Online Encyclopedia

Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.

VAULT 1 (Fr. voute, Ital. volta, Ger....

Online Encyclopedia
Originally appearing in Volume V27, Page 961 of the 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica.
Spread the word: del.icio.us del.icio.us it!

VAULT 1 (Fr. voute, Ital. See also:

volta, Ger. Gaavolbe)  , in See also:architecture, the See also:term given to the covering over of a space with See also:stone or See also:brick in arched See also:form, the component parts of which exert a thrust and necessitate a See also:counter resistance: In the See also:case of vaults built under the level of the ground, the latter gave all that was required, but, when raised aloft, various expedients had to be employed, such as See also:great thickness of walls in the case of See also:barrel or continuous vaults, and See also:cross walls or buttresses when intersecting vaults were employed . The simplest See also:kind of vault *is that known as the barrel, See also:wagon Or See also:tunnel vault; which is generally semicircular in See also:section, and may be"regarded as a continuous See also:arch, the length of which is in excess of its See also:diameter; like the arch (q.v.), the same See also:provision is required as regards its temporary support whilst the voussoirs constituting one of its rings are being placed in position, for until the upper See also:voussoir, or See also:keystone, is introduced it is not self-supporting . At the See also:present See also:day, when See also:timber of all kinds is easily procurable, this temporary support is given by centring, consisting of a framed See also:truss with semicircular or segmental See also:head, which carries the voussoirs until the See also:ring of the whole arch is completed and is then, with a barrel vault, shifted on to support other rings; in See also:early times, and particularly in See also:Chaldaea and See also:Egypt, where timber was scarce, other means of support had to be contrived, and it would seem that it was only in See also:Roman times that centring was regularly employed . The earliest example known of a vault is that found under the Chaldaean ziggurat at See also:Nippur in Babylonia, ascribed to about 4000 B.C., which was built of burnt bricks cemented with See also:clay See also:mortar . The earliest tunnel vaults in Egypt are those at Requaqnah and Denderah, c . 3500 B.C.; these were built in unburnt brick in three rings over passages descending to' tombs: in these cases, as the span of the vault was only 6 ft., the bricks constituting the voussoirs were laid flatwise, and adhered sufficiently to those behind to enable the ring to be completed without other support; in the See also:granaries built by Ramessu II., still in See also:part existing behind the Ramesseum, at See also:Thebes, the span was 12 ft., and another See also:system was employed; the See also:lower part of For the form of safe so called see See also:SAFES . the arch was built in See also:horizontal courses, up to about one-third of the height, and the rings above were inclined back at a slight See also:angle, so that the bricks of each ring, laid flatwise, adhered till the ring was completed, no centring of any kind being required; the vault, thus formed was elliptic in section, arising from the method of its construction . A similar system of construction was employed for the vault over the great See also:hall at See also:Ctesiphon, where the material employed was burnt bricks or tiles of great dimensions, cemented with mortar; but the span was See also:close upon 83 ft., and the thickness of the vault was nearly 5 ft. at the See also:top, there being four rings of See also:brickwork . It is probable that the great vaults of the See also:Assyrian palaces were constructed in the same way, but with unburnt bricks dried only in the See also:sun: one of the drains discovered by See also:Layard at Nimrud was built in rings sloping backwards . From the fact that each Assyrian monarch on his See also:accession to the See also:throne commenced his reign by the erection of a See also:palace, it is probable that, owing to the ephemeral construction of these great vaults, See also:half a See also:century was the term of their existence . This may also See also:account for the fact that no domed structures exist of the type shown in one of the bas reliefs from Nimrud (fig . I); the tradition of their erection, however, would seem to have been handed down to their successors in See also:Mesopotamia, viz. to the Sassanians, who in their palaces at Serbistan and See also:Firuzabad built domes of similar form to those shown in the Nimrud sculptures, the, See also:chief difference being that, constructed in See also:rubble stone and cemented with mortar, they still exist, though 'probably abandoned on the See also:Mahommedan invasion in the 7th century .

