Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:TORTURE (from See also:Lat. torquere, to twist)
, the See also:general name for innumerable modes of inflicting See also:pain which have been from See also:time to time devised by the perverted ingenuity of See also:man, and especially for those employed in a legal aspect by the civilized nations of antiquity and of See also:modern See also:Europe
.
From this point of view See also:torture was always inflicted for one of two purposes: (1) As a means of eliciting See also:evidence from a See also:witness or from an accused See also:person either before or after condemnation; (2) as a See also:part of the See also:punishment
.
The second was the earlier use, its See also:function as a means of evidence arising when rules were gradually formulated by the experience of legal experts
.
Torture as a part of the punishment may be regarded as including every See also:kind of bodily or See also:mental pain beyond what is necessary for the safe custody of the offender (with or without enforced labour) or the destruction of his See also:life—in the See also:language of See also:Bentham, an " afflictive " as opposed to a " See also:simple " punishment
.
Thus the unnecessary sufferings endured in See also:English prisons before the reforms of See also: Confession, as probatio probatissima and vox See also:vera, was the best of all evidence, and all the machinery of law was moved to obtain it . The trials for See also:witchcraft remain on See also:record as a refutation of the theory . The opinions of the best See also:lay authorities have been almost unanimously against the use of torture, even in a See also:system where it was as completely established as it was in See also:Roman law . " Tormenta," says See also:Cicero,' in words which it is almost impossible to translate satisfactorily, " gubernat dolor, regit quaesitor, flectit libido, corrumpit See also:spes, infirmat metus, ut in tot rerum angustiis nihil veritati loci relinquatur." See also:Seneca says bitterly, " it forces even the See also:innocent to See also:lie." St See also:Augustine 4 recognizes the See also:fallacy of torture . " If," says he, " the accused be innocent, he will undergo for an uncertain See also:crime a certain punishment, and that not for having committed a crime, but because it is'unknown whether he committed it." At the same time he regards it as excused by its See also:necessity . The words of See also:Ulpian, in the See also:Digest of Justinian,' are no less impressive: " The torture (quaestio) is not to be regarded as wholly deserving or wholly undeserving of confidence; indeed, it is untrustworthy, perilous and deceptive . For most men, by See also:patience or the severity of the torture, come so to despise the torture that the truth cannot be elicited from them; others are so impatient that they will lie in any direction rather than suffer the torture; so it happens that they depose to contradictions and accuse not only themselves but others." See also:Montaigne's' view of torture as a part of the punishment is a most just one: " All that exceeds a simple See also:death appears to me See also:absolute See also:cruelty; neither can our See also:justice expect that he whom the fear of being executed by being beheaded or hanged will not restrain should be any more awed by the See also:imagination of a languishing See also:fire, burning pincers, - or the See also:wheel." He continues with the curious phrase: " He whom the See also:judge has tortured (gehenne) that he may not See also:die innocent, See also:dies innocent and tortured." See also:Montesquieu' speaks of torture in a most guarded manner, condemning it, but without giving reasons, and eulogizing England for doing without it . The system was condemned by See also:Bayle and See also:Voltaire with less reserve . Among 1 But even in these countries, whatever the law was, torture certainly existed in fact . 2 See also:Primitive systems varied . There is no trace of it in Babylonian or See also:Mosaic law, but See also:Egyptian and See also:Assyrian provided for it; and the See also:story of See also:Regulus seems to show that it was in use at See also:Carthage . ' See also:Pro See also:Sulla, c . 28 . 4 De civ . Dei, bk. xix. c . 6 . Dig. xlviii . 18, 23 . 'See also:Essay lxv . (See also:Cotton's trans.) 7 Esprit See also:des lois, bk. vi . C . 17 . the Germans, Sonnenfels (1766), and, among the Italians, See also:Beccaria,l Verri 2 and See also:Manzoni 3 will be found to contain most that can be said on the subject . The See also:influence of Beccaria in rendering the use of torture obsolete was undoubtedly greater than that of any other legal reformer . The great point that he makes is the unfair incidence of torture, as minds and bodies differ in strength . Moreover, it is, says he, to confound all relations to expect that a man should be both accuser and accused, and that pain should be the test of truth, as though truth resided in the muscles and See also:fibres of a wretch under torture . The result of the torture is simply a See also:matter of calculation . Given the force of the muscles and the sensibility of the nerves of an innocent person, it is required to find the degree of pain necessary to make him confess himself guilty of a given crime . Bentham's4 objection to torture is that the effect is exactly the See also:reverse of the intention . " Upon the See also:face of it, and probably enough in the intention of the framers, the See also:object of this institution was the See also:protection of innocence; the protection of See also:guilt and the See also:aggravation of the pressure upon innocence was the real See also:fruit of it." The apologists of torture are chiefly among jurists . But theoretical objections to it are often urged by the authors of books of practice, as by Damhouder, von Rosbach, von Boden, Voet, and others named below under the See also:head of The See also:Netherlands, It is worthy of See also:note as illustrative of the feeling of the time that even Bacon9 compares experiment in nature to torture in See also:civil matters as the best means of eliciting truth . Muyart de Vouglans 6 derives the origin of torture from the law of See also:God . Other apologists are See also:Simancas, See also:bishop of See also:Badajoz,7 See also:Engel,8 Pedro de See also:Castro,9 and in England See also:Sir R . See also:Wiseman.10 See also:Greece.—The See also:opinion of See also:Aristotle was in favour of torture as a mode of See also:proof . " It is," he says, " a kind of evidence, and appears to carry with it absolute credibility because a kind of constraint is applied." It is classed as one of the " artless persuasions " (itesgpoL 7rturssS).11 " It was the surest means of obtaining evidence, says See also:Demosthenes .? At See also:Athens slaves, and probably at times See also:resident aliens, were tortured,13 in the former See also:case generally with the See also:master's consent, but torture was seldom applied to See also:free citizens,34 such application being forbidden by a psephism passed in the archonship of Scamandrius . After the See also:mutilation of the See also:Hermae in 415 B.C. a proposition was made, but not carried, that it should be applied to two senators named by an informer . In this particular case See also:Andocides gave up all his slaves to be tortured.15 Torture was sometimes inflicted in open See also:court . The See also:rack was used as a punishment even for free citizens . See also:Antiphon was put to death by this means ? The torture of See also:Nicias by the Syracusans is alluded to by Thucydides17 as an event likely to happen, and it was only in See also:order to avoid the possibility of inconvenient disclosures that he was put to death without torture . Isocrates and See also:Lysias refer to torture under the generic name of orpl¢Xwocs, but it was generally called (i6.Qavo,, in the plural, like tormenta . As might be expected, torture was frequently inflicted by the See also:Greek despots, and both See also:Zeno and See also:Anaxarchus are said to have been put to it by such irresponsible authorities . At See also:Sparta the See also:despot Nabis was accustomed, as we learn from See also:Polybius,ls to put persons to death by an See also:instrument of torture in the See also:form of his wife Apega, a mode of torture no doubt resembling the Jungfernkuss once used in See also:Germany . At See also:Argos, as Diodorus informs us (xv . 57), certain conspirators were put to the torture in 371 B.C.19 Dei Delitti e delle bene, c. xvi . 2 Osservazioni sulla tortura . 3 Storia della See also:Colonna infame .
