, were See also:bound to be See also:present at every examination
.
Owing to the occurrence of certain cases of abuse of torture, a See also:decree of See also: The rules in themselves were not so cruel as the construction put upon them by the inquisitors . For instance, by Torquemada's instructions torture could not be repeated unless in case of retractation . This led to the subtlety of calling a renewed torture a continuation, Strafrecht, iii . 5 (Leipzig, 1899) ; Greenidge, Legal Procedure of Cicero's Time, p . 479 (See also:Oxford, 1901) . " a See Escobar, Theol . Mor. See also:tract. vi. c . 2 . They were to be tortured only by the clergy, where possible, and only on indicia of special gravity . " See also:Lea, Superstition and Force, p . 419 (3rd ed., See also:Philadelphia, 1878) . 2° Leges et constitutions contra haereticos, § 26 . 21 See also:Lecky, |