In all the instances above quoted in Chaldaea and Egypt the bricks, whether burnt or sun-dried, were of the description to which the term " See also:

tile" would now be given; the dimensions varied from 18or See also:coin. to to in., being generally square and about 4 to 2 in. thick,, and they were not shaped as voussoirs, the connecting See also:medium being thicker at the top than at the bottom . The earliest See also:Egyptian examples of See also:regular voussoirs in stone belong to the XXVIth See also:Dynasty (c . 65o B.C.) in the additions made then to the See also:temple of Medinet-Abou, and here it is probable that centring of some kind was provided, as the vaults are built in rings, so that the same centring could be shifted on after the completion of each ring . The earliest example of regularly shaped voussoirs, and of about the same date, is found in the See also:cloaca at Graviscae in See also:Etruria, with a span of about 14 ft., the voussoirs of which are from 5 to 6 ft. See also:long . The cloaca See also:maxima in See also:Rome, built by Tarquin (603 Lc.) to drain the marshy ground between the See also:Palatine and the Capitoline Hills, was according to Commendatore See also:Boni vaulted over in thelet century s.e., the vault being over Boo ft. long, to ft. in span, with three concentric rings of voussoirs . So far, all the vaults mentioned have been barrel vaults, which, when not built underground, required continuous walls of great thickness to resist their thrust; the earliest example of the next variety, the intersecting barrel vault, is said to be over a small hall at See also:Pergamum,in See also:Asia See also:Minor, but its first employment over halls of great dimensions is due to the See also:Romans . When two semicircular barrel vaults of the same diameter cross one another (fig . 2) their intersection (a true See also:ellipse) is known as a See also:groin, down which the thrust of the vault is carried to the cross walls.; if a See also:series of two or more barrel vaults intersect one another, the See also:weight is carried on to the piers at their intersection and the thrust is trans- - mitted to the See also:outer FIG . 2 . cross walls; thus in the Roman See also:reservoir at Baiae, known as the See also:piscina mirabilis, a series of five aisles with semicircular barrel vaults are intersected, by twelve cross aisles, the vaults being carried on 48 piers and thick See also:external walls . The width of these aisles being only about 13 ft. there was no great difficulty in the construction of these vaults, but in the Roman Thermae the See also:tepidarium had a span of 8o ft., more than twice that of an See also:English See also:cathedral, so that its construction both from the statical and economical point of view was of the greatest importance . The researches of M .

See also:

