Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
TRANSFERENCE OF See also:HEAT 25 . Modes of Transference.—There are three See also:principal modes of transference of heat, namely (r) convection, (2) See also:conduction,. and (3) See also:radiation . (r) In convection, heat is carried or conveyed by the See also:motion of heated masses of See also:matter . The most See also:familiar illustrations of this method of transference are the See also:heating of buildings by the circulation of See also:steam or hot See also:water, or the equalization of temperature of a See also:mass of unequally heated liquid or See also:gas by convection currents, produced by natural changes of See also:density or by artificial stirring . (2) In conduction, heat is transferred by contact between contiguous particles of matter and is passed on from one particle to the next without visible relative motion of the parts of the See also:body . A familiar See also:illustration of conduction is the passage of heat through the See also:metal plates of a See also:boiler from the See also:fire to the water inside, or the transference of heat from a soldering See also:bolt to the See also:solder and the metal with which it is placed in contact . (3) In radiation, the heated body gives rise to a motion of vibration in the See also:aether, which is propagated equally in all directions, and is reconverted into heat when it encounters any obstacle capable of absorbing it . Thus radiation differs from conduction and convection in taking See also:place most perfectly in the See also:absence of matter, whereas conduction and convection require material communication between the bodies concerned . In the See also:majority of cases of transference of heat all three modes of transference are simultaneously operative in a greater or less degree, and the combined effect is generally of See also:great complexity . The different modes of transference are subject to widely different See also:laws, and the difficulty of disentangling their effects and subjecting them to calculation is often one of the most serious obstacles in the experimental investigation of heat . In space void of matter, we should have pure radiation, but it is difficult to obtain so perfect a vacuum that the effects of the residual gas in transferring heat by conduction or convection are inappreciable . In the interior of an opaque solid we should have pure conduction, but if the solid is sensibly transparent in thin layers there must also be an See also:internal radiation, while in a liquid or a gas it is very difficult to eliminate the effects of convection . These difficulties are well illustrated in the See also:historical development of the subject by the experimental investigations which have been made to determine the laws of heat-transference, such as the laws of cooling, of radiation and of conduction . 26 . See also:Newton's See also:Law of Cooling.—There is one essential See also:condition See also:common to all three modes of heat-transference, namely, that they depend on difference of temperature, that the direction of the See also:transfer of heat is always from hot to See also:cold, and that the See also:rate of transference is, for small See also:differences, directly proportional to the difference of temperature . Without difference of temperature there is no transfer of heat . When two bodies have been brought to the same temperature by conduction, they are also in See also:equilibrium as regards radiation, and See also:vice versa . If this were not the See also:case, there could be no equilibrium of heat defined by equality of temperature . A hot body placed in an enclosure of See also:lower temperature, e.g. a calorimeter in its containing See also:vessel, generally loses heat by all three modes simultaneously in different degrees . The loss by each mode will depend in different ways on the See also:form, extent and nature of its See also:surface and on that of the 2nciosure, on the manner in which it is supported, on its relative position and distance from the enclosure, and on the nature of the intervening See also:medium . But provided that the difference of temperature is small, the rate of loss of heat by all modes will be approximately proportional to the difference of temperature, the other conditions remaining See also:constant . The rate of cooling or the rate of fall of temperature will also be nearly proportional to the rate of loss of heat, if the specific heat of the cooling body is constant, or the rate of cooling at any moment will be proportional to the difference of temperature . This See also:simple relation is commonly known as Newton's law of cooling, but is limited in its application to comparatively simple cases such as the foregoing . Newton himself applied it to estimate the temperature of a red-hot See also:iron See also:ball, by observing the See also:time which it took to cool from a red heat to a known temperature, and comparing this with the time taken to cool through a known range at See also:ordinary temperatures .
According to this law if the excess of temperature of the body above its surroundings is observed at equal intervals of time, the observed values will form a geometrical progression with a common ratio
.
Supposing, for instance, that the surrounding temperature were o° C., that the red-hot ball took 25 minutes to cool from its See also:original temperature to 20° C., and 5 minutes to cool from 20° C. to 10° C., the original temperature is easily calculated on the See also:assumption that the excess of temperature above o° C. falls to See also:half its value in each See also:interval of 5 minutes
.
Doubling the value 200 at 25 minutes five times, we arrive at 640° C. as the original temperature
.
No other method of estimation of such temperatures was available in the time of Newton, but, as we now know, the simple law of proportionality
to the temperature difference is inapplicable over such large
ranges of temperature
.
The rate of loss of heat by radiation,and also by convection and conduction to the surrounding See also:air, increases much more rapidly than in simple proportion to the temperature difference, and the rate of increase of each follows a different law
.
At a later date See also:Sir See also:
225 and 337), who observed the rate of cooling of a See also:mercury thermometer from 300° C. in a water-jacketed enclosure at various temperatures from 6° C. to 8o° C
.
In See also:order to obtain the rate of cooling by radiation alone, they exhausted the enclosure as perfectly as possible after the introduction of the thermometer, but with the imperfect appliances available at that time they were not able to obtain a vacuum better than about 3 or 4 mm. of mercury
.
They found that the velocity of cooling V in a vacuum could be represented by a See also:formula of the type
V=A(aa–a'o) (5)
in which t is the temperature of the thermometer, and to that of the enclosure, a is a constant having the value 1.0075, and the coefficient A depends on the form of the bulb and the nature of its surface
.
For the ranges of temperature they employed, this formula gives much better results than Newton's, but it must be remembered that the temperatures were expressed on the arbitrary See also:scale of the mercury thermometer, and were not corrected for the large and uncertain errors of See also:stem-exposure (see See also:THERMOMETRY)
.
Moreover, although the effects of cooling by convection currents are practically eliminated by exhausting to 3 or 4 mm
.
(since the density of the gas is reduced to 1/2ooth while its viscosity is not appreciably affected), the rate of cooling by conduction is not materially diminished, since the conductivity, like the viscosity, is nearly See also:independent of pressure
.
It has since been shown by Sir See also: (6) They found that the cooling effect of convection, unlike that of radiation, was independent of the nature of the surface of the thermometer, whether silvered or blackened, that it varied as some See also:power c of the pressure p, and that it was independent of the See also:absolute temperature of the enclosure, but varied as the excess temperature (t–to) raised to the power I'233,„ ,This highly artificial result undoubtedly contains some elements of truth, but could only be applied to experiments similar to those from which it was derived . F . Herve de la Provostaye and P . Q . Desains (Ann . Chico . Phys., 1846, 16, p . 337), in repeating these experiments under various conditions, found that the coefficients A and B were to some extent dependent on the temperature, and that the manner in which the cooling effect varied with the pressure depended on the form and See also:size of the enclosure . It is evident that this should be the case, since the cooling effect of the gas depends partly on convective currents . which are necessarily greatly modified by the form of the enclosure in a manner which it would appear hopeless to See also:attempt to represent by any general formula . 28 . Surface Emissivity.—The same remark applies to many attempts which have since been made to determine the general value of the constant termed by See also:Fourier and See also:early writers the " exterior conductibility," but now called the surface emissivity .
This coefficient represents the rate of loss of heat from a body per unit See also:area of surface per degree excess of temperature, and includes the effects of radiation, convection and conduction
.
As already pointed out, the combined effect will be nearly proportional to the excess of temperature in any given case provided that the excess is small, but it is not necessarily proportional to the extent of surface exposed except in the case of pure radiation
.
The rate of loss by convection and conduction varies greatly with the form of the surface, and, unless the enclosure is very large compared with the cooling body, the effect depends also on the size and form of the enclosure
.
Heat is necessarily communicated from the cooling body to the layer of gas in contact with it by conduction
.
If the linear dimensions of the body are small, as in the case of a See also:fine See also:wire, or if it is separated from the enclosure by a thin layer of gas, the rate of loss depends chiefly on conduction
.
For very fine metallic wires heated by an electric current, W
.
E
.
See also:Ayrton and H
.
Kilgour (Phil
.
Trans., 1892) showed that the rate of loss is nearly independent of the surface, instead of being directly proportional to it
.
This should be the case, as See also:Porter has shown (Phil
.
See also:Hag., See also: The effects of conduction and radiation may be approximately estimated if the conductivity of the gas and the nature and forms of the surfaces of the body and enclosure are known, but the effect of convection in any case can be determined only by experiment . It has been found that the rate of cooling by a current of air is approximately proportional to the velocity of the current, other things being equal . It is obvious that this should be the case, but the result cannot generally be applied to convection currents . Values which are commonly given for the surface emissivity must therefore be accepted with great reserve . They can be regarded only as approximate, and as applicable only to cases precisely similar to those for which they were experimentally obtained . There cannot be said to be any general law of convection . The loss of heat is not necessarily proportional.to the area of the surface, and no general value of the coefficient can be given to suit all cases . The laws of conduction and radiation admit of being more precisely formulated, and their effects predicted, except in so far as they are complicated by convection . 29 . Conduction of Heat.—The laws of transference of heat in the interior of a solid body formed one of the earliest subjects of mathematical and experimental treatment in the theory of heat . The law assumed by Fourier was of the simplest possible type, but the mathematical application, except in the simplest cases, was so difficult as to require the development of a new mathematical method . Fourier succeeded in showing how, by his method of See also:analysis, the See also:solution of any given problem with regard to the flow of heat by conduction in any material could be obtained in terms of a See also:physical constant, the thermal conductivity of the material, and that the results obtained by experiment agreed in a qualitative manner with those predicted by his theory . But the experimental determination of the actual values of these constants presented formidable difficulties which were not surmounted till a later date The experimental methods and difficulties are discussed in a See also:special See also:article on CONDUCTION OF HEAT . It will suffice here to give a brief historical See also:sketch, including a few of the more important results by way of illustration . 30 . Comparison of Conducting See also:Powers.—That the power of transmitting heat by conduction varied widely in different materials was probably known in a general way from prehistoric times . Empirical knowledge of this See also:kind is shown in the construction of many articles for heating, cooking, &c., such as the See also:copper soldering bolt, or the See also:Norwegian cooking-See also:stove . Oneof the earliest experiments for making an actual comparison of conducting powers was that suggested by See also:Franklin, but carried out by See also:Jan Ingenhousz (Journ. de phys., 1789, 34, pp . 68 and 38o) . Exactly similar bars of different materials, See also:glass, See also:wood, metal, &c., thinly coated with See also:wax, were fixed in the See also:side of a trough of boiling water so as to project for equal distances through the side of the trough into the See also:external air . The wax coating was observed to melt as the heat travelled along the bars, the distance from the trough to which the wax was melted along each affording an approximate indication of the See also:distribution of temperature . When the temperature of each See also:bar had become stationary the heat which it gained by conduction from the trough must be equal to the heat lost to the surrounding air, and must therefore be approximately proportional to the distance to which the wax had melted along the bar . But the temperature fall per unit length, or the temperature-gradient, in each bar at the point where it emerged from the trough would be inversely proportional to the same distance . For equal temperature-gradients the quantities of heat conducted (or the relative conducting powers of the bars) would therefore be proportional to the squares of the distances to which the wax finally melted on each bar . This was shown by Fourier and Despretz (Ann. chins. phys., 1822, 19, p . 97) . 31 . See also:Diffusion of Temperature.