Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
JUAN VALERA Y See also:ALCALA GALIANO (1824-1905) , See also:Spanish novelist, son of a retired See also:commodore, Jose Valera, who married Dona Dolores See also:Alcala Galiano, marquesa de la Paniega, widow of a Swiss See also:general named Freuller, was See also:born on the 18th of See also:October 1824 at See also:Cabra (See also:Cordova) . Valera' was educated at See also:Malaga and at the university of See also:Granada, where he took a- degree in See also:law . Entering See also:diplomacy in 1847, he became unpaid attache to thedied on the 18th of See also:April 1905 . Valera's first publication, Canciones; Romances y Poemas, was published in 1856 . His verses are melodious, finished and various in subject; but they are rather the imitative exercises of a scholarly See also:man of the See also:world than the inspirations of an See also:original poet . That they failed to attract See also:notice is not altogether to be regretted, for, as Valera himself confessed later in his See also:half-ironical, half-ingenuous See also:preface to the second edition (1885), " In spite of my idleness, I should have shown a most deplorable fecundity had I been received with favour and See also:applause." However, if he published little more in the shape of See also:verse, he wrote incessantly in See also:prose . More than two-thirds of his See also:work is still uncollected, buried in reviews and See also:newspapers; but we may take it that he rescued what he thought most valuable . His See also:criticism may be read in the Estudios criticos sobre literatura (1864), in the Disertaciones y juicios literarios (1878) and in the Nuevos estudios criticos (1888); yet, with all his penetration and See also:taste, Valera laboured under one disadvantage not frequent in critics . He suffered from an excessive amiability . He said a See also:hundred incisive, See also:wise, witty, subtle and suggestive things concerning the See also:mysticism of St See also:Theresa, the See also:art of novel-See also:writing, See also:Faust, the See also:Inquisition, See also:Don Quixote, See also:Shakespeare, the See also:psychology of love in literature; but, to do himself See also:justice, it was an almost indispensable See also:condition that he should See also:deal with the past . In the presence of a living author Valera was disarmed . Unless the writer were an incurable pessimist, Valera would find something in his work to praise, exhausting the vocabulary of compliment and graceful See also:tribute; but, except in the Cartas americanas (1889), where the laudation was manifestly so exaggerated that no harm could come of it, this See also:trick of eulogy became perplexing and misleading .
Valera, in effect, refused to criticize contemporary literature; as a See also:rival author it seemed to him an indelicacy to censure his competitors, and he was either laudatory or silent
.
It is regrettable, for criticism was and is greatly needed in See also:Spain
.
Valera, then, excelled neither as a poet nor as an impartial critic; he had the vocation of the novelist, though he was slow in discovering it, since he was in his fiftieth See also:year before he published the novel which was to make him famous
.
Pepita
Spanish See also:embassy at See also:Naples under the famous See also:Duke de Rivas, the See also:leader of the romantic See also:movement in Spain
.
Valera witnessed the events of the Revolution, was promoted second secretary to the embassy at See also:Lisbon in 185o, and in 1851 was transferred as first secretary to Rio de Janeiro, where he remained for two years
.
After a See also:short See also:period passed at See also:Dresden, he was appointed to the permanent See also:staff of the See also:Foreign See also:Office at See also:Madrid, and in 1857 was attached to the See also:special embassy to St See also:Petersburg under the Duke de See also:Osuna
.
In 1858 he resigned his See also:post, was elected See also:deputy for Archidona, in the See also:province of Malaga, took his seat with the advanced Liberal Opposition, and joined with Albareda and Fabie in See also:founding El Contempordneo, a very influential See also:journal
.
An See also:expert in the art of covering an opponent with polite ridicule, his writings in the See also:press attracted general See also:attention
.
He was elected a member of the Spanish See also:Academy in 1861, and remained in Opposition till 1865, when O'Donnell appointed him See also:minister at See also:Frankfort; on the See also:flight of See also:Isabella II. in 1868 he was elected deputy for See also:Montilla in the province of Cordova, became under-secretary of See also:state for foreign affairs, and was one of the deputation who offered the See also:crown to Amadeus of See also:Savoy in the Pitti See also:Palace at See also:Florence
.
