Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:WISDOM, See also:BOOK OF, or WISDOM OF See also:SOLOMON (See also:Sept. Io4ia IaXwµwvos; See also:Lat. Vulg. See also:Liber sapientiae) , an apocryphal See also:book of the " See also:Wisdom Literature " (q.v.), the most brilliant See also:production of pre-See also:Christian See also:Hebrew philosophical thought, remarkable both for the See also:elevation of its ideas and for the splendour of its diction . It divides itself naturally, by its contents, into two parts, in one of which the theme is righteousness and wisdom, in the other the See also:early fortunes of the Israelite See also:people considered as a righteous nation beloved by See also:God . The first See also:part (ch. i.-ix.) falls also into two divisions, the first (i.-v.) dwelling on the contrast between the righteous and the wicked, the second (vi.-ix.) setting forth the glories of wisdom . After an exhortation to the See also:judges of the See also:earth to put away evil counsels and thus avoid See also:death, the author declares that God has made no See also:kingdom of death on the earth, but ungodly men have made a See also:covenant with it: certain sceptics (probably both See also:Gentile and Jewish) holding this See also:life to be brief and without a future, give themselves up to sensuality and oppress the poor and the righteous; but God created See also:man to be immortal (ii . 23), and there will be See also:compensation and retribution in the future: the See also:good will See also:rule (on earth), the wicked will be hurled down to destruction, though they seem now to flourish with See also:long life and abundance of See also:children (ii.-v.) . At this point See also:Solomon is introduced, and from the following See also:section (vi.-ix.) the book seems to have taken its See also:title . Solomon reminds See also:kings and rulers that they will be held to strict See also:account by God, and, urging them to learn wisdom from his words, proceeds to give his own experience: devoting himself from his youth to the pursuit of wisdom he had found her to be a treasure that never failed, the source and embodiment of all that is most excellent and beautiful in the See also:world—through her he looks to obtain See also:influence over men and See also:immortality, and he concludes with a See also:prayer that God would send her out of his See also:holy heavens to be his See also:companion and See also:guide . The second part of the book (x.-xix.) connects itself formally with the first by a See also:summary description of the role of wisdom in the early times: she directed and preserved the fathers from See also:Adam to See also:Moses (x. i-xi . 1) . From this point, however, nothing is said of wisdom—the See also:rest of the See also:hook is a philosophical and imaginative narrative of Israelite affairs from the See also:Egyptian oppression to the See also:settlement in See also:Canaan . A brief description of how the Egyptians were punished through the very things with which they sinned (though the See also:punishment was not fatal, for God loves all things that exist), and how judgments on the Canaanites were executed gradually (so as to give them See also:time to repent), is followed by a dissertation on the origin, various forms, absurdity and results of polytheism and See also:idolatry (xiii.-xv.): the See also:worship of natural See also:objects is said to be less blame-worthy than the worship of images—this latter, arising from the See also:desire to See also:honour dead children and living kings (the Euhemeristic theory), is inherently absurd, and led to all sorts of moral depravity . In the four last chapters the author, returning to the See also:history, gives a detailed account of the See also:provision made for the Israelites in the See also:wilderness and of the pains and terrors with which the Egyptians were plagued . i See also:President VanHise (b . 1857) graduated at the university of See also:Wisconsin in 1879, became instructor in See also:geology there in 1883, in 1897 became consulting geologist of the Wisconsin See also:Geological and Natural History Survey, and in 1900 became geologist in See also:charge of the See also:Division of Pre-See also:Cambrian and Metamorphic Geology, U.S . Geological Survey . He wrote Correlation Papers—Archaean and Algonkian (1892), Some Principles Controlling the Deposition of Ores (19o1) . A See also:Treatise on See also:Metamorphism (1903) and several See also:works with other authors on the different See also:iron regions of See also:Michigan . It is not easy to determine whether the book is all from the same author . On the one See also:hand, it may be said that one See also:general theme—the salvation and final prosperity of the righteous—is visible throughout the See also:work, that God is everywhere represented as the supreme moral See also:governor of the world, and that the conception of immortality is found in both parts; the second part, though differing in See also:form from the first, may be regarded as the See also:historical See also:illustration of the principles set forth in the latter . On the other hand, it must be admitted that the points of view in the two parts are very different: the philosophical conception of wisdom and the general See also:Greek colouring, so prominent in the first part, are quite lacking in the second (x . 1-xi. r being regarded as a transition or connecting section inserted by an editor) . While the first has the form of a treatise, the second is an address to God; the first, though it has the Jewish people in mind, does not refer to them by name except incidentally in Solomon's prayer; the second is wholly devoted to the Jewish See also:national experiences (this is true even of the section on idolatry) . It is in the second that we have the finer ethical conception of God as See also:father and saviour of all men, See also:lover of souls, merciful in his dealings with the wicked—in the first part it is his See also:justice that is emphasized; the See also:hope of immortality is prominent in the first, but is mentioned only once (in xv . 