Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:VERSE (from See also:Lat. versus, literally a See also:line or furrow See also:drawn by turning the plough, from vertere, and afterwards signifying an arrangement of syllables into feet)
, the name given to an assemblage of words so placed together as to produce a metrical effect
.
The See also:art of making, and the See also:science of analysing, such verses is known as Versification
.
According to Max See also:
This appears from definite statements preserved in the fragments of See also:Aristoxenus of See also:Tarentum, a grammarian who lived in the See also:age of See also: For instance, what we are somewhat vaguely told of the See also:influence of a poet like See also:Archilochus, to whom the very invention of See also:trochaic and See also:iambic metre is, perhaps fabulously, attributed, points to the See also:probability that in Archilochus the Ionian See also:race produced a poet of extraordinary daring and delicacy of ear, who gathered the wandering rhythms that had existed, and had doubtless been used in an uncertain way before his See also:time, into a system which could be depended upon, and not in his hands only, to produce certain effects of welcome variety . His system would engage the attention of theorists, and we learn that by the time of See also:Plato See also:schools of oral metrical See also:education were already in existence, where the science of sounds and syllables was already beginning to be recognized, as may be seen in the Cratylus . Before long, the teachings in these peripatetic schools would be preserved, for safety's See also:sake, in writing, and the theoretic literature of versification would begin . In fact, we read in Suidas of a certain See also:Lasus of Hermione who wrote an Art of Poetry, and the age of this, the earliest of recorded authorities on the formal laws of verse, is fixed for us by the fact that he is spoken of as having been the See also:master of See also:Pindar . Of the writings of Lasus and his followers, however, nothing remains, and the See also:character of their teaching is problematical . In the 3rd See also:century B.C., however, we come upon a figure which preserves a definite character; this is Aristoxenus, the See also:disciple of See also:Aristotle, who gave his undivided attention to rhythm, and who lives, unfortunately only in fragments, as the most eminent musical critic of antiquity . The brief fragments of his Elements of Rhythm (puO z Ka vrotxsia), originally written in three books, are of unsurpassed value to us as illustrating the attitude of classical See also:Greece to the interrelation of verse and music . The third See also:book of Aristoxenus dealt specifically with M tr, or the application of rhythm to artistically composed and written verse . It is certain that, after the time of Alexander the Great, the theories of verse tended somewhat rapidly to See also:release themselves from the theories of music, and when, in the successive ages of Greek criticism, much attention was given to the laws of versification, less and less was said about harmony and more and more about metre . Rules, often of a highly arbitrary nature, were See also:drawn up by grammarians, who founded their laws on a scholiastic study of the ancient poets . The See also:majority of the See also:works in which these rules were collected are lost, but an enchiridion of Greek metres, by Hephaestion, a scholiast of the 2nd century A.D., has been preserved . First printed in 1526, See also:editions and See also:translations of Hephaestion's See also:manual have not been infrequent . It is from Hephaestion that most of our ideas on the subject of classical prosody are obtained . His work, as we possess it, seems to be a See also:summary, made by himself, for use in schools, of an exhaustivetreatise he had published .on the Greek metrical system as a whole. in 48 books . The pre-eminent importance of Hephaestion was exposed to the learned See also:world of See also:Europe by Th . See also:Gaisford, in 181o . A contemporary of Hephaestion, Herodian, who was one of the most eminent of Alexandrian grammarians, gave See also:close attention to prosody, and was believed to have summed up everything that could be known on the subject of verse by critics of the and century A.D., in his MeyaAn ,rpor La, in twenty hooks . As Herodian, throughout his See also:life, seems to have concentrated his attention on the study of See also:Homer, it is supposed that he started with a See also:consideration of the metre and See also:accent of the Iliad . The almost complete loss of his See also:treatises is regrettable . See also:Philoxenus was the author of a very See also:early work, JIpi uirpwv; but this is entirely lost . In the musical cyclopaedia of See also:Quintilian, there was included a See also:chapter on the elements of the rhythmic art, and in this the metres recognized at the time were recorded and described . Among the Latin authorities on versification, the leading See also:place is taken, in the 1st century Inc., by Terentius See also:Varro, whose systematic treatment of metre in his works De sermone latino and De lingua See also:latina is often referred to But we know more of See also:Terentianus Maurus, who flourished in the second See also:half of the 2nd century A.D., since we possess from his hand a hand-book to metre, written in verse, in which, in particular, the Horatian metres are carefully analysed . He follows Caesius See also:Bassus, the friend of See also:Nero, who had dedicated to his imperial See also:patron a work on prosody, of which fragments exist . Three tracts, attributed to the rhetor C . See also:Marius See also:Victorinus (one entitled De ration metrorum), belong, to the 4th century, and are still quoted by scholars . Another early authority was h'lavius Mallius See also:Theodorus, whose De Metris has been frequently reprinted . The metrical theory of the See also:Byzantine grammarians was entirely in unison with the old tradition of the Alexandrian schools, and depended on the authority of Hephaestion . See also:Michael See also:Psellus, in the 9th century, wrote abundantly on the subject, and towards the close of the See also:Empire the verse-handbooks of See also:Isaac See also:Tzetzes (d . 1138) and of his See also:brother Joannes were in general use . A large number of other Byzantine scholiasts and theorists are mentioned in this connexion by Gleditsch . Very little attention was paid to metrical science in See also:medieval and even See also:Renaissance days . It is much to the See also:honour of English scholarship that the earliest modern writer who made a rational study of ancient metre was See also:Richard See also:Bentley, in his Schediasma de metris Terentianis, printed at See also:Cambridge in 1726 . He was soon followed by the Germans, in particular by See also:Hermann, Boeckh and J . A . Apel . To this See also:day, See also:German scholarship easily leads in the rational and accurate study of classical versification . The See also:chief principle in ancient verse was quantity, that is, the amount of time involved in the effort to See also:express a syllable . Accordingly, the two basal types which See also:lie at the See also:foundation of classical metre are "longs " and " shorts." The See also:convention was that a long syllable was equal to two See also:short ones: accordingly there was a real truth in calling the succession of such " feet " metre, for the length, or See also:weight, of the syllables forming them could be, and was, measured . What has to be realized in speaking of ancient metre is that the value of these feet was defined with exactitude, not See also:left uncertain, as it is in modern European verse, when accent is almost always made the guiding principle . In Greek verse, there might be an ictus (stress), which See also:fell upon the long syllable, but it could only be a regulating See also:element, and accent was always a secondary element in the construction of Greek metre . The " feet " recognized and described by the ancient grammarians were various, and in their apparent diversity sometimes difficult to follow, but the comprehension of them is simplified if the student realizes that the names given to them are often superfluous . The main distinction between feet consists in the diversity of the relation between the strong and the weak syllables . There are naturally only two movements, the See also:quick and the slow . Thus we have the See also:anapaest (v v —, short-short-long) and the See also:dactyl (— long-short-short), which are equal, and differ only as regards the position of their parts . To these follow two feet which must be considered as in their essence non-metrical, as it is only in See also:combination with others that they can become metrical . These are the spondee (- -, long-long) and the pyrrhic ( short-short) . Of more essential character are the two descriptions of slow feet, the iamb ( "—, short- long) and the trochee (— long-short) . Besides these definite types, the ingenuity of formalists has invented an almost See also:infinite number of other " feet." It is, perhaps, necessary to mention some of the principal of these, 'although they are, in the majority of cases, purely arbitrary . In the rapid measures we find the tribrach (- - -e '--, short-shortshort), the molossus (---, Iong-long-long), the amphibrach (se- - short-long-short), the amphimacer (— -, longshort-long), the bacchius (v--, short-long-long) and the antibacchius (-- long-long-short) . There is a See also:foot of four syllables, the choriamb (— —, long-short-shortlong), which is the fundamental foot in Aeolic verse—very frequently mentioned, but very seldom met with . It must not be forgotten that the prosodical terminology of the Greeks, which is often treated by non-poetical writers as something scientific and even sacrosanct, See also:dates from a time when ancient literature had lost all its freshness and impulse, and was exclusively the study of analysts and grammarians . Between the life of Pindar, for instance, and that of Hephaestion, the great metrical authority, there extends a longer See also:period than between See also:Chaucer and See also:Professor See also:Skeat; and to appreciate the value of the rules of Greek prosody we must recollect that those rules were invented by learned and See also:academic men to See also:account for phenomena which they observed, and wished to comprehend, in writings that had long been classical, and were already growing positively archaic . The fact seems to be that the combination of long and short syllables into spondees, iambs, dactyls and anapaests, forms the See also:sole genuine basis of all classical verse . Metre is a science which pays attention to all the possible See also:regular arrangements which can be made of these four indispensable and indestructible types . Of the metres of the ancients by far the most often employed, and no doubt the See also:oldest, was the dactylic See also:hexameter, a combination of six feet, five successive dactyls and a spondee or trochee: This was known to the ancients as " epic " verse, in contrast to the various lyrical measures . The poetry of Homer is the typical example of the use of the epic hexameter, and the character of the Homeric See also:saga led to the See also:fashion by which the dactylic hexameter, whatever its subject, was styled " heroic metre." The earliest