See also:CONGRESS OF See also:VERONA
, the last of the See also:series of inter-See also:national conferences or congresses based on the principle enunciated in See also:Art
.
6 of the treaty of See also:Paris of See also:November loth, 1815 (see See also:EUROPE, See also:History)
.
It met at See also:Verona on the 20th
' The view of some scholars is that the See also:original walls were earlier than the See also:- TIME (0. Eng. Lima, cf. Icel. timi, Swed. timme, hour, Dan. time; from the root also seen in " tide," properly the time of between the flow and ebb of the sea, cf. O. Eng. getidan, to happen, " even-tide," &c.; it is not directly related to Lat. tempus)
- TIME, MEASUREMENT OF
- TIME, STANDARD
time of See also:Gallienus, who reconstructed them on the old lines, taking in, however, the See also:amphitheatre
.
of See also:October 1822
.
The See also:emperor See also:Alexander I. of See also:Russia was See also:present in See also:person
.
There were also present See also:Count See also:Nesselrode, the See also:Russian See also:minister of See also:foreign affairs; See also:Prince Metternich, representing See also:Austria; Prince See also:Hardenberg and Count See also:Bernstorff, representing See also:Prussia; MM. de See also:Montmorency and See also:Chateaubriand, representing See also:France; and the See also:duke of See also:Wellington, representing See also:Great See also:Britain in See also:place of See also:Lord See also:Londonderry (Castlereagh), whose tragic See also:death occurred on the See also:eve of his setting out to the See also:congress
.
In the instructions 'See also:drawn up by Londonderry for his own guidance, which had been handed to Wellington by See also:Canning without alteration, was clearly defined the attitude of Great Britain towards the three questions which it was supposed would be discussed, viz. the See also:Turkish Question (See also:Greek insurrection), the question of intervention in favour of the royal See also:power in See also:Spain, together with that of the revolted See also:Spanish colonies, and the See also:Italian Question
.
As regards the latter it was laid down that Great Britain could not See also:charge herself with any superintendence of a See also:system in which she had merely acquiesced, and the See also:duty of the See also:British minister would be merely to keep himself informed, and to see that nothing was done " inconsistent with the See also:European system and the See also:treaties." To make this attitude quite clear, Wellington was further instructed not to See also:hand in his See also:credentials until this question had been disposed of, his place being meanwhile taken by Lord Londonderry (See also:- STEWART, ALEXANDER TURNEY (1803-1876)
- STEWART, BALFOUR (1828-1887)
- STEWART, CHARLES (1778–1869)
- STEWART, DUGALD (1753-1828)
- STEWART, J
- STEWART, JOHN (1749—1822)
- STEWART, JULIUS L
- STEWART, SIR DONALD MARTIN (1824–19o0)
- STEWART, SIR HERBERT (1843—1885)
- STEWART, SIR WILLIAM (c. 1540—c. 1605)
- STEWART, STUART
- STEWART, WILLIAM (c. 1480-c. 1550)
Stewart), Castlereagh's See also:half-See also:brother and successor in the See also:title, who had fulfilled the same See also:function at See also:Troppau and See also:Laibach
.
In the Spanish Question Wellington was to give See also:voice to the uncompromising opposition of Great Britain to the whole principle of intervention
.
In the Turkish Question, the probable raising of which had alone induced the British See also:government to send a plenipotentiary to the congress, he was to suggest the eventual See also:necessity for recognizing the belligerent rights of the Greeks, and, in the event of concerted intervention, to be careful not to commit Great Britain beyond the limits of See also:good offices
.
The immediate problems arising out of the Turkish Question had, however, been settled between the emperor Alexander and Metternich, to their mutual See also:satisfaction, at the preliminary conferences held at See also:Vienna in See also:September, and at Verona the only question raised was that of the proposed See also:French intervention in Spain
.
The discussion was opened by three questions formally propounded by Montmorency: (I) Would the See also:Allies withdraw their ministers from See also:Madrid in the event of France being compelled to do so
?
(2) In See also:case of See also:war, under what See also:form and by what acts would the See also:powers give France their moral support, so as to give to her See also:action the force of the See also:Alliance, and inspire a salutary fear in the revolutionaries of all countries
?
(3) What material aid would the powers give, if asked by France to intervene, under restrictions which she would declare and they would recognize
?