Choisy (L'See also:Art de bdtir chez See also:les Romains), based on a See also:minute examination of those portions of the vaults which still remain in situ, have shown that: on a comparatively slight centring, consisting of trusses placed about to ft. apart and covered with planks laid, from truss to truss, were laid—to begin with—two layers of the Roman brick (measuring nearly 2 ft. square and thick); on these and on the trusses transverse rings of brick were built with See also:longitudinal ties at intervals; on the brick layers and embedding the rings and cross ties See also:concrete was thrown in horizontal layers, the haunches being filled in solid, and the See also:surface sloped on either See also:side and covered over with a tile roof of See also:low See also:pitch laid See also:direct on the concrete . The rings relieved the centring from the weight imposed; and' the two layers of bricks carried the concrete till it had set . As the walls carrying these vaults were also built in concrete with occasional See also:bond courses of brick, the whole structure was homogeneous . One of the important ingredients of the mortar was a volcanic' See also:deposit found near Rome, known as pozzolana, which, when the concrete had 'set, not only made the concrete as solid as the See also:rock itself, but to a certain extent neutralized the thrust of the vaults, which formed shells See also:equivalent to that of a See also:metal lid, the Romans, however, do not seem to have recognized the extra-See also:ordinary value of this pozzolana mixture, for they otherwise provided amply for the counteracting of any thrust which might exist by the erection of cross walls and buttresses . In the tepidaria of the Thermae and in the See also:basilica of See also:Constantine, in See also:order to bring the thrust well within the walls, the See also:main barrel vault of the' hall was brought forward on each side and rested on detached columns, which constituted the See also:principal architectural decoration . In cases where the cross vaults intersecting were not of the same span as those of the main vault,, the See also:arches were either See also:stilted so that their soffits. might be of the same height, or they formed smaller intersections in the lower part of the vattit;, in both of these cases, however, the intersections or groins were See also:twisted, for which it was very difficult to form a centring, and, moreover, they *ere of disagreeable effect` though every See also:attempt was made to See also:mask this in the decoration of the vault by panels and reliefs modelled in See also:stucco . The widest hall vaulted by the Romans was that of the throne See also:room in the palace of See also:Diocletian on the Palatine See also:Hill, and this had the enormous span of too ft., its. thrust being counteracted by other halls on, either side with buttresses outside: •In provincial towns and in -other • parts of ; the, Roman See also:Empire, where the material pozzolana was not procurable, the Romans had to See also:trust to‘ their mortar. as a cementing medium, but this, though excellent of its kind, was not of sufficient cohesive strength to allow of the erection ofvaults of more than about 40 ft. span, which were generally built in rubble See also:masonry . There still . exist in Asia Minor.. and See also:Syria some vaulted halls, generally attached to -thermae, which are . carried on walls of great- thickness . There were ftraay varieties of the Roman vault, whether continuous or intersected, such as those employed oyer the corridors on the Colosseum and the See also:theatre of See also:Mar tellus, but in these eases the springing of the vault was above the See also:summit of the arches of the main front, so that there was no intersection; on the other See also:hand, over the corridors were either elliptical- or semicircular,- or over the staircases, -rising vaults, all of which were more difficult to construct; there were also numerous sfrlutions of vault over circular halls, of which that of the See also:Pantheon was the most important example, having a diameter of 142 ft., and over the hemicycles, which were sometimes of great See also:size; that known as See also:Canopus in See also:Hadrian's See also:villa at See also:Tivoli had a diameter of 75 ft.,- and was vaulted over with a series of ribs, between which were alternating rampant See also:flat. and semicircular webs and cells; in the Same villa- and in Rome were octagonal halls with various other combinations of vault . Another type. of vault not yet referred to is that of the See also:Tabularium See also:arcade where the See also:cloister• vault was employed . Fig . 3 compared - with fig .

2 will show the difference; in the former the angles of intersection are inset, and inthe latter they -~ are groins with. pror :jecting angles at the See also:

base, which See also:die away at the summit . The -vault of the basilica, , commenced .by.: - Diocletian and completed by . - See also:Con- stantine, was the last The See also:diagram (fig . 4) shows the outlines of the See also:solution of the problem . If hemispherical See also:dome is cut by -four See also:vertical planes, the. intersection gives four, semicircular arches; if cut in addition by a horizontal See also:plane tangent to the top, of these arches, it describes a circle; that portion of the See also:sphere which is below this circle and between-the 'arehessfarming a spherical" See also:spandril, is the See also:Pendentive (fig . 5), and its See also:radius is equal to the See also:diagonal of the square on whichthe four arches See also:rest . - Having obtained -a• circle for the base-of the dome, it is not necessary that the upper portion of the dome should - --------- ---FIG . 5.—AA,pendentive . See also:spring from the same level as the arches, or that its domical surface should be a continuation of that of the pendentive . The first and second dome of Sta See also:Sophia apparently See also:fell down, so that Justinian determined to raise it, possibly to give greater lightness to the structure, but mainly in order to obtain increased See also:light for the interior of the See also:church . This was effected by piercing it with See also:forty windows—the effect of which was of an extraordinary nature, as,the light streaming through these windows gave to the dome the See also:appearance of.being suspended in the See also:air . The pendentive which carried the dome rested on four great arches, the thrust of those See also:crossing the church being counteracted by immense buttresses which traversed the aisles, and 'the other -two partly by smaller arches in the See also:apse, the thrust being carried to the outer walls, and to a certain ex-See also:tent by the side walls Which Were built under the arches .