Though he always called himself a Moderate Liberal, Valera invariably voted for what are considered See also:Radical See also:measures in Spain, and a speech delivered by him in See also:February 1863 against the temporal See also:power of the See also:pope created a profound sensation
.
However, though a member of the revolutionary party, he steadily opposed organic constitutional changes, and therefore he retired from public See also:life during the period of republican See also:government
.
After the See also:Bourbon restoration he acted as minister at Lisbon (1881-1883), at See also:Washington (1885), at See also:Brussels (1886) and as See also:ambassador at See also:Vienna (1893-1895), retiring from the See also:diplomatic service on the 5th of See also: During the last ten years of his life he took no active See also:part in politics . He Jimenez (1874) is a See also:recital of the fall of Luis de Vargas, a seminarist who conceived himself to be a mystic and a potential See also:saint, and whose aspirations dissolve at the first contact with reality . It is easy to point out blemishes: the See also:story is not well constructed, and it has pauses during which the. writer's fantasy plays at See also:pleasure over a hundred subjects not very germane to the See also:matter; but its characters are as real as any in fiction, the love story is told with the most refined subtlety and malicious truth, while See also:page upon page is written in such Spanish as would do See also:credit to the best writers of the 16th and 17th centuries . Unquestionably Pepita Jimenez is a very remarkable achievement--so remarkable, that contemporaries were reluctant to admit the superiority of its successors . It is certain that Valera's second novel, See also:Las ilusiones del See also:Doctor Faustino (1875), was received with marked disfavour, and that it has the faults of over-refinement and of See also:cruelty; yet in keen See also:analysis and in See also:humour it surpasses Pepita Jimenez . The Comendador See also:Mendoza (1877) is more pathetic and of a profounder significance; and if Dona Luz (1879) repeats the situation and the general See also:idea already used in Pepita Jimenez, it strikes a deeper and more tragic See also:note, which came as a surprise to those See also:familiar only with the lighter See also:side of Valera's , See also:genius . Besides these elaborate psychological studies, Valera issued a See also:volume of Cuentos (1887), some of these short tales and dialogues being marvels of art and of insight . Thenceforward he was silent for eight years, but after his retirement from politics he published several See also:good books—El hechicero (1895), Juanita la larga (1896), Genio y figura (1897), De varios Mores' (1898) and Morsamor (1899) . These are not all of equal excellence, but they are characteristic of their author, and abound in understanding, humorous comment and sympathetic creation . At the See also:close of the 19th See also:century Valera was recognized as the most eminent man of letters in Spain . He had not See also:Pereda's force nor his energetic See also:realism; he had not the copious invention nor the reforming purpose of See also:Perez GaldSs; yet he was as realistic as the former and as innovating as the latter . And, for all his See also:cosmopolitan spirit, he fortunately remained in-tensely and incorrigibly Spanish . His aristocratic See also:scepticism, his See also:strange elusiveness, his incomparable See also:charm are his own: his humour, his flashing See also:irony, his urbanity are eminently the gifts of his See also:land and See also:race . He is by no means an impersonal artist; in almost every story there is at least one See also:character who talks and thinks and subtilizes and refines as Valera himself wrote in his most brilliant essays . This may be a See also:fault in art; but, if so, it is a fault which many See also:great artists have committed, from Cervantes to See also:Thackeray . It is dangerous to See also:attempt a forecast of Valera's final See also:place in See also:literary See also:history, yet it seems safe to say that, though his poems and essays will be forgotten, Pepita Jimenez and Dona Luz will survive changes of See also:fashion and of taste, and that their author's name will be inseparably connected with the See also:renaissance of the See also:modern Spanish novel . (J . |
|
|
[back] FERNANDO DE VALENZUELA (163o-1692) |
[next] VIA VALERIA |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.