Other Free Encyclopedias » Online Encyclopedia » Encyclopedia - Featured Articles » Contributed Topics from A-E

Afrikaner Broederbond - THE AFRIKANER WEERSTANDSBEWEGING

south africa party awb

In the wake of the Anglo-Boer War (1899–1902), the impoverished and largely rural Afrikaners of present-day South Africa experienced an ethnic awakening, particularly regarding aspects of language, religion, and education. It was also, at first, largely an anti-English movement. In May 1918 a group of fourteen white men in Johannesburg formed an organization they called “Jong Suid-Afrika.” On June 5 this loose organization was recast as the Afrikaner Broederbond (AB), which aimed to bring together Afrikaners and to serve their interests. The constitution of the AB made it clear that only Afrikaners—in fact only “super-Afrikaners”—would be invited to join the group. In time, membership implied religious conservatism, linguistic priority, and racial prejudice. Young persons, especially students, were brought into the fold through a junior secret society, the Ruiterwag.

To better achieve their aims, the AB became a secret society in 1924, and henceforth membership was by invitation only. As a front the secret society employed the FAK (Federation of Afrikaner Cultural Organizations), established in 1929. The AB leadership had clearly conceptualized their role in South Africa. At the Bond Congress in August 1932 the chairman of the Executive Council, stated: “After the cultural and economic needs, the AB will have to dedicate its attention to the political needs of our people … the aim must be a completely independent real Afrikaans Government for South Africa” (du Toit 1976, p. 116). To this end, the AB surreptitiously supported the HNP (United National Party) under Daniel Francois Malan, who led the party to victory in the 1948 general elections. Meanwhile, AB leaders within the church justified the political policy of apartheid through the selective use of Biblical texts.

In 1965, Brian M. du Toit published Beperkte lidmaatskap (Restricted Membership), the first exposé of the AB. He pointed out that early members occupied prominent positions in the Afrikaans churches, educational institutions, and in the increasingly important industrial and business world. AB members looked and sounded like their neighbors, but their hidden agenda and prejudice was always uppermost in their values and decisions. Jan Hendrik Philippus Serfontein, in his study Brotherhood of Power (1978), explains that “for an Afrikaner who defects, or opposes the Broederbond, the price is terrible—total excommunication. He will be ostracized from Afrikaner society, and a man in business faces economic destruction” (p. 11). All persons in leadership positions, especially those in politics, were AB members.

The greatest challenge for South Africa’s leaders involved the multiethnic population. Beginning in 1948, D. F. Malan was able to prevent Indian representation in Parliament. In 1958 the new prime minister, Hendrik F. Verwoerd, introduced increasingly severe policies concerning geographical separation of “tribal” homelands (referred to as “Bantustans”), while a policy of residential separation (for blacks working in white areas) was used to prevent social contact. Laws on population registration, miscegenation, mixed marriages, and other issues were clearly based on skin color. As a political residue of more enlightened and liberal days, “colored” people remained on the voting roles in the Cape Province. When all vestiges of colored representation in Parliament were removed under Prime Minister John Vorster, however, the AB was ecstatic.

One of the best-kept secrets, and one of the most powerful instruments for the pursuit of the AB’s ideals, was a system of secret watchdog committees. Each committee included specialists in a particular field or profession, and the AB thus had its fingers on the very pulse of South Africa. The AB, through the government, directed an increasingly isolationist national policy. What started out as an anti-English cultural organization gradually became more exclusionist as a secret society that was instrumental in gradually ushering in total apartheid in South Africa. Blacks were only tolerated in “white areas” as workers, and coloreds and Indians had their own residential areas. The rest of South Africa was supposed to belong to whites, especially the Afrikaners guided by the AB.

As the race-based policies flowing from apartheid in South Africa reached fruition, they were increasingly challenged by those with more democratic sentiments. This included organizations representing the four “racial” groups, including the African National Congress, which represented black Africans. Some Afrikaners in leadership positions were covertly meeting with ANC members outside South Africa. In response, a number of organizations on the far right emerged, all aimed at maintaining a white society in a separate geographical region. Among these were the Afrikaner Weerstandsbeweging (AWB, founded in 1973); Vereniging van Oranjewerkers (Organization of Orange Workers, 1980); Afrikanervolkswag (Afrikaner People’s Guard, 1984); Blanke Bevrydingsbeweging (White Liberation Movement, 1985); Boere-Vryheidsbeweging (Boer Freedom Movement, 1989); and the Boerestaat (Boer State) Party (1990). Each of these movements had grandiose ideas about perpetuating a white South Africa, or at least retaining white ethnic enclaves in a future South Africa under majority rule. Some proclaimed themselves willing to take up arms to defend their claims.

