Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
VAULT 1 (Fr. voute, Ital. See also:volta, Ger. Gaavolbe)
, in See also:architecture, the See also:term given to the covering over of a space with See also: In all the instances above quoted in Chaldaea and Egypt the bricks, whether burnt or sun-dried, were of the description to which the term " See also:tile" would now be given; the dimensions varied from 18or See also:coin. to to in., being generally square and about 4 to 2 in. thick,, and they were not shaped as voussoirs, the connecting See also:medium being thicker at the top than at the bottom . The earliest See also:Egyptian examples of See also:regular voussoirs in stone belong to the XXVIth See also:Dynasty (c . 65o B.C.) in the additions made then to the See also:temple of Medinet-Abou, and here it is probable that centring of some kind was provided, as the vaults are built in rings, so that the same centring could be shifted on after the completion of each ring . The earliest example of regularly shaped voussoirs, and of about the same date, is found in the See also:cloaca at Graviscae in See also:Etruria, with a span of about 14 ft., the voussoirs of which are from 5 to 6 ft. See also:long . The cloaca See also:maxima in See also:Rome, built by Tarquin (603 Lc.) to drain the marshy ground between the See also:Palatine and the Capitoline Hills, was according to Commendatore See also:Boni vaulted over in thelet century s.e., the vault being over Boo ft. long, to ft. in span, with three concentric rings of voussoirs . So far, all the vaults mentioned have been barrel vaults, which, when not built underground, required continuous walls of great thickness to resist their thrust; the earliest example of the next variety, the intersecting barrel vault, is said to be over a small hall at See also:Pergamum,in See also:Asia See also:Minor, but its first employment over halls of great dimensions is due to the See also:Romans . When two semicircular barrel vaults of the same diameter cross one another (fig . 2) their intersection (a true See also:ellipse) is known as a See also:groin, down which the thrust of the vault is carried to the cross walls.; if a See also:series of two or more barrel vaults intersect one another, the See also:weight is carried on to the piers at their intersection and the thrust is trans- - mitted to the See also:outer FIG . 2 . cross walls; thus in the Roman See also:reservoir at Baiae, known as the See also:piscina mirabilis, a series of five aisles with semicircular barrel vaults are intersected, by twelve cross aisles, the vaults being carried on 48 piers and thick See also:external walls . The width of these aisles being only about 13 ft. there was no great difficulty in the construction of these vaults, but in the Roman Thermae the See also:tepidarium had a span of 8o ft., more than twice that of an See also:English See also:cathedral, so that its construction both from the statical and economical point of view was of the greatest importance . The researches of M .
See also:Choisy (L'See also:Art de bdtir chez See also:les Romains), based on a See also:minute examination of those portions of the vaults which still remain in situ, have shown that: on a comparatively slight centring, consisting of trusses placed about to ft. apart and covered with planks laid, from truss to truss, were laid—to begin with—two layers of the Roman brick (measuring nearly 2 ft. square and thick); on these and on the trusses transverse rings of brick were built with See also:longitudinal ties at intervals; on the brick layers and embedding the rings and cross ties See also:concrete was thrown in horizontal layers, the haunches being filled in solid, and the See also:surface sloped on either See also:side and covered over with a tile roof of See also:low See also:pitch laid See also:direct on the concrete
.
The rings relieved the centring from the weight imposed; and' the two layers of bricks carried the concrete till it had set
.
As the walls carrying these vaults were also built in concrete with occasional See also:bond courses of brick, the whole structure was homogeneous
.
One of the important ingredients of the mortar was a volcanic' See also:deposit found near Rome, known as pozzolana, which, when the concrete had 'set, not only made the concrete as solid as the See also:rock itself, but to a certain extent neutralized the thrust of the vaults, which formed shells See also:equivalent to that of a See also:metal lid, the Romans, however, do not seem to have recognized the extra-See also:ordinary value of this pozzolana mixture, for they otherwise provided amply for the counteracting of any thrust which might exist by the erection of cross walls and buttresses
.