epics, doubtless, were chanted to the See also:accompaniment of a stringed See also:instrument, on which the pulsation of the verse (E7rr7) was recorded . It was the See also:opinion of V . See also:Christ that the origin of the hexameter was to be sought in See also:hieratic poetry, the fulness of the long dactylic line attracting the priests to its use in the delivery of oracles, from which it naturally passed to See also:solemn tales of the actions of gods and heroes . It is more difficult to see how, later on, it became the vehicle for comic and satiric writing, and is found at last adopted by the bucolic poets for their amorous and See also:pastoral dialogues . The Homeric form of the dactylic hexameter has been usually taken, and was taken in classical times, as the normal one, but there have been many See also:variations . A hexameter found in See also:Catullus consists exclusively of spondees, and deviation from the See also:original heroic type could go no further . This concentration of heavy sounds was cultivated to give solemnity to the character of the line . In the whole See also:matter, it is best to recognize that the rules of the grammarians were made after the event, to account for the fact that the poets had chosen, while. adhering to the verse-structure of five rapid beats and a subsidence, to vary the See also:internal character of that structure exactly as their ear and their See also:passion dictated . This seems particularly true in the See also:case of the See also:caesura, where the question is not so much a matter of defining " male " caesura or " See also:female " caesura, " bucolic " caesura or " trochaic," as of patiently noting instances in which the unconscious poet, led by his See also:inspiration, has varied his pauses and his emphasis at his own See also:free will . The critics have written much of " prosodical See also:licence," but verse in the days of Homer, like verse now, is simply See also:good or See also:bad, and if it is good it may show See also:liberty and variety, but it knows nothing of " licence." We pass, by a natural transition, to the pentameter, whichis the most frequently employed of what are known as the syncopied forms of dactylic verse . It was used with the hexameter, to produce the effect which was early called elegiac, and its form shows the appropriateness of this See also:custom: "Cynthia prima fu- it, 11 Cynthia finis e- rit." A hexameter, full of See also:energy and exaltation, followed . by a descending and See also:melancholy pentameter, had an immediate tendency to take a complete form, and this is the origin of the See also:stanza . The See also:peculiar character of this two-line stanza has been fixed for all time by a brilliant See also:epigram of See also:Schiller, which is itself a specimen of the form: " See also:Im Hexameter steigt See also:des Springquells flussige Saute, Im Pentameter drauf fallt sie melodisch herab." Such a distich was called an See also:elegy, EXeyeiov, as specially suitable to an EXeyos or lamentation . It is difficult to say with certainty whether the distich so composed was essential as an accompaniment to See also:flute-music in the earliest times, or how soon there came to be written purely See also:literary elegies towards which the melody stood in a secondary or ornamental relation . It has, however, been observed that even when the distich had obviously come to be a purely intellectual or lyrical thing, there remained in the sound of the pentameter the trace of lamentation, in which its See also:primitive use at funeral services was clearly preserved . Other grammarians, however, among whom Casar, in his work on the origin of elegiac verse, is prominent, do not believe in the lugubrious essence of the pentameter, and think that the elegiacal See also:couplet was originally erotic, and was adapted to mournful themes by See also:Simonides . If we may See also:credit a'passage in See also:Athenaeus, it would seem that the earliest-known elegists, such as See also:Callinus and See also:Solon, wrote for recitation, pure and See also:simple, without the accompaniment of any instrument . Trochaic verse is called by the ancient grammarians See also:head-less (aich¢aaov), because it really consists of iambic verse deprived of its head, or opening syllable .
The iambic
measure (s-- - se — S- -) becomes trochaic if we cut off
the first " short," and make it run — — v —
.
The pure trochaic trimeter and tetrameter had a character of breathless See also:speed, and sometimes See also:bore the name of choric (puOµds xopeios), because it was peculiarly appropriate to the See also:dance, and was used for poems which •expressed a. quickly stepping sentiment
.
It is understood that, after having been known as a musical movement, it was first employed in the See also:composition of poetry by Archilochus of See also:Paros, in the 7th century B.C
.
Iambic metre was, next to the dactylic hexameter, the form of verse most frequently employed by the poets of Greek antiquity
.
Archilochus, again, who seems to have been a great initiator in the arts of versification, is credited with the invention of the iambic trimeter also, but it certainly existed before his time
.
See also:
I I ---•
I L— _
The stanza of Alcaeus runs:-
-
...
I
%I I
These marvellous inventions suited the different moods of these strongly contrasted lyrists, the " See also:violet-crowned, pure, softly smiling Sappho," and the Eery, vehement soldier who was Alcaeus
.
We must give them peculiar attention, since they were the two earliest See also:models for the lyric passion which has since then expressed itself in so many stanzaic forms, but in none of so faultless a perfection as the original Lesbian types
.
The name of See also:Stesichorus of See also:Himera points to the belief of antiquity that he was the earliest poet who gave form to the choral See also:song; he must have been called the " See also:choir-setter " because he arranged and wrote for choirs semi-epic verse of a new See also:kind, " made up of halves of the epic hexameter, interspersed with short variations—epitrites, anapaests or See also:mere syncopae—just enough to break the dactylic See also:swing, to make the verse lyrical " (See also: The earliest use of poetry as a national art in Italy is to be judged by See also:inscriptions in what is called the Saturnian metre . Already, the first Latin epic poets, Livius Andronicus in his Odyssia, See also:Naevius in his Bellum Punicum, the Scipios in their Elogia, combined their See also:rude national sense of folk-song with a consciousness of the quantitative rules of the Greeks . But the same writers, in their dramas, undoubtedly used Greek metres without See also:adaptation, and it is therefore likely that the ancient Saturnian measure was already looked upon as barbarous, and it makes no further reappearance in Latin literature (cf . Gleditsch) . The introduction of Greek dramatic metre marks the start of regular poetry among the Latins, which was due, not to men of Roman See also:birth, but to poets of Greek extractionor inhabiting the Greek-speaking provinces of Italy . These writers, bearing the See also:stamp of a widely recognized cultivation, threw the old national verse back into oblivion . Latin verse, then, began in a free but loyal modification of the principles of Greek verse . See also:Plautus was particularly ambitious and skilful in this work, and, aided by a native genius for metre, he laid down the basis of Latin dramatic versification . See also:Terence was a feebler and at the same time a more timid metrist . In See also:satire, the iambic and trochaic measures were carefully adaptedby See also:Ennius and See also:Lucilius . The dactylic hexameter followed, and Ennius, in all matters of verse a daring innovator, directly imitated in his Annales the epic measure of the Greeks . To him also is attributed the introduction of the elegiac distich, hexameter and pentameter .
The dactylic hexameter was forthwith adopted as the leading metre of the Roman poets, and, as Gleditsch has pointed out, the basis upon which all future versification was to be erected was firmly laid down before the See also:death of Ennius in 169 B.C
.
Lucilius followed, but perhaps with some tendency to retrogression, for the Latin critics seem to have looked upon his metre as wanting both in melody and See also:elasticity
.
See also:Lucretius, on the other hand, made a further advance on the labours of Ennius, in his study of
" the rise And long See also:roll of the Hexameter."
Lest, however, this great form of verse should take too exclusive a place in the See also:imagination of the See also:Romans, a younger See also:generation, with See also:Laevius and Terentius Varro at their head, began to imitate the lyrical measures of the Greeks with remarkable success
.
Varro, who has been styled the earliest metrical theorist of See also:Rome, opened up a new See also: Although he is actually writing in dactylic hexameters, he does not mention this form of verse; he is chiefly occupied in describing, rather unscientifically, the iambic trimeter, and in praising the iamb, pes cites . He applauds, still somewhat vaguely, the stately versification of the precursors, Ennius and See also:Accius, and blames the immodulata poemata of careless modern writers, whose laxity is condoned by popular See also:ignorance . The only way to See also:escape such faults is to study the Greeks by See also:night and by day, but Horace evidently means by his exemplaria Graeca, not the scholiasts with their lists of metres and their laborious rules, but the old poets with their See also:fine raptures . On Italian ground he points to Plautus, and laments that the Romans of his own day, fascinated by softer cadences, have lost their veneration for the vigorous beauty of the Plautinos numeros . And Horace closes with a queer See also:suggestion, which may be taken as we please, that a poet in an age of flagging inspiration must See also:trust to his fingers as well as his ears . Modern Versification.—The main distinction between classical and modern versification consists in the See also:negligence shown by the moderns to quantity, which is defined as the length or shortness of the sound of syllables, as determined by the time required to pronounce them . This See also:dimension of sound was rigid in the case of Greek and Latin poetry, until, in what is known as the See also:Middle Greek period, there came in a general tendency to relax the exact value of sounds and syllables, and to introduce accent, which is a measure of quality rather than of quantity . A syllable, in modern verse, is heavy or See also:light, according as it is accented or unaccented—that is to say, according as it receives stress from the See also:voice or not . In the word " See also:tulip," for instance, the syllables are of equal length, but the accent is strongly upon the first . It is mainly a question of force with us, not of time as with the ancients . There is, however, an element of quantity in modern verse, as there was of accent in ancient verse . The foot, in modern verse, takes a less prominent place in itself than it did in Greece, and is regarded more in relation to the whole line of which it makes a See also:part . |