THE AFRIKANER WEERSTANDSBEWEGING

The Afrikaner Weerstandsbeweging (AWB) was formed in 1973 as a secret society in Heidelberg (Transvaal) by Eugene Terre Blanche and a few friends. In 1979 they abandoned the secrecy component to gain greater impact. This semi-militant, ultraconservative extremist group formed the Blanke Volkstaat Party (White People’s State Party) in 1980 and started working toward the ideal of a white homeland. Some members, finding that they had no political clout, disbanded the party in 1982, joining two rightist political parties, the Herstigte Nasionale Party (HNP) and the Conservative Party (CP). But the AWB movement continued.

One wing of the movement, the Stormvalke (Storm Falcons) served as a military group, and in time they were replaced by the khaki-clad Wenkommando. The AWB operated through small vigilante cells, called Boere-Brandwag, consisting of seven to ten members. In 1990 the movement claimed approximately 150,000 active supporters, but only 15,000 registered members.

Other rightist spokesmen characterized the AWB as an emotional group structured around the personality of Eugene Terre Blanche, who was the most emotional and dynamic orator on the political scene. Carl Boshoff (a onetime chairman of the Afrikaner Broederbond and the leader of the Vereniging van Oranjewerkers) told this writer in August 1990: “It is a glorious experience to hear him speak … but his plan is infeasible.” Most spokesmen for other groups agreed that his plans, namely to establish a volkstaat (nation state) that included the Transvaal, the Orange Free State, and the Republic of Vryheid (this refers to the so-called Nieuwe Republiek formed in 1884 in northern Natal) was a complete illusion.

The AWB flag resembles a swastika. Terre Blanche denied its link to Nazism or to an anti-Christ symbolism of three sixes, insisting it is a pro-Christ configuration of three sevens. The flag and the movement, Terre Blanche claimed, served to galvanize conservative Afrikaners. In fact, he maintained, the CP would not have been the official opposition party if it were not for AWB support. In any case, Terre Blanche claimed, the CP parliamentarians were all members of the AWB. They opposed President de Klerk’s “giving away” the country to Nelson Mandela and the ANC.

Terre Blanche’s racist proclamations and treatment of blacks working on his and other farms in the Ventersdorp (western Transvaal) region frequently led to police confrontation and intervention. Eventually, he was sentenced to five years in jail for the attempted murder of a black security guard. He gained his freedom in June 2005.

Like all other political parties and movements, the AWB gradually dissolved. Ultra-conservative sentiments linger in the new South Africa and find expression in opposition organizations.

Agassiz, Jean Louis Rodolphe [next] [back] African Feminisms

User Comments

Your email address will be altered so spam harvesting bots can't read it easily.
Hide my email completely instead?

Cancel or

Vote down Vote up

almost 7 years ago

There are a number of dangerous misconceptions & outright lies here particularly by the poster. First off: the Boer people are not a political group nor a religious group & neither are they of Dutch origin. The Boers are the folks who developed on the north eastern Cape frontier from the late 17th cent when they trekked inland in order to get away from the autocratic rule of the Dutch East India Co. The Boers are thus even an anthropologically distinct entity from the Cape Dutch descended Afrikaners who emerged at the Western Cape as the Boers MOVED away from them by the 1700s. Now the ancestors of the Boers [ & most Afrikaners too ] can not be legitimately held responsible for leaving Europe as they were PULLED out of Europe [ & Asia ] by the Dutch East India Co. who flooded them out of their homes then forced them to accompany the cruel tyrant Jan van Riebeeck to the Cape where they were dumped as used as servants of the VOC. The Boer people are not some regressive sect as you erroneously imply but are simply an Africanized homegrown ethnic group which emerged from the Trekboers - the nomadic pastoralists of the Cape frontier long before the formal arrival of the Colonial powers.