—It was shown in connexion with this experiment by Sir H . See also:Davy, and the experiment was later popularized by John See also:Tyndall, that the rate at which wax melted along the bar, or the rate of See also:propagation of a given temperature, during the first moments of heating, as distinguished from the melting-distance finally attained, depended on the specific heat as well as the conductivity . See also:Short prisms of iron and See also:bismuth coated with wax were placed on a hot metal See also:plate . The wax was observed to melt first on the bismuth, although its conductivity is less than that of iron . The See also:reason is that its specific heat is less than that of iron in the proportion of 3 to I1 . The densities of iron and bismuth being 7.8 and 9.8, the thermal capacities of equal prisms will be in the ratio •86 for iron to •29 for bismuth . If the prisms receive heat at equal rates, the bismuth will reach the temperature of melting wax nearly three times as quickly as the iron . It is often stated on the strength of this experiment that the rate of propagation of a temperature See also:wave, which depends on the ratio of the conductivity to the specific heat per unit See also:volume, is greater in bismuth than in iron (e.g . See also:Preston, Heat, p . 628) . This is quite incorrect, because the conductivity of iron is about six times that of bismuth, and the rate of propagation of a temperature wave is therefore twice as great in iron as in bismuth . The experiment in reality is misleading because the rates of reception of heat by the prisms are limited by the very imperfect contact with the hot metal plate, and are not proportional to the respective conductivities . If the iron and bismuth bars are properly faced and soldered to the See also:top of a copper See also:box (in order to ensure See also:good metallic contact, and exclude a non-conducting film of air), and the box is then heated by steam, the rates of reception of heat will be nearly proportional to the conductivities, and the wax will melt nearly twice as fast along the iron as along the bismuth . A bar of See also:lead similarly treated will show a faster rate of propagation than iron, because, although its conductivity is only half that of iron, its specific heat per unit volume is 2.5 times smaller . 32 . See also:Bad Conductors . Liquids and Gases.—See also:Count See also:Rumford (1792) compared the conducting powers of substances used in clothing, such as See also:wool and See also:cotton, See also:fur and down, by observing the time which a thermometer took to cool when embedded in a- - globe filled successively with the different materials . The times of cooling observed for a given range varied from 1300 to 900 seconds for different materials . The See also:low conducting power of such materials is principally due to the presence of air in the interstices, which is prevented from forming convection currents by the presence of the fibrous material . Finely powdered See also:silica is a very bad conductor, but in the compact form of See also:rock crystal it is as good a conductor as some of the metals . According to the kinetic theory of gases, the conductivity of a gas depends on molecular diffusion .
See also:Maxwell estimated the conductivity of
air at ordinary temperatures at about 2o,000 times less than that of copper
.
This has been verified experimentally by See also:Kundt and Warburg, Stefan and See also:Winkelmann, by taking special precautions to eliminate the effects of convection currents and radiation
.
It was for some time doubted whether a gas possessed any true conductivity for heat
.
The experiment of T
.
See also:Andrews, repeated by See also: Difficulty of Quantitative Estimation of Heat Transmitted.—The conducting powers of different metals were compared by C . M . Despretz, and later by G . H . See also:Wiedemann and R . See also:Franz, employing an See also:extension of the method of Jan Ingenhousz, in which the temperatures at different points along a bar heated at one end were measured by thermometers or thermocouples let into small holes in the bars, instead of being measured at one point only by means of melting wax . These experiments undoubtedly gave fairly accurate relative values, but did not permit the calculation of the absolute amounts of heat transmitted . This was first obtained by J . D . See also:Forbes (Brit . Assoc . See also:Rep., 1852; Trans . Roy . Soc . Ed., 1862, 23, p . 133) by deducing the amount of heat lost to the surrounding air from a See also:separate experiment in which the rate of cooling of the bar was observed (see CONDUCTIO.i of HEAT) . See also:Clement (Ann. chim. phys., 1841) had previously attempted to determine the conductivities of metals by observing the amount of heat transmitted by a plate with one side exposed to steam at See also:ioo° C., and the other side cooled by water at z8° C . Employing a copper plate 3 mm. thick, and assuming that the two surfaces of the plate were at the same temperatures as the water and the steam to which they were exposed, or that the temperature-gradient in the metal was 92° in 3 mm., he had thus obtained a value which we now know to be nearly zoo times too small . The actual temperature difference in the metal itself was really about o•36° C . The See also:remainder of the 92° drop