From the description given by See also:

Procopius we gather that the centring employed for the grs'ntafthes consisted of a See also:wall erected to support them during their erection . The construction of the pendentive§ is not known, but it is surmised that to the top of the pendentives they were built in horizontal courses of brick, projecting one over the other, the projecting angles being cut off afterwards and covered with stucco in which the mosaics were embedded ; this was the method employed in the erection of the Periaordiandomes, to which we shall return; these, however, were of leas diameter than tho'se' of Sta Sophia, being only about 40 to 6o ft. instead of i.oy ft . The See also:apotheosis of See also:Byzantine architecture, in fact, was reached in Sta Sophia, for although It formed the See also:model on which all subsequent' . Byzantine churches were based, so far at their See also:plan was concerned, no domes approaching' the former in dimensions were even&'I't`empted . The principal difference in some later examples is that which took See also:place in the form of the pendentive on which the dome was carried . Instead of the spherical, spandril of Sta Sophia, large niches were formed in the angles, .as in the See also:mosque of See also:Damascus, which was built by Byzantine workmen for the Sherif al Walid in A.D . 705; these gave, an .octagonal `base See also:ion Which the hemispherical dome rested (fig . 6) ;, or again, as in the ,4anian palaces iof Serbistan and Firuzabad of the 4th a Sth*'ten- tury of our, era, when a a of con- '-centric arch rings, projecting one in front'` ,%~ - of the other, were built, giving also an c octagonal base; each of these pendentives is known as a See also:squinch . There is one other remarkable vault, also built by Justinian, in the church of S . See also:Sergius and lacchus in See also:Constantinople . The Central See also:area of this church Was octagonal on plan; and the dome is divided into. sinteen compartments; of these eight consist of broad flat bands rising FIG . 6.—BB, See also:niche or from the centre of each of the walls, squinch pendentive. and the alternate eight are Cohcave cells over the angles of the octagon; which externally and internally give to the roof the appearance of an See also:umbrella .

Although the dome constitutes the principal characteristic of the Byzantine church, throughout Asia Minor are numerous examples in which the naves are vaulted with the semicircular barrel vault, and this is the type of vault found throughout the See also:

south of See also:France in the r rth and r2th centuries, the only See also:change being the occasional substitution of the 'pointed barrel vault, adopted not only on account of its exerting a less thrust, but because, as pointed out by See also:Fergusson (vol. ii. p . 46), the roofing tiles were laid directly on the vault and a less amount of filling in at the top was required . The continuous thrust of the barrel vault in these cases was met either by semicircular or pointed barrel vaults on the aisles, which had only half the span-of the See also:nave; of this there is an interesting example in the See also:chapel of St See also:John in the See also:Tower of See also:London—and sometimes by half-barrel vaults., ,The great thickness of the walls, however, required in such constructions would seem to have led to another solutio i See also:roll , .s . .s of the problem of roofing over churches with incombustible material, viz. that which is found throughout See also:Perigord and La See also:Charente, where a series of domes carried on pendentives covered over the nave, the chief peculiarities of these domes being the fact that the arches, carrying them form 'part of the pendentives, which are all built in horizontal courses . The intersecting and groined vault of the Romans . was, employed in the early See also:Christian churches in Rome, but only over the aisles, which were comparatively of small span, but in these there was a tendency to raise the centres of. these vaults, which became slightly domical; in all these cases centring was employed . Reference has been made to the twisting of the groins in Roman See also:work, where the intersecting barrel vaults were not of the same diameter; their construction must at all times have been somewhat difficult, but where the barrel vaulting was carried See also:round over the See also:choir See also:aisle and was intersected, as in St See also:Bartholomew's, Smithfield,, by semicones, instead of cylinders, it became worse and the groins more complicated; this would seem to have led to a change of system, and to the introduction of a new feature, which completely revolutionized the construction of the vault . Hitherto the intersecting features were geometrical surfaces, of which the diagonal groins were the intersections, elliptical in form, generally weak in construction and often twisting (See also:Plate I. fig . 13) . The See also:medieval builder reversed the See also:process, and set up the diagonal ribs first, which were utilized as permanent centres, and on these he carried his vault or See also:web, which henceforward took its shape from the ribs . Instead of the elliptical See also:curve which was given by the intersection of two semicircular barrel vaults, or cylinders, he employed the semicircular arch for the diagonal ribs; this, how-ever, raised the centre of the square See also:bay vaulted above the level of the transverse arches and of the wall ribs, and thus gave the appearance of a dome to the vault, such as may be seen in the nave of Sant' Ambrogio, See also:Milan . To meet this, at first the trans-See also:verse and wall ribs were stilted, or the upper part of their arches was raised, as in the Abbaye-aux-Hommes at See also:Caen, and the See also:abbey of Lessay, in See also:Normandy . The problem was ultimately solved by the introduction of the pointed arch for the trans-verse and wall ribs—the pointed arch had long been known and employed, on account of its much greater strength and of the less thrust it exerted on the walls .

Phoenix-squares

When employed for the ribs of a vault, however narrow the span might be, by adopting a pointed arch, its summit could be made to range in height with the diagonal See also:

rib; and, moreover, when utilized for the ribs of the See also:annular vault, as in the aisle round the apsidal termination of the choir, it was not necessary that the half ribs on the outer side should be in the same plane as those of the inner side; for when the opposite ribs met in the centre of the annular vault, the thrust was equally transmitted from one to the other, and being already a broken arch the change of its direction was not noticeable . The first introduction of the pointed arch rib would seem to have taken place in the choir aisles of the abbey of St See also:Denis, near See also:Paris, built by the See also:Abbe See also:Suger in 1135, and it was in the church at See also:Vezelay (1140) that it was extended to the square bay of .the;See also:porch . Before entering into the question of the web or stone See also:shell of the vault carried on the ribs, the earlier development of the great vaults which were thrown over the naves of a cathedral, or church, before the introduction of the pointed arch rib, shall here be noted . As has been pointed out, the. aisles had already in the early Christian churches been covered over with groined vaults, the only advance made in the later developments being the introduction of transverse ribs'. dividing the bays into square-compartments; but when in the See also:lath century I Transverse ribs under the vaulting surfaces had been employed from very early times by the Romans, and utilized as permanent stone centrings for their vaults; perhaps the earliest examples are those in the See also:corridor of the Tabularium in Rome, which is divided into square bays, each vaulted with a cloister dome . Transverse ribs are also found in the Roman Piscinae and in the See also:Nymphaeum at See also:Nimes; they were not introduced by the Romanesque masons till the t t th century.the first attempts were made to vault over the naves, another difficulty presented itself, because the latter were twice the width of the aisles, so that it became necessary to include two bays of the aisles to form.: one square bay in the nave: This, was, an immense space to vault over, and, moreover, it ,followed that every alternate See also:pier served no purpose, so f as the support of. the nave vault was concerned, and''this we ld~seem to hav+ suggested an alternative, viz. to provide a supplementary tib across the church and between the transverse ribs . This resulted in what is known as a sexpartite, or six-celled vault, of which one of the `earliest examples is found in the Abbaye-aux-Hoinmes (S . See also:Etienne) at Caen . This church, built by See also:William theConqueror, was originally constructed to carry a timber roof only, but nearly a century later the upper part of the nave walls were partly rebuilt, in order that it might be covered with a vault . The immense size, however, of the square vault over the nave necessitated some additional support, so that an intermediate rib was thrown across the church, dividing the square compartment into six cells; ' and called the sexpartite vault (fig . 7); this was adopted in the cathedrals of See also:Sens (1170), See also:Laon (1i9s), See also:Noyon (r190), Paris' (1223—35),. and See also:Bourges, (125o) . The, intermediate rib, however, had the disadvantage of partially obscuring one side : of the See also:clerestory windows, and it threw unequal weights on the ' alternate piers, so that in the cathedral of S ' (1205) a quadripartite (fig . 8) or four-celled vault was introduced, the width of each bay being half the span of the nave, and corresponding therefore with the aisle piers .