4 See also:Works, vii
.
525
.
Nov
.
Org., bk. i. aph
.
98
.
In the See also:Advancement of Learning, bk. iv. ch
.
4, See also: 122 (See also:London, 1686) . Rhet . I . 15, 26 . 12 In Onetum, i . 874 . 13 Usually by the diaetetae in the Hephaestaeum, Isocrates, Trapez . 361 . u The opinion of Cicero (De partitionibus oraloriis, § 34), that it was so applied at Athens and See also:Rhodes, seems, as far as regards Athens, not to be justified by existing evidence . 15 The demand for, or the giving up of, a slave for torture was called 7rpac?1rioLS its $avavov . 18 In the See also:Ramie of See also:Aristophanes, v . 617, there is a See also:list of kinds of torture, and the wheel is alluded to in Lysistrata, v . 846 . 17 vii . 86 . 18 xiii . 7 . 19 For the whole subject, see See also:Diet . See also:Ant., s.v . Tormenta . Rome.—The Roman system was the basis of all subsequent See also:European systems which recognized torture as a part of their See also:procedure, and the rules attained a refinement beyond anything approached at Athens . The law of torture was said by Cicero to See also:rest originally on See also:custom (mores majorum), but there is no allusion to it in the Twelve Tables . There are frequent allusions to it in the classical writers? both of the See also:republic and the See also:empire . The law, as it existed under the later empire, is contained mainly in the titles De quaestionibus 21 of the Digest and the See also:Code 22—the former consisting largely of opinions from the Sententiae receptae of See also:Paulus,23 the latter being for the most part merely a repetition of constitutions contained in the Theodosian Code.24 Both substantive law and procedure were dealt with by these texts of Roman law, the latter, however, not as fully as in See also:medieval codes, a large discretion being See also:left to the See also:judges . Torture was used both in civil and criminal trials, but in the former only upon slaves and freedmen or infamous persons (after Nov. xc . 1, 1, upon ignoti and obscuri if they showed signs of corruption)—such as See also:gladiators—and in the absence of alia See also:manifest¢ indici¢ 25 as in cases affecting the See also:inheritance (res hereditariae) . Its See also:place in the case of free citizens was taken by the reference to the See also:oath of the party . During the republic torture appears to have been confined to slaves in all cases, but with the empire a free man became liable to it if accused of a crime, though in most cases not as a witness . On an See also:accusation of treason every one, whatever his See also:rank, was liable to torture, for in treason the See also:condition of all was equal.20 The same was the case of those accused of sorcery (magi), who were regarded as humani generis inirnici 17 A wife might be tortured (but only after her slaves had been put to the torture) if accused of poisoning her See also:husband . In accusations of crimes other than treason or sorcery, certain persons were protected by the dignity of their position or their See also:tender See also:age . The See also:main exemptions were contained in a constitution of See also:Diocletian and Maximian, and included soldiers, nobles of a particular rank, i.e. eminentissimi and perfectissimi, and their descendants to the third See also:generation, and decuriones and their See also:children to a limited extent (tormenta moderata)—that is to say, they were subject to the torture of the plumbatae in certain cases, such as See also:fraud on the See also:revenue and See also:extortion . In addition to these, priests (but not See also:clergy of a See also:lower rank), children under fourteen and pregnant See also:women were exempt . A free man could be tortured only where he had been inconsistent in his depositions, or where there was a suspicion that he was lying 28 The rules as to the torture of slaves were numerous and precise . It was a See also:maxim of Roman law that torture of slaves was the most efficacious means of obtaining truth.29 They could be tortured either as accused or as witnesses for their masters in all cases, but against their masters only in accusations of treason, See also:adultery, frauds on the revenue, coining, and similar offences (which were regarded as a See also:species of treason), attempts by a husband or wife on the life of the other, and in cases where a master had bought a slave for the See also:special See also:reason that he should not give evidence against him . The See also:privilege from accusations by the slave extended to the master's See also:father, See also:mother, wife, or See also:tutor, and also to a former master . On the same principle a freedman could not be tortured against his See also:patron . The privilege did not apply where the slave was See also:joint See also:property, and one of his masters had been murdered by the other, or where he was the property of a See also:corporation, for in such a case he could be tortured in a See also:charge against a member of the corporation . Slaves belonging to the inheritance could be tortured in actions concerning the inheritance . The adult slaves of a deceased person could be tortured where the deceased had been murdered . In a charge of adultery against a wife, her husband's, her own and her father's slaves could be put to the torture . A slave manumitted for the See also:express purpose of escaping torture was regarded as still liable to it . Before putting a slave to torture without the consent of his master, See also:security must be given to the master for his value and the oath of calumny must be taken.30 The master of a slave tortured on a false accusation could recover See also:double his value from the accuser . The undergoing of torture had at one time a serious effect upon the after-life of the slave, for in the time of See also:Gaius a slave who had been tortured could on manumission obtain no higher civil rights than those of a dediticius.31 The rules of procedure were conceived in a spirit of as much fairness as such rules could be . Some of the most important were these: The amount of torture was at the discretion of the judge, but it was to be so 20 An instance is See also:Pliny's See also:letter to See also:Trajan (Epist. x . 97), where he mentions having put to the torture two See also:Christian deaconesses (ministrae) . The words are confitentes iterum ac tertio interrcgavi . This supports See also:Tertullian's objection to the torture of Christians, torquemur confitentes (A poi. c . 2) . z1 Quaestio included the whole See also:process of which torture was a part . In the words of Cujacius, Quaestio est interrogatio quae See also:fit per aormenta, vel de reis, vel de testibus qui facto intervenisse dicuntur . 22 Dig. xlviii . 18; See also:Cod. ix . 41 . 23 v . 14, 15, 16 . 24 ix . 35 . 25 Cod. ix . 8, 3 . 29 Ibid. ix . 8, 4 . 27 Ibid. ix . 18, 7 . 28 Ibid. iv . 20, 13 . 29 Ibid. i . 3, 8 . 30 Ibid. ii . 59, I, T . The demand of another man's slave for torture was postulare . 31 Gaius i . 13 . applied as not to injure life or See also:limb . If so applied the judge was infamis . The examination was not to begin by torture; other proofs must be exhausted first . The evidence' must have advanced so far that nothing but the confession of the slave was wanting to See also:complete it . Those of weakest See also:frame and tenderest age were to be tortured first . Except in treason, the unsupported testimony of a single witness was not a sufficient ground for torture . The See also:voice and manner of the accused were to be carefully observed . A spontaneous confession, or the evidence of a See also:personal enemy, was to be received with caution . Repetition of the torture could only be ordered in case of inconsistent depositions or denial in the face of strong evidence . There was no See also:rule limiting the number of repetitions . Leading questions were not to be asked . A judge was not liable to an See also:action for anything done during the course of the examination .
An See also:appeal from an order to torture was competent to the accused, except in the case of slaves, when an appeal could be made only by the master.' The appellant was not to be tortured pending the appeal, but was to remain in See also:prison.' The quaesitor asked the questions, the tortores applied the See also:instruments
.