3) in the second . The two parts are distinguished by difference of See also:style; the Hebrew principle of See also:parallelism of clauses is employed far more in the first than in the second, which has a number of See also:plain See also:prose passages, and is also See also:rich in uncommon See also:compound terms . In view of these See also:differences there is ground for holding that the second part is a See also:separate production which has been See also:united with the first by an editor, an historical haggadic See also:sketch, a See also:midrash, full of imaginative additions to the Biblical narrative, and en-livened by many striking ethical reflections . The question, however, may be See also:left undecided . Both parts of the book ignore the Jewish sacrificial cult . Sacrifices are not mentioned at all; a passing reference to the See also:temple is put into Solomon's mouth (ix . 8) . Moses is described (xi . 1) not as the See also:great lawgiver, but as the holy See also:prophet through whom the works of the people were prospered . (It may be noted, as an illustration of the allusive style of the book, that, though a number of men are spoken of, not one of them is mentioned by name; in iv . 10-14, which is an expansion of Gen. v . 24, the reader is left to recognize See also:Enoch from his knowledge of the Biblical narrative.) In the second part of the book there is no expression of " messianic " hope ; in the first part the picture of the national future agrees in general (if its expressions are to be taken literally) with that given in the book of See also:Daniel: the See also:Jews are to have dominion over the peoples (iii . 8), and to receive from the See also:Lord's hand the diadem of beauty (v . 16), but there is no mention of particular nations . The historical See also:review in the second part is coloured by a See also:bitter hatred of the See also:ancient Egyptians; whether this springs from resentment of the former sufferings of the Israelites or is meant as an allusion to the circumstances of the author's own time it is hardly possible to say . The book appears to See also:teach individual ethical immortality, though its treatment of the subject is somewhat vague . On the basis of Gen. i.-iii. it is said (ii . 23 f.) that God created man for immortality (that is, apparently, on earth) and made him an See also:image of his own being, but through the envy of the See also:devil death came into the world, yet (iii . 1-4) the souls of the righteous are in the hand of God, and, though they seem to See also:die, their hope is full of immortality . The description, however, appears to glide into the conception of national immortality (iii . 8, v . 16), especially in the See also:fine sorites in vi . 17-20: the beginning of wisdom is desire for instruction, and devoted regard to instruction is love, and love is observance of her See also:laws, and obedience to her laws is assurance of incorruption, and incorruption brings us near to God, and therefore desire for wisdom leads to a kingdom (but the nature of the kingdom is not stated) . The individualistic view is expressed in xv . 3: the knowledge of God's See also:power (that is, a righteous life) is the See also:root of immortality . This passage appears to exclude the wicked, who, however, are said (iv . 20) to be punished hereafter . The figurative nature of the See also:language respecting the future makes it difficult to determine precisely the thought of the book on this point; but it seems to contemplate continued existence hereafter for both righteous and wicked, and rewards and punishments allotted on the basis of moral See also:character . Angels are not mentioned; but the See also:serpent of Gen. iii. is, for the first time in literature, identified with the devil (" Diabolos," ii . 24, the Greek See also:translation of the Hebrew " Satan ") ; the role assigned him (envy) is similar to that expressed in " Secrets of Enoch," xxxi . 3-6; he is here introduced to account for the fact of death in the world . In iii . 4 the writer, in his polemic against the prosperous ungodly men of his time, denies that death, See also:short life and lack of children are to be considered 750 misfortunes for the righteous—over against these things the See also:possession of wisdom is declared to be the supreme good . The ethical See also:standard of the book is high except in the bitterness displayed towards the " wicked," that is, the enemies of the Jews . The only occurrence in old Jewish literature (except in Ecclus. xiv . 2) of a word for "See also:conscience " is found in xvii . 11 (evesihnrns) : wickedness is timorous under the condemnation of conscience (the same thought in Prov. See also:xxviii . I) . The book is absolutely monotheistic, and the character ascribed to the deity is ethically pure with the exception mentioned above . The style shows that the book was written in Greek, though naturally it contains Hebraisms . The author of the first part was in all See also:probability an Alexandrian See also:Jew; nothing further is known of him; and this is true of the author of the second part, if that be a separate production . As to the date, the decided Greek colouring (the conception of wisdom, the See also:list of Stoic virtues, viii . 7, the See also:idea of pre-existence, viii . 20, and the ethical conception of the future life) points to a time not earlier than the 1st See also:century B.C., while the fact that the history is not allegorized suggests priority to See also:Philo; probably the work was composed See also:late in the ist century B.C . (this date would agree with the social situation described) . Its exclusion from the Jewish See also:Canon of Scripture resulted naturally from its Alexandrian thought and from the fact that it was written in Greek . It was used, however, by New Testament writers (vii . 22 f., Jas. iii . 17, vii . 26; Heb. i . 2 f., ix . 15; 2 See also:Cor . V . 1-4, xi . 23; Acts xvii . 30, xiii . 1-5, xiv . 22-26; Rom. i . 18-32, xvi . 7; 1 Tim. iv. ro), and is quoted freely by Patristic and later authors, generally as inspired . It was recognized as canonical by the See also:council of See also:Trent, but is not so regarded by Protestants .
|
|
|
[back] WISDOM LITERATURE |
[next] HENRY ALEXANDER WISE (1806-1876) |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.