Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

JUAN VALERA Y ALCALA GALIANO (1824-1905)

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V27, Page 858 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

JUAN VALERA Y See also:

ALCALA GALIANO (1824-1905)  , See also:Spanish novelist, son of a retired See also:commodore, Jose Valera, who married Dona Dolores See also:Alcala Galiano, marquesa de la Paniega, widow of a Swiss See also:general named Freuller, was See also:born on the 18th of See also:October 1824 at See also:Cabra (See also:Cordova) . Valera' was educated at See also:Malaga and at the university of See also:Granada, where he took a- degree in See also:law . Entering See also:diplomacy in 1847, he became unpaid attache to thedied on the 18th of See also:April 1905 . Valera's first publication, Canciones; Romances y Poemas, was published in 1856 . His verses are melodious, finished and various in subject; but they are rather the imitative exercises of a scholarly See also:man of the See also:world than the inspirations of an See also:original poet . That they failed to attract See also:notice is not altogether to be regretted, for, as Valera himself confessed later in his See also:half-ironical, half-ingenuous See also:preface to the second edition (1885), " In spite of my idleness, I should have shown a most deplorable fecundity had I been received with favour and See also:applause." However, if he published little more in the shape of See also:verse, he wrote incessantly in See also:prose . More than two-thirds of his See also:work is still uncollected, buried in reviews and See also:newspapers; but we may take it that he rescued what he thought most valuable . His See also:criticism may be read in the Estudios criticos sobre literatura (1864), in the Disertaciones y juicios literarios (1878) and in the Nuevos estudios criticos (1888); yet, with all his penetration and See also:taste, Valera laboured under one disadvantage not frequent in critics . He suffered from an excessive amiability . He said a See also:hundred incisive, See also:wise, witty, subtle and suggestive things concerning the See also:mysticism of St See also:Theresa, the See also:art of novel-See also:writing, See also:Faust, the See also:Inquisition, See also:Don Quixote, See also:Shakespeare, the See also:psychology of love in literature; but, to do himself See also:justice, it was an almost indispensable See also:condition that he should See also:deal with the past . In the presence of a living author Valera was disarmed . Unless the writer were an incurable pessimist, Valera would find something in his work to praise, exhausting the vocabulary of compliment and graceful See also:tribute; but, except in the Cartas americanas (1889), where the laudation was manifestly so exaggerated that no harm could come of it, this See also:trick of eulogy became perplexing and misleading .

Valera, in effect, refused to criticize contemporary literature; as a See also:

rival author it seemed to him an indelicacy to censure his competitors, and he was either laudatory or silent . It is regrettable, for criticism was and is greatly needed in See also:Spain . Valera, then, excelled neither as a poet nor as an impartial critic; he had the vocation of the novelist, though he was slow in discovering it, since he was in his fiftieth See also:year before he published the novel which was to make him famous . Pepita Spanish See also:embassy at See also:Naples under the famous See also:Duke de Rivas, the See also:leader of the romantic See also:movement in Spain . Valera witnessed the events of the Revolution, was promoted second secretary to the embassy at See also:Lisbon in 185o, and in 1851 was transferred as first secretary to Rio de Janeiro, where he remained for two years . After a See also:short See also:period passed at See also:Dresden, he was appointed to the permanent See also:staff of the See also:Foreign See also:Office at See also:Madrid, and in 1857 was attached to the See also:special embassy to St See also:Petersburg under the Duke de See also:Osuna . In 1858 he resigned his See also:post, was elected See also:deputy for Archidona, in the See also:province of Malaga, took his seat with the advanced Liberal Opposition, and joined with Albareda and Fabie in See also:founding El Contempordneo, a very influential See also:journal . An See also:expert in the art of covering an opponent with polite ridicule, his writings in the See also:press attracted general See also:attention . He was elected a member of the Spanish See also:Academy in 1861, and remained in Opposition till 1865, when O'Donnell appointed him See also:minister at See also:Frankfort; on the See also:flight of See also:Isabella II. in 1868 he was elected deputy for See also:Montilla in the province of Cordova, became under-secretary of See also:state for foreign affairs, and was one of the deputation who offered the See also:crown to Amadeus of See also:Savoy in the Pitti See also:Palace at See also:Florence . Though he always called himself a Moderate Liberal, Valera invariably voted for what are considered See also:Radical See also:measures in Spain, and a speech delivered by him in See also:February 1863 against the temporal See also:power of the See also:pope created a profound sensation . However, though a member of the revolutionary party, he steadily opposed organic constitutional changes, and therefore he retired from public See also:life during the period of republican See also:government . After the See also:Bourbon restoration he acted as minister at Lisbon (1881-1883), at See also:Washington (1885), at See also:Brussels (1886) and as See also:ambassador at See also:Vienna (1893-1895), retiring from the See also:diplomatic service on the 5th of See also:March 1896 .

During the last ten years of his life he took no active See also:

part in politics . He Jimenez (1874) is a See also:recital of the fall of Luis de Vargas, a seminarist who conceived himself to be a mystic and a potential See also:saint, and whose aspirations dissolve at the first contact with reality . It is easy to point out blemishes: the See also:story is not well constructed, and it has pauses during which the. writer's fantasy plays at See also:pleasure over a hundred subjects not very germane to the See also:matter; but its characters are as real as any in fiction, the love story is told with the most refined subtlety and malicious truth, while See also:page upon page is written in such Spanish as would do See also:credit to the best writers of the 16th and 17th centuries . Unquestionably Pepita Jimenez is a very remarkable achievement--so remarkable, that contemporaries were reluctant to admit the superiority of its successors . It is certain that Valera's second novel, See also:Las ilusiones del See also:Doctor Faustino (1875), was received with marked disfavour, and that it has the faults of over-refinement and of See also:cruelty; yet in keen See also:analysis and in See also:humour it surpasses Pepita Jimenez . The Comendador See also:Mendoza (1877) is more pathetic and of a profounder significance; and if Dona Luz (1879) repeats the situation and the general See also:idea already used in Pepita Jimenez, it strikes a deeper and more tragic See also:note, which came as a surprise to those See also:familiar only with the lighter See also:side of Valera's , See also:genius . Besides these elaborate psychological studies, Valera issued a See also:volume of Cuentos (1887), some of these short tales and dialogues being marvels of art and of insight . Thenceforward he was silent for eight years, but after his retirement from politics he published several See also:good books—El hechicero (1895), Juanita la larga (1896), Genio y figura (1897), De varios Mores' (1898) and Morsamor (1899) . These are not all of equal excellence, but they are characteristic of their author, and abound in understanding, humorous comment and sympathetic creation . At the See also:close of the 19th See also:century Valera was recognized as the most eminent man of letters in Spain . He had not See also:Pereda's force nor his energetic See also:realism; he had not the copious invention nor the reforming purpose of See also:Perez GaldSs; yet he was as realistic as the former and as innovating as the latter . And, for all his See also:cosmopolitan spirit, he fortunately remained in-tensely and incorrigibly Spanish .

His aristocratic See also:

scepticism, his See also:strange elusiveness, his incomparable See also:charm are his own: his humour, his flashing See also:irony, his urbanity are eminently the gifts of his See also:land and See also:race . He is by no means an impersonal artist; in almost every story there is at least one See also:character who talks and thinks and subtilizes and refines as Valera himself wrote in his most brilliant essays . This may be a See also:fault in art; but, if so, it is a fault which many See also:great artists have committed, from Cervantes to See also:Thackeray . It is dangerous to See also:attempt a forecast of Valera's final See also:place in See also:literary See also:history, yet it seems safe to say that, though his poems and essays will be forgotten, Pepita Jimenez and Dona Luz will survive changes of See also:fashion and of taste, and that their author's name will be inseparably connected with the See also:renaissance of the See also:modern Spanish novel . (J .

End of Article: JUAN VALERA Y ALCALA GALIANO (1824-1905)
[back]
FERNANDO DE VALENZUELA (163o-1692)
[next]
VIA VALERIA

Additional information and Comments

There are no comments yet for this article.
» Add information or comments to this article.
Please link directly to this article:
Highlight the code below, right click and select "copy." Paste it into a website, email, or other HTML document.