In the tepidaria of the Thermae and in the See also:basilica of See also:Constantine, in See also:order to bring the thrust well within the walls, the See also:main barrel vault of the' hall was brought forward on each side and rested on detached columns, which constituted the See also:principal architectural decoration
.
In cases where the cross vaults intersecting were not of the same span as those of the main vault,, the See also:arches were either See also:stilted so that their soffits. might be of the same height, or they formed smaller intersections in the lower part of the vattit;, in both of these cases, however, the intersections or groins were See also:twisted, for which it was very difficult to form a centring, and, moreover, they *ere of disagreeable effect` though every See also:attempt was made to See also:mask this in the decoration of the vault by panels and reliefs modelled in See also:stucco
.
The widest hall vaulted by the Romans was that of the throne See also:room in the palace of See also:Diocletian on the Palatine See also:
2 will show the difference; in the
former the angles of
intersection are inset,
and inthe latter they -~ are groins with. pror
:jecting angles at the See also:base, which See also:die away at the summit
.
The -vault of the basilica, , commenced .by.: - Diocletian and completed by
.
- See also:Con-
stantine, was the last
The See also:diagram (fig
.
4) shows the outlines of the See also:solution of the problem
.
If hemispherical See also:dome is cut by -four See also:vertical planes, the. intersection gives four, semicircular arches; if cut in addition by a horizontal See also:plane tangent to the top, of these arches, it describes a circle; that portion of the See also:sphere which is below this circle and between-the 'arehessfarming a spherical" See also:spandril, is the See also:Pendentive (fig
.
5), and its See also:radius is equal to the See also:diagonal of the square on whichthe four arches See also:rest
.
- Having obtained -a• circle for the base-of the dome, it is not necessary that the upper portion of the dome should
- --------- ---FIG
.
5.—AA,pendentive
.
See also:spring from the same level as the arches, or that its domical surface should be a continuation of that of the pendentive
.
The first and second dome of Sta See also:Sophia apparently See also:fell down, so that Justinian determined to raise it, possibly to give greater lightness to the structure, but mainly in order to obtain increased See also:light for the interior of the See also: From the description given by See also:Procopius we gather that the centring employed for the grs'ntafthes consisted of a See also:wall erected to support them during their erection . The construction of the pendentive§ is not known, but it is surmised that to the top of the pendentives they were built in horizontal courses of brick, projecting one over the other, the projecting angles being cut off afterwards and covered with stucco in which the mosaics were embedded ; this was the method employed in the erection of the Periaordiandomes, to which we shall return; these, however, were of leas diameter than tho'se' of Sta Sophia, being only about 40 to 6o ft. instead of i.oy ft . The See also:apotheosis of See also:Byzantine architecture, in fact, was reached in Sta Sophia, for although It formed the See also:model on which all subsequent' . Byzantine churches were based, so far at their See also:plan was concerned, no domes approaching' the former in dimensions were even&'I't`empted . The principal difference in some later examples is that which took See also:place in the form of the pendentive on which the dome was carried . Instead of the spherical, spandril of Sta Sophia, large niches were formed in the angles, .as in the See also:mosque of See also:Damascus, which was built by Byzantine workmen for the Sherif al Walid in A.D . 705; these gave, an .octagonal `base See also:ion Which the hemispherical dome rested (fig . 6) ;, or again, as in the ,4anian palaces iof Serbistan and Firuzabad of the 4th a Sth*'ten- tury of our, era, when a a of con- '-centric arch rings, projecting one in front'` ,%~ - of the other, were built, giving also an c octagonal base; each of these pendentives is known as a See also:squinch . There is one other remarkable vault, also built by Justinian, in the church of S . See also:Sergius and lacchus in See also:Constantinople . The Central See also:area of this church Was octagonal on plan; and the dome is divided into. sinteen compartments; of these eight consist of broad flat bands rising FIG . 6.—BB, See also:niche or from the centre of each of the walls, squinch pendentive. and the alternate eight are Cohcave cells over the angles of the octagon; which externally and internally give to the roof the appearance of an See also:umbrella .