The notion that any particular part of the world was not "made for" a certain group of people is chauvinism & discrimination. Furthermore the fact that the Boers are mostly of White origin is irrelevant to the fact that they have been striving for self determination since 1795 when the first Boer Republics were declared on the Cape frontier. The Boers have had to struggle against various White rulers. Furthermore the Difaqane of King Shaka Zulu killed FAR MORE PEOPLE in Southern Africa than the groups you mentioned. Shaka killed at least 1.5 million people & he displaced entire Sotho peoples to the point where the Boers were able to easily settle into the regions north of the Orange River & establish Boer Republics which were internationally recognized by the world. The Boers do not "dislike" Black people: this is yet another lie like the other lie that they "are of Dutch origin". The Boers entered into agreements with Griquas / Xhosas / Zulus / Rolong / Sothos & Swazis in the past. The Boers & Swazis used to share resources with each other. The Zulu King Dinizulu gave some land in northern Natal to the Boers where the Vryheid Republic was established. The Boers & Rolong joined in their struggles against the Ndebels. Boers & Zulus exchanged Rocks of Peace at Ncombe River in a spirit of reconciliation in 1840 & met again in 1866 to stack rocks as a symbol of peace. The Griquas adopted a flag which is the inverse version of the famous Transvaal Vierkleur: a renown Boer flag. Which was flown at an American political party convention in 1900 as a symbol of anti-imperialism. You make it sound as though the Boers irrationally "hated" neighbours or had any decision for being in Africa at all & do not realize that they are a PRODUCT of Africa as many authors have noted in print.

The obsession that folks like you have with their White origins is a total distraction. As they would have struggled for self determination regardless of their race as the Griqaus have also done in the past. The White label is often arbitrarily applied to them in an illegitimate attempt at alienating them from the continent of their birth / their African origins & their inherent right to self determination.

Now to address the article. The Afrikaner Broederbond was one of the biggest OPPRESSORS of the Boer people ever as they attempted to co-opt them & assimilate them into the Cape Dutch dominated Afrikaner group. The Boers have had to struggle against the Afrikaner establishment particularly when they were trying to restore the Boer Republics in the late 1940s only to have their movement opposed & broken up by the Afrikaner establishment. The Afrikaner Broederbond was OPPOSED to Boer independence & only concerned themselves with a narrow agenda & entrenching an elite group. The impoverished rural so called Afrikaners were in fact Boers not Afrikaners. The Boers were yet to be folded into the Afrikaner reservation during the second Anglo-Boer War.

D F Malan was a Cape Dutch not a Boer & Hendrik Verwoerd was a Dutch born but naturalized Afrikaner who worked against the Boers aspiration for self determination. The Boerestaat Party was formed in 1986 not 1990 & it was founded by a one Robert van Tonder who left the National Party in 1961 [ the same year that the usurper Verwoerd turned South Africa into a nominal republic ] as he saw the establishment of the Republic of South Africa & Verwoerd's immigration policy as a total betrayal of the Boers & the old Boer Republics. Robert van Tonder refused to be part of the Afrikaner Broederbond & had his own illegal printing press & was repressed & harassed by the National Party government.

Therefore would you please learn the truth about these people & stop perpetuating the insipid lies about them which were formulated for the sole reason of demonizing them & removing them as an obstacle to global financial powers as they inadvertently settled into a mineral rich region following the Great Trek. The Boers were recognized as an independent indigenous people in the past. Though they only lost their independence when the British conquered their Boer Republics after having killed off 50 % of the Boer child population within the British created concentration camps.

The Boers have gone through a lot & have paid a MASSIVE price for trying to remain an independent people & to maintain their freedom in Africa therefore one should not be too quick to judge them considering that you do not even know much about them nor their struggles. The fact of the matter is that the Boers could have worked out an accommodation by now through negotiation with the locals groups were it not for the interference of the global financial power which runs South Africa & does not want the macro State to break up as it suits their financial aims. There is no room to them for Boer or other group self determination.


Vote down Vote up

almost 7 years ago

There are a number of dangerous misconceptions & outright lies here particularly by the poster. First off: the Boer people are not a political group nor a religious group & neither are they of Dutch origin. The Boers are the folks who developed on the north eastern Cape frontier from the late 17th cent when they trekked inland in order to get away from the autocratic rule of the Dutch East India Co. The Boers are thus even an anthropologically distinct entity from the Cape Dutch descended Afrikaners who emerged at the Western Cape as the Boers MOVED away from them by the 1700s. Now the ancestors of the Boers [ & most Afrikaners too ] can not be legitimately held responsible for leaving Europe as they were PULLED out of Europe [ & Asia ] by the Dutch East India Co. who flooded them out of their homes then forced them to accompany the cruel tyrant Jan van Riebeeck to the Cape where they were dumped as used as servants of the VOC. The Boer people are not some regressive sect as you erroneously imply but are simply an Africanized homegrown ethnic group which emerged from the Trekboers - the nomadic pastoralists of the Cape frontier long before the formal arrival of the Colonial powers.