was in the badly conducting films of water and steam See also:close to the metal surface . Similarly in a boiler plate in contact with See also:flame at 15oo° C. on one side and water at. say, 15o° C. on the other, the actual difference of temperature in the metal, even if it is an See also:inch thick, is only a few degrees . The metal, unless badly furred with incrustation, is but little hotter than the water . It is immaterial so far as the transmission of heat is concerned, whether the plates are iron or copper, The greater See also:part of the resistance to the passage of heat resides in a comparatively quiescent film of gas close to the surface, through which film the heat has to pass mainly by conduction . If a See also:Bunsen flame, preferably coloured with See also:sodium, is observed impinging on a cold metal plate, it will be seen to be separated from the plate by a dark space of a millimetre or less, throughout which the temperature of the gas is lowered by its own conductivity below the temperature of incandescence . There is no abrupt change of temperature in passing from the gas to the metal, but a continuous temperature-gradient from the temperature of the metal to that of the flame . It is true that this gradient may be upwards of r000° C. per mm., but there is no discontinuity . 34 . Resistance of a Gas Film to the Passage of Heat.—It is possible to make a rough estimate of the resistance of such a film to the passage of heat through it . Taking the See also:average conductivity of the gas in the film as ro,000 times less than that of copper (about See also:double the conductivity of air at ordinary temperatures) a millimetre film would be See also:equivalent to a thickness of ro metres of copper, or about 1.2 metres of iron . Taking the temperature-gradient as r000° C. per mm. such a film would transmit r gramme-calorie per sq. cm. per sec., or 36,000 kilo-calories per sq. See also:metre per See also:hour . With an area of 100 sq. See also:ems. the heat transmitted at this rate would raise a litre of water from 2o° C. to roo° C. in 800 secs . By experiment with a strong Bunsen flame it takes from 8 to ro minutes to do this, which would indicate that on the above assumptions the equivalent thickness of quiescent film should be rather less than i mm. in this case . The thickness of the film diminishes with the velocity of the burning gases impinging on the surface . This accounts for the rapidity of heating by a See also:blowpipe flame, which is not due to any great increase in temperature of the flame as compared with a Bunsen . Similarly the efficiency of a boiler is but slightly reduced if half the tubes are stopped up, because the increase of See also:draught through the remainder compensates partly for the diminished heating surface . Some resistance to the passage of heat into a boiler is also due to the water film on the inside . But this is of less See also:account, because the conductivity of water is much greater than that of air, and because the film is continually broken up by the formation of steam, which abstracts heat very rapidly . 35 . Heating by Condensation of Steam.—It is often stated that the rate at which steam will condense on a metal surface at a temperature below that corresponding to the saturation pressure of the steam is practically See also:infinite (e.g . See also:Osborne See also:Reynolds, Proc . Roy . Soc . Ed., 1893, p . 275), and conversely that the rate at which water will abstract heat from a metal surface by the formation of steam (if the metal is above the temperature of saturation of the steam) is limited only by the rate at which the metal can See also:supply heat by conduction to its surface layer . The rate at which heat can be supplied by condensation of steam appears to be much greater than that at which heat can be supplied by a flame under ordinary conditions, but there is no reason to suppose that it is infinite, or that any discontinuity exists . Experiments by H . L . Callendar and J . T . See also:Nicolson by three independent methods (Proc . Inst . Civ . Eng., 1898, 131, p . 149; Brit . Assoc . Rep. p . 418) appear to show that the rate of See also:abstraction of heat by evaporation, or that of communication of heat by condensation, depends chiefly on the difference of temperature between the metal surface and the saturated steam, and is nearly proportional to the temperature difference (not to the pressure difference, as suggested by Reynolds) for such ranges of pressure as are common in practice . The rate of heat transmission they observed was equivalent to about 8 calories per sq. cm. per sec., for a difference of 20 ° C. between the temperature of the metal surface and the saturation temperature of the steam . This would correspond to a condensation of 530 kilogrammes of steam at roo° C. per sq. metre per hour, or 109 lb per sq. ft. per hour for the same difference of temperature, values which are many times greater than those actually obtained in ordinary surface condensers . The reason for this is that there is generally some air mixed with the steam in a surface See also:condenser, which greatly retards the condensation . It is also difficult to keep the temperature of the metal as much as zo° C. below the temperature of the steam unless a very See also:free and copious circulation of cold water is available . For the same difference of temperature, steam can supply heat by condensation about a thousand times faster than hot air . This rate is not often approached in practice, but the facility of See also:generation and transmission of steam, combined with its, high latent heat and the accuracy of See also:control and regulation of temperature afforded, render it one of the most convenient agents for the distribution of large quantities of heat in all kinds of manufacturing processes . 36 . Spheroidal See also:State.—An interesting contrast to the extreme rapidity with which heat is abstracted by the evaporation of a liquid in contact with a metal plate, is the so-called spheroidal state . A small drop of liquid thrown on a red-hot metal plate assumes a spheroidal form, and continues See also:swimming about for some time, while it slowly evaporates at a temperature somewhat below its boiling-point . The explanation is simply that the liquid itself cannot come in actual contact with the metal plate (especially if the latter is above the See also:critical temperature), but is separated from it by a badly conducting film of vapour, through which, as we have seen, the heat is comparatively slowly transmitted even if the difference of temperature is several See also:hundred degrees . If the metal plate is allowed to cool gradually, the drop remains suspended on its See also:cushion of vapour, until, in the case of water, a temperature of about 200° C. is reached, at which the liquid comes in contact with the plate and boils explosively, reducing the temperature of the plate, if thin, almost instantaneously to oo° C . The temperature of the metal is readily observed by a thermo-electric method, employing a See also:platinum dish with a platinum-See also:rhodium wire soldered with See also:gold to its under side . The absence of contact between the liquid and the dish in the spheroidal state may also be shown by connecting one terminal of a See also:galvanometer to the drop and the other through a See also:battery to the dish, and observing that no current passes until the drop boils . 37 . Early Theories of Radiation..—It was at one time supposed that there were three distinct kinds of radiation—thermal, luminous and actinic, combined in the radiation from a luminous source such as the sun or a flame . The first gave rise to heat, the second to See also:light and the third to chemical See also:action . The three kinds were partially separated by a See also:prism, the actinic rays being generally more refracted, and the thermal rays less refracted than the luminous . This conception arose very naturally from the observation that the feebly luminous See also:blue and See also:violet rays produced the greatest photographic effects, which also showed the existence of dark rays beyond the violet, whereas the brilliant yellow and red were practically without action on the photographic plate . A thermometer placed in the blue or violet showed no appreciable rise of temperature, and even in the yellow the effect was hardly discernible . The effect increased rapidly as the light faded towards the extreme red, and reached a maximum beyond the extreme limits of the spectrum (Herschel), showing that the greater part of the thermal radiation was al-together non-luminous . It is now a See also:commonplace that chemical action, See also:colour sensation and heat are merely different effects of one and the same kind of radiation, the particular effect produced in each case depending on the frequency and intensity of the vibration, and on the nature of the substance on which it falls . When radiation is completely absorbed by a See also:black substance, it is converted into heat, the quantity of heat produced being equivalent to the See also:total See also:energy of the radiation absorbed, irrespective of the colour or frequency of the different rays . The actinic or chemical effects, on the other See also:hand, depend essentially on some relation between the See also:period of the vibration and the properties of the substance acted on . The rays producing such effects are generally those which are most strongly absorbed . The spectrum of See also:chlorophyll, the See also:green colouring matter of See also:plants, shows two very strong absorption bands in the red . The red rays of corresponding period are found to be the most active in promoting the growth of the plant . The chemically active rays are not necessarily the shortest . Even photographic plates may be made to See also:respond to the red rays by staining them with pinachrome or some other suitable dye . The action of light rays on the retina is closely analogous to the action on a photographic plate . The retina, like the plate, is sensitive only to rays within certain restricted limits of frequency . The limits of sensitiveness of each colour sensation are not exactly defined, but vary slightly from one individualto another, especially in cases of partial colour-See also:blindness, and are modified by conditions of fatigue . We are not here concerned with these important physiological and chemical effects of radiation, but rather with the question of the See also:conversion of energy of radiation into heat, and with the laws of emission and absorption of radiation in relation to temperature . We may here also assume the identity of visible and invisible radiations from a heated body in all their physical properties . It has been abundantly proved that the invisible rays, like the visible, (1) are propagated in straight lines in homogeneous See also:media; (2) are reflected and diffused from the surface of bodies according to the same law; (3) travel with the same velocity in free space, but with slightly different velocities in denser media, being subject to the same law of See also:refraction; (4) exhibit all the phenomena of diffraction and interference which are characteristic of wave-motion in general; (5) are capable of polarization and double refraction; (6) exhibit similar effects of selective absorption . These properties are more easily demonstrated in the case of visible rays on account of the great sensitiveness of the See also:eye . But with the aid of the thermopile or other sensitive See also:radiometer, they may be shown to belong equally to all the radiations from a heated body, even such as are See also:thirty to fifty times slower in frequency than the longest visible rays . The same physical properties have also been shown to belong to electromagnetic waves excited by an electric See also:discharge, whatever the frequency, thus including all kinds of aetherial radiation in the same See also:category as light . 38 . Theory of Exchanges.—The apparent concentration of cold by a See also:concave See also:mirror, observed by G . B . Porta and rediscovered by M . A . Pictet, led to the enunciation of the theory of exchanges by See also:Pierre See also:Prevost in 1791 . Prevost's leading See also:idea was that all bodies, whether cold or hot, are constantly radiating heat . Heat equilibrium, he says, consists in an equality of ex-change . When equilibrium is interfered with, it is re-established by inequalities of See also:exchange . If into a locality at See also:uniform temperature a refracting or reflecting body is introduced, it has no effect in the way of changing the temperature at any point of that locality . A reflecting body, heated or cooled in the interior of such an enclosure, will acquire the surrounding temperature more slowly than would a non-reflector, and will less affect another body placed at a little distance, but will not affect the final equality of temperature . Apparent radiation of cold, as from a See also:block of See also:ice to a thermometer placed near it, is due to the fact that the thermometer being at a higher temperature sends more heat to the ice than it received back from it . Although Prevost does not make the statement in so many words, it is clear that he regards the radiation from a body as depending only on its own nature and temperature, and as independent of the nature and presence of any adjacent body . Heat equilibrium in an enclosure of constant temperature such as is here postulated by Prevost, has often been regarded as a consequence of See also:Carnot's principle .
Since difference of temperature is required for transforming heat into See also:work, no work could be obtained from heat in such a See also:system, and no spontaneous changes of temperature can take place, as any such changes might be utilized for the See also:production of work
.
This See also:line of reasoning does not appear quite satisfactory, because it is tactitly assumed, in the reasoning by which Carnot's principle was established, as a result of universal experience, that a number of bodies within the same impervious enclosure, which contains no source of heat, will ultimately acquire the same temperature, and that difference of temperature is required to produce flow of heat
.
Thus although we may regard the equilibrium in such an enclosure as being due to equal exchanges of heat in all directions, the equal and opposite streams of radiation annul and neutralize each other in such a way that no actual transfer of energy in any direction takes place
.
The state of the medium is everywhere the same in such an enclosure, but its energy of-agitation per unit volume is a See also:function of the temperature, and is such that it would not be in equilibrium with any body at a different temperature
.
3o
.
" Full" and Selective Radiation
.
See also:Correspondence of Emission and Absorption.—The most obvious difficulties in the
way of this theory arise from the fact that nearly all radiation is more or less selective in See also:character, as regards the quality and frequency of the rays emitted and absorbed
.
It was shown by J
.
See also:Leslie, M
.
See also:Melloni and other experimentalists that many substances such as glass and water, which are very transparent to visible rays, are extremely opaque to much of the invisible radiation of lower frequency; and that polished metals, which are perfect reflectors, are very feeble radiators as compared with dull or black bodies at the same temperature
.
If two bodies emit rays of different periods in different proportions, it is not at first sight easy to see how their radiations can See also:balance each other at the same temperature
.
The See also: It follows from this conception that the proportion of the full radiation stream absorbed by any body in such an enclosure must be exactly compensated in quality as well as quantity by the proportion emitted, or that the emissive and absorptive powers of any body at a given temperature must be precisely equal . A good reflector, like a polished metal, must also be a feeble radiator and absorber . Of the incident radiation it absorbs a small fraction and reflects the remainder, which together with the radiation emitted (being precisely equal to that absorbed) makes up the full radiation stream . A partly transparent material, like glass, absorbs part of the full radiation and transmits part . But it emits rays precisely equal in quality and intensity to those which it absorbs, which together with the transmitted portion make up the full stream . The ideal black body or perfect radiator is a body which absorbs all the radiation incident on it . The rays emitted from such a body at any temperature must be equal to the full radiation stream in an isothermal enclosure at the same temperature . Lampblack, which may absorb between 98 to 99 % of the incident radiation, is generally taken as the type of a black body . But a closer approximation to full radiation may be obtained by employing a hollow vessel the internal walls of which are blackened and maintained at a uniform temperature by a steam jacket or other suitable means . If a relatively small hole is made in the side of such a vessel, the radiation proceeding through the See also:aperture will be the full radiation corresponding to the temperature . Such a vessel is also a perfect absorber . Of radiation entering through the aperture an infinitesimal fraction only could possibly emerge by successive reflection even if the sides were of polished metal internally . A thin platinum See also:tube heated by an electric current appears feebly luminous as compared with a blackened tube at the same temperature . But if a small hole is made in the side of the polished tube, the light proceeding through the hole appears brighter than the blackened tube, as though the inside of the tube were much hotter than the outside, which is not the case to any appreciable extent if the tube is thin . The radiation proceeding through the hole is nearly that of a perfectly black body if the hole is small . If there were no hole the internal stream of radiation would be exactly that of a blackbody at the same temperature however perfect the reflecting power, or however low the emissive power of the walls, because the defect in emissive power would be exactly compensated by the internal reflection . Balfour Stewart gave a number of striking illustrations of the qualitative identity of emission and absorption of a substance . Pieces of coloured glass placed in a fire appear to lose their colour when at the same temperature as the coals behind them, because they compensate exactly for their selective absorption by radiating chiefly those See also:colours which they absorb . Rocksalt is remarkably transparent to thermal radiation of nearly all kinds, but it is extremely opaque to radiation from a heated plate of rocksalt, because it emits when heated precisely those rays which it absorbs . A plate of See also:tourmaline cut parallel to the See also:axis absorbs almost completely light polarized in a See also:plane parallel to the axis, but transmits freely light polarized in a perpendicular plane . When heated its radiation is polarized in the same plane as the radiation which it absorbs . In the caseof incandescent vapours, the exact correspondence of emission and absorption as regards wave-length of frequency of the light emitted and absorbed forms the See also:foundation of the See also:science of spectrum analysis . See also:Fraunhofer had noticed the coincidence of a pair of See also:bright yellow lines seen in the spectrum of a See also:candle flame with the dark D lines in the solar spectrum, a coincidence which was afterwards more exactly verified by W . A . See also:Miller . See also:Foucault found that the flame of the electric arc showed the same lines bright in its spectrum, and proved that they appeared as dark lines in the otherwise continuous spectrum when the light from the See also:carbon poles was transmitted through the arc . See also: |