Although the dome constitutes the principal characteristic of the Byzantine church, throughout Asia Minor are numerous examples in which the naves are vaulted with the semicircular barrel vault, and this is the type of vault found throughout the See also:south of See also:France in the r rth and r2th centuries, the only See also:change being the occasional substitution of the 'pointed barrel vault, adopted not only on account of its exerting a less thrust, but because, as pointed out by See also:Fergusson (vol. ii. p
.
46), the roofing tiles were laid directly on the vault and a less amount of filling in at the top was required
.
The continuous thrust of the barrel vault in these cases was met either by semicircular or pointed barrel vaults on the aisles, which had only half the span-of the See also:nave; of this there is an interesting example in the See also:chapel of St See also:
When employed for the ribs of a vault, however narrow the span might be, by adopting a pointed arch, its summit could be made to range in height with the diagonal See also:rib; and, moreover, when utilized for the ribs of the See also:annular vault, as in the aisle round the apsidal termination of the choir, it was not necessary that the half ribs on the outer side should be in the same plane as those of the inner side; for when the opposite ribs met in the centre of the annular vault, the thrust was equally transmitted from one to the other, and being already a broken arch the change of its direction was not noticeable
.
The first introduction of the pointed arch rib would seem to have taken place in the choir aisles of the abbey of St See also:Denis, near See also:Paris, built by the See also:Abbe See also:Suger in 1135, and it was in the church at See also:Vezelay (1140) that it was extended to the square bay of .the;See also:porch
.
Before entering into the question of the web or stone See also:shell of the vault carried on the ribs, the earlier development of the great vaults which were thrown over the naves of a cathedral, or church, before the introduction of the pointed arch rib, shall here be noted
.
As has been pointed out, the. aisles had already in the early Christian churches been covered over with groined vaults, the only advance made in the later developments being the introduction of transverse ribs'. dividing the bays into square-compartments; but when in the See also:lath century
I Transverse ribs under the vaulting surfaces had been employed from very early times by the Romans, and utilized as permanent stone centrings for their vaults; perhaps the earliest examples are those in the See also:corridor of the Tabularium in Rome, which is divided into square bays, each vaulted with a cloister dome
.
Transverse ribs are also found in the Roman Piscinae and in the See also:Nymphaeum at See also:Nimes; they were not introduced by the Romanesque masons till the t t th century.the first attempts were made to vault over the naves, another difficulty presented itself, because the latter were twice the width of the aisles, so that it became necessary to include two bays of the aisles to form.: one square bay in the nave: This, was, an immense space to vault over, and, moreover, it ,followed that every alternate See also:pier served no purpose, so f as the support of. the nave vault was concerned, and''this we ld~seem to hav+ suggested an alternative, viz. to provide a supplementary tib across the church and between the transverse ribs
.
This resulted in what is known as a sexpartite, or six-celled vault, of which one of the `earliest examples is found in the Abbaye-aux-Hoinmes (S
.
See also:Etienne) at Caen
.
This church, built by See also: To this there are some exceptions, in Sant' Ambrogio, Milan, and See also:San Michele, See also:Pavia (the See also:original vault) and in the cathedrals of See also:Spires, See also:Mainz and See also:Worms, where the quadripartite vaults are nearly square, . the intermediate piers of the aisles being of much smaller dimensions . In See also:England sexpartite vaults exist at See also:Canterbury (1175) (set out by William of Sens), See also:Rochester (r aoo), See also:Lincoln (1215), See also:Durham (See also:east See also:transept), and St Faith's chapel, See also:Westminster: Abbey . In the earlier See also:stage of rib 'vaulting, the arched ribs consisted of See also:independent or • See also:separate voussoirs down to the springing; the difficulty, however, of working the ribs separately led to two other important changes: (I) the lower part of the transverse diagonal and wall ribs were all worked out of one stone; and (2) the lower courses were all made horizontal, constituting what is known as the tas-de-See also:charge (q.v.) or solid See also:springer . Fig . 9 is a diagram made by See also:Professor See also:Willis taken from the south transept of Westminster Abbey . The horizontal courses rise to N. or about half the height of the vault, but the ribs are freed from one another from the point M . The tas-de-charge, or solid springer, had two ad- vantages: (I) it enabled the stone courses to run straight through the wall, so as to bond the See also:whale together much better; and (2) it lessened the span of the vault, which then required a centring of smaller dimen- sions . As soon as the ribs were completed, the web or stone shell verse and diagonal ribs; P, some English work, as may be seen centre of the same; DE, longi- in fig . 