To this there are some exceptions, in Sant' Ambrogio, Milan, and See also:

San Michele, See also:Pavia (the See also:original vault) and in the cathedrals of See also:Spires, See also:Mainz and See also:Worms, where the quadripartite vaults are nearly square, . the intermediate piers of the aisles being of much smaller dimensions . In See also:England sexpartite vaults exist at See also:Canterbury (1175) (set out by William of Sens), See also:Rochester (r aoo), See also:Lincoln (1215), See also:Durham (See also:east See also:transept), and St Faith's chapel, See also:Westminster: Abbey . In the earlier See also:stage of rib 'vaulting, the arched ribs consisted of See also:independent or • See also:separate voussoirs down to the springing; the difficulty, however, of working the ribs separately led to two other important changes: (I) the lower part of the transverse diagonal and wall ribs were all worked out of one stone; and (2) the lower courses were all made horizontal, constituting what is known as the tas-de-See also:charge (q.v.) or solid See also:springer . Fig . 9 is a diagram made by See also:Professor See also:Willis taken from the south transept of Westminster Abbey . The horizontal courses rise to N. or about half the height of the vault, but the ribs are freed from one another from the point M . The tas-de-charge, or solid springer, had two ad- vantages: (I) it enabled the stone courses to run straight through the wall, so as to bond the See also:whale together much better; and (2) it lessened the span of the vault, which then required a centring of smaller dimen- sions . As soon as the ribs were completed, the web or stone shell verse and diagonal ribs; P, some English work, as may be seen centre of the same; DE, longi- in fig . 9, each course of stone was tudinal See also:ridge rib; DF, inter- of See also:uniform height from ohe side section of webs; M, top of solid to the other; but, as the diagonal springer; KN. starting level rib was longetlimn either a be of web; LK, Springing of wall transverse or *all rib, the courses rib; EBD, bosses at inter- dipped towards the former, and at section of ribs, the See also:apex of the vault were See also:cat to See also:fit one another . At an early See also:period, in consequence of the great span of the vault and the very slight rise or curvature of the web, it was thought better to simplify the construction of the web by introducing intermediate ribs between the wall rib and the diagonal rib and between the diagonal and the transverse ribs; and in order to meet the thrust of these intermediate ribs a ridge rib was required, and the prolongation of this rib to the all rib hid the junction of the web at the summit, which was not Airways very sightly, and constituted the ridge rib . In France, on the other hand, the web courses were always laid horizontally, and they are therefore of unequal height, increasing towards the diagonal ribs Each course a so was given a slight rise iwth< centre, so as to increase its strength this enabled the See also:French masons to dispense with the intermediate rib, which was not introduced by them till the 15th century, and then more as a decorative than a constructive feature, as the domical form given to the French web rendered unnecessary the ridge rib, which, with some few exceptions, exists only in England . In both English and French vaulting centring was rarely required for the See also:building of the web, a template (Fr, cerce) being employed to support the stones of each ring until it was See also:complete .

In See also:

Italy, See also:Germany and See also:Spain the French method of building the web was adopted, with horizontal courses and a domical form . Sometimes, in the case of comparatively narrow compartments, and more especially in clerestories, the wall rib was` stilted, and this caused a See also:peculiar tvbting of the web, as may be seen in fig . 9, where the springing of the-wall rib is at K: to these twisted surfaces the term " ploughshare vaulting " is given . ' One of the earliest examples of the introduction of the inter-Mediate rib is found in the nave of Lincoln Cathedral, and there the ridge rib is not carried to the wall rib . It was soon found, however, that the construction of the web was much facilitated by additional ribs, and consequently there was a tendency to increase their number, s(Ythat in the nave of See also:Exeter Cathedral three intermediate ribs were provided between the wall rib and the diagonal rib . In order to Mask the junction of the various ribs, their intersections were ornamented with richly carved bosses, and this practice increased on the introduction of another See also:short rib, known as the lierne, a term I France given to the ridge rib . Lierne ribs in English vaults are sort ribs crossing between the main ribs, and were employed chiefly a!,•idecorative features, as, for instance, in the stellar vault (see Plate I. fig . 16), one of the best examples of See also:watch exists in the vault of the See also:oriel window of See also:Crosby Hall, London . The tendency to increase the number of ribs led to singular results in some cases, as in the choir of See also:Gloucester (see Plate II. fig . 17), where the ordinary diagonal ribs become See also:mere ornamental See also:mouldings on the surface of an intersected pointed barrel vault, and again in the cloisters, where the introduction of the See also:fan vault, forming a See also:concave-sided See also:conoid, returned to the principles of the Roman geometrical vault . This is further shown in the construction of these fan vaults, for although in the earliest examples each of the ribs above the tas-de-charge was an independent feature, eventually it was found easier to carve them and the web out of-the solid stone, so that the rib and web were purely decorative and had no constructional or independent functions . The fan vault would seem to have owed its origin to the employment of centrings of one curve for all the ribs, instead of having separate centrings for the transverse, diagonal wall and intermediate ribs; it was facilitated also by the introduction of the four-centred arch, because the lower portion of the arch formed part of the fan, or conoid, and the upper part could be extended at See also:pleasure with a greater radius across the vault .

The simplest version is that foundin the cloisters of Gloucester Cathedral, where the fans meet one another at the summit, so that there are only small compartments between the fans to be filled up . In later examples, as in See also:

King's See also:College chapel, See also:Cambridge (see Plate II. fig . 18), on account of the great dimensions of the vault, it was found necessary to introduce transverse ribs, which were required to give greater strength . Similar transverse ribs are found in See also:Henry VII.'s chapel (see Plate II. fig . 19) and in the divinity See also:schools at See also:Oxford, where a new development presented itself . One of the defects of the fan vault at Gloucester is the appearance it gives of being half sunk in, the wall ; to •remedy this, in the two buildings just quoted, the complete conoid is detached and treated as a See also:pendant . One of the most interesting examples of the fan vault is that over the See also:staircase leading to the hall of See also:Christ Church, Oxford, and here the complete conoid is displayed in its centre carried on a central See also:column . This vault, not built until 164o, is an exceptional example of the long continuance of traditional workmanship, probably in Oxford transmitted in consequence of the See also:late vaulting of the entrance gateways to the colleges . Fan vaulting is peculiar to England, the only example approaching it in France being the pendant of the See also:Lady chapel at Caudebec, in Normandy, In France, Germany and Spain the multiplication of ribs in the 15th century led to decorative vaults of various kinds, but with some singular modifications . Thus' in Germany, recognizing that the rib was no longer a necessary constructivefeature, they cut it off abruptly, leaving a stump only; in France, on the other hand, they gave still more importance to the rib, by making it of greater See also:depth, piercing it with See also:tracery and See also:hanging pendants from it, and the web became a horizontal stone paving laid on the top of these deco-rated vertical webs . This is the characteristic of the great See also:Renaissance work in France and Spain; but it soon gave way to See also:Italian See also:influence, when the construction of vaults reverted to the geometrical surfaces of the Romans, without, however, always that See also:economy in centring to which they had attached so much importance, and more especially i