The See also:principal forms of torture in use were the equuleus, or rack (mentioned as far back as Cicero),4 the plumbatae, or leaden balls, the ungulae, or barbed hooks, the lamina, or hot See also:plate, the male mansio,' and the
fidiculae, or See also:cord compressing the See also:arm
.
Other allusions in the Digest and Code, in addition to those already cited, may be shortly noticed
.
The testimony of a gladiator or infamous person (such as an See also:accomplice) was not valid without torture.' This was no doubt the origin of the medieval See also:maxims (which were, however, by no means universally recognized)—Vilitas personae est justa causa torquendi testem, and Tortura purgatur infamia
.
Torture could not be inflicted during the See also:forty days of See also:Lent.' Robbers and pirates might be tortured even on See also:Easter See also:day, the divine See also:pardon being hoped for where the safety of society was thus assured.' See also:Capital punishment was not to be suffered until after conviction or confession under torture.9 Withdrawal from See also:prosecution (abolitio) was not to be allowed as a rule after the accused had undergone the torture." In charges of treason the accuser was liable to torture if he did not prove his case." The infliction of torture, not judicial, but at the same time countenanced by law, was at one time allowed to creditors
.
They were allowed to keep their debtors in private prisons, and most cruelly See also:ill-use them, in order to extort See also:payment.12 Under the empire private prisons were forbidden.13 In the time of See also:Juvenal the Roman ladies actually hired the public torturers to torture their domestic slaves." As a part of the punishment torture was in frequent use
.
Crucifixion, mutilation, exposure to See also:wild beasts in the See also:arena and other cruel modes of destroying life were See also:common, especially in the time of the persecution of the Christians under See also:Nero." Crucifixion as a punishment was abolished by See also:Constantine in 315, in veneration of the memory of Him who was crucified for mankind
.
On the other See also:hand, where the interests of the See also:
Indicium was rather the See also:foundation or cause of probatio, whether plena or semiplena
.
An indicium or a concurrence of indicia might, according to circumstances, constitute a plena or semi plena probatio
.
The phrase legitima indicia was sometimes used
.
In Sir T
.
See also: 62, 12 . 4 See also:Milo, )vii . Of doubtful meaning, but perhaps like the " Little Ease " of the See also:Tower of London . 6 Dig. xxii . 5, 21, 2 . 7 Cod. iii . 12, 6 . ' Ibid. in . 12, 10 . 9 Ibid. ix . 47, 16 . " o Ibid. ix . 42, 3 . " Ibid. ix . 8, 3 . 12 See, for instance, See also:Livy vi . 36 . 1' Cod. i . 4, 23; ix . 5 . " 4 Ibid. vi . 480 . " As an example of such punishments, cf. the well-known lines of Juvenal (Sat. i . 155) : Taeda lucebis in ilia, Qua stantes ardent qui fixo,gutture fumant." For other poetical allusions, see vi . 48o, xiv . 21; Lucr. iii . 1030; Propert. iv . 7, 35 . is xvi . 53 . '7 Nov. cxxiii . 31 . On the subject of torture in Roman law reference may be made to Wasserscheben, Historia quaestionum per tormenta apud See also:Romanos (See also:Berlin, 1836) ; H . See also:Walton . Histoire de l'esclavage daps l'antiquite (Paris, 1879) ; See also:Mommsen, Romisches The Leges barbarorum are interesting as forming the See also:link of connexion between the Roman and the medieval systems . Through them the Roman doctrines were transmitted into the Roman law countries . The See also:barbarian codes were based chiefly on the Theodosian Code . As compared with Roman law there seems to be a leaning towards humanity, e.g. the provision for redemption of a slave after confession by s . 40 of the Lex salica . After the See also:edict of Gundobald in 501 the combat rather than the torture became the expression of the judicium Dei . The Church.—As far as it could the Church adopted the Roman law . The Church generally secured the almost entire See also:immunity of its clergy, at any See also:rate of the higher ranks, from torture by civil tribunals;" but in general, where laymen were concerned all persons were equal . In many instances See also:councils of the Church pronounced against torture, e.g. in a See also:synod at Rome in 384.19 Torture even of heretics seems to have been originally left to the See also:ordinary tribunals . Thus a See also:bull of Innocent IV., in 1282, directed the torture of heretics by the civil See also:power, as being robbers and murderers of souls, and thieves of the sacraments of God." The Church also enjoined torture for See also:usury.21 A characteristic See also:division of torture, accepted by the Church, but not generally acknowledged by lay authorities, was into spiritual and See also:corporal, the latter being simply the See also:imposition of the oath of purgation, the only form originally in use in the ecclesiastical courts . The See also:canon law contains little on the subject of torture, and that little of a comparatively humane nature . It laid down that it was no See also:sin in the faithful to inflict torture," but a priest might not do so with his own hands,23 and charity was to be used in all punishments.24 No confession was to be extracted by torture" and it was not to be ordered indiciis non praecedentibus2' The principal ecclesiastical tribunal by which torture was inflicted in more recent times was the See also:Inquisition . The code of instructions issued by See also:Torquemada in See also:Spain in 1484 provided that an accused person might be put to the torture if semiplena probatio existed against the accused—that is, so much evidence as to raise a See also:grave and not merely a See also:light presumption of guilt, often used for the evidence of one See also:eye or See also:ear witness of a fact . If the accused confessed during torture, and afterwards confirmed the confession, he was punished as convicted ; if he retracted, he was tortured again, or subjected to extraordinary punishment .
One or two inquisitors, or a See also:commissioner of the See also:Holy See also:Office, were See also:bound to be See also:present at every examination
.
Owing to the occurrence of certain cases of abuse of torture, a See also:decree of See also: The rules in themselves were not so cruel as the construction put upon them by the inquisitors . For instance, by Torquemada's instructions torture could not be repeated unless in case of retractation . This led to the subtlety of calling a renewed torture a continuation, Strafrecht, iii . 5 (Leipzig, 1899) ; Greenidge, Legal Procedure of Cicero's Time, p . 479 (See also:Oxford, 1901) . " a See Escobar, Theol . Mor. See also:tract. vi. c . 2 . They were to be tortured only by the clergy, where possible, and only on indicia of special gravity . " See also:Lea, Superstition and Force, p . 419 (3rd ed., See also:Philadelphia, 1878) . 2° Leges et constitutions contra haereticos, § 26 . 21 See also:Lecky, See also:Rationalism in Europe, ii . 34 . 22 Decretum, pt. ii . 23, 4, 45 . 23 Ibid. pt. i . 86, 25 . 24 Ibid. pt. ii . 12, 2, 11 . 26 Ibid. pt. ii . 15, 6, I . 26 See also:Decretals, v . 41, 6 .
27 The rules will be found in H
.
C
.
Lea, Hist. of the Inquisition of Spain (1go6)
.
See also Hist. of the Inquisition of the See also:Middle Ages (New See also:York, 1888) by the same writer; R
.
See also:Schmidt, Die Herkunft des Inquisitionsprocesses (Berlin, 1902)
.
and not a repetition
.
The rules of Torquemada and of Valdes are those of the greatest historical importance, the latter forming the code of the Holy Office until its suppression, not only in Spain, but in other countries where the Inquisition was established
.
But several other manuals of procedure existed before the final perfection of the system by Valdes
.
The earliest is perhaps the instructions for inquisitors (Directorium inquisitorum) compiled a See also:century earlier than Torquemada by See also:Nicholas Eymerico, See also:grand inquisitor of Aragon about 1368.1 Rules of practice were also framed two centuries later by Simancas, whose position as an apologist has been already stated
.
The textbook of procedure of the See also:Italian Inquisition was the Sacra arsenale.2 In 1545 and 155o instructions for the guidance of inquisitors were issued by See also: In practice all the ingenuity of cruelty was exercised to find new modes of torment.4 These cruelties led at times to remonstrance from the civil power . One example is the edict of Philip II. just mentioned . Another and an earlier one is an ordonnance of Philip the See also:Fair, in 1302, bidding the Inquisition confine itself within the limits of the law.' At See also:Venice the See also:senate decreed that three sena'Iors should be present as inquisitors . As the practice of torture became more systematized, it See also:grew to be the subject of casuistical inquiry by churchmen to an extent far exceeding the scanty discussion of the question in the See also:text of the canon law . It will be sufficient here to cite as an example the treatment of it by See also:Liguori, who incorporates the opinions of many of the See also:Spanish casuists . On the whole, his views appear to be more humane than the prevailing practice . The object of torture he defines very neatly as being to turn semi plena into plena probatio . For this proper indicia are necessary . He then proceeds to decide certain questions which had arisen, the most interesting of which See also:deal with the nature of the sin of which the accused and the judge are guilty in particular instances . A judge sins gravely if he does not See also:attempt all milder means of discovering truth before resorting to torture . He sins in a criminal cause, or in one of notable See also:infamy, if he binds the accused by oath to tell the truth before there is proof against him . It is the same if without oath he uses threats, terror or See also:exhibition of torments to confound the witness.' If any one, to avoid grave torments, charges himself with a capital crime, he does not sin mortally ? It was a doubtful question whether he sinned gravely in such a case . Escobar at an earlier date supported the morally dangerous view that an inquisitor may follow a probable opinion in ordering torture, relinquishing a more probable.' England.—It is the boast of the common law of England that it never recognized torture as legal . One, perhaps the See also:chief, reason for this position taken by the law is the difference of the nature of the procedure in criminal cases from that in general use in European countries . To use words more See also:familiar in See also:foreign See also:jurisprudence, the English system is accusatorial as distinguished from inquisitorial . In the former the accuser has to prove guilt, in the latter the accused has to prove innocence . The common law of England has always shown itself averse from the inquisitorial system, and so (at least in theory) to the torture which may be regarded as an outcome of the system whose one end was to obtain a confession from the accused . The tendency of the small amount of See also:statute law bearing on the subject is in the same direction . It was provided by Magna Carta, § 29, " that no free man . . . should be destroyed in any way unless by legal See also:judgment of his equals or by the law of the See also:land." On this Sir E . See also:Coke comments, " No man destroyed, &c., that is, fore-judged of life or limb, disinherited, or put to torture or death."' The See also:act of 27 See also:Hen . VIII. c . 4 enacted that, owing to the frequent See also:escape of pirates in trials by the civil law, " the nature whereof is that before any judgment of death can be given against the offenders they must plainly confess their offence (which they will never do without torture or pains)," such persons should be tried by jury before commissioners under the Great See also:Seal . Finally, the See also:Bill of Rights provided that cruel and unusual punishments ought not to be inflicted . The opinions of the judges have been invariably against torture in theory, however much some of them may have 1 An edition was published at Rome in 1558, and a compendium at See also:Lisbon in 1762, and by See also:Marchena at See also:Montpellier in 1821 . 2 It was by Father Masini, and went through numerous See also:editions (complete or compendia) from 1558 to 1730 . Among other manuals of practice were those of Carenas See also:Caesar (1655), See also:Morellet (1762) . Llorente c. xiv . 4 Among others were the See also:gradual pouring of See also:water drop by drop on a particular spot of the See also:body, the tormento de loco, or pouring of water into a See also:gauze bag in the See also:throat, which gradually forced the gauze into the See also:stomach, and the pendola, or swinging pendulum, so graphically described in one of See also:Edgar See also:Poe's tales . Ordonnances des rois, i . 346 . 6 Theol. mor. bk. ix . § 202 . 7 Ibid . § 274 .
Ibid. v
.
3 and 7
.
9 2 Inst
.
48 b.been led to countenance it in practice
.
The strongest authority is the See also:resolution of the judges in See also:Felton's case (1628), " that he ought not by the law to be tortured by the rack, for no such punishment is known or allowed by our law."10 In accordance with this are the opinions of Sir John See also:Fortescue," Sir See also: In the words of See also:Hallam, " the rack seldom stood idle in the Tower for all the latter part of Elizabeth's reign."'" The varieties of torture used at this See also:period are fully described by Dr See also:Lingard,23 and consisted of the rack, the See also:scavenger's daughter,24 the See also:iron gauntlets or bilboes, and the See also:cell called " Little Ease." The registers of the council during the Tudor and early See also:Stuart reigns are full of entries as to the use of torture, both for See also:state and for ordinary offences.26 Among notable prisoners put to the torture were See also:Anne See also:Askew, the Jesuit See also:Campion, See also:Guy Fawkes26 and See also:Peacham (who was examined by Bacon " before torture, in torture and after torture ").27 The prevalence of torture in Elizabeth's reign led to the well-known defence attributed to See also:Lord See also:Burghley, " A See also:declaration of the favourable dealing of Her See also:Majesty's commissioners appointed for the examination of certain traitors, and of tortures unjustly reported to be done upon them for matter of See also:religion," 1583.28 The use of torture in England being always of an extraordinary and extra-judicial nature, it is '° 3 State Trials, 371 . 11 De laudibus legum Angliae, c . 22 . 12 See also:Commonwealth of England, bk. ii . C . 27 (1583; ed. by L . See also:Alston, 1906) . It is curious that Sir T . Smith, with all his hatred of torture, was directed by a warrant under the See also:queen's seal alone (not through the council) to torture the duke of See also:Norfolk's servants in 1571 . In a letter to Lord Burghley he pleaded for exemption from so hateful a task . 13 3 Inst . 35 . Nevertheless, in the trials of Lord See also:Essex and See also:Southampton, Coke is found extolling the queen's See also:mercy for not racking or torturing the accused (1 State Trials, 1338) . (See further authorities in See also:Pollock and See also:Maitland, Hist. of English Law, ii . 656.) 14 Jardine, See also:Reading on the Use of Torture in the Criminal Law of England (1837), p . 52 . 16 L . O . See also:Pike, Hist. of Crime in England, i . 427 . 16 See also:Rymer, Foedera, iii . 228, 232 . 77 See also:Walter of Hemingford, p . 256 . 1s Pike i . 481 . 19 3 Inst . 34 . 20 This is the date of the latest warrant in Jardine's work, but it was used on three Portuguese at See also:Plymouth during the Common-See also:wealth (See also:Thurloe iii . 298) . 21 It is to be noticed, as Jardine observes, that all these are cases of an ordinary nature, and afford no.ground for the assertions made by See also:Strutt and Bishop See also:Burnet that torture was used to heretics as heretics . 22 Cons' . Hist. i . 201 . 23 Hist. of England, vol. viii. app. note v . 24 These two were exactly opposite in principle .