9, each course of stone was tudinal See also:ridge rib; DF, inter- of See also:uniform height from ohe side section of webs; M, top of solid to the other; but, as the diagonal springer; KN. starting level rib was longetlimn either a be of web; LK, Springing of wall transverse or *all rib, the courses rib; EBD, bosses at inter- dipped towards the former, and at section of ribs, the See also:apex of the vault were See also:cat to See also:fit one another . At an early See also:period, in consequence of the great span of the vault and the very slight rise or curvature of the web, it was thought better to simplify the construction of the web by introducing intermediate ribs between the wall rib and the diagonal rib and between the diagonal and the transverse ribs; and in order to meet the thrust of these intermediate ribs a ridge rib was required, and the prolongation of this rib to the all rib hid the junction of the web at the summit, which was not Airways very sightly, and constituted the ridge rib . In France, on the other hand, the web courses were always laid horizontally, and they are therefore of unequal height, increasing towards the diagonal ribs Each course a so was given a slight rise iwth< centre, so as to increase its strength this enabled the See also:French masons to dispense with the intermediate rib, which was not introduced by them till the 15th century, and then more as a decorative than a constructive feature, as the domical form given to the French web rendered unnecessary the ridge rib, which, with some few exceptions, exists only in England . In both English and French vaulting centring was rarely required for the See also:building of the web, a template (Fr, cerce) being employed to support the stones of each ring until it was See also:complete . In See also:Italy, See also:Germany and See also:Spain the French method of building the web was adopted, with horizontal courses and a domical form . Sometimes, in the case of comparatively narrow compartments, and more especially in clerestories, the wall rib was` stilted, and this caused a See also:peculiar tvbting of the web, as may be seen in fig . 9, where the springing of the-wall rib is at K: to these twisted surfaces the term " ploughshare vaulting " is given . ' One of the earliest examples of the introduction of the inter-Mediate rib is found in the nave of Lincoln Cathedral, and there the ridge rib is not carried to the wall rib . It was soon found, however, that the construction of the web was much facilitated by additional ribs, and consequently there was a tendency to increase their number, s(Ythat in the nave of See also:Exeter Cathedral three intermediate ribs were provided between the wall rib and the diagonal rib . In order to Mask the junction of the various ribs, their intersections were ornamented with richly carved bosses, and this practice increased on the introduction of another See also:short rib, known as the lierne, a term I France given to the ridge rib . Lierne ribs in English vaults are sort ribs crossing between the main ribs, and were employed chiefly a!,•idecorative features, as, for instance, in the stellar vault (see Plate I. fig . 16), one of the best examples of See also:watch exists in the vault of the See also:oriel window of See also:Crosby Hall, London . The tendency to increase the number of ribs led to singular results in some cases, as in the choir of See also:Gloucester (see Plate II. fig . 17), where the ordinary diagonal ribs become See also:mere ornamental See also:mouldings on the surface of an intersected pointed barrel vault, and again in the cloisters, where the introduction of the See also:fan vault, forming a See also:concave-sided See also:conoid, returned to the principles of the Roman geometrical vault . This is further shown in the construction of these fan vaults, for although in the earliest examples each of the ribs above the tas-de-charge was an independent feature, eventually it was found easier to carve them and the web out of-the solid stone, so that the rib and web were purely decorative and had no constructional or independent functions . The fan vault would seem to have owed its origin to the employment of centrings of one curve for all the ribs, instead of having separate centrings for the transverse, diagonal wall and intermediate ribs; it was facilitated also by the introduction of the four-centred arch, because the lower portion of the arch formed part of the fan, or conoid, and the upper part could be extended at See also:pleasure with a greater radius across the vault .
The simplest version is that foundin the cloisters of Gloucester Cathedral, where the fans meet one another at the summit, so that there are only small compartments between the fans to be filled up
.
In later examples, as in See also: |