The notion that any particular part of the world was not "made for" a certain group of people is chauvinism & discrimination. Furthermore the fact that the Boers are mostly of White origin is irrelevant to the fact that they have been striving for self determination since 1795 when the first Boer Republics were declared on the Cape frontier. The Boers have had to struggle against various White rulers. Furthermore the Difaqane of King Shaka Zulu killed FAR MORE PEOPLE in Southern Africa than the groups you mentioned. Shaka killed at least 1.5 million people & he displaced entire Sotho peoples to the point where the Boers were able to easily settle into the regions north of the Orange River & establish Boer Republics which were internationally recognized by the world. The Boers do not "dislike" Black people: this is yet another lie like the other lie that they "are of Dutch origin". The Boers entered into agreements with Griquas / Xhosas / Zulus / Rolong / Sothos & Swazis in the past. The Boers & Swazis used to share resources with each other. The Zulu King Dinizulu gave some land in northern Natal to the Boers where the Vryheid Republic was established. The Boers & Rolong joined in their struggles against the Ndebels. Boers & Zulus exchanged Rocks of Peace at Ncombe River in a spirit of reconciliation in 1840 & met again in 1866 to stack rocks as a symbol of peace. The Griquas adopted a flag which is the inverse version of the famous Transvaal Vierkleur: a renown Boer flag. Which was flown at a political party convention in 1900 as a symbol of anti-imperialism. You make it sound as though the Boers irrationally "hated" neighbours or had any decision for being in Africa at all & do not realize that they are a PRODUCT of Africa as many authors have noted in print.

The obsession that folks like you have with their White origins is a total distraction. As they would have struggled for self determination regardless of their race as the Griqaus have also done in the past. The White label is often arbitrarily applied to them in an illegitimate attempt at alienating them from the continent of their birth / their African origins & their inherent right to self determination.

Now to address the article. The Afrikaner Broederbond was one of the biggest OPPRESSORS of the Boer people ever as they attempted to co-opt them & assimilate them into the Cape Dutch dominated Afrikaner group. The Boers have had to struggle against the Afrikaner establishment particularly when they were trying to restore the Boer Republics in the late 1940s only to have their movement opposed & broken up by the Afrikaner establishment. The Afrikaner Broederbond was OPPOSED to Boer independence & only concerned themselves with a narrow agenda & entrenching an elite group. The impoverished rural so called Afrikaners were in fact Boers not Afrikaners. The Boers were yet to be folded into the Afrikaner reservation during the second Anglo-Boer War.

D F Malan was a Cape Dutch not a Boer & Hendrik Verwoerd was a Dutch born but naturalized Afrikaner who worked against the Boers aspiration for self determination. The Boerestaat Party was formed in 1986 not 1990 & it was founded by a one Robert van Tonder who left the National Party in 1961 [ the same year that the usurper Verwoerd turned South Africa into a nominal republic ] as he saw the establishment of the Republic of South Africa & Verwoerd's immigration policy as a total betrayal of the Boers & the old Boer Republics. Robert van Tonder refused to be part of the Afrikaner Broederbond & had his own illegal printing press & was repressed & harassed by the National Party government.

Therefore would you please learn the truth about these people & stop perpetuating the insipid lies about them which were formulated for the sole reason of demonizing them & removing them as an obstacle to global financial powers as they inadvertently settled into a mineral rich region following the Great Trek. The Boers were recognized as an independent indigenous people in the past. Though they only lost their independence when the British conquered their Boer Republics after having killed off 50 % of the Boer child population within the British created concentration camps.

The Boers have gone through a lot & have paid a MASSIVE price for trying to remain an independent people & to maintain their freedom in Africa therefore one should not be too quick to judge them considering that you do not even know much about them nor their struggles. The fact of the matter is that the Boers could have worked out an accommodation by now through negotiation with the locals groups were it not for the interference of the global financial power which runs South Africa & does not want the macro State to break up as it suits their financial aims. There is no room to them for Boer or other group self determination.