The rack stretched the limbs of the sufferer; the scavenger's daughter compressed him into a See also:ball
.
26 Fifty-five of these will be found in the appendix to Mr Jardine's work
.
An ordinary robber of plate was threatened with torture in 1567.—See also:Froude, Hist. of England, viii
.
386
.
28 It is not certain whether he was racked, but probably he was, in accordance with the See also: So far of what may be called torture proper, to which the common law professed itself a stranger . There were, however, cases fully recognized by the common law which differed from torture only in name . The peine forte et dure was a notable example of this . If a prisoner stood See also:mute of malice instead of See also:pleading, he was condemned to the peine, that is, to be stretched upon his back and to have iron laid upon him as much as he could See also:bear, and more, and so to continue, fed upon bad See also:bread and stagnant water through alternate days until he pleaded or died.2 It was abolished by 12 Geo . III. c . 20 . 7 and 8 Geo . IV. c . 28 enacted that a plea of " not guilty " should be entered for a prisoner so See also:standing mute . A case of peine occurred as lately as 1726 . At times tying the thumbs with See also:whip-cord was used instead of the peine . This was said to be a common practice at the Old See also:Bailey up to the 18th century.' In trials for witchcraft the legal proceedings often partook of the nature of torture, as in the throwing of the reputed See also:witch into a See also:pond to see whether she would sink or swim, in drawing her See also:blood,' and in thrusting pins into the body to try to find the insensible spot .
Confessions, too, appear to have been often extorted by actual torture, and torture of an unusual nature, as the See also:devil was supposed to protect his votaries from the effects of ordinary torture
.
Torture as a part of the punishment existed in fact, if not in name, down to a very recent period
.
Mutilation as a punishment appears in some of the pre-See also:Conquest codes, such as those of See also:Alfred, fEthelstan and Canute, in the laws attributed to See also: 23), the See also:stocks, See also:branks and tucking-See also:stool, and the burning in the hand for See also:felony (abolished by 19 Geo . III. c . 7 ) . Corporal punishment now exists only in the case of juvenile offenders and of See also:robbery with violence . It was abolished in the See also:army by the Army Act 1881.6 Cruelty in punishment did not entirely cease in prisons even after the Bill of Rights . See such cases as R. v . See also:Huggins, 17 State Trials, 298; See also:Castell v . Bambridge, 2 See also:Strange's See also:Rep . 856 . See also:Scotland.—Torture was See also:long a recognized part of Scottish criminal procedure, and was acknowledged as such by many acts and warrants of the Scottish See also:parliament and warrants of the Crown and the privy council . Numerous instances occur in the See also:Register of the Privy Council ? Two acts in 1649 dealt with torture; one took the form of a warrant to examine witnesses against William See also:Barton by any form of See also:probation,' the other of a warrant to a See also:committee to inquire as to the use of torture against persons suspected of witchcraft.' The judges in 1689 were empowered by the estates to torture Chiesly of Dalrye, charged with the See also:murder of the lord See also:president See also:Lockhart, in order to discover accomplices . In the same See also:year the use of torture without evidence or in ordinary cases was declared illegal in the Claim of Right . The careful wording of this will be noticed: it does not object to torture altogether, but reserves it for cases where a basis of evidence had already been laid, and for crimes of great gravity, thus admitting the dangerous principle, founded on Roman law, that the importance of the crime is a reason for departing from the ordinary rules of justice . However great the crime, it is no more certain than in the case of a crime of less gravity that the person accused was the person who committed it . A warrant issued in the same yea: to put to the torture certain persons accused of conspiring against the See also:government, and also certain dragoons suspected of corresponding with Lord See also:Dundee . In 1690 an act passed reciting the torture of William See also:Carstares, a See also:minister, in 1683, and re-establishing his competency as a witness.10 The last warrant appears to be one in 1690 for torturing a man accused of See also:rape and murder . In 1708 torture in Scotland was finally abolished by 7 1 Table Talk, " Trial." 2 See also:Stephen, Hist. of the Criminal Law, i . 297 . 3 Stephen i . 300; Kelyng, Reports, p . 27 . The superstition was that any one drawing a witch's blood was free from her power . This is alluded to in Henry VI. pt. i. act i. sc . 5; " Blood will I draw on thee; See also:thou See also:art a witch." 5 104b . 6 44 Vict . C . 9, s 7 . E.g. i . 525, iv . 68o, vi . 156 . 8 c . 333• ' 370 . " The thumbscrew with which Carstares had been tortured was afterwards presented to him as a remembrance by the privy council . Anne c . 21, s 5 . Many details of the tortures inflicted will be found in See also:Pitcairn's Criminal Trials, the introduction to J . Maclaurins' R . Criminal Cases and J . H . See also:Burton's Narratives from Criminal Trials . Among other varieties—the nature of some of them can only be guessed—were the rack, the pilniewinkis, the See also:boot,11 the caschie-laws, the See also:lang irnis, the narrow-See also:bore, the pynebankis, and worst of all, the waking, or artificial prevention of See also:sleep.12 The ingenuity of torture was exercised in a special degree on charges of witchcraft, notably in the reign of James VI., an See also:expert both in witchcraft and in torture . The act of 1649 already cited shows that the principle survived him . Under the government of the See also:dukes of See also:Lauderdale and York torture as a practice in charges of religious and See also:political offences reached its height . " The privy council was accustomed to extort confessions by torture; that grim See also:divan of bishops, lawyers and peers sucking in the groans of each undaunted enthusiast, in See also:hope that some imperfect avowal might lead to the See also:sacrifice of other victims, or at least warrant the See also:execution of the present." 13 With such examples before them in the law, it is scarcely to be wondered at that persons in positions of authority, especially the See also:nobility, sometimes exceeded the law and inflicted torture at their own will and for their own purposes . There are several instances in the Register of the Privy Council of suits against such persons, e.g. against the See also:earl of See also:Orkney, in 1605, for putting a son of Sir See also:Patrick See also:Bellenden in the boots . See also:Ireland seems to have enjoyed See also:comparative immunity from torture . It was not recognized by the common or statute law, and the cases of its infliction do not appear to be numerous . In 1566 the president and council of See also:Munster, or any three of them, were empowered to inflict torture, " in cases necessary, upon vehement presumption of any great offence in any party committed against the Queen's Majesty." 14 In 1583 Hurley, an Irish priest, was tortured in See also:Dublin by " toasting his feet against the fire with hot boots." 15 In 1627 the lord See also:deputy doubted whether he had authority to put a priest named O'Cullenan to the rack . An See also:answer was returned by Lord Killultagh to the effect that " you ought to rack him if you saw cause and hang him if you found reason." 16 The latest case of peine forte et dure seems to have been in 1740 . See also:British Colonies and Dependencies.—The infliction of torture in any British See also:colony or dependency has usually been regarded as contrary to law, and ordered only by arbitrary authority . It is true that in the trial of Sir Thomas See also:Picton in 1806, for subjecting, while See also:governor of See also:Trinidad, a woman named Luisa See also:Calderon to the torture of the picquet, 17 one of the grounds of defence was that such torture was authorized by the Spanish law of the See also:island, but the accused was convicted in spite of this defence, and the final decision of the court of king's See also:bench, in 1812, decreeing a See also:respite of the See also:defendant's recognizances till further order, was perhaps not so much an See also:affirmation of the legality in the particular instance as the See also:practical expression of a wish to spare an eminent public servant.1s As to See also:India, the second charge against See also:Warren See also:Hastings was extortion from the begums of 'Dude by means of the torture of their servants." In the present See also:Indian Penal Code and Evidence Acts there are provisions intended, as Sir James Stephen says 20 to prevent the practice of torture by the See also:police for the purpose of extracting confessions from persons in their custody21 In See also:Ceylon torture, which had been allowed under the Dutch government, was expressly abolished by royal See also:proclamation in 1799• In the Channel Islands confessions of persons accused of witch-See also:craft in the 17th century were frequently obtained by torture22 See also:United States.—One instance of the peine forte et dure is known . It was inflicted in 1692 on See also:Giles See also:Cory of See also:Salem, who refused to plead when arraigned for witchcraft.23 The constitution of the United States provides, in the words of the Bill of Rights, that cruel and unusual punishments are not to be inflicted.24 This is repeated in the constitutions of most states . The infliction of cruel and unusual punishment by the master or officer of an See also:American See also:vessel on the high seas, or within the maritime See also:jurisdiction of the United States, is punishable with See also:fine or imprisonment, or both.Y6 There have been a good many decisions on the question of cruel and unusual punishments; e.g . Wilkerson v . See also:Utah, 99 U.S . Rep . 130; u Persons subjected to more than usual torture from the boot were said to be " extremely booted." 12 This seems to have been used in one case in England . Lecky, Rationalism in Europe, i . 122 . 13 Hallam, Const . Hist. iii . 436 . See Burnet, Hist. of Own Time, i . 583; and SCOTLAND . 14 Froude, Hist. of England, viii . 386 . '5 Ibid xi . 263 . 16 Jardine, p . 54 . 17 In the picquet the sufferer was supported only on the great toe (which rested on a See also:sharp stake), and by a rope attached to one arm . 18 3o State Trials, 449, besides many See also:pamphlets of the period . 19 See the See also:Report of the Proceedings, vol. i . 20 Stephen, Indian Evidence Act, p . 126 . 21 Sections 327–331 of code; ss . 25–27 of act . 22 J . L . Pitts, Witchcraft in the Channel Islands, p . 9 (See also:Guernsey, 1886) . 23 See also:Bouvier, Law Dict., s.v . " Peine forte et dure." 24 Amendments, art. viii . (1789) . 25 Revised Slat . 5347 . Territory of New See also:Mexico v . Ketchum, 65 Pacific Rep . 169 (death See also:penalty for See also:train robbery held not unconstitutional) . See also:Continental European States.—These fall into four main See also:groups, the Latin, See also:Teutonic, Scandinavian and Slav states respectively . The principles of Roman law were generally adopted in the first and second groups . Latin States.—In See also:France torture does not seem to have existed as a recognized practice before the 13th century . From that period until the 17th century it was regulated by a See also:series of royal ordonnances at first of See also:local See also:obligation, afterwards applying to the whole See also:kingdom . Torture was used only by the royal courts, its place in the seigneurial courts being supplied by the judicial combat .
The earliest ordonnance on the subject was that of See also: In some parts of France not only were See also:half-proofs admitted, but quarters and eighths of proofs.' Among the numerous cases of historical interest were those of the Templars in 1307, See also:Villon about 1457, See also:Dolet in 1546, the marquise de Brinvilliers in 1676 and See also:Jean See also:Calas in 1762.2 The law as it existed in See also:Italy is contained in a long See also:line of authorities chiefly supplied by the school of See also:Bologna, beginning with the glossatores and coming down through the See also:post-glossatores, until the system attained its perfection in the vast work of Farinaccius, written early in the 17th century, where every possible question that could arise is treated with a revolting completeness . One of the earliest jurists to treat it was Cino da See also:Pistoia, the friend of See also:Dante .9 He treats it at no great length . With him the theory of indicia exists only in embryo, as they cannot be determined by law but must be at the discretion of the judge . Differing from See also:Bartolus, he affirms that torture cannot be repeated without fresh indicia . The writings of jurists were supplemented by a large body of legislative enactments in most of the Italian states, extending from the constitutions of the See also:emperor See also:Frederick II. down to the 18th century . It is not until Bartolus (1314–1357) that the law begins to assume a definite and complete form . In his commentary on See also:book xlviii. of the Digest he follows Roman law closely, but introduces some further refinements: e.g. though leading questions may not be asked in the main inquiry they are admissible as subsidiary . There is a beginning of See also:classification of indicia . A very full discussion of the law is contained in the work on practice of See also:Hippolytus de Marsiliis,7 a jurist of Bologna, notorious, on his own See also:admission, as the inventor of the torture of keeping without sleep . He defines the question as inquisitio veritatis per tormenta et cordis dolorem, thus recognizing the mental as well as the physical elements in torture . It was to be used only in capital cases and atrocious crimes . The works of Farinaccius and of See also:Julius Clarus nearly a century later were of great authority from the high See also:official positions filled by the writers . Farinaccius was See also:procurator-general to See also:Pope See also:Paul V., and his discussion of torture is one of the most complete of any s It occupies 251 closely printed See also:folio pages with double columns . The length at which the subject is treated is one of the best proofs Ordonnances des rois, i . 72 . 2 s . 303 . 3 s . 344 . ' See Pollock and Maitland, ii . 