The reply of Alexander, who expressed his surprise at the See also:desire of France to keep the question " wholly French, " was to offer to See also:march 150,000 Russians through See also:Germany to See also:Piedmont, where they could be held ready to See also:act against the See also:Jacobins whether in Spain or France
.
This See also:solution appealed to Metternich and Montmorency as little as to Wellington; but though See also:united in opposing it, four days of " confidential communications " revealed a fundamental difference of See also:opinion between the representative of Great Britain and those of the See also:continental powers on the See also:main point at issue
.
Wellington, firmly based on the principle of non-intervention, refused to have anything to do with the See also:suggestion, made by Metternich, that the powers should address a See also:common See also:note to the Spanish government in support of the action of France
.
Finally, Metternich proposed that the Allies should " hold a common See also:language, but in See also:separate notes, though See also:uniform in their principles and See also:objects." This solution was adopted by the continental powers; and Wellington, in accordance with his instructions not to countenance any intervention in Spanish affairs, took no See also:part in the conferences that followed
.
On the 3oth of October the powers handed in their formal replies to the French memorandum
.
Russia, Austria and Prussia would act as France should in respect of their ministers in Spain, and would give to France every countenance and assistance she might require, the details " being reserved to be specified in a treaty." Wellington, on the other hand, replied on behalf of Great Britain that " having no knowledge of the cause of dispute, and not being able to form a See also:judgment upon a hypothetical case, he could give no See also:answer to any of the questions."
Thus was proclaimed the open See also:breach of Great Britain with the principles and policy of the Great Alliance, which is what gives to the congress its main See also:historical See also:interest
.
See See also:Cambridge See also:Modern Hist., See also:chap. i
.
" The Congresses," by W
.
See also:Alison See also:Phillips, and for authorities, ibid. p
.
787
.
(W
.
A
.
P.) VERONAL, in See also:medicine, diethylmalonyl See also:urea or diethylbarbituric See also:acid (C2II6)2C[CO NH]2CO, extensively used as a hypnotic
.
It is prepared by condensing diethylmalonic ester with urea in the presence of See also:sodium ethylate, or by acting with See also:ethyl iodide on the See also:silver See also:salt of malonyl urea; it forms a See also:- WHITE
- WHITE, ANDREW DICKSON (1832– )
- WHITE, GILBERT (1720–1793)
- WHITE, HENRY KIRKE (1785-1806)
- WHITE, HUGH LAWSON (1773-1840)
- WHITE, JOSEPH BLANCO (1775-1841)
- WHITE, RICHARD GRANT (1822-1885)
- WHITE, ROBERT (1645-1704)
- WHITE, SIR GEORGE STUART (1835– )
- WHITE, SIR THOMAS (1492-1567)
- WHITE, SIR WILLIAM ARTHUR (1824--1891)
- WHITE, SIR WILLIAM HENRY (1845– )
- WHITE, THOMAS (1628-1698)
- WHITE, THOMAS (c. 1550-1624)
white crystalline See also:powder, which is odourless, and has a slightly See also:bitter See also:taste
.
Its introduction followed the investigations of Emil See also:Fischer and J. v
.
Merling on the pharmacological properties of certain open and closed ureides
.
Led thereto by the impression that hypnotic action appears to be largely dependent on the presence of ethyl See also:groups, they prepared diethylacetyl urea, diethylmalonyl urea, and dipropylmalonyl urea
.
All three were found to be hypnotics: the first was about equal in power to See also:sulphonal, whilst the third was four times as powerful, but its use was attended by prolonged after-effects
.
Veronal was found to be midway
.
It is best given in cachets (10 to 15 grains)
.
As it does not affect the circulatory or See also:respiratory systems, or temperature, it can be employed in many diseased conditions of the See also:heart and lungs as well as in See also:mental disturbances, acute alcoholism, morphinomania and See also:kidney disease
.
If taken during a prolonged See also:period it seems to lose its effect
.
A soluble salt of veronal has been introduced under the name of medinal
.
Although the toxicity of veronal is See also:low, 135 grains having been taken in a single dose without serious results, the unreasonable See also:consumption by persons suffering from See also:insomnia has led to many deaths, and it has been suggested that the See also:sale should be restricted by the See also:Pharmacy Acts
.
End of Article: