Search over 40,000 articles from the original, classic Encyclopedia Britannica, 11th Edition.
|
See also:WITAN, or WITENAGEMOT (from O. Eng. wita, p1. witan, a See also:wise See also:man, and gemot, a See also:meeting, from O. Eng. metan, to meet) , the See also:national See also:council in See also:England in Anglo-Saxon times . Its origin is obscure . There is some resemblance between it and the two assemblies mentioned by See also:Tacitus in the Germania, a larger and a smaller one, but this See also:analogy must not be pressed too far . In Anglo-Saxon England in the 7th and 8th centuries it seems certain that each of the larger kingdoms, See also:Kent, Wessex, See also:Mercia and See also:Northumbria, had its See also:separate See also:witan, or council, but there is a difference of See also:opinion as to whether this was identical with, or distinct from, the folkmoot, in which, theoretically at least, all freemen had the right to appear . H . R. von See also:Gneist (See also:History of the See also:English Constitution) agrees that the two assemblies were identical, and a somewhat similar view is put forward by J . M . See also:Kemble (See also:Saxons in England) and E . A . See also:Freeman (History of the See also:Norman See also:Conquest) . Freeman advances the theory that the right of all the freemen to attend the gembt had for See also:practical purposes fallen into disuse, and thus the See also:assembly had come tobe confined to the See also:wise men . In other words, the folkmoot had become the witan .
See also:Evidence in support of this view is sought for in the accounts in the Anglo-Saxon See also:Chronicle and elsewhere, where the decisions of the witan were received with loud expressions of approval or of disapproval by an assembled See also:crowd, and it is argued that this is a survival from an earlier See also:age, when all the freemen attended the witan
.
But the attendance of the crowd can be otherwise explained
..
The meetings referred to were probably those of exceptional See also:interest, such as the See also:election or the See also:coronation of a See also: Its members had the power of electing a new king, although the See also:area of their choice was strictly limited by See also:custom and also the right of deposing a king, although this seems to have been infrequently exercised . Its members signed the charters by which the king conveyed grants of land to churches and to individuals, and it is from the extant charters that we mainly derive our knowledge about the See also:composition of the witan . It consisted, in addition to the king, his sons and other relatives, of the bishops and later some abbots, of some under-kings and the ealdormen of the shires or provinces, and of a number of ministri, or king's thegns . These ministri were nominees of the king; they included the important members of his See also:household, and their number gradually increased until it outstripped that of all the other members . The witan appears probably to have had no fixed See also:place of See also:meeting, and to have assembled around the See also:person of the king, wherever he might be . In the later years of its existence, at least, it met three times a See also:year, at See also:Easter, Whitsuntide and See also:Christmas . The number of counsellors attending the meetings of the witan varied considerably from See also:time to time . " In a witenagemot held at See also:Luton in See also:November A.D . 931 were the two archbishops, two Welsh princes, seventeen bishops, fifteen ealdormen, five abbots and fifty-nine ministri . In another, that of See also:Winchester of A.D . 934, were See also:present the two archbishops, four Welsh kings, seventeen bishops, four abbots, twelve ealdormen and fifty-two ministri . These are perhaps the fullest extant lists . Of See also:Edgar's witenagemots, the one of A.D . 966 contained the king's See also:mother, two archbishops, seven bishops, five ealdormen and fifteen ministri; and this is a See also:fair specimen of the usual See also:pro-portion " (Stubbs, Const . Hist. ch. vi.) . Almost immediately after the Norman Conquest the word See also:fell into disuse . See also D . J . Medley, English Constitutional History (1907); H . M . See also:Chadwick, Studies on Anglo-Saxon Institutions (1905) ; and the See also:article See also:PARLIAMENT . (A . W . |
|
|
[back] WISMAR |
[next] WITCH |
There are no comments yet for this article.
Do not copy, download, transfer, or otherwise replicate the site content in whole or in part.
Links to articles and home page are encouraged.