658, note . On the See also:French system generally see Imbertus, Institutiones forenses gallicae (See also:Utrecht, 1649) ; N . See also:Weiss, La Chambre ardente, 1540–1550 (Paris, 1889) . A large number of authorities deal mainly with the ordonnance of 167o; Muyart de Vouglans, Inst. See also:trim . (Paris, 1767), and Jousse, Traite de la justice trim . (Paris, 1771), are examples . F . Siegneux de Correvon, Essai See also:sus l'usage, l'abus, et See also:les inconveniens de la torture (See also:Geneva, 1768), is one of the opponents of the system . 6 Cinus Pistorensis, Super codice, de tormentis (Venice, 1493) . 7 Practica criminalis quae Averolda nuncupatur (Venice, 1532) . 9 Praxis et theorica criminalis, bk. ii. tit. v. quaest . 36–51 (See also:Frankfort, 1622) . of the See also:science to which it had been reduced . The chief feature of the work is the See also:minute and skilful analysis of indicia, fame, praesumptio, and other technical terms . Many See also:definitions of indicium are suggested, the best perhaps being conjectura ex probabilibus et non necessariis See also:orta, a quibus potest abesse veritas sed non verisimilitudo . For every infliction of torture a distinct indicium is required . A single witness or an accomplice constitutes an indicium . But this rule does not apply where it is inflicted for discovering accomplices or for discovering a crime other than that for which it was originally inflicted . Torture may be ordered in all criminal cases, except small offences, and in certain civil cases, such as denial of a depositum, See also:bankruptcy, usury, treasure trove, and fiscal cases . It may be inflicted on all persons; unless specially exempted (clergy, minors, &c.), and even those exempted may be tortured by command of the See also:sovereign . There are three kinds of torture, See also:levis, gravis and gravissima, the first and second corresponding to the ordinary torture of French writers, the last to the extraordinary . The extraordinary or gravissima was as much as could possibly be See also:borne without destroying life . The judge could not begin with torture; it was only a subsidium . If inflicted without due course of law, it was void as a proof . The judge was liable to penalties if he tortured without proper indicia, if a privileged person, or if to the extent that death or permanent illness was the result . An immense variety of tortures is mentioned, and the list tended to grow, for, as Farinaccius says, judges continually invented new modes of torture to please themselves . Numerous casuistical questions are treated at length, such as, what kinds of reports or how much hearsay evidence constituted fame ? Were there three or five grades in torture ? Julius Clarus of See also:Alessandria was a member of the council of Philip II . To a great extent he follows Farinaccius . He puts the questions for the See also:consideration of the judge with great clearness . They are—whether (1) a crime has been committed, (2) the charge is one in which torture is admissible, (3) the fact can be proved other-See also:wise, (4) the crime was See also:secret or open, (5) the object of the torture is to elicit confession of crime or See also:discovery of accomplices . The clergy can be tortured only in charges of treason, poisoning and violation of tombs . On the great question whether there are three or five grades, he decides in favour of five, viz. threats, taking to the place of torment, stripping and binding, lifting on the rack, racking.9 Other Italian writers of less See also:eminence have been referred to for the purposes of this See also:article . The See also:burden of their writings is practically the same, but they have not attained the systematic perfection of Farinaccius . Citations from many of them are made by Manzoni (see below) . Among others are Guido de Suzara, Paris de Puteo, Aegidius Bossius of See also:Milan, Casonus of Venice, Decianus, Follerius and Tranquillus Ambrosianus, whose works See also:cover the period from the 13th to the end of the 17th century . The law depended mainly on the writings of the jurists as interpreters of custom . At the same time in all or nearly all the Italian states and colonies10 the customary law was limited, supplemented, or amended by legislation . That a check by legislative authority was necessary appears from the glimpses afforded by the writings of the jurists that the letter of the law was by no means always followed . The earliest legislation after the Roman law seems to be the constitutions of the emperor Frederick II. for See also:Sicily promulgated in 1231 . Torture was abolished in See also:Tuscany in 1786, largely owing to the influence of Beccaria, whose work first appeared in 1764, and other states followed, but the puntale or See also:piquet seems to have existed in practice at See also:Naples up to 1859 . Several instances of the torture of eminent persons occur in Italian See also:history, such as See also:Savonarola, See also:Machiavelli, See also:Giordano See also:Bruno, See also:Campanella . Galileo appears to have only been threatened with the esame rigoroso . The historical case of the greatest See also:literary interest is that of the persons accused of bringing the See also:plague into Milan in 163o by smearing the walls of houses with See also:poison . An analysis of the case was undertaken by Verri 11 and Manzoni,i2 and puts in a clear light some of the abuses to which the system led in times of popular panic . Convincing arguments are urged by Manzoni, after an exhaustive See also:review of the authorities, to prove the groundlessness of the charge on which two innocent persons underwent the torture of the canape, or hempen cord (the effect of which was partial or complete dislocation of the See also:wrist), and afterwards suffered death by breaking on the wheel . The main arguments, shortly stated, are these, all based upon the evidence as recorded, and the law as laid down by jurists . (I) The unsupported evidence of an accomplice was treated as an indicium in a case not one of those exceptional ones in which such an indicium was sufficient . The evidence of two witnesses or a confession by the accused was necessary to establish a remote indicium, such as lying . (2) Hearsay evidence was received when See also:primary evidence was obtainable . (3) The confession made under torture was not ratified afterwards . (4) It was made in consequence of a promise of impunity . (5) It was of an impossible crime . 9 Practica criminalis,finalis (See also:Lyons, 1637) . io It is obvious from the allusion at the end of Othello that See also:Shakespeare regarded torture as possible in See also:Cyprus when it was a Venetian colony . 11 Osservazioni See also:sully torture . 12 See also:Scoria della Colonna infame . Neither writer alludes to Beccaria . In Spain, as in Italy, the law depended partly on the writings of Jrists, partly on legislation . Roman law was carried through the Visigothic Code and the See also:Fuero juzgo' (which repeats it almost word for word) down to the Siete partidas.2 This See also:treatise, compiled by See also:Alphonso the Wise about 1243, but not promulgated till 1256, amended the previously existing law in the direction of greater precision . Torment is defined as a manner of punishment which lovers of justice use, to scrutinize by it the truth of crimes committed secretly and not provable in any other manner . Repetition was allowed in case of grave crimes . There were the usual provisions for the infliction of torture only by a judge having jurisdiction, and for the liability of the judge for exceeding legal limits .
Subsequent codes did little more than amend the Partidas in matters of procedure
.
Torture is not named in the Ordenanzas reales of See also: A judge is liable to different punishment according as he orders torture dolose or culpabiliter . Differing from Hippolytus de Marsiliis, Gomez holds that the dying accusation of a murdered man is not an indicium . A confession on insufficient indicia is void . His division of torture into tortura actualis and terror propinquus is the same as that of the French jurists into torture and presentment . The conclusions of the ecclesiastical writers of Spain, such as Eymerico and Simancas, were accepted wholly or partially by the secular writers, such as See also:Alvarez de Velasco,8 and the Peruvian, Juan de Hevia Bolai os,9 who points out differences in the ecclesiastical and secular systems, e.g. the former brought up the accused for ratification in three days, the latter in twenty-four hours . A good deal of the Spanish law will be found in the proceedings against Sir Thomas Picton (see above) . Torture in Spain seems to have been inflicted on See also:Jews to an extraordinary extent, as it was also in See also:Portugal, where the latest legislation as to torture seems to be of the year 1678 . In 1790 it had become obsolete,10 and in a work on criminal procedure four years later it is only referred to for the purpose of stating that when it did exist it was realis or verbalis." Teutonic States.—Germany (including See also:Austria) is distinguished by the See also:possession of the most extensive literature and legislation vi . 4, 5 . 2 Partida, vii . 30 . It was one of the earliest books printed in Spain, the earliest edition appearing in 1491 . ' Cited Hallam, Middle Ages, iii . 76 . 4 Du Cange, s.v . Fame necare . 6In all the Latin countries the See also:idea of torture had become a commonplace . The dramatists contain frequent allusions to it . In Lope de See also:Vega's El Perro del hortelano (" The See also:Dog in the Manger "), one of the characters says, " Here's a See also:pretty inquisition!" to which the answer is, " The torture will be next applied." See also:Moliere and See also:Racine both make use of it . In L'Avare, act iv. sc . 7, Harpagon threatens to put his whole See also:household to the question . In Les Plaideurs Dandin invites Isabelle to see la question as a mode of passing an See also:hour gr two . In England Bacon (Essay lvi.) says, There is no worse torture than the torture of laws." The same idea occurs again in the Advancement of Learning, viii . 3, 13, " It is a cruel thing to torture the laws that they may torture men." Praxis ecclesiastica et saecularis, vol. i. pt. v . § . 3 (Salamanca, 1583)- 7 Variae resolutiones, p . 412 (See also:Antwerp, 1593) . e Judex perfectus (See also:Lausanne, 1740) . ° See also:Curia filipica (Madrid, 1825) . 10 Repertorio geral das leis extravagantes, p . 381 (See also:Coimbra, 1815). u See also:Paschal Freirus, Inst. See also:jur. trim. lusitani, p . 203 (Lisbon, 1794) . on the subject . The principal writers are Langer, von Rosbach and von Boden . In addition may be cited the curious Layenspiegel of See also:Ulrich Tengler (1544), and the works of Remus, Casonus and Carpzow.12 Legislation was partly for the empire, partly for its component states . Imperial legislation dealt with the matter in the See also:Golden Bull (1356), the See also:Ordinance of See also:Bamberg (1507), the Carolina (1532)13 and the Constitutio criminalis theresiana (1768).14 The Carolina followed the usual lines, the main difference being that the infliction must be in the presence of two scabini and a See also:notary, who was to make a detailed record of the proceedings . The code of Maria 'See also:Theresa defines torture as " a subsidiary means of eliciting truth." It could be applied only in cases where condemnation would have involved capital or severe corporal punishment . The illustrated edition was suppressed by See also:Prince Kaunitz a few See also:clays after its See also:appearance . Torture was formally abolished in the empire in 1776 . In See also:Prussia it was practically abolished by Frederick the Great in 1740, formally in 1805 . Even before its abolition it was in use only to discover accomplices after conviction.15 In some other states it existed longer, in See also:Baden as See also:late as 1831 . It was carried to excess in Germany, as In the Netherlands and Scotland in charges of witchcraft . The Netherlands.—The principal legislative enactment was the code of criminal procedure promulgated by Philip II. in 1570 and generally known as the Ordonnance sur le See also:style." One of its main See also:objects was to assimilate the varieties of local custom, as the Nueva recopilacion had done in Spain three years earlier . The French ordonnance of 167o is probably largely based on it . In spite of the attempt of the ordinance to introduce uniformity, certain cities of See also:Brabant, it is said, still claimed the privilege of torturing in certain cases not permitted by the ordinance, e.g. where there was only one witness." The law of 167o continued to be the basis of criminal procedure in the See also:Austrian Netherlands until 1787 . In the United Provinces it was not repealed until 1798 . The principal text-writers are Damhouder,10 See also:van Leeuwen 19 and Voet . Van Leeuwen See also:lays down as a fundamental principle that no one was to be condemned to death without confession, and such confession, if attainable in no other way, ought to be elicited by torture . Witnesses could be tortured only if they varied on confrontation . One of the indicia not always recognized by jurists was previous conviction for a similar crime . Voet's commentary ad Pandectas20 is interesting for its taking the same view as St Augustine as to the uselessness of torture, and compares its effect with that of the trial by battle . At the same time he allows it to be of some value in the case of very grave crimes . The value of torture was doubted by others as well as Voet, e.g. by A . Nicholais 21 and by van See also:Essen." At the same time a writer was found to compose a work on the unpromising subject of the rack.23 Scandinavian Countries.—There is a notice of torture in the Icelandic Code known as the Gragas (about 1119) . Judicial torture is said to have been introduced into See also:Denmark by Valdemar I. in 1157.24 In the code of Christian V . (1683) it was limited to cases of treason.25 It was abolished by the influence of See also:Struensee in 1771, but notwithstanding this he was threatened with it, though it was not actually inflicted, before his execution in 1772 . In Sweden torture never existed as a system, and in the code of 1734 it was expressly forbidden.28 It was however occasionally inflicted, as in England, by extrajudicial authorities, called secret committees . "Extracts from these and other writers will be found in Lea, Superstition and Force, and in R . Quanter, Die Folter in der deutschen Rechtspflege sonst and jetzt (Berlin, 19o0) . 13 Chs . 33-44 . !4 Art . 38 (See also:Vienna, 1769) . 15 This statement is made on the authority of a work attributed to Frederick himself, Dissertation sur les raisons d'etablir ou d'abroger les Lois (1748) . 15 A list of the numerous commentaries on this code will be found in Nybels, Les Ordonnances criminelles de Philippe II. de 1570, p . 23 (See also:Brussels, 1856) . Nybels, pp . 31, 33 . 1e Pratique judiciaire en causes criminelles (Antwerp, 1564) . 's Censura forensis, pt. ii. bk. ii. chs . 8, 9 (See also:Leiden, 1677) . 20 On Dig. xlviii . 18 . There are numerous editions of Voet, the See also:sixth (generally found in See also:libraries) is the See also:Hague (1734) . 21 Si la torture est un moyen stir a verifier les crimes (See also:Amsterdam, 1681) . Also by an See also:anonymous writer See also:thirty years earlier, De Pijnbank wedersproken en bematigt (See also:Rotterdam, 1651) . 22 See also:Jus ecclesiasticum universum (See also:Louvain, 1720) . 23 Hieronymi Magii Anglarenis de equuleo See also:Tiber postumus (Amster-See also:dam, 1664) . There are several works dealing with torture in witchcraft proceedings . A large number of cases will be found in J . Scheltema, Geschiedenis der Hexen-processen (See also:Haarlem, 1828) . For torture in the 18th century see E . See also:Hubert, La Torture aux Pays Bas autrichiens See also:pendant la xviiie siecle (Brussels, 1897) . 24 Baden, Dansk juridisk Ordbog, s.v . " Tortur " (See also:Copenhagen, 1828) . 25 Kolderup-Rosenvinge, Udvalg of gamle Danske-Domme, bk. i . C . 20 (Copenhagen, 1848) . 20 Cod. See also:leg. svecicarum, pp . 233, 370 (See also:Stockholm, 1743) . The " See also:cave of See also:roses," where See also:reptiles were kept for the purpose of torture, was closed by Gustavus III. in 1772 . Slav Countries.—The earliest mention of torture seems to be that of the mutilation provided for certain offences by the code of Stephen Dushan in 1349 . In See also:Russia torture does not occur in the recensions of the earlier law . It was possibly of Tatar origin, and the earliest mention of it in an official document is probably in the Sudebnik of See also:Ivan the Terrible (1497) . In the ordinance of 1556 there are elaborate regulations, which one learns from history were not always observed in periods of political disturbance, and torture seems to have been used even as a means of enforcing payment of debts . The reaction begins with See also:Peter the Great and culminates with Catharine II., who was largely influenced by the opinions of Beccaria and Voltaire .
In the instructions to the commission for framing a criminal code (1766), it is declared that all punishments by which the body is maimed ought to be abolished,' and that the torture of the rack violates the rules of equity and does not produce the end proposed by the laws
?
It was formally abolished by See also: |
|
|
[back] TORTOSA |